FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2146647003> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2146647003 endingPage "695" @default.
• W2146647003 startingPage "695" @default.
• W2146647003 abstract "As the title suggests, this work concerns itself with our assessment of the environmental movement's impact upon the procedures, organizational structure, and objectives of the Corps of Engineers. The authors have selected four measures of organizational change-setting new goals, reorganization, changes in output, and open decisionmaking-as important factors in the assessment of bureaucratic change in the 1970s. With these factors in mind, the authors provide five case studies of the Corps of Engineers project planning process, and a survey data analysis of the attitudes of citizens who took part in Corps public involvement activities. The methodology is innovative and sophisticated. The reader is allowed the richness of detail and insight that only case studies provide, and empirical generalizations derived from survey data analysis, upon which conclusions about the overall effectiveness of Corps planning strategies on citizen attitudes can be based. The conclusion? Not much change, either in citizen attitudes about the Corps, or the Agency's organizational accommodation to citizen demands through citizen participation. The book, therefore, represents a missed opportunity. Instead of considering a wide scope of decision making in order to define the changing constellation of political support, opposition, and the Corps' organizational responses, the authors chose to focus on a rather minor component of decision making and public relations, the public involvement process. Thus, the work stands primarily as a technical analysis of citizen participation strategies, rather than a political study of the Corps of Engineers. However, the book may be testimony enough to this agency's political strength. The environmental movement of the last decade gave us sweeping anti-pollution legislation, unprecedented federal authority to regulate many sectors of society, wholesale governmental reorganization, and billions for anti-pollution control technology. The authors admit that this social movement led only to what amounted to organizational fine tuning within the Corps: brief experimentation with open planning and decision making, a small increase in environmentally-oriented personnel, and the creation of environmental units in District Planning and Engineering Divisions. These modifications" @default.
• W2146647003 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2146647003 creator A5045804456 @default.
• W2146647003 creator A5048652830 @default.
• W2146647003 creator A5049965449 @default.
• W2146647003 date "1980-09-01" @default.
• W2146647003 modified "2023-09-25" @default.
• W2146647003 title "Can Organizations Change? Environmental Protection, Citizen Participation, and the Corps of Engineers." @default.
• W2146647003 cites W1537521353 @default.
• W2146647003 doi "https://doi.org/10.2307/2065512" @default.
• W2146647003 hasPublicationYear "1980" @default.
• W2146647003 type Work @default.
• W2146647003 sameAs 2146647003 @default.
• W2146647003 citedByCount "29" @default.
• W2146647003 countsByYear W21466470032012 @default.
• W2146647003 countsByYear W21466470032013 @default.
• W2146647003 countsByYear W21466470032014 @default.
• W2146647003 countsByYear W21466470032017 @default.
• W2146647003 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2146647003 hasAuthorship W2146647003A5045804456 @default.
• W2146647003 hasAuthorship W2146647003A5048652830 @default.
• W2146647003 hasAuthorship W2146647003A5049965449 @default.
• W2146647003 hasConcept C107826830 @default.
• W2146647003 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
• W2146647003 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2146647003 hasConcept C3116431 @default.
• W2146647003 hasConcept C39432304 @default.
• W2146647003 hasConcept C39549134 @default.
• W2146647003 hasConcept C91375879 @default.
• W2146647003 hasConceptScore W2146647003C107826830 @default.
• W2146647003 hasConceptScore W2146647003C144133560 @default.
• W2146647003 hasConceptScore W2146647003C17744445 @default.
• W2146647003 hasConceptScore W2146647003C3116431 @default.
• W2146647003 hasConceptScore W2146647003C39432304 @default.
• W2146647003 hasConceptScore W2146647003C39549134 @default.
• W2146647003 hasConceptScore W2146647003C91375879 @default.
• W2146647003 hasIssue "5" @default.
• W2146647003 hasLocation W21466470031 @default.
• W2146647003 hasOpenAccess W2146647003 @default.
• W2146647003 hasPrimaryLocation W21466470031 @default.
• W2146647003 hasRelatedWork W1992609303 @default.
• W2146647003 hasRelatedWork W2028816189 @default.
• W2146647003 hasRelatedWork W2119062135 @default.
• W2146647003 hasRelatedWork W2128457231 @default.
• W2146647003 hasRelatedWork W2314087861 @default.
• W2146647003 hasRelatedWork W2501151668 @default.
• W2146647003 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.
• W2146647003 hasRelatedWork W2801327878 @default.
• W2146647003 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
• W2146647003 hasRelatedWork W3143901977 @default.
• W2146647003 hasVolume "9" @default.
• W2146647003 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2146647003 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2146647003 magId "2146647003" @default.
• W2146647003 workType "article" @default.