Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2147463960> ?p ?o ?g. }
- W2147463960 endingPage "856" @default.
- W2147463960 startingPage "847" @default.
- W2147463960 abstract "Concerns exist about whether monovalent (RV1) and pentavalent (RV5) rotavirus vaccines provide adequate protection against diverse strains and whether vaccine introduction will lead to selective pressure. We aimed to investigate the distribution of rotavirus strains and strain-specific rotavirus vaccine effectiveness after vaccine introduction.We did a systematic review of published work to assess the strain-specific effectiveness of RV1 and RV5 rotavirus vaccines. We classified strains as homotypic, partly heterotypic, and fully heterotypic based on the amount of antigen-matching between strain and vaccine. When studies reported vaccine effectiveness against single antigens (G-type or P-type), we categorised them as either single-antigen vaccine type or single-antigen non-vaccine type. Our primary outcome was strain-specific vaccine effectiveness, comparing effectiveness of homotypic strains with fully or partly heterotypic strains. A secondary outcome was the prevalence of rotavirus strains after vaccine introduction. We estimated pooled odds ratios using random-effect regression models, stratified by country income level and vaccine type, and tested for differences in strain-specific vaccine effectiveness. We assessed strain distribution trends from surveillance reports.In high-income countries, RV1 pooled vaccine effectiveness was 94% (95% CI 80-98) against homotypic strains, 71% (39-86) against partly heterotypic strains, and 87% (76-93) against fully heterotypic strains. In middle-income settings, respective pooled data were 59% (36-73), 72% (58-81), and 47% (28-61). In high-income countries, RV5 vaccine effectiveness was 83% (78-87) against homotypic strains, 82% (70-89) against single-antigen vaccine type strains, 82% (70-89) against partly heterotypic strains, and 75% (47-88) against single-antigen non-vaccine type strains. In middle-income settings, RV5 vaccine effectiveness was 70% (58-78) against single-antigen vaccine type strains, 37% (10-56) against partly heterotypic strains, and 87% (38-97) against single-antigen non-vaccine type strains. No difference was noted in vaccine effectiveness for either RV1 or RV5 in any setting (all p>0·05). Prevalent strains in countries using RV1 were G2P[4] (2198 of 4428, 50%) and G1P[8] (953, 22%), and those in countries using RV5 were G1P[8] (1280 of 3875, 33%) and G2P[4] (1169, 30%). Sustained predominance of a single strain was not recorded.RV1 and RV5 exert similar effectiveness against homotypic and heterotypic rotavirus strains. Persistence of specific strains was not recorded, suggesting vaccine-induced selective pressure did not occur. Expansion of rotavirus surveillance efforts to low-income countries and ongoing surveillance are crucial to identify emergence of new strains and to assess strain-specific vaccine effectiveness in various settings.None." @default.
- W2147463960 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W2147463960 creator A5004697478 @default.
- W2147463960 creator A5014826823 @default.
- W2147463960 creator A5054966986 @default.
- W2147463960 creator A5062106023 @default.
- W2147463960 creator A5074401641 @default.
- W2147463960 creator A5077183317 @default.
- W2147463960 creator A5087750390 @default.
- W2147463960 date "2014-09-01" @default.
- W2147463960 modified "2023-10-18" @default.
- W2147463960 title "Distribution of rotavirus strains and strain-specific effectiveness of the rotavirus vaccine after its introduction: a systematic review and meta-analysis" @default.
- W2147463960 cites W1749459704 @default.
- W2147463960 cites W1974323362 @default.
- W2147463960 cites W1974362136 @default.
- W2147463960 cites W1982309623 @default.
- W2147463960 cites W1985183611 @default.
- W2147463960 cites W1985314879 @default.
- W2147463960 cites W2011175996 @default.
- W2147463960 cites W2014605855 @default.
- W2147463960 cites W2027227419 @default.
- W2147463960 cites W2030086466 @default.
