FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2148440080> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2148440080 endingPage "60" @default.
• W2148440080 startingPage "55" @default.
• W2148440080 abstract "Purpose To evaluate the effects of secondary deployment of expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE)–covered stent grafts in the treatment of dysfunctional transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts (TIPSs) in comparison with other common approaches (conventional angioplasty or implantation of bare metal stents). Materials and Methods A retrospective review of 121 dysfunctional bare metal TIPS presenting between 2000 and 2004 was conducted. The group was divided into four subgroups according to the type of intervention: conventional angioplasty (52 cases; 43%), bare metal stent deployment (35 cases; 28.9%), nondedicated ePTFE-covered stent-graft deployment (15 cases; 12.4%), and dedicated ePTFE-covered stent-graft deployment (19 cases; 15.7%). In all four groups, the primary patency after the specific intervention was calculated and mutually compared. Results Primary patency rates after 12 and 24 months were 49.7% and 25.3%, respectively, in conventional angioplasty; 74.9% and 64.9%, respectively, with bare metal stents; 75.2% and 64.5%, respectively, with nondedicated ePTFE-covered stent grafts; and 88.1% and 80.8%, respectively, with dedicated ePTFE-covered stent grafts. Conclusions In the treatment of dysfunctional TIPS, better patency after the intervention was obtained by deploying dedicated ePTFE-covered stent grafts in comparison with conventional angioplasty, bare metal stents, and nondedicated ePTFE-covered stents. To evaluate the effects of secondary deployment of expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE)–covered stent grafts in the treatment of dysfunctional transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts (TIPSs) in comparison with other common approaches (conventional angioplasty or implantation of bare metal stents). A retrospective review of 121 dysfunctional bare metal TIPS presenting between 2000 and 2004 was conducted. The group was divided into four subgroups according to the type of intervention: conventional angioplasty (52 cases; 43%), bare metal stent deployment (35 cases; 28.9%), nondedicated ePTFE-covered stent-graft deployment (15 cases; 12.4%), and dedicated ePTFE-covered stent-graft deployment (19 cases; 15.7%). In all four groups, the primary patency after the specific intervention was calculated and mutually compared. Primary patency rates after 12 and 24 months were 49.7% and 25.3%, respectively, in conventional angioplasty; 74.9% and 64.9%, respectively, with bare metal stents; 75.2% and 64.5%, respectively, with nondedicated ePTFE-covered stent grafts; and 88.1% and 80.8%, respectively, with dedicated ePTFE-covered stent grafts. In the treatment of dysfunctional TIPS, better patency after the intervention was obtained by deploying dedicated ePTFE-covered stent grafts in comparison with conventional angioplasty, bare metal stents, and nondedicated ePTFE-covered stents." @default.
• W2148440080 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2148440080 creator A5003003525 @default.
• W2148440080 creator A5012996494 @default.
• W2148440080 creator A5023263242 @default.
• W2148440080 creator A5029081155 @default.
• W2148440080 creator A5033353214 @default.
• W2148440080 creator A5035521266 @default.
• W2148440080 creator A5050654021 @default.
• W2148440080 creator A5065604638 @default.
• W2148440080 creator A5074828660 @default.
• W2148440080 creator A5075339020 @default.
• W2148440080 creator A5091638967 @default.
• W2148440080 date "2011-01-01" @default.
• W2148440080 modified "2023-10-15" @default.
• W2148440080 title "Influence of the Secondary Deployment of Expanded Polytetrafluoroethylene–covered Stent Grafts on Maintenance of Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt Patency" @default.
• W2148440080 cites W1965900587 @default.
• W2148440080 cites W1966541066 @default.
• W2148440080 cites W1966755945 @default.
• W2148440080 cites W1996571028 @default.
• W2148440080 cites W2000361216 @default.
• W2148440080 cites W2014734906 @default.
• W2148440080 cites W2028749685 @default.
• W2148440080 cites W2031221807 @default.
• W2148440080 cites W2032479444 @default.
• W2148440080 cites W2036507227 @default.
• W2148440080 cites W2064348729 @default.
