FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2145582955> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2145582955 endingPage "276" @default.
• W2145582955 startingPage "264" @default.
• W2145582955 abstract "Abstract Objective To explore patients’ perceptions of health‐care built environments, to assess how they perceived health‐care built facilities and designs. To develop a set of patient‐centred indicators by which to appraise future health‐care designs. Design Qualitative and quantitative methodologies, including futures group conferencing, autophotographic study, novice‐expert exchanges and a questionnaire survey of a representative sample of past patients. Setting and participants The research was carried out at Salford Royal Hospitals NHS Trust (SRHT), Greater Manchester, UK, selected for the study because of planned comprehensive redevelopment based on the new NHS vision for hospital care and service delivery for the 21 st century. Participants included 35 patients who took part in an autophotographic study, eight focus groups engaged in futures conferencing, a sample of past inpatients from the previous 12 months that returned 785 completed postal questionnaires. Results The futures group provided suggestions for radical improvements which were categorized into transport issues; accessibility and mobility; ground and landscape designs; social and public spaces; homeliness and assurance; cultural diversity; safety and security; personal space and access to outside. Patients’ autophotographic study centred on: the quality of the ward design, human interactions, the state and quality of personal space, and facilities for recreation and leisure. The novices’ suggestions were organized into categories of elemental factors representing patient‐friendly designs. Experts from the architectural and surveying professions and staff at SRHT in turn considered these categories and respective subsets of factors. They agreed with the novices in terms of the headings but differed in prioritizing the elemental factors. The questionnaire survey of past patients provided opinions about ward designs that varied according to where they stayed, single room, bay ward or long open ward. The main concerns were limitation of private space around the bed area, supportive of privacy and dignity, ward noise and other disturbances. Conclusions Patients perceived sustainable health‐care environments to be supportive of their health and recovery. The design indicators developed from their perspectives and from their considerations for improvements to the health‐care built environment were based on their visions of the role of the health‐care facilities. These were homely environments that supported normal lifestyle and family functioning and designs that were supportive of accessibility and travel movements through transitional spaces." @default.
• W2145582955 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2145582955 creator A5025216750 @default.
• W2145582955 creator A5055495876 @default.
• W2145582955 date "2005-08-02" @default.
• W2145582955 modified "2023-10-11" @default.
• W2145582955 title "Patient-centred improvements in health-care built environments: perspectives and design indicators" @default.
• W2145582955 cites W134022443 @default.
• W2145582955 cites W1837267844 @default.
• W2145582955 cites W1972362631 @default.
• W2145582955 cites W1977301061 @default.
• W2145582955 cites W1977433525 @default.
• W2145582955 cites W1980882241 @default.
• W2145582955 cites W1986439365 @default.
• W2145582955 cites W2018124312 @default.
• W2145582955 cites W2049816870 @default.
• W2145582955 cites W2087377410 @default.
• W2145582955 cites W2134038658 @default.
• W2145582955 cites W2136736601 @default.
• W2145582955 cites W2170611075 @default.
• W2145582955 cites W2417774999 @default.
• W2145582955 cites W4253117802 @default.
• W2145582955 cites W4666717 @default.
• W2145582955 doi "https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1369-7625.2005.00336.x" @default.
• W2145582955 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/5060295" @default.
• W2145582955 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16098156" @default.
• W2145582955 hasPublicationYear "2005" @default.
• W2145582955 type Work @default.
• W2145582955 sameAs 2145582955 @default.
• W2145582955 citedByCount "121" @default.
• W2145582955 countsByYear W21455829552012 @default.
• W2145582955 countsByYear W21455829552013 @default.
• W2145582955 countsByYear W21455829552014 @default.
• W2145582955 countsByYear W21455829552015 @default.
• W2145582955 countsByYear W21455829552016 @default.
• W2145582955 countsByYear W21455829552017 @default.
• W2145582955 countsByYear W21455829552018 @default.
• W2145582955 countsByYear W21455829552019 @default.
• W2145582955 countsByYear W21455829552020 @default.
• W2145582955 countsByYear W21455829552021 @default.
• W2145582955 countsByYear W21455829552022 @default.
• W2145582955 countsByYear W21455829552023 @default.
• W2145582955 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2145582955 hasAuthorship W2145582955A5025216750 @default.
• W2145582955 hasAuthorship W2145582955A5055495876 @default.
• W2145582955 hasBestOaLocation W21455829552 @default.
• W2145582955 hasConcept C110269972 @default.
• W2145582955 hasConcept C111472728 @default.
• W2145582955 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W2145582955 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
• W2145582955 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2145582955 hasConcept C159110408 @default.
• W2145582955 hasConcept C160735492 @default.
• W2145582955 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W2145582955 hasConcept C162853370 @default.
• W2145582955 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2145582955 hasConcept C185592680 @default.
• W2145582955 hasConcept C187736073 @default.
• W2145582955 hasConcept C198531522 @default.
• W2145582955 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2145582955 hasConcept C2777042776 @default.
• W2145582955 hasConcept C2779530757 @default.
• W2145582955 hasConcept C43617362 @default.
• W2145582955 hasConcept C50522688 @default.
• W2145582955 hasConcept C509550671 @default.
• W2145582955 hasConcept C56995899 @default.
• W2145582955 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2145582955 hasConcept C75630572 @default.
• W2145582955 hasConceptScore W2145582955C110269972 @default.
• W2145582955 hasConceptScore W2145582955C111472728 @default.
• W2145582955 hasConceptScore W2145582955C138885662 @default.
• W2145582955 hasConceptScore W2145582955C144133560 @default.
• W2145582955 hasConceptScore W2145582955C15744967 @default.
• W2145582955 hasConceptScore W2145582955C159110408 @default.
• W2145582955 hasConceptScore W2145582955C160735492 @default.
• W2145582955 hasConceptScore W2145582955C162324750 @default.
• W2145582955 hasConceptScore W2145582955C162853370 @default.
• W2145582955 hasConceptScore W2145582955C17744445 @default.
• W2145582955 hasConceptScore W2145582955C185592680 @default.
• W2145582955 hasConceptScore W2145582955C187736073 @default.
• W2145582955 hasConceptScore W2145582955C198531522 @default.
• W2145582955 hasConceptScore W2145582955C199539241 @default.
• W2145582955 hasConceptScore W2145582955C2777042776 @default.
• W2145582955 hasConceptScore W2145582955C2779530757 @default.
• W2145582955 hasConceptScore W2145582955C43617362 @default.
• W2145582955 hasConceptScore W2145582955C50522688 @default.
• W2145582955 hasConceptScore W2145582955C509550671 @default.
• W2145582955 hasConceptScore W2145582955C56995899 @default.
• W2145582955 hasConceptScore W2145582955C71924100 @default.
• W2145582955 hasConceptScore W2145582955C75630572 @default.
• W2145582955 hasIssue "3" @default.
• W2145582955 hasLocation W21455829551 @default.
• W2145582955 hasLocation W21455829552 @default.
• W2145582955 hasLocation W21455829553 @default.
• W2145582955 hasLocation W21455829554 @default.
• W2145582955 hasOpenAccess W2145582955 @default.
• W2145582955 hasPrimaryLocation W21455829551 @default.
• W2145582955 hasRelatedWork W1501475761 @default.

• next