- W2147463960 cites W2039862142 @default.
- W2147463960 cites W2040393189 @default.
- W2147463960 cites W2044265671 @default.
- W2147463960 cites W2051514059 @default.
- W2147463960 cites W2054126241 @default.
- W2147463960 cites W2055735989 @default.
- W2147463960 cites W2055947986 @default.
- W2147463960 cites W2065739477 @default.
- W2147463960 cites W2077128987 @default.
- W2147463960 cites W2083934734 @default.
- W2147463960 cites W2095820230 @default.
- W2147463960 cites W2100178369 @default.
- W2147463960 cites W2106050401 @default.
- W2147463960 cites W2109176401 @default.
- W2147463960 cites W2109417543 @default.
- W2147463960 cites W2110318366 @default.
- W2147463960 cites W2113014022 @default.
- W2147463960 cites W2119259412 @default.
- W2147463960 cites W2123497124 @default.
- W2147463960 cites W2126581854 @default.
- W2147463960 cites W2129210733 @default.
- W2147463960 cites W2129508569 @default.
- W2147463960 cites W2130096431 @default.
- W2147463960 cites W2135985984 @default.
- W2147463960 cites W2143233237 @default.
- W2147463960 cites W2148256289 @default.
- W2147463960 cites W2148326834 @default.
- W2147463960 cites W2150294366 @default.
- W2147463960 cites W2150741463 @default.
- W2147463960 cites W2158178343 @default.
- W2147463960 cites W2159396395 @default.
- W2147463960 cites W2160624250 @default.
- W2147463960 cites W2163306701 @default.
- W2147463960 cites W2170749337 @default.
- W2147463960 cites W2316156844 @default.
- W2147463960 cites W4231603137 @default.
- W2147463960 cites W4236114911 @default.
- W2147463960 cites W4362206875 @default.
- W2147463960 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/s1473-3099(14)70832-1" @default.
- W2147463960 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25082561" @default.
- W2147463960 hasPublicationYear "2014" @default.
- W2147463960 type Work @default.
- W2147463960 sameAs 2147463960 @default.
- W2147463960 citedByCount "173" @default.
- W2147463960 countsByYear W21474639602014 @default.
- W2147463960 countsByYear W21474639602015 @default.
- W2147463960 countsByYear W21474639602016 @default.
- W2147463960 countsByYear W21474639602017 @default.
- W2147463960 countsByYear W21474639602018 @default.
- W2147463960 countsByYear W21474639602019 @default.
- W2147463960 countsByYear W21474639602020 @default.
- W2147463960 countsByYear W21474639602021 @default.
- W2147463960 countsByYear W21474639602022 @default.
- W2147463960 countsByYear W21474639602023 @default.
- W2147463960 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2147463960 hasAuthorship W2147463960A5004697478 @default.
- W2147463960 hasAuthorship W2147463960A5014826823 @default.
- W2147463960 hasAuthorship W2147463960A5054966986 @default.
- W2147463960 hasAuthorship W2147463960A5062106023 @default.
- W2147463960 hasAuthorship W2147463960A5074401641 @default.
- W2147463960 hasAuthorship W2147463960A5077183317 @default.
- W2147463960 hasAuthorship W2147463960A5087750390 @default.
- W2147463960 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
- W2147463960 hasConcept C147483822 @default.
- W2147463960 hasConcept C159047783 @default.
- W2147463960 hasConcept C203014093 @default.
- W2147463960 hasConcept C22070199 @default.
- W2147463960 hasConcept C2522874641 @default.
- W2147463960 hasConcept C2777227250 @default.
- W2147463960 hasConcept C2778022156 @default.
- W2147463960 hasConcept C2780441014 @default.
- W2147463960 hasConcept C2781367151 @default.
- W2147463960 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W2147463960 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
- W2147463960 hasConceptScore W2147463960C126322002 @default.
- W2147463960 hasConceptScore W2147463960C147483822 @default.