• W2148440080 cites W2067778191 @default.
• W2148440080 cites W2088866743 @default.
• W2148440080 cites W2088994247 @default.
• W2148440080 cites W2091758628 @default.
• W2148440080 cites W2104569292 @default.
• W2148440080 cites W2105805802 @default.
• W2148440080 cites W2125730253 @default.
• W2148440080 cites W2129982107 @default.
• W2148440080 cites W2134055787 @default.
• W2148440080 cites W2168059534 @default.
• W2148440080 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvir.2010.09.016" @default.
• W2148440080 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21106389" @default.
• W2148440080 hasPublicationYear "2011" @default.
• W2148440080 type Work @default.
• W2148440080 sameAs 2148440080 @default.
• W2148440080 citedByCount "27" @default.
• W2148440080 countsByYear W21484400802012 @default.
• W2148440080 countsByYear W21484400802013 @default.
• W2148440080 countsByYear W21484400802014 @default.
• W2148440080 countsByYear W21484400802015 @default.
• W2148440080 countsByYear W21484400802016 @default.
• W2148440080 countsByYear W21484400802017 @default.
• W2148440080 countsByYear W21484400802018 @default.
• W2148440080 countsByYear W21484400802020 @default.
• W2148440080 countsByYear W21484400802021 @default.
• W2148440080 countsByYear W21484400802022 @default.
• W2148440080 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2148440080 hasAuthorship W2148440080A5003003525 @default.
• W2148440080 hasAuthorship W2148440080A5012996494 @default.
• W2148440080 hasAuthorship W2148440080A5023263242 @default.
• W2148440080 hasAuthorship W2148440080A5029081155 @default.
• W2148440080 hasAuthorship W2148440080A5033353214 @default.
• W2148440080 hasAuthorship W2148440080A5035521266 @default.
• W2148440080 hasAuthorship W2148440080A5050654021 @default.
• W2148440080 hasAuthorship W2148440080A5065604638 @default.
• W2148440080 hasAuthorship W2148440080A5074828660 @default.
• W2148440080 hasAuthorship W2148440080A5075339020 @default.
• W2148440080 hasAuthorship W2148440080A5091638967 @default.
• W2148440080 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2148440080 hasConcept C126838900 @default.
• W2148440080 hasConcept C139059822 @default.
• W2148440080 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2148440080 hasConcept C27502469 @default.
• W2148440080 hasConcept C2777214474 @default.
• W2148440080 hasConcept C2778583881 @default.
• W2148440080 hasConcept C2778808290 @default.
• W2148440080 hasConcept C2780326628 @default.
• W2148440080 hasConcept C2781033279 @default.
• W2148440080 hasConcept C3017582275 @default.
• W2148440080 hasConcept C70410870 @default.
• W2148440080 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2148440080 hasConceptScore W2148440080C126322002 @default.
• W2148440080 hasConceptScore W2148440080C126838900 @default.
• W2148440080 hasConceptScore W2148440080C139059822 @default.
• W2148440080 hasConceptScore W2148440080C141071460 @default.
• W2148440080 hasConceptScore W2148440080C27502469 @default.
• W2148440080 hasConceptScore W2148440080C2777214474 @default.
• W2148440080 hasConceptScore W2148440080C2778583881 @default.
• W2148440080 hasConceptScore W2148440080C2778808290 @default.
• W2148440080 hasConceptScore W2148440080C2780326628 @default.
• W2148440080 hasConceptScore W2148440080C2781033279 @default.
• W2148440080 hasConceptScore W2148440080C3017582275 @default.
• W2148440080 hasConceptScore W2148440080C70410870 @default.
• W2148440080 hasConceptScore W2148440080C71924100 @default.
• W2148440080 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W2148440080 hasLocation W21484400801 @default.
• W2148440080 hasLocation W21484400802 @default.
• W2148440080 hasOpenAccess W2148440080 @default.
• W2148440080 hasPrimaryLocation W21484400801 @default.
• W2148440080 hasRelatedWork W1993757382 @default.
• W2148440080 hasRelatedWork W1995140171 @default.

• next