FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2148759898> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2148759898 endingPage "202" @default.
• W2148759898 startingPage "199" @default.
• W2148759898 abstract "No AccessJournal of UrologyAdult urology1 Jan 2007The Urgency Perception Score: Validation and Test-Retest Jerry G. Blaivas, Georgia Panagopoulos, Jeffrey P. Weiss, Chandra Somaroo, and David C. Chaikin Jerry G. BlaivasJerry G. Blaivas Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, New York More articles by this author , Georgia PanagopoulosGeorgia Panagopoulos Lenox Hill Hospital, New York, New York More articles by this author , Jeffrey P. WeissJeffrey P. Weiss Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, New York More articles by this author , Chandra SomarooChandra Somaroo UroCenter of New York, New York, New York More articles by this author , and David C. ChaikinDavid C. Chaikin Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, New York More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2006.08.091AboutFull TextPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail Abstract Purpose: We validate a grading system for urinary urgency. Materials and Methods: A total of 225 subjects participated in a validation study of a fixed format question that examined the reasons why an individual usually voids. The response comprised 5 graded categories. The written questionnaire was completed by the subject twice in 3 to 14 days, during which there was no change in symptoms. Subjects included asymptomatic normal volunteers and consecutive patients with lower urinary tract symptoms without urinary urgency and those with overactive bladder with or without other lower urinary tract symptoms. Content validity was established by an expert panel. Discriminant validity was assessed by examining the frequency of responses in the various categories across the 3 groups (chi-square test) and by comparing average scores in each of the 3 groups using 1-way ANOVA, followed by LSD post hoc tests. Test-retest reliability was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient and κ coefficient. Results: A total of 83 normal subjects, 62 patients with lower urinary tract symptoms and 80 patients with overactive bladder were included in the study. Median age was 71 years (range 21 to 97). For test-retest reliability the intraclass correlation coefficient (0.86) and κ coefficient (0.68) indicated a good level of agreement (p <0.001). The overactive bladder group achieved a significantly higher score than the normal and lower urinary tract symptoms groups (mean ± SD 2.5 ± 0.99 vs 1.6 ± 0.93 and 1.8 ± 0.93, respectively, each p <0.001). Conclusions: The urgency perception score appears to be a valid and reliable means of grading urinary urgency. We believe that this method of grading urgency will prove to be more clinically useful than the simple yes/no characterization of urgency as a sudden compelling desire to void and it will be a useful item for questionnaires and diary keeping. References 1 : The standardisation of terminology of lower urinary tract function: report from the Standardisation sub-committee of the international continence society. Neurourol Urodyn2002; 21: 167. Google Scholar 2 : Frequency-volume charts: a tool to evaluate bladder sensation. Neurourol Urodyn2003; 22: 638. Google Scholar 3 : The role of urinary urgency and its measurement in the overactive bladder symptom syndrome: Current concepts and future prospects. BJU Int2005; 95: 335. Google Scholar 4 : A validated patient reported measure of urinary urgency severity in overactive bladder for use in clinical trials. J Urol2005; 174: 604. Link, Google Scholar 5 : The overactive bladder-symptom composite score: a composite symptom score of toilet voids, urgency severity and urge urinary incontinence in patients with overactive bladder. J Urol2005; 173: 1639. Link, Google Scholar © 2007 by American Urological AssociationFiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited byTownsend J (2016) Development and Pilot Testing of a New Bladder Diary Format: Phase 1Urology Practice, VOL. 3, NO. 3, (218-223), Online publication date: 1-May-2016.Heeringa R, van Koeveringe G, Winkens B, van Kerrebroeck P and de Wachter S (2011) Degree of Urge, Perception of Bladder Fullness and Bladder Volume—How are They Related?Journal of Urology, VOL. 186, NO. 4, (1352-1357), Online publication date: 1-Oct-2011.Blaivas J (2010) Urodynamics for the Evaluation of Painful Bladder Syndrome/Interstitial CystitisJournal of Urology, VOL. 184, NO. 1, (16-17), Online publication date: 1-Jul-2010.Twiss C, Triaca V, Anger J, Patel M, Smith A, Kim J, Raz S and Rodríguez L (2009) Validating the Incontinence Symptom Severity Index: A Self-Assessment Instrument for Voiding Symptom Severity in WomenJournal of Urology, VOL. 182, NO. 5, (2384-2391), Online publication date: 1-Nov-2009.Rapp D, Neil N, Govier F and Kobashi K (2009) Bladder Sensation Measures and Overactive BladderJournal of Urology, VOL. 182, NO. 3, (1050-1054), Online publication date: 1-Sep-2009.Blaivas J, Panagopoulos G, Weiss J and Somaroo C (2007) Validation of the Overactive Bladder Symptom ScoreJournal of Urology, VOL. 178, NO. 2, (543-547), Online publication date: 1-Aug-2007. Volume 177Issue 1January 2007Page: 199-202 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2007 by American Urological AssociationKeywordsurination disordersquestionnairesbladderMetricsAuthor Information Jerry G. Blaivas Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, New York More articles by this author Georgia Panagopoulos Lenox Hill Hospital, New York, New York More articles by this author Jeffrey P. Weiss Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, New York More articles by this author Chandra Somaroo UroCenter of New York, New York, New York More articles by this author David C. Chaikin Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, New York More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ..." @default.
