FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2148658693> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2148658693 endingPage "188" @default.
• W2148658693 startingPage "155" @default.
• W2148658693 abstract "Financial Accountability & ManagementVolume 23, Issue 2 p. 155-188 AUDIT FEE DETERMINANTS IN THE UK UNIVERSITY SECTOR Howard Mellett, Howard Mellett Cardiff Business School, Cardiff UniversitySearch for more papers by this author Michael J. Peel, Michael J. Peel Cardiff Business School, Cardiff UniversitySearch for more papers by this authorYusuf Karbhari, Yusuf Karbhari Cardiff Business School, Cardiff University They are grateful for the helpful comments of two anonymous referees and to the universities who supplied copies of their accounts. They are also grateful for the additional information supplied by the Director of Corporate Services of one of the universities included in the study.Search for more papers by this author Howard Mellett, Howard Mellett Cardiff Business School, Cardiff UniversitySearch for more papers by this author Michael J. Peel, Michael J. Peel Cardiff Business School, Cardiff UniversitySearch for more papers by this authorYusuf Karbhari, Yusuf Karbhari Cardiff Business School, Cardiff University They are grateful for the helpful comments of two anonymous referees and to the universities who supplied copies of their accounts. They are also grateful for the additional information supplied by the Director of Corporate Services of one of the universities included in the study.Search for more papers by this author First published: 04 May 2007 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0408.2007.00424.xCitations: 13 Address for correspondence: Howard Mellett, Cardiff Business School, Cardiff University, Colum Drive, Cardiff CF10 3EU, UK.e-mail: [email protected] Read the full textAboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onEmailFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditWechat REFERENCES Accountancy (2001), ‘ Top 60 League Table’, Vol. 128, No. 1295, pp. 16–17. Antle R., E. Gordon, G. Narayanamoorthy and L. Zhou (2002), The Joint Determination of Audit Fees, Non-audit Fees, and Abnormal Accruals, Yale School of Management Working Paper . Baber, W., E. Brooks and W. Ricks (1987), ‘An Empirical Investigation of the Market for Audit Services in the Public Sector’, Journal of Accounting Research, Vol. 25, No. 2, pp. 293–305. Barkess, L. and R. Simnett (1994), ‘The Provision of Other Services by Auditors: Independence and Pricing Issues’, Accounting and Business Research, Vol. 24, No. 94, pp. 98–108. Basioudis, I.G. and S. Ellwood (2005a), ‘External Audit in the National Health Service in England and Wales: A Study of an Oversight Body's Control of Auditor Remuneration’, Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, Vol. 24, No. 2, pp. 207–41. Basioudis, I.G. and S. Ellwood (2005b), ‘An Empirical Investigation of Price Competition and Industry Specialisation in NHS Audit Services’, Financial Accountability & Management, Vol. 21, No. 2, pp. 219–50. Beattie, V., A. Goodacre, K. Pratt and J. Stevenson (2001), ‘The Determinants of Audit Fees – Evidence from the Voluntary Sector’, Accounting and Business Research, Vol. 31, No. 4, pp. 243–74. Beatty, R. (1989), ‘Auditor Reputation and the Pricing of Initial Public Offerings’, Accounting Review, Vol. LXIV, No. 4, pp. 693–709. Breusch, T. and A. Pagan (1979), ‘A Simple Test for Heteroskedasticity and Random Coefficient Variation’, Econometrica, Vol. 47, pp. 1287–94. Brinn, T., M. Peel and R. Roberts (1994), ‘Audit Fee Determinants of Independent and Subsidiary Unquoted Companies in the UK: An Exploratory Study’, British Accounting Review, Vol. 26, No. 2, pp. 101–21. Chan, P., M. Ezzamel and D. Gwilliam (1993), ‘Determinants of Audit Fees for Quoted UK