FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2146990032> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2146990032 endingPage "227" @default.
• W2146990032 startingPage "220" @default.
• W2146990032 abstract "Introduction Sole utilization of computed tomography (CT) scans in gross tumor volume (GTV) delineation for head-and-neck cancers is subject to inaccuracies. This study aims to evaluate contributions of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), positron emission tomography (PET), and physical examination (PE) to GTV delineation in oropharyngeal cancer (OPC). Methods Forty-one patients with OPC were studied. All underwent contrast-enhanced CT simulation scans (CECTs) that were registered with pretreatment PETs and MRIs. For each patient, three sets of primary and nodal GTV were contoured. First, reference GTVs (GTVref) were contoured by the treating radiation oncologist (RO) using CT, MRI, PET, and PE findings. Additional GTVs were created using fused CT/PET scans (GTVctpet) and CT/MRI scans (GTVctmr) by two other ROs blinded to GTVref. To compare GTVs, concordance indices (CI) were calculated by dividing the respective overlap volumes by overall volumes. To evaluate the contribution of PE, composite GTVs derived from CT, MRI, and PET (GTVctpetmr) were compared with GTVref. Results For primary tumors, GTVref was significantly larger than GTVctpet and GTVctmr (p < 0.001). Although no significant difference in size was noted between GTVctpet and GTVctmr (p = 0.39), there was poor concordance between them (CI = 0.62). In addition, although CI (ctpetmr vs. ref) was low, it was significantly higher than CI (ctpet vs. ref) and CI (ctmr vs. ref) (p < 0.001), suggesting that neither modality should be used alone. Qualitative analyses to explain the low CI (ctpetmr vs. ref) revealed underestimation of mucosal disease when GTV was contoured without knowledge of PE findings. Similar trends were observed for nodal GTVs. However, CI (ctpet vs. ref), CI (ctmr vs. ref), and CI (ctpetmr vs. ref) were high (>0.75), indicating that although the modalities were complementary, the added benefit was small in the context of CECTs. In addition, PE did not aid greatly in nodal GTV delineation. Conclusion PET and MRI are complementary and combined use is ideal. However, the low CI (ctpetmr vs. ref) particularly for primary tumors underscores the limitations of defining GTVs using imaging alone. PE is invaluable and must be incorporated." @default.
• W2146990032 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2146990032 creator A5015672299 @default.
• W2146990032 creator A5017166305 @default.
• W2146990032 creator A5024216842 @default.
• W2146990032 creator A5053488998 @default.
• W2146990032 creator A5057307476 @default.
• W2146990032 creator A5061365371 @default.
• W2146990032 creator A5072271778 @default.
• W2146990032 creator A5074725191 @default.
• W2146990032 creator A5078178893 @default.
• W2146990032 date "2012-05-01" @default.
• W2146990032 modified "2023-10-12" @default.
• W2146990032 title "Target Volume Delineation in Oropharyngeal Cancer: Impact of PET, MRI, and Physical Examination" @default.
• W2146990032 cites W1852497784 @default.
• W2146990032 cites W1969463716 @default.
• W2146990032 cites W1982975352 @default.
• W2146990032 cites W2010569651 @default.
• W2146990032 cites W2025172079 @default.
• W2146990032 cites W2039253328 @default.
• W2146990032 cites W2039630953 @default.
• W2146990032 cites W2041698775 @default.
• W2146990032 cites W2055964054 @default.
• W2146990032 cites W2061565656 @default.
• W2146990032 cites W2071559780 @default.
• W2146990032 cites W2080386114 @default.
• W2146990032 cites W2082615917 @default.
• W2146990032 cites W2082766386 @default.
• W2146990032 cites W2084919861 @default.
• W2146990032 cites W2096719319 @default.
• W2146990032 cites W2100978556 @default.
• W2146990032 cites W2121463465 @default.
• W2146990032 cites W2127063269 @default.
• W2146990032 cites W2132654217 @default.
• W2146990032 cites W2134235092 @default.
• W2146990032 cites W2151204137 @default.
• W2146990032 cites W22701908 @default.
• W2146990032 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.05.060" @default.
• W2146990032 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22035663" @default.
• W2146990032 hasPublicationYear "2012" @default.
• W2146990032 type Work @default.
• W2146990032 sameAs 2146990032 @default.
• W2146990032 citedByCount "54" @default.
• W2146990032 countsByYear W21469900322012 @default.
• W2146990032 countsByYear W21469900322013 @default.
• W2146990032 countsByYear W21469900322014 @default.
• W2146990032 countsByYear W21469900322015 @default.
• W2146990032 countsByYear W21469900322016 @default.
• W2146990032 countsByYear W21469900322017 @default.
• W2146990032 countsByYear W21469900322018 @default.
• W2146990032 countsByYear W21469900322019 @default.
• W2146990032 countsByYear W21469900322020 @default.
• W2146990032 countsByYear W21469900322021 @default.
• W2146990032 countsByYear W21469900322022 @default.
• W2146990032 countsByYear W21469900322023 @default.
• W2146990032 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2146990032 hasAuthorship W2146990032A5015672299 @default.
• W2146990032 hasAuthorship W2146990032A5017166305 @default.
• W2146990032 hasAuthorship W2146990032A5024216842 @default.
• W2146990032 hasAuthorship W2146990032A5053488998 @default.
• W2146990032 hasAuthorship W2146990032A5057307476 @default.
• W2146990032 hasAuthorship W2146990032A5061365371 @default.
• W2146990032 hasAuthorship W2146990032A5072271778 @default.
• W2146990032 hasAuthorship W2146990032A5074725191 @default.
• W2146990032 hasAuthorship W2146990032A5078178893 @default.
• W2146990032 hasConcept C121608353 @default.
• W2146990032 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2146990032 hasConcept C126838900 @default.
• W2146990032 hasConcept C143409427 @default.
• W2146990032 hasConcept C160798450 @default.
• W2146990032 hasConcept C2775842073 @default.
• W2146990032 hasConcept C2776530083 @default.
• W2146990032 hasConcept C2780920918 @default.
• W2146990032 hasConcept C2989005 @default.
• W2146990032 hasConcept C509974204 @default.
• W2146990032 hasConcept C544519230 @default.
• W2146990032 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2146990032 hasConceptScore W2146990032C121608353 @default.
• W2146990032 hasConceptScore W2146990032C126322002 @default.
• W2146990032 hasConceptScore W2146990032C126838900 @default.
• W2146990032 hasConceptScore W2146990032C143409427 @default.
• W2146990032 hasConceptScore W2146990032C160798450 @default.
• W2146990032 hasConceptScore W2146990032C2775842073 @default.
• W2146990032 hasConceptScore W2146990032C2776530083 @default.
• W2146990032 hasConceptScore W2146990032C2780920918 @default.
• W2146990032 hasConceptScore W2146990032C2989005 @default.
• W2146990032 hasConceptScore W2146990032C509974204 @default.
• W2146990032 hasConceptScore W2146990032C544519230 @default.
• W2146990032 hasConceptScore W2146990032C71924100 @default.
• W2146990032 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W2146990032 hasLocation W21469900321 @default.
• W2146990032 hasLocation W21469900322 @default.
• W2146990032 hasOpenAccess W2146990032 @default.
• W2146990032 hasPrimaryLocation W21469900321 @default.
• W2146990032 hasRelatedWork W1548510492 @default.
• W2146990032 hasRelatedWork W1964496343 @default.
• W2146990032 hasRelatedWork W1965188844 @default.
• W2146990032 hasRelatedWork W1974239774 @default.

• next