FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2146642726> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2146642726 endingPage "532" @default.
• W2146642726 startingPage "526" @default.
• W2146642726 abstract "Background and objective: To determine the difference of acquired skills of how to perform Digital Rectal Examination and Urethral Catheterization, by medical students of two groups. Group (A) large group (traditional teaching group) and Group (B) small teaching group Methods: A questionnaire containing information related to digital rectal examination (DRE) and urethral catheterization was given to all year six medical students at College of Medicine, University of Sulaimanyia , in June 2004 and 2007, just before their fina examination. The questionnaire focused on the important points in relation to ways of teaching. Results: Responses to all given questions in the questionnaire from the two groups were different, 54% of students from traditional teaching group responded as oppose to 53% from small group . Up to 93% of traditional teaching group student were taught how to perform Digital Rectal Examination, while approximately 80% of students from small teaching group have been taught to do DRE. Only 23% of those among traditional teaching group have done more than 3 DRE, while that of small teaching group was only 8%. In both groups, their findings were uncommonly checked by senior doctor. In both groups nearly 80% of the students had never felt a clinically malignant prostate and nearly the same for rectal tumor. Students from traditional teaching group, who did Digital Rectal Examination, 22% of them were not sure about their ability to give an opinion based on their clinical findings, while 33% of the small teaching groups were unable to give opinion. Nearly 73% in traditional reaching group have been taught how to perform male urethral catheterization, while that of small teaching group was 78%. In traditional teaching group, only 23% have performed 2 and less male urethral catheterization on qualification while 44% in small teaching group. 39% of small teaching group were not confident at all to do male urethral catheterization, while that of traditional teaching group was 27% only. Conclusion: There was obvious similarity between the two groups regarding the lack of basic skill in conducting DRE, urethral catheterization. This was probably due lack of objectives in the teaching curriculum." @default.
• W2146642726 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2146642726 creator A5039275637 @default.
• W2146642726 date "2013-10-01" @default.
• W2146642726 modified "2023-10-16" @default.
• W2146642726 title "Digital rectal examination and urethral catheterization by medical students: comparative study" @default.
• W2146642726 cites W1866012025 @default.
• W2146642726 cites W2014760033 @default.
• W2146642726 cites W2038332299 @default.
• W2146642726 cites W2062301139 @default.
• W2146642726 cites W2068163043 @default.
• W2146642726 cites W2089969749 @default.
• W2146642726 cites W2127205218 @default.
• W2146642726 cites W2514120568 @default.
• W2146642726 doi "https://doi.org/10.15218/zjms.2013.0044" @default.
• W2146642726 hasPublicationYear "2013" @default.
• W2146642726 type Work @default.
• W2146642726 sameAs 2146642726 @default.
• W2146642726 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W2146642726 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2146642726 hasAuthorship W2146642726A5039275637 @default.
• W2146642726 hasBestOaLocation W21466427261 @default.
• W2146642726 hasConcept C121608353 @default.
• W2146642726 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2146642726 hasConcept C145420912 @default.
• W2146642726 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2146642726 hasConcept C2776235491 @default.
• W2146642726 hasConcept C2780101318 @default.
• W2146642726 hasConcept C3018023364 @default.
• W2146642726 hasConcept C509550671 @default.
• W2146642726 hasConcept C527108885 @default.
• W2146642726 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2146642726 hasConcept C88610354 @default.
• W2146642726 hasConceptScore W2146642726C121608353 @default.
• W2146642726 hasConceptScore W2146642726C126322002 @default.
• W2146642726 hasConceptScore W2146642726C145420912 @default.
• W2146642726 hasConceptScore W2146642726C15744967 @default.
• W2146642726 hasConceptScore W2146642726C2776235491 @default.
• W2146642726 hasConceptScore W2146642726C2780101318 @default.
• W2146642726 hasConceptScore W2146642726C3018023364 @default.
• W2146642726 hasConceptScore W2146642726C509550671 @default.
• W2146642726 hasConceptScore W2146642726C527108885 @default.
• W2146642726 hasConceptScore W2146642726C71924100 @default.
• W2146642726 hasConceptScore W2146642726C88610354 @default.
• W2146642726 hasIssue "3" @default.
• W2146642726 hasLocation W21466427261 @default.
• W2146642726 hasOpenAccess W2146642726 @default.
• W2146642726 hasPrimaryLocation W21466427261 @default.
• W2146642726 hasRelatedWork W1601396276 @default.
• W2146642726 hasRelatedWork W2003797590 @default.
• W2146642726 hasRelatedWork W2392975071 @default.
• W2146642726 hasRelatedWork W2411188990 @default.
• W2146642726 hasRelatedWork W2417143723 @default.
• W2146642726 hasRelatedWork W2463051663 @default.
• W2146642726 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
• W2146642726 hasRelatedWork W3098517361 @default.
• W2146642726 hasRelatedWork W4243636516 @default.
• W2146642726 hasRelatedWork W93404254 @default.
• W2146642726 hasVolume "17" @default.
• W2146642726 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2146642726 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2146642726 magId "2146642726" @default.
• W2146642726 workType "article" @default.