Companies’, Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Vol. 20, No. 6, pp. 765–86. Chidgey, P. and S. Stone (2002), Implementing GAAS 2002/2003 (Croner.CCH, London ). Clatworthy, M.A., H.J. Mellett and M.J. Peel (2000), ‘External Audit Fee Levels in NHS Trusts’, Public Money and Management, Vol. 20, No. 1, pp. 63–68. Clatworthy, M.A., H.J. Mellett and M.J. Peel (2002), ‘The Market for External Audit Services in the Public Sector: An Empirical Analysis of NHS Trusts’, Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Vol. 29, No. 9, pp. 1399–439. Cook, R. (1977), ‘Detection of Influential Observations in Linear Regression’, Technometrics, Vol. 19, pp. 15–18. Copley, P. (1989a), ‘The Determinants of Local Government Audit Fees: Additional Evidence’, Research in Governmental and Nonprofit Accounting, Vol. 5, pp. 3–23. Copley, P. (1989b), ‘ Municipal Audit Fees: A Survey and Analysis’, Government Finance Review (October), pp. 21–23. Crace, J. (2003), ‘ Some Universities are Risking Insolvency by their Borrowing Choices’, The Guardian Education (June 24). Craswell, A. and J. Francis (1999), ‘Pricing Initial Audit Engagements: A Test of Competing Theories’, The Accounting Review, Vol. 74, No. 2, pp. 201–16. Craswell, A. and J. Francis and S. Taylor (1995), ‘Auditor Brand Name Reputations and Industry Specializations’, Journal of Accounting and Economics, Vol. 20, pp. 297–322. CUR (2001), ‘ CAPSA and its Implementation: Interim Statement by the Board of Scrutiny’, Cambridge University Reporter (21 November). Davidson, R. and J.G. MacKinnon (2004), Econometric Theory and Methods (Oxford University Press, Oxford ). Demski, J.S. and R.J. Swieringa (1974), ‘A Cooperative Formulation of the Audit Choice Problem’, The Accounting Review, Vol. 49, No. 2, pp. 506–13. Ezzamel, M., D. Gwilliam and K. Holland (1996), ‘Some Empirical Evidence from Publicly Quoted Companies on the Relationship between the Pricing of Audit and Non-audit Services’, Accounting and Business Research, Vol. 27, No. 1, pp. 3–16. Firth, M. (1990), ‘Auditor Reputation: The Impact of Critical Reports Issued by Government Inspectors’, RAND Journal of Economics, Vol. 21, No. 3, pp. 374–87. Firth, M. (1997), ‘The Provision of Non-Audit Services and the Pricing of Audit Fees’, Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Vol. 24, No. 3, pp. 551–25. Francis, J. (1984), ‘The Effects of Audit Firm Size on Audit Prices: A Study of the Australian Market’, Journal of Accounting and Economics, Vol. 6 (August), pp. 133–51. Gray, R. and J. Haslam (1990), ‘External Reporting by UK Universities: An Exploratory Study of Accounting Change’, Financial Accountability & Management, Vol. 6, No. 1, pp. 51–72. Gregory, A. and P. Collier (1996), ‘Audit Fees and Auditor Change: An Investigation of the Persistence of Fee Reduction by Type of Change’, Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Vol. 23, No. 1, pp. 13–28. Gugler, K. (2003), ‘Corporate Governance and Investment’, International Journal of the Economics of Business, Vol. 10, No. 3, pp. 261–89. Iyer, M. and G. Iyer (1996), ‘Effect of Big 8 Mergers on Audit Fees: Evidence from the United Kingdom’, Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, Vol. 15, No. 2, pp. 123–32. Johnsen, A., P. Meklin, L. Oulasvirta and J. Vakkuri (2004), ‘Governance Structures and Contracting Out Municipal Auditing in Finland and Norway’, Financial Accountability & Management, Vol. 20, No. 4, pp. 445–77. Lapsley, I. and P. Miller (2004), ‘Transforming Universities: The Uncertain, Erratic Path’, Financial Accountability & Managemen, Vol. 20, No. 2, pp. 103–6. Larcker, D. and T. Rusticus (2005), On the Use of Instrumental Variables in Accounting Research, The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania Working Paper . Maddala, G. (1992), Introduction to Econometrics ( 2nd