Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2144199821> ?p ?o ?g. }
- W2144199821 endingPage "1479" @default.
- W2144199821 startingPage "1479" @default.
- W2144199821 abstract "To evaluate the accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) in the staging of esophageal cancer.Only EUS studies confirmed by surgery were selected. Articles were searched in Medline and Pubmed. Two reviewers independently searched and extracted data. Meta-analysis of the accuracy of EUS was analyzed by calculating pooled estimates of sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratios, and diagnostic odds ratio. Pooling was conducted by both the Mantel-Haenszel method (fixed effects model) and DerSimonian Laird method (random effects model). The heterogeneity of studies was tested using Cochran's Q test based upon inverse variance weights.Forty-nine studies (n = 2558) which met the inclusion criteria were included in this analysis. Pooled sensitivity and specificity of EUS to diagnose T1 was 81.6% (95% CI: 77.8-84.9) and 99.4% (95% CI: 99.0-99.7), respectively. To diagnose T4, EUS had a pooled sensitivity of 92.4% (95% CI: 89.2-95.0) and specificity of 97.4% (95% CI: 96.6-98.0). With Fine Needle Aspiration (FNA), sensitivity of EUS to diagnose N stage improved from 84.7% (95% CI: 82.9-86.4) to 96.7% (95% CI: 92.4-98.9). The P value for the c2 test of heterogeneity for all pooled estimates was > 0.10.EUS has excellent sensitivity and specificity in accurately diagnosing the TN stage of esophageal cancer. EUS performs better with advanced (T4) than early (T1) disease. FNA substantially improves the sensitivity and specificity of EUS in evaluating N stage disease. EUS should be strongly considered for staging esophageal cancer." @default.
- W2144199821 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W2144199821 creator A5015550443 @default.
- W2144199821 creator A5028917594 @default.
- W2144199821 creator A5029081597 @default.
- W2144199821 creator A5046089256 @default.
- W2144199821 creator A5062536724 @default.
- W2144199821 creator A5091005021 @default.
- W2144199821 date "2008-01-01" @default.
- W2144199821 modified "2023-10-16" @default.
- W2144199821 title "Staging accuracy of esophageal cancer by endoscopic ultrasound: A meta-analysis and systematic review" @default.
- W2144199821 cites W1237736762 @default.
- W2144199821 cites W1513826912 @default.
- W2144199821 cites W1560656232 @default.
- W2144199821 cites W1963767908 @default.
- W2144199821 cites W1964435302 @default.
- W2144199821 cites W1972267070 @default.
- W2144199821 cites W1973479295 @default.
- W2144199821 cites W1979423827 @default.
- W2144199821 cites W1980691366 @default.
- W2144199821 cites W1981963727 @default.
- W2144199821 cites W1983315463 @default.
- W2144199821 cites W1985649917 @default.
- W2144199821 cites W1986215651 @default.
- W2144199821 cites W1987603634 @default.
- W2144199821 cites W1988629715 @default.
- W2144199821 cites W1994868617 @default.
- W2144199821 cites W2000442546 @default.
- W2144199821 cites W2003046299 @default.
- W2144199821 cites W2006898607 @default.
- W2144199821 cites W2007176213 @default.
- W2144199821 cites W2007965859 @default.
- W2144199821 cites W2008332501 @default.
- W2144199821 cites W2011382784 @default.
- W2144199821 cites W2013294198 @default.
- W2144199821 cites W2015243830 @default.
- W2144199821 cites W2019256809 @default.
- W2144199821 cites W2020568285 @default.
- W2144199821 cites W2020786593 @default.
- W2144199821 cites W2021537423 @default.
- W2144199821 cites W2022809915 @default.
- W2144199821 cites W2024131939 @default.
- W2144199821 cites W2026235439 @default.
- W2144199821 cites W2028337921 @default.
- W2144199821 cites W2029070168 @default.
- W2144199821 cites W2034703262 @default.
- W2144199821 cites W2035376700 @default.
- W2144199821 cites W2036740 @default.
- W2144199821 cites W2038490201 @default.
- W2144199821 cites W2039418122 @default.
- W2144199821 cites W2041333915 @default.
- W2144199821 cites W2042549553 @default.
- W2144199821 cites W2042583842 @default.
- W2144199821 cites W2044810185 @default.
- W2144199821 cites W2047076393 @default.
- W2144199821 cites W2049331396 @default.
- W2144199821 cites W2049803129 @default.
- W2144199821 cites W2049842614 @default.
- W2144199821 cites W2063504694 @default.
- W2144199821 cites W2065573720 @default.
- W2144199821 cites W2068147173 @default.
- W2144199821 cites W2068555546 @default.
- W2144199821 cites W2069774100 @default.
- W2144199821 cites W2073313181 @default.
- W2144199821 cites W2076852994 @default.
- W2144199821 cites W2077147525 @default.
- W2144199821 cites W2077345448 @default.
- W2144199821 cites W2077421021 @default.
- W2144199821 cites W2078166730 @default.
- W2144199821 cites W2078182688 @default.
- W2144199821 cites W2079579185 @default.
- W2144199821 cites W2079869760 @default.
- W2144199821 cites W2081605724 @default.
- W2144199821 cites W2083448968 @default.
- W2144199821 cites W2091083288 @default.
- W2144199821 cites W2092048993 @default.
- W2144199821 cites W2092801622 @default.
- W2144199821 cites W2093579014 @default.
- W2144199821 cites W2094883331 @default.
- W2144199821 cites W2101723078 @default.
- W2144199821 cites W2103277516 @default.
- W2144199821 cites W2117891689 @default.
- W2144199821 cites W2119055415 @default.
- W2144199821 cites W2129020649 @default.
- W2144199821 cites W2131784314 @default.
- W2144199821 cites W2132478199 @default.
- W2144199821 cites W2146020675 @default.
- W2144199821 cites W2165893660 @default.
- W2144199821 cites W2168383483 @default.
- W2144199821 cites W2169567819 @default.
- W2144199821 cites W2339899137 @default.
- W2144199821 cites W2413740872 @default.
- W2144199821 cites W274703735 @default.
- W2144199821 cites W4236495801 @default.
- W2144199821 cites W4244877893 @default.
- W2144199821 cites W95862963 @default.
- W2144199821 doi "https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.14.1479" @default.
- W2144199821 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/2693739" @default.