Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2144479551> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 74 of
74
with 100 items per page.
- W2144479551 endingPage "382" @default.
- W2144479551 startingPage "374" @default.
- W2144479551 abstract "Background: A well-defined supratarsal crease has often been considered attractive, representing a significant component in a beautiful upper eyelid. Approximately 50% of East and Southeast Asian women are born with either a minimal or absent supratarsal eyelid crease. Among people of Chinese descent, the creation of a supratarsal crease (“double” eyelid blepharoplasty) is the most common cosmetic surgical procedure, but no comparative study has assessed the height by which an upper eyelid crease is deemed most attractive and depending on cultural background. Objectives: The authors assess how attractiveness is interpreted by different cultural groups to determine whether double-eyelid blepharoplasty enhances attractiveness according to both Chinese and non-Chinese observers. Methods: Facial photographs were taken of 19 women of Chinese descent. The photographs were enhanced with computer imaging software to generate 3 additional pictures, depicting low, medium, and high upper eyelid creases on each model. Via an Internet-based survey tool, Chinese and non-Chinese observers were asked to rate the attractiveness of the faces with each potential eyelid position. (Surveys are available online at www.aestheticsurgeryjournal.com, as Appendix 1 and Appendix 2.) Results: Both Chinese and non-Chinese observers considered the medium-height upper eyelid crease most attractive (P < .00001). An absent upper eyelid crease was deemed the least attractive (P < .00001). Conclusions: These preference data for eyelid height can be used to better counsel patients on perceived attractiveness and expectations for surgical results, since these results further elucidate which facial features are universally considered attractive." @default.
- W2144479551 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W2144479551 creator A5011779016 @default.
- W2144479551 creator A5067991595 @default.
- W2144479551 date "2014-03-01" @default.
- W2144479551 modified "2023-10-17" @default.
- W2144479551 title "The Effect of “Single” vs “Double” Eyelids on the Perceived Attractiveness of Chinese Women" @default.
- W2144479551 cites W102683796 @default.
- W2144479551 cites W1965398153 @default.
- W2144479551 cites W1968432642 @default.
- W2144479551 cites W1979355582 @default.
- W2144479551 cites W2028203828 @default.
- W2144479551 cites W2068531469 @default.
- W2144479551 cites W2069364564 @default.
- W2144479551 cites W2075921875 @default.
- W2144479551 cites W2076855439 @default.
- W2144479551 cites W2084543517 @default.
- W2144479551 cites W4240792475 @default.
- W2144479551 doi "https://doi.org/10.1177/1090820x14523020" @default.
- W2144479551 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24604790" @default.
- W2144479551 hasPublicationYear "2014" @default.
- W2144479551 type Work @default.
- W2144479551 sameAs 2144479551 @default.
- W2144479551 citedByCount "51" @default.
- W2144479551 countsByYear W21444795512014 @default.
- W2144479551 countsByYear W21444795512015 @default.
- W2144479551 countsByYear W21444795512016 @default.
- W2144479551 countsByYear W21444795512017 @default.
- W2144479551 countsByYear W21444795512018 @default.
- W2144479551 countsByYear W21444795512019 @default.
- W2144479551 countsByYear W21444795512020 @default.
- W2144479551 countsByYear W21444795512021 @default.
- W2144479551 countsByYear W21444795512022 @default.
- W2144479551 countsByYear W21444795512023 @default.
- W2144479551 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2144479551 hasAuthorship W2144479551A5011779016 @default.
- W2144479551 hasAuthorship W2144479551A5067991595 @default.
- W2144479551 hasBestOaLocation W21444795511 @default.
- W2144479551 hasConcept C107038049 @default.
- W2144479551 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
- W2144479551 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
- W2144479551 hasConcept C2781302119 @default.
- W2144479551 hasConcept C2781468188 @default.
- W2144479551 hasConcept C31173074 @default.
- W2144479551 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W2144479551 hasConceptScore W2144479551C107038049 @default.
- W2144479551 hasConceptScore W2144479551C138885662 @default.
- W2144479551 hasConceptScore W2144479551C141071460 @default.
- W2144479551 hasConceptScore W2144479551C2781302119 @default.
- W2144479551 hasConceptScore W2144479551C2781468188 @default.
- W2144479551 hasConceptScore W2144479551C31173074 @default.
- W2144479551 hasConceptScore W2144479551C71924100 @default.
- W2144479551 hasIssue "3" @default.
- W2144479551 hasLocation W21444795511 @default.
- W2144479551 hasLocation W21444795512 @default.
- W2144479551 hasOpenAccess W2144479551 @default.
- W2144479551 hasPrimaryLocation W21444795511 @default.
- W2144479551 hasRelatedWork W1981944840 @default.
- W2144479551 hasRelatedWork W2002407380 @default.
- W2144479551 hasRelatedWork W2033658409 @default.
- W2144479551 hasRelatedWork W2076032751 @default.
- W2144479551 hasRelatedWork W2330151130 @default.
- W2144479551 hasRelatedWork W2356646940 @default.
- W2144479551 hasRelatedWork W4318262721 @default.
- W2144479551 hasRelatedWork W4380871146 @default.
- W2144479551 hasRelatedWork W4385487354 @default.
- W2144479551 hasRelatedWork W4386023162 @default.
- W2144479551 hasVolume "34" @default.
- W2144479551 isParatext "false" @default.
- W2144479551 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W2144479551 magId "2144479551" @default.
- W2144479551 workType "article" @default.