FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2144711892> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2144711892 endingPage "1882" @default.
• W2144711892 startingPage "1875" @default.
• W2144711892 abstract "New technologies in surgery are in constant and considerable evolution; they transform the surgeon s activity and practice. In laparoscopic surgery, new systems allow the use of two(2D) or three-dimensional (3D) vision. However, the literature reports contradictory results concerning the benefits of 3D vision: some studies show that better motor performances are obtained with 3D vision [1, 8, 19, 25, 26] while others fail to reveal any difference in performance between 2D and 3D vision [5, 6, 12, 20]. In some studies [5], only complex tasks were performed faster and more easily with a 3D view whereas no difference between the use of 2D and 3D views appeared when performing the easiest tasks. The divergence in these results is partially due to the fact that first-generation 3D systems, with their lower resolution, were compared with standard 2D systems [10]. Nowadays, new 3D systems allow a natural bidimensional view and thus suppress the bias observed in previous studies. In this paper, we used a new-generation 3D system, the da Vinci robotic system. This robotic system allows a 3D visualization of the operative field to be gained, restores the degrees of freedom (DOFs) lost in classical laparoscopy, and improves the dexterity of the surgeon s hand and wrist. Only one published study [13] has compared the performance obtained using classical laparoscopic techniques and those using this robotic system. This study revealed advantages of the da Vinci robotic system, particularly when it was used with the 3D view option. However, only six subjects participated in this study and the chosen tasks were very specific to the robotic system training. Our objective was therefore to study, with more participants, the impact of the da Vinci robotic system on standard and ecological surgical tasks of increasing complexity (ecological in the sense that our tasks were similar to the gestures made by the surgeon in a real situation, for which we used bench models developed and validated in several studies [7, 22, 23]). To analyse the nature of the benefits brought about by these expensive new technologies precisely, we independently differentiated and studied the influence of the 3D view (afferent component), comparing 2D and 3D view, and the influence of movement freedom restauration (DOFs, efferent component), comparing the classical laparoscopy with the robotic system. We also studied the impact of the use of the robotic technology on the subject s self-confidence, satisfaction and facility, knowing that these three factors influence both the performance and acceptance of new technology in the operating room [16, 17]. To avoid any bias from earlier laparoscopic experience in our comparison between classical and robotic laparoscopic techniques, we only selected medical students without any prior experience in open, minimally invasive or robotically assisted surgery." @default.
• W2144711892 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2144711892 creator A5036341585 @default.
• W2144711892 creator A5053796901 @default.
• W2144711892 creator A5055822310 @default.
• W2144711892 creator A5071807865 @default.
• W2144711892 date "2007-05-04" @default.
• W2144711892 modified "2023-09-25" @default.
• W2144711892 title "Perceptual and instrumental impacts of robotic laparoscopy on surgical performance" @default.
• W2144711892 cites W1511889812 @default.
• W2144711892 cites W1967704315 @default.
• W2144711892 cites W1967929908 @default.
• W2144711892 cites W1978119702 @default.
• W2144711892 cites W1978699343 @default.
• W2144711892 cites W1986189171 @default.
• W2144711892 cites W2006984919 @default.
• W2144711892 cites W2007687557 @default.
• W2144711892 cites W2015807465 @default.
• W2144711892 cites W2018991691 @default.
• W2144711892 cites W2019645499 @default.
• W2144711892 cites W2027891072 @default.
• W2144711892 cites W2037611846 @default.
• W2144711892 cites W2041009926 @default.
• W2144711892 cites W2047520518 @default.
• W2144711892 cites W2049895164 @default.
• W2144711892 cites W2059582997 @default.
• W2144711892 cites W2096244365 @default.
• W2144711892 cites W2111306286 @default.
• W2144711892 cites W2114944648 @default.
• W2144711892 cites W2131519235 @default.
• W2144711892 cites W2135103746 @default.
• W2144711892 cites W2140232429 @default.
• W2144711892 cites W2146983383 @default.
• W2144711892 cites W2148540117 @default.
• W2144711892 cites W2414564679 @default.
• W2144711892 cites W4233529945 @default.
• W2144711892 doi "https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-007-9342-5" @default.
• W2144711892 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17479326" @default.
• W2144711892 hasPublicationYear "2007" @default.
• W2144711892 type Work @default.
• W2144711892 sameAs 2144711892 @default.
• W2144711892 citedByCount "18" @default.
• W2144711892 countsByYear W21447118922012 @default.
• W2144711892 countsByYear W21447118922013 @default.
• W2144711892 countsByYear W21447118922014 @default.
• W2144711892 countsByYear W21447118922015 @default.
• W2144711892 countsByYear W21447118922017 @default.
• W2144711892 countsByYear W21447118922022 @default.
• W2144711892 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2144711892 hasAuthorship W2144711892A5036341585 @default.
• W2144711892 hasAuthorship W2144711892A5053796901 @default.
• W2144711892 hasAuthorship W2144711892A5055822310 @default.
• W2144711892 hasAuthorship W2144711892A5071807865 @default.
• W2144711892 hasBestOaLocation W21447118922 @default.
• W2144711892 hasConcept C103203806 @default.
• W2144711892 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2144711892 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2144711892 hasConcept C169760540 @default.
• W2144711892 hasConcept C26760741 @default.
• W2144711892 hasConcept C2778451229 @default.
• W2144711892 hasConcept C2780047204 @default.
• W2144711892 hasConcept C2780120127 @default.
• W2144711892 hasConcept C2988501903 @default.
• W2144711892 hasConcept C41260117 @default.
• W2144711892 hasConcept C61434518 @default.
• W2144711892 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2144711892 hasConceptScore W2144711892C103203806 @default.
• W2144711892 hasConceptScore W2144711892C141071460 @default.
• W2144711892 hasConceptScore W2144711892C15744967 @default.
• W2144711892 hasConceptScore W2144711892C169760540 @default.
• W2144711892 hasConceptScore W2144711892C26760741 @default.
• W2144711892 hasConceptScore W2144711892C2778451229 @default.
• W2144711892 hasConceptScore W2144711892C2780047204 @default.
• W2144711892 hasConceptScore W2144711892C2780120127 @default.
• W2144711892 hasConceptScore W2144711892C2988501903 @default.
• W2144711892 hasConceptScore W2144711892C41260117 @default.
• W2144711892 hasConceptScore W2144711892C61434518 @default.
• W2144711892 hasConceptScore W2144711892C71924100 @default.
• W2144711892 hasIssue "10" @default.
• W2144711892 hasLocation W21447118921 @default.
• W2144711892 hasLocation W21447118922 @default.
• W2144711892 hasLocation W21447118923 @default.
• W2144711892 hasOpenAccess W2144711892 @default.
• W2144711892 hasPrimaryLocation W21447118921 @default.
• W2144711892 hasRelatedWork W1978399471 @default.
• W2144711892 hasRelatedWork W2040764097 @default.
• W2144711892 hasRelatedWork W2048208513 @default.
• W2144711892 hasRelatedWork W2130251583 @default.
• W2144711892 hasRelatedWork W2333859104 @default.
• W2144711892 hasRelatedWork W4236996282 @default.
• W2144711892 hasRelatedWork W4246330582 @default.
• W2144711892 hasRelatedWork W4247058221 @default.
• W2144711892 hasRelatedWork W4301493390 @default.
• W2144711892 hasRelatedWork W4302076288 @default.
• W2144711892 hasVolume "21" @default.
• W2144711892 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2144711892 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2144711892 magId "2144711892" @default.

• next