FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2144612119> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2144612119 endingPage "8" @default.
• W2144612119 startingPage "3ii" @default.
• W2144612119 abstract "The assessment and investigation of a possible neuropathy is one of the most common clinical problems facing the general neurologist. Studies of the prevalence of neuropathy in the community are rare but suggest a figure of between 2–8%,1 making peripheral neuropathy at least as common as stroke. Despite this high prevalence of neuropathy, it is only a small proportion of patients with neuropathies who are referred for detailed evaluation, principally those individuals with disabling disease, or with none of the obvious risk factors such as diabetes or alcoholism.A logical approach to the assessment of such patients is essential and can be organised into a number of basic questions. The neurologist faced with a patient with a neuropathy has to deal with literally thousands of possible causes, many extremely uncommon, and these can only be simplified by defining the neuropathy by other features that lead to the select few of most likely diagnoses. This is in part a process of pattern recognition but can be helped by a stepwise approach. Several algorithms2 and review articles3 have been published to aid this process and a typical one has been constructed here (fig 1). Figure 1 Algorithm showing a stepwise approach to the assessment and investigation of a possible neuropathy. CIDP, chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy; CMT, Charcot-Marie-Tooth; EMG, electromyography; GBS, Guillain-Barre syndrome; HNPP, hereditary neuropathy with liability to pressure palsies; NCS, nerve conduction studies.The approach adopted in this article is to present the evaluation as a list of commonly asked questions that, if correctly addressed and answered, are likely to yield diagnostically important information, and hence direct appropriate management. This is not intended as an exhaustive account of neuropathy but is a personal view, illustrative of a diagnostic process that is commonly adopted.This question can usually be answered easily, …" @default.
• W2144612119 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2144612119 creator A5000168044 @default.
• W2144612119 creator A5068429951 @default.
• W2144612119 date "2003-06-01" @default.
• W2144612119 modified "2023-10-18" @default.
• W2144612119 title "CLINICAL EVALUATION AND INVESTIGATION OF NEUROPATHY" @default.
• W2144612119 cites W1979976286 @default.
• W2144612119 cites W1997269853 @default.
• W2144612119 cites W1999882780 @default.
• W2144612119 cites W2001024287 @default.
• W2144612119 cites W2001767199 @default.
• W2144612119 cites W2047531711 @default.
• W2144612119 cites W2050357585 @default.
• W2144612119 cites W2059064888 @default.
• W2144612119 cites W2060189429 @default.
• W2144612119 cites W2091849245 @default.
• W2144612119 cites W2101697605 @default.
• W2144612119 cites W2112821184 @default.
• W2144612119 cites W2163550872 @default.
• W2144612119 cites W2166118538 @default.
• W2144612119 cites W2474336862 @default.
• W2144612119 doi "https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp.74.suppl_2.ii3" @default.
• W2144612119 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/1765621" @default.
• W2144612119 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12754322" @default.
• W2144612119 hasPublicationYear "2003" @default.
• W2144612119 type Work @default.
• W2144612119 sameAs 2144612119 @default.
• W2144612119 citedByCount "32" @default.
• W2144612119 countsByYear W21446121192012 @default.
• W2144612119 countsByYear W21446121192013 @default.
• W2144612119 countsByYear W21446121192014 @default.
• W2144612119 countsByYear W21446121192015 @default.
• W2144612119 countsByYear W21446121192017 @default.
• W2144612119 countsByYear W21446121192018 @default.
• W2144612119 countsByYear W21446121192019 @default.
• W2144612119 countsByYear W21446121192021 @default.
• W2144612119 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2144612119 hasAuthorship W2144612119A5000168044 @default.
• W2144612119 hasAuthorship W2144612119A5068429951 @default.
• W2144612119 hasBestOaLocation W21446121191 @default.
• W2144612119 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2144612119 hasConceptScore W2144612119C71924100 @default.
• W2144612119 hasIssue "90002" @default.
• W2144612119 hasLocation W21446121191 @default.
• W2144612119 hasLocation W21446121192 @default.
• W2144612119 hasLocation W21446121193 @default.
• W2144612119 hasLocation W21446121194 @default.
• W2144612119 hasOpenAccess W2144612119 @default.
• W2144612119 hasPrimaryLocation W21446121191 @default.
• W2144612119 hasRelatedWork W1506200166 @default.
• W2144612119 hasRelatedWork W1995515455 @default.
• W2144612119 hasRelatedWork W2039318446 @default.
• W2144612119 hasRelatedWork W2048182022 @default.
• W2144612119 hasRelatedWork W2080531066 @default.
• W2144612119 hasRelatedWork W2604872355 @default.
• W2144612119 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.
• W2144612119 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
• W2144612119 hasRelatedWork W3032375762 @default.
• W2144612119 hasRelatedWork W3108674512 @default.
• W2144612119 hasVolume "74" @default.
• W2144612119 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2144612119 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2144612119 magId "2144612119" @default.
• W2144612119 workType "article" @default.