FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2146992048> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2146992048 endingPage "351" @default.
• W2146992048 startingPage "347" @default.
• W2146992048 abstract "Objective To compare the experiences of women who received a screen-positive test result for Down syndrome after nuchal translucency screening or after biochemical screening in the first trimester of pregnancy in the Netherlands. Method Semi-quantitative questionnaires were sent to 40 women with a screen-positive test result for Down syndrome in the first trimester of pregnancy: 20 had undergone nuchal translucency screening (NT group) and 20 had undergone serum screening (PAPP-A and free beta-hCG) (SS group). In all the cases, chorionic villus sampling (CVS) had not revealed any chromosomal abnormalities. Results The major reason for undergoing the screening test in both groups of women was to be more reassured about the health of the baby. In the NT group, 5 out of the 20 women stated that they had suddenly been confronted with the NT measurement during the ultrasound examination without even being asked, or had been caught by surprise about the possibility. Together with two other women, they felt that at that stage they had been insufficiently informed about what the test meant. In the SS group, two women also held this opinion. In 10 out of the 20 women in the SS group, the positive-screening result had caused (a great deal of) anxiety. In the NT group, this proportion was as high as 18 out of the 20. Six of the women in the NT group mentioned that ‘seeing the baby’ had been an important factor in their decision to undergo CVS. Even after a favourable result of CVS, a proportion of the pregnant women were still feeling anxious about the health of their baby (5 women in the SS group and 12 in the NT group). Nevertheless, a large proportion of the women in both groups was pleased that they had undergone the screening test. Only a few of them stated that they would not choose the same screening test again in a future pregnancy. Conclusions An unfavourable screening result after NT screening appeared to have a greater impact than an unfavourable result after serum screening. This might partly be explained by the ultrasound examination visualising the increased risk during NT screening. An additional important role may have been played by the fact that an abnormal NT screening result implies an increased risk of other disorders besides Down syndrome, which the women should be informed about beforehand. Several factors place special demands on the counselling prior to NT screening. Copyright © 2004 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd." @default.
• W2146992048 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2146992048 creator A5017914658 @default.
• W2146992048 creator A5032217543 @default.
• W2146992048 creator A5058385931 @default.
• W2146992048 creator A5066208119 @default.
• W2146992048 creator A5076235088 @default.
• W2146992048 creator A5081150801 @default.
• W2146992048 date "2004-05-01" @default.
• W2146992048 modified "2023-10-14" @default.
• W2146992048 title "A comparison of the impact of screen-positive results obtained from ultrasound and biochemical screening for Down syndrome in the first trimester: a pilot study" @default.
• W2146992048 cites W1988432766 @default.
• W2146992048 cites W2020990789 @default.
• W2146992048 cites W2027657108 @default.
• W2146992048 cites W2051870623 @default.
• W2146992048 cites W2059137879 @default.
• W2146992048 cites W2061514086 @default.
• W2146992048 cites W2081902923 @default.
• W2146992048 cites W2088647258 @default.
• W2146992048 cites W2102489859 @default.
• W2146992048 cites W2123610946 @default.
• W2146992048 cites W2137887594 @default.
• W2146992048 cites W2144144725 @default.
• W2146992048 cites W2148260008 @default.
• W2146992048 cites W2151020010 @default.
• W2146992048 doi "https://doi.org/10.1002/pd.872" @default.
• W2146992048 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15164407" @default.
• W2146992048 hasPublicationYear "2004" @default.
• W2146992048 type Work @default.
• W2146992048 sameAs 2146992048 @default.
• W2146992048 citedByCount "26" @default.
• W2146992048 countsByYear W21469920482012 @default.
• W2146992048 countsByYear W21469920482014 @default.
• W2146992048 countsByYear W21469920482015 @default.
• W2146992048 countsByYear W21469920482016 @default.
• W2146992048 countsByYear W21469920482017 @default.
• W2146992048 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2146992048 hasAuthorship W2146992048A5017914658 @default.
• W2146992048 hasAuthorship W2146992048A5032217543 @default.
• W2146992048 hasAuthorship W2146992048A5058385931 @default.
• W2146992048 hasAuthorship W2146992048A5066208119 @default.
• W2146992048 hasAuthorship W2146992048A5076235088 @default.
• W2146992048 hasAuthorship W2146992048A5081150801 @default.
• W2146992048 hasBestOaLocation W21469920482 @default.
• W2146992048 hasConcept C118552586 @default.
• W2146992048 hasConcept C131872663 @default.
• W2146992048 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2146992048 hasConcept C151730666 @default.
• W2146992048 hasConcept C172680121 @default.
• W2146992048 hasConcept C2776555163 @default.
• W2146992048 hasConcept C2777267654 @default.
• W2146992048 hasConcept C2777785397 @default.
• W2146992048 hasConcept C2778258057 @default.
• W2146992048 hasConcept C2779234561 @default.
• W2146992048 hasConcept C2779954681 @default.
• W2146992048 hasConcept C2780733764 @default.
• W2146992048 hasConcept C2909999348 @default.
• W2146992048 hasConcept C29456083 @default.
• W2146992048 hasConcept C3017541802 @default.
• W2146992048 hasConcept C3019714739 @default.
• W2146992048 hasConcept C46973012 @default.
• W2146992048 hasConcept C54355233 @default.
• W2146992048 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2146992048 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W2146992048 hasConceptScore W2146992048C118552586 @default.
• W2146992048 hasConceptScore W2146992048C131872663 @default.
• W2146992048 hasConceptScore W2146992048C141071460 @default.
• W2146992048 hasConceptScore W2146992048C151730666 @default.
• W2146992048 hasConceptScore W2146992048C172680121 @default.
• W2146992048 hasConceptScore W2146992048C2776555163 @default.
• W2146992048 hasConceptScore W2146992048C2777267654 @default.
• W2146992048 hasConceptScore W2146992048C2777785397 @default.
• W2146992048 hasConceptScore W2146992048C2778258057 @default.
• W2146992048 hasConceptScore W2146992048C2779234561 @default.
• W2146992048 hasConceptScore W2146992048C2779954681 @default.
• W2146992048 hasConceptScore W2146992048C2780733764 @default.
• W2146992048 hasConceptScore W2146992048C2909999348 @default.
• W2146992048 hasConceptScore W2146992048C29456083 @default.
• W2146992048 hasConceptScore W2146992048C3017541802 @default.
• W2146992048 hasConceptScore W2146992048C3019714739 @default.
• W2146992048 hasConceptScore W2146992048C46973012 @default.
• W2146992048 hasConceptScore W2146992048C54355233 @default.
• W2146992048 hasConceptScore W2146992048C71924100 @default.
• W2146992048 hasConceptScore W2146992048C86803240 @default.
• W2146992048 hasIssue "5" @default.
• W2146992048 hasLocation W21469920481 @default.
• W2146992048 hasLocation W21469920482 @default.
• W2146992048 hasLocation W21469920483 @default.
• W2146992048 hasLocation W21469920484 @default.
• W2146992048 hasOpenAccess W2146992048 @default.
• W2146992048 hasPrimaryLocation W21469920481 @default.
• W2146992048 hasRelatedWork W1861410928 @default.
• W2146992048 hasRelatedWork W2032834035 @default.
• W2146992048 hasRelatedWork W2039612854 @default.
• W2146992048 hasRelatedWork W2059257743 @default.
• W2146992048 hasRelatedWork W2114431729 @default.
• W2146992048 hasRelatedWork W2115364205 @default.
• W2146992048 hasRelatedWork W2138976556 @default.

• next