FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2143694256> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2143694256 endingPage "107" @default.
• W2143694256 startingPage "99" @default.
• W2143694256 abstract "Located on a 20-ha commercial apple ( Malus domestica Borkh.) orchard in the Yakima Valley, Washington, a 1.7-ha study area was planted with apple trees in 1994 in a randomized complete block design with four replications of three treatments: organic (ORG), conventional (CON), and integrated (INT). Soil classification, rootstock, cultivar, plant age, and all other conditions except management were the same on all plots. In years 9 (2002) and 10 (2003) of this study, we compared the orchard productivity and fruit quality of `Galaxy Gala' apples. Measurements of crop yield, yield efficiency, crop load, average fruit weight, tree growth, color grades, and weight distributions of marketable fruit, percentages of unmarketable fruit, classifications of unmarketable fruit, as well as leaf, fruit, and soil mineral concentrations, were used to evaluate orchard productivity. Apple fruit quality was assessed at harvest and after refrigerated (0 to 1 °C) storage for three months in regular atmosphere (ambient oxygen levels) and for three and six months in controlled atmosphere (1.5% to 2% oxygen). Fruit internal ethylene concentrations and evolution, fruit respiration, flesh firmness, soluble solids concentration (SSC), titratable acidity (TA), purgeable volatile production, sensory panels, and total antioxidant activity (TAA) were used to evaluate fruit quality. ORG crop yields were two-thirds of the CON and about half of the INT yields in 2002, but about one-third greater than either system in 2003. High ORG yields in 2003 resulted in smaller ORG fruit. Inconsistent ORG yields were probably the result of several factors, including unsatisfactory crop load management, higher pest and weed pressures, lower leaf and fruit tissue nitrogen, and deficient leaf tissue zinc concentrations. Despite production difficulties, ORG apples had 6 to 10 N higher flesh firmness than CON, and 4 to 7 N higher than INT apples, for similar-sized fruit. Consumer panels tended to rate ORG and INT apples to have equal or better overall acceptability, firmness, and texture than CON apples. Neither laboratory measurements nor sensory evaluations detected differences in SSC, TA, or the SSC to TA ratio. Consumers were unable to discern the higher concentrations of flavor volatiles found in CON apples. For a 200 g fruit, ORG apples contained 10% to 15% more TAA than CON apples and 8% to 25% more TAA than INT apples. Across most parameters measured in this study, the CON and INT farm management systems were more similar to each other than either was to the ORG system. The production challenges associated with low-input organic apple farming systems are discussed. Despite limited technologies and products for organic apple production, the ORG apples in our study showed improvements in some fruit quality attributes that could aid their marketability." @default.
• W2143694256 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2143694256 creator A5011845486 @default.
• W2143694256 creator A5035895137 @default.
• W2143694256 creator A5054505067 @default.
• W2143694256 creator A5063530033 @default.
• W2143694256 date "2006-02-01" @default.
• W2143694256 modified "2023-10-17" @default.
• W2143694256 title "Apple Orchard Productivity and Fruit Quality under Organic, Conventional, and Integrated Management" @default.
• W2143694256 cites W1510072616 @default.
• W2143694256 cites W1532397077 @default.
• W2143694256 cites W1539749825 @default.
• W2143694256 cites W1659079088 @default.
• W2143694256 cites W1750622734 @default.
• W2143694256 cites W1795861364 @default.
• W2143694256 cites W1912161334 @default.
• W2143694256 cites W1931398535 @default.
• W2143694256 cites W1967717756 @default.
• W2143694256 cites W1976844145 @default.
• W2143694256 cites W1979253522 @default.
• W2143694256 cites W1981184057 @default.
• W2143694256 cites W1990959125 @default.
• W2143694256 cites W2013740978 @default.
• W2143694256 cites W2013933541 @default.
• W2143694256 cites W2017997758 @default.
• W2143694256 cites W2031975069 @default.