ed., Prentice-Hall International, London ). Moizer, P. (1997), ‘Auditor Reputation: The International Empirical Evidence’, International Journal of Auditing, Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 61–74. Norusis, V. (1988), SPSS-X Users Guide (SPCC Inc., Chicago ). Palmrose, Z. (1986), ‘The Effect of Non-Audit Services on the Pricing of Audit Services: Further Evidence’, Journal of Accounting Research, Vol. 24, No. 2, pp. 405–11. Peel, M. and M. Clatworthy (2001), ‘The Relationship between Governance Structure and Audit Fees Pre-Cadbury: Some Empirical Evidence’, Corporate Governance: An International Review, Vol. 9, No. 4, pp. 286–97. Peel, M. and R. Roberts (2003), ‘Audit Fee Determinants and Auditor Premiums: Evidence from the Micro-firm Sub-Market’, Accounting and Business Research, Vol. 33, No. 3, pp. 207–33. Pong, C. and G. Whittington (1994), ‘The Determinants of Audit Fees: Some Empirical Models’, Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Vol. 21, No. 8, pp. 1071–95. Power, M. (1997), The Audit Society: Rituals of Verification (OUP, Oxford ). Ramsey, J. (1969), ‘Tests for Specification Errors in Classical Linear Least Squares Regression Analysis’, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, Vol. 31, pp. 350–71. Revell, P. (2003), ‘ Education: A Theft Too Far’, The Guardian (16 September), p. 4. Roberts, R. and G. Glezen (1990), ‘Determinants of School District Audit Fees’, Research in Governmental and Non-profit Accounting, Vol. 6, pp. 127–47. Rubin, M. (1988), ‘Municipal Audit Fee Determinants’, The Accounting Review, Vol. 63, No. 2, pp. 219–36. Shattock, M. (1988), ‘Financial Management in Universities: The Lessons from University College, Cardiff’, Financial Accountability & Management, Vol. 4, No. 2, pp. 99–112. Shattock, M. (2003), ‘ University Makeover’, Guardian Education (9 December), p. 21 Simon, D. and J. Francis (1988), ‘The Effects of Auditor Change on Audit Fees: Tests of Price Cutting and Price Recovery’, The Accounting Review, Vol. 63, No. 2, pp. 255–69. Simunic, D. (1980), ‘The Pricing of Audit Services: Theory and Evidence’, Journal of Accounting Research, Vol. 18, No. 1, pp. 161–90. Simunic, D. (1984), ‘Auditing, Consulting and Auditor Independence’, Journal of Accounting Research, Vol. 22, No. 2, pp. 679–702. Taffler, R. and K. Ramalinggam (1982), The Determinants of the Audit Fee in the UK: An Exploratory Study, The City University Business School , London, Working Paper No. 37. Teoh, S.H. and T.J. Wong (1993), ‘Perceived Auditor Quality and the Earnings Response Coefficient’, Accounting Review, Vol. LXVII, No. 2, pp. 346–66. Vasager, J. (2003), ‘ Headmistress Who Stole from School Gets Five Years: Judge Asks How Accountants Failed to Spot £500000 Theft’, The Guardian (2 September), p. 6. Wallace, W. (1987), ‘The Economic Role of the Audit in Free and Regulated Markets: A Review’, Research in Accounting Regulation, Vol. 1, pp. 7–34. Ward, D., R. Elder and S. Kattelus (1994), ‘Further Evidence on the Determinants of Municipal Audit Fees’, The Accounting Review, Vol. 69, No. 2, pp. 399–411. Whisenant, S., S. Sankaraguruswamy and R. Raghunandan (2003), ‘Evidence on the Joint Determination of Audit and Non-Audit Fees’, The Journal of Accounting Research, Vol. 41, No. 4, pp. 721–44. Yardley, J., N. Kauffman, T. Cairney and W. Albrecht (1992), ‘Supplier Behaviour in the US Audit Market’, Journal of Accounting Literature, Vol. 24, No. 2, pp. 405–11. Citing Literature Volume23, Issue2May 2007Pages 155-188 ReferencesRelatedInformation" @default.
• W2148658693 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2148658693 creator A5054173989 @default.
• W2148658693 creator A5055829880 @default.
• W2148658693 creator A5080106517 @default.
• W2148658693 date "2007-05-01" @default.
• W2148658693 modified "2023-10-16" @default.