• W2148759898 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2148759898 creator A5004806685 @default.
• W2148759898 creator A5024950152 @default.
• W2148759898 creator A5062874659 @default.
• W2148759898 creator A5083728390 @default.
• W2148759898 creator A5089899876 @default.
• W2148759898 date "2007-01-01" @default.
• W2148759898 modified "2023-10-03" @default.
• W2148759898 title "The Urgency Perception Score: Validation and Test-Retest" @default.
• W2148759898 cites W1967312126 @default.
• W2148759898 cites W1987343995 @default.
• W2148759898 cites W1996242258 @default.
• W2148759898 cites W2064038683 @default.
• W2148759898 cites W2116833336 @default.
• W2148759898 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2006.08.091" @default.
• W2148759898 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17162042" @default.
• W2148759898 hasPublicationYear "2007" @default.
• W2148759898 type Work @default.
• W2148759898 sameAs 2148759898 @default.
• W2148759898 citedByCount "58" @default.
• W2148759898 countsByYear W21487598982012 @default.
• W2148759898 countsByYear W21487598982013 @default.
• W2148759898 countsByYear W21487598982014 @default.
• W2148759898 countsByYear W21487598982015 @default.
• W2148759898 countsByYear W21487598982016 @default.
• W2148759898 countsByYear W21487598982018 @default.
• W2148759898 countsByYear W21487598982019 @default.
• W2148759898 countsByYear W21487598982020 @default.
• W2148759898 countsByYear W21487598982021 @default.
• W2148759898 countsByYear W21487598982022 @default.
• W2148759898 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2148759898 hasAuthorship W2148759898A5004806685 @default.
• W2148759898 hasAuthorship W2148759898A5024950152 @default.
• W2148759898 hasAuthorship W2148759898A5062874659 @default.
• W2148759898 hasAuthorship W2148759898A5083728390 @default.
• W2148759898 hasAuthorship W2148759898A5089899876 @default.
• W2148759898 hasConcept C120107772 @default.
• W2148759898 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W2148759898 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
• W2148759898 hasConcept C147176958 @default.
• W2148759898 hasConcept C151730666 @default.
• W2148759898 hasConcept C171606756 @default.
• W2148759898 hasConcept C204787440 @default.
• W2148759898 hasConcept C2777267654 @default.
• W2148759898 hasConcept C2777286243 @default.
• W2148759898 hasConcept C2778941218 @default.
• W2148759898 hasConcept C3018868096 @default.
• W2148759898 hasConcept C70410870 @default.
• W2148759898 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2148759898 hasConcept C74909509 @default.
• W2148759898 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W2148759898 hasConceptScore W2148759898C120107772 @default.
• W2148759898 hasConceptScore W2148759898C127413603 @default.
• W2148759898 hasConceptScore W2148759898C142724271 @default.
• W2148759898 hasConceptScore W2148759898C147176958 @default.
• W2148759898 hasConceptScore W2148759898C151730666 @default.
• W2148759898 hasConceptScore W2148759898C171606756 @default.
• W2148759898 hasConceptScore W2148759898C204787440 @default.
• W2148759898 hasConceptScore W2148759898C2777267654 @default.
• W2148759898 hasConceptScore W2148759898C2777286243 @default.
• W2148759898 hasConceptScore W2148759898C2778941218 @default.
• W2148759898 hasConceptScore W2148759898C3018868096 @default.
• W2148759898 hasConceptScore W2148759898C70410870 @default.
• W2148759898 hasConceptScore W2148759898C71924100 @default.
• W2148759898 hasConceptScore W2148759898C74909509 @default.
• W2148759898 hasConceptScore W2148759898C86803240 @default.
• W2148759898 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W2148759898 hasLocation W21487598981 @default.
• W2148759898 hasLocation W21487598982 @default.
• W2148759898 hasOpenAccess W2148759898 @default.
• W2148759898 hasPrimaryLocation W21487598981 @default.
• W2148759898 hasRelatedWork W2004171362 @default.
• W2148759898 hasRelatedWork W2219152298 @default.
• W2148759898 hasRelatedWork W2386104210 @default.
• W2148759898 hasRelatedWork W2619573964 @default.
• W2148759898 hasRelatedWork W2802050200 @default.
• W2148759898 hasRelatedWork W2911504947 @default.
• W2148759898 hasRelatedWork W291973568 @default.
• W2148759898 hasRelatedWork W3044762901 @default.
• W2148759898 hasRelatedWork W3089556105 @default.
• W2148759898 hasRelatedWork W3108460588 @default.
• W2148759898 hasVolume "177" @default.
• W2148759898 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2148759898 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2148759898 magId "2148759898" @default.
• W2148759898 workType "article" @default.