• W2143694256 cites W2032008748 @default.
• W2143694256 cites W2045115819 @default.
• W2143694256 cites W2050289170 @default.
• W2143694256 cites W2053417073 @default.
• W2143694256 cites W2053726318 @default.
• W2143694256 cites W2056758965 @default.
• W2143694256 cites W2062889137 @default.
• W2143694256 cites W2065425096 @default.
• W2143694256 cites W2067203917 @default.
• W2143694256 cites W2067544065 @default.
• W2143694256 cites W2069073623 @default.
• W2143694256 cites W2077187692 @default.
• W2143694256 cites W2109713793 @default.
• W2143694256 cites W2113595758 @default.
• W2143694256 cites W2117007319 @default.
• W2143694256 cites W2124683786 @default.
• W2143694256 cites W2131022148 @default.
• W2143694256 cites W2137014294 @default.
• W2143694256 cites W2141683990 @default.
• W2143694256 cites W2144735679 @default.
• W2143694256 cites W2150165474 @default.
• W2143694256 cites W2151001012 @default.
• W2143694256 cites W2151215955 @default.
• W2143694256 cites W2155915063 @default.
• W2143694256 cites W2158280263 @default.
• W2143694256 cites W2182927674 @default.
• W2143694256 cites W2185475339 @default.
• W2143694256 cites W2188640467 @default.
• W2143694256 cites W2491259057 @default.
• W2143694256 cites W2794599824 @default.
• W2143694256 cites W3216403072 @default.
• W2143694256 cites W2181654640 @default.
• W2143694256 doi "https://doi.org/10.21273/hortsci.41.1.99" @default.
• W2143694256 hasPublicationYear "2006" @default.
• W2143694256 type Work @default.
• W2143694256 sameAs 2143694256 @default.
• W2143694256 citedByCount "136" @default.
• W2143694256 countsByYear W21436942562012 @default.
• W2143694256 countsByYear W21436942562013 @default.
• W2143694256 countsByYear W21436942562014 @default.
• W2143694256 countsByYear W21436942562015 @default.
• W2143694256 countsByYear W21436942562016 @default.
• W2143694256 countsByYear W21436942562017 @default.
• W2143694256 countsByYear W21436942562018 @default.
• W2143694256 countsByYear W21436942562019 @default.
• W2143694256 countsByYear W21436942562020 @default.
• W2143694256 countsByYear W21436942562021 @default.
• W2143694256 countsByYear W21436942562022 @default.
• W2143694256 countsByYear W21436942562023 @default.
• W2143694256 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2143694256 hasAuthorship W2143694256A5011845486 @default.
• W2143694256 hasAuthorship W2143694256A5035895137 @default.
• W2143694256 hasAuthorship W2143694256A5054505067 @default.
• W2143694256 hasAuthorship W2143694256A5063530033 @default.
• W2143694256 hasBestOaLocation W21436942561 @default.
• W2143694256 hasConcept C137580998 @default.
• W2143694256 hasConcept C144027150 @default.
• W2143694256 hasConcept C144938864 @default.
• W2143694256 hasConcept C185592680 @default.
• W2143694256 hasConcept C189775405 @default.
• W2143694256 hasConcept C197321923 @default.
• W2143694256 hasConcept C27406016 @default.
• W2143694256 hasConcept C2777306635 @default.
• W2143694256 hasConcept C2779276392 @default.
• W2143694256 hasConcept C2780753983 @default.
• W2143694256 hasConcept C6557445 @default.
• W2143694256 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W2143694256 hasConceptScore W2143694256C137580998 @default.
• W2143694256 hasConceptScore W2143694256C144027150 @default.
• W2143694256 hasConceptScore W2143694256C144938864 @default.
• W2143694256 hasConceptScore W2143694256C185592680 @default.
• W2143694256 hasConceptScore W2143694256C189775405 @default.

• next