• W2148658693 title "AUDIT FEE DETERMINANTS IN THE UK UNIVERSITY SECTOR" @default.
• W2148658693 cites W1549788403 @default.
• W2148658693 cites W1966770588 @default.
• W2148658693 cites W1967529433 @default.
• W2148658693 cites W1980670357 @default.
• W2148658693 cites W1986304424 @default.
• W2148658693 cites W1992216167 @default.
• W2148658693 cites W1996615803 @default.
• W2148658693 cites W2013389014 @default.
• W2148658693 cites W2016480715 @default.
• W2148658693 cites W2022840860 @default.
• W2148658693 cites W2047181870 @default.
• W2148658693 cites W2060806362 @default.
• W2148658693 cites W2071646736 @default.
• W2148658693 cites W2074095290 @default.
• W2148658693 cites W2081724247 @default.
• W2148658693 cites W2088037186 @default.
• W2148658693 cites W2094329355 @default.
• W2148658693 cites W2095216792 @default.
• W2148658693 cites W2108724918 @default.
• W2148658693 cites W2147918236 @default.
• W2148658693 cites W2155653861 @default.
• W2148658693 cites W2158752536 @default.
• W2148658693 cites W2168376576 @default.
• W2148658693 cites W2315439995 @default.
• W2148658693 cites W2327127881 @default.
• W2148658693 cites W2963263835 @default.
• W2148658693 cites W3122477143 @default.
• W2148658693 cites W3124475441 @default.
• W2148658693 cites W3124479255 @default.
• W2148658693 cites W3124895982 @default.
• W2148658693 cites W3125475238 @default.
• W2148658693 cites W4214531382 @default.
• W2148658693 doi "https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0408.2007.00424.x" @default.
• W2148658693 hasPublicationYear "2007" @default.
• W2148658693 type Work @default.
• W2148658693 sameAs 2148658693 @default.
• W2148658693 citedByCount "20" @default.
• W2148658693 countsByYear W21486586932012 @default.
• W2148658693 countsByYear W21486586932013 @default.
• W2148658693 countsByYear W21486586932014 @default.
• W2148658693 countsByYear W21486586932015 @default.
• W2148658693 countsByYear W21486586932016 @default.
• W2148658693 countsByYear W21486586932017 @default.
• W2148658693 countsByYear W21486586932018 @default.
• W2148658693 countsByYear W21486586932019 @default.
• W2148658693 countsByYear W21486586932021 @default.
• W2148658693 countsByYear W21486586932023 @default.
• W2148658693 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2148658693 hasAuthorship W2148658693A5054173989 @default.
• W2148658693 hasAuthorship W2148658693A5055829880 @default.
• W2148658693 hasAuthorship W2148658693A5080106517 @default.
• W2148658693 hasConcept C121955636 @default.
• W2148658693 hasConcept C137725906 @default.
• W2148658693 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
• W2148658693 hasConcept C199521495 @default.
• W2148658693 hasConceptScore W2148658693C121955636 @default.
• W2148658693 hasConceptScore W2148658693C137725906 @default.
• W2148658693 hasConceptScore W2148658693C144133560 @default.
• W2148658693 hasConceptScore W2148658693C199521495 @default.
• W2148658693 hasIssue "2" @default.
• W2148658693 hasLocation W21486586931 @default.
• W2148658693 hasOpenAccess W2148658693 @default.
• W2148658693 hasPrimaryLocation W21486586931 @default.
• W2148658693 hasRelatedWork W1552135273 @default.
• W2148658693 hasRelatedWork W1967231687 @default.
• W2148658693 hasRelatedWork W2075288496 @default.
• W2148658693 hasRelatedWork W2370876720 @default.
• W2148658693 hasRelatedWork W2585110990 @default.
• W2148658693 hasRelatedWork W2752119254 @default.
• W2148658693 hasRelatedWork W2914006595 @default.
• W2148658693 hasRelatedWork W3101499207 @default.
• W2148658693 hasRelatedWork W3120694592 @default.
• W2148658693 hasRelatedWork W621346424 @default.
• W2148658693 hasVolume "23" @default.
• W2148658693 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2148658693 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2148658693 magId "2148658693" @default.
• W2148658693 workType "article" @default.