FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2145668455> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2145668455 endingPage "139" @default.
• W2145668455 startingPage "138" @default.
• W2145668455 abstract "Sir,It is well known that declining kidney function is accompanied by an increasing contribution of tubular creatinine secretion to the total creatinine clearance; secretion may account for as much as 50% of creatinine clearance in the later stages of chronic kidney disease (CKD). The implications of this phenomenon for creatinine-based estimation of glomerular filtration rate are well recognized, but the mechanism responsible is not understood.Increasing tubular creatinine secretion is often considered simply to reflect the greater interstitial creatinine concentration to which tubular cells are exposed as CKD progresses [1]. This is not, however, an adequate explanation for the greater relative contribution of secretion; the increase in plasma creatinine accompanying declining kidney function will also lead to a proportional increase in the rate of creatinine filtration across each intact functioning glomerulus. Therefore, if the functional integrity of glomeruli and tubules is conserved equally (consistent with Bricker’s intact nephron hypothesis [2]), an increase in fractional contribution of secretion must require a mechanism whereby creatinine secretion per tubule increases disproportionately to the serum concentration.Since tubular fluid creatinine concentration rises with ultrafiltrate reabsorption, increased concentration of plasma (and therefore filtered) creatinine will actually lead to a greater absolute concentration difference between tubular fluid and interstitium, opposing secretion at the proximal tubule. Furthermore, if there is hyperfiltration at remaining glomeruli (a ‘remnant nephron’ effect), then it is apparent that tubular creatinine hypersecretion must be even greater to achieve the observed increased proportional contribution.What then is the basis for this increase in proportional tubular creatinine secretion? Possibilities include:(1)Non-linear kinetics of the creatinine secretion apparatus: this is not supported by in vitro studies of the relevant organic cation transporters. Creatinine infusions also do not produce disproportionate increments in creatinine secretion, which is saturated when serum creatinine concentration approaches 700 μM [3].(2)Increased tubular flow: the reduction in tubular sodium and water reabsorption required to maintain fluid homeostasis through a dwindling nephron number limits the distal tubular creatinine concentration, so could reduce tubular creatinine reabsorption. This effect may be important for other secreted organic ions, but tubular creatinine reabsorption is generally considered to be minimal in most circumstances.(3)Disproportionate loss of glomerular function relative to tubular function: this would contradict both the ‘intact nephron’ and remnant nephron hypotheses.(4)Up-regulation of the creatinine (organic cation) secretion apparatus: substrate stimulation regulating transcription of organic ion transporters is recognized mainly for its impact on anionic drug excretion, though it may also regulate cation transport [4]. Whether accumulation of organic ions in uraemia up-regulates transcription of their transporters is unknown. Similarly, the effect of the uraemic environment on organic ion secretion is unknown.Laboratory assessment of residual kidney function is currently based largely on glomerular filtration rate estimation. The variable increase in tubular creatinine secretion accompanying declining kidney function suggests that tubular function, or at least secretion of some substrates, does not always parallel glomerular filtration. Therefore, the measurement of toxic compounds cleared by secretion might in future contribute to the assessment of a patient’s uraemia burden. If organic ion transporters are up-regulated by their endogenous substrates or by the uraemic milieu, this could be an important mechanism by which the failing kidney defends against uraemic complications, contributing to the benefits of residual kidney function on dialysis; increased expression of an anion transporter protected against uraemic cardiovascular complications in an animal model [5]. Although most organic ions considered to be uraemic toxins are anionic, cationic compounds also accumulate in the setting of renal failure and may have adverse effects. Since organic ion transporters display wide substrate specificity, increased secretion of creatinine may indicate increased secretion of toxic cationic (and even anionic) compounds. Subjects with extremes of tubular creatinine secretion will also of course have inaccurate estimated glomerular filtration rates based on serum creatinine.The unknown mechanism underlying the observed increased contribution of tubular secretion to creatinine clearance in CKD is thus of more than purely academic interest." @default.
• W2145668455 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2145668455 creator A5006933497 @default.
• W2145668455 date "2011-02-07" @default.
• W2145668455 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W2145668455 title "Increased tubular creatinine secretion by remnant nephrons--unexplained but informative?" @default.
• W2145668455 cites W2049229528 @default.
• W2145668455 cites W2068702532 @default.
• W2145668455 cites W2071158780 @default.
• W2145668455 cites W2092296126 @default.
• W2145668455 cites W2116977954 @default.
• W2145668455 doi "https://doi.org/10.1093/ndtplus/sfq215" @default.
• W2145668455 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/4421573" @default.
• W2145668455 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25984137" @default.
• W2145668455 hasPublicationYear "2011" @default.
• W2145668455 type Work @default.
• W2145668455 sameAs 2145668455 @default.
• W2145668455 citedByCount "2" @default.
• W2145668455 countsByYear W21456684552023 @default.
• W2145668455 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2145668455 hasAuthorship W2145668455A5006933497 @default.
• W2145668455 hasBestOaLocation W21456684551 @default.
• W2145668455 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2145668455 hasConcept C126894567 @default.
• W2145668455 hasConcept C134018914 @default.
• W2145668455 hasConcept C2780091579 @default.
• W2145668455 hasConcept C2780306776 @default.
• W2145668455 hasConcept C2909587778 @default.
• W2145668455 hasConcept C49039625 @default.
• W2145668455 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2145668455 hasConceptScore W2145668455C126322002 @default.
• W2145668455 hasConceptScore W2145668455C126894567 @default.
• W2145668455 hasConceptScore W2145668455C134018914 @default.
• W2145668455 hasConceptScore W2145668455C2780091579 @default.
• W2145668455 hasConceptScore W2145668455C2780306776 @default.
• W2145668455 hasConceptScore W2145668455C2909587778 @default.
• W2145668455 hasConceptScore W2145668455C49039625 @default.
• W2145668455 hasConceptScore W2145668455C71924100 @default.
• W2145668455 hasIssue "2" @default.
• W2145668455 hasLocation W21456684551 @default.
• W2145668455 hasLocation W21456684552 @default.
• W2145668455 hasLocation W21456684553 @default.
• W2145668455 hasLocation W21456684554 @default.
• W2145668455 hasOpenAccess W2145668455 @default.
• W2145668455 hasPrimaryLocation W21456684551 @default.
• W2145668455 hasRelatedWork W1966296538 @default.
• W2145668455 hasRelatedWork W1988109684 @default.
• W2145668455 hasRelatedWork W2020884724 @default.
• W2145668455 hasRelatedWork W2074268135 @default.
• W2145668455 hasRelatedWork W2090408064 @default.
• W2145668455 hasRelatedWork W2161296685 @default.
• W2145668455 hasRelatedWork W2256084850 @default.
• W2145668455 hasRelatedWork W2410537918 @default.
• W2145668455 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.
• W2145668455 hasRelatedWork W4255681344 @default.
• W2145668455 hasVolume "4" @default.
• W2145668455 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2145668455 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2145668455 magId "2145668455" @default.
• W2145668455 workType "article" @default.