FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2145082109> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2145082109 endingPage "11" @default.
• W2145082109 startingPage "607" @default.
• W2145082109 abstract "Gastric Bypass (GB) constitutes the surgical treatment of election of morbid obesity (BMI < 50) at the present time, however doubts exist about its effectiveness in super obesity patients (BMI > 50).The purpose of this work is one of to analyze the results of loss of weight of the first 52 open GB of our series, and to compare the losses of weight in morbid obesity (MO) and super obesity (SO), to determine if the superobese patient looses enough weight with this technique or if it would be more indicated another technique more malabsorptive, like some authors recommend.Retrospective study of the first 52 patients operated of open GB pathway. The weight loss of 32 patients' with MO are compared with the weight loss of 20 patients with super obesity after five year follow-up. The parameters analyzed are: age, sex, height, initial weight, current weight, initial BMI, current BMI, % BMI lost, % overweight lost, incidence of incisional hernia, acceptable oral tolerance and metabolic alterations. The malabsorptive procedure associated in patients with super obesity was a 200 cm Roux-en-Y and a patients with BMI between 40 and 50 was a 150 cm Roux-en-Y. The results are compared by means of the X2 and Mann Whitney statistical test.The age, the sex and the stature are homogeneous in the two groups. In the group of MO the initial weight was of 121.5 kg; initial BMI, 45; current BMI; 28.9, the median loss of weight in 5 years was of 48 kg; the percentage loss of the excess of BMI is of 80% and the percentage loss of the excess of weight is of 74.6%. In the group of SO the initial weight was of 142.,7 kg; initial BMI, 54.9; current BMI, 34.,9; the median loss of weight in 5 years was of 54 kg; the percentage loss of the excess of BMI was of 65,3% and the percentage loss of the excess of weight was of 63.2%. The analysis of the results ponders shows that it exists statistically significant differences (P < 0.05) among the two groups, however the rate of success, according to the classic parameter of loss of more than 50% of the excess of weight, was superior to 90% in both groups. The results of the study about the presence of incisional postoperative hernia, alimentary tolerance and metabolic alterations, indicate that it doesn't exist differences statistically significant between both groups.GB is an effective surgical technique in patients with morbid obesity and with super obesity, provided that in these patients is realized a procedure more malabsorptive. There are not differences between both groups, in morbidity, improvement in the associate disease, alimentary tolerance and necessity of nutritional supplements." @default.
• W2145082109 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2145082109 creator A5008847084 @default.
• W2145082109 creator A5014999514 @default.
• W2145082109 creator A5027787320 @default.
• W2145082109 creator A5029883471 @default.
• W2145082109 creator A5056150381 @default.
• W2145082109 creator A5057615853 @default.
• W2145082109 creator A5072551487 @default.
• W2145082109 creator A5077983037 @default.
• W2145082109 creator A5080492585 @default.
• W2145082109 creator A5081975351 @default.
• W2145082109 date "2007-11-01" @default.
• W2145082109 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W2145082109 title "[Gastric bypass in the surgical treatment of the morbid obesity and super obesity: comparative study]." @default.
• W2145082109 cites W1963685726 @default.
• W2145082109 cites W1968062435 @default.
• W2145082109 cites W1988557598 @default.
• W2145082109 cites W2002286145 @default.
• W2145082109 cites W2014801189 @default.
• W2145082109 cites W2043071325 @default.
• W2145082109 cites W2046518518 @default.
• W2145082109 cites W2054824927 @default.
• W2145082109 cites W2056773391 @default.
• W2145082109 cites W2064655425 @default.
• W2145082109 cites W2067944856 @default.
• W2145082109 cites W2074500855 @default.
• W2145082109 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17970547" @default.
• W2145082109 hasPublicationYear "2007" @default.
• W2145082109 type Work @default.
• W2145082109 sameAs 2145082109 @default.
• W2145082109 citedByCount "9" @default.
• W2145082109 countsByYear W21450821092012 @default.
• W2145082109 countsByYear W21450821092015 @default.
• W2145082109 countsByYear W21450821092019 @default.
• W2145082109 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2145082109 hasAuthorship W2145082109A5008847084 @default.
• W2145082109 hasAuthorship W2145082109A5014999514 @default.
• W2145082109 hasAuthorship W2145082109A5027787320 @default.
• W2145082109 hasAuthorship W2145082109A5029883471 @default.
• W2145082109 hasAuthorship W2145082109A5056150381 @default.
• W2145082109 hasAuthorship W2145082109A5057615853 @default.
• W2145082109 hasAuthorship W2145082109A5072551487 @default.
• W2145082109 hasAuthorship W2145082109A5077983037 @default.
• W2145082109 hasAuthorship W2145082109A5080492585 @default.
• W2145082109 hasAuthorship W2145082109A5081975351 @default.
• W2145082109 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W2145082109 hasConcept C15708023 @default.
• W2145082109 hasConcept C29456083 @default.
• W2145082109 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2145082109 hasConceptScore W2145082109C138885662 @default.
• W2145082109 hasConceptScore W2145082109C15708023 @default.
• W2145082109 hasConceptScore W2145082109C29456083 @default.
• W2145082109 hasConceptScore W2145082109C71924100 @default.
• W2145082109 hasIssue "5" @default.
• W2145082109 hasLocation W21450821091 @default.
• W2145082109 hasOpenAccess W2145082109 @default.
• W2145082109 hasPrimaryLocation W21450821091 @default.
• W2145082109 hasVolume "22" @default.
• W2145082109 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2145082109 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2145082109 magId "2145082109" @default.
• W2145082109 workType "article" @default.