FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2148942576> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2148942576 endingPage "358" @default.
• W2148942576 startingPage "353" @default.
• W2148942576 abstract "GENE R. NIGHOL [*] I have good deal of interest in the topic of this panel, Administration and Individual Rights. Given that, it was difficult to choose between the two papers for comment. There is good deal to agree with in Professor Volokh's effort--particularly the notion that, even in these new arenas, traditional First Amendment concerns have real merit. [1] It is likely, though, that Professor Volokh and I would set up shop at different places on the slippery side of the slope. Professor Volokh himself acknowledges that the harassment issues he focuses on have not actually been major sources of attention for the Clinton Administration. [2] Indeed, it is remarkably hard to believe that one of President Clinton's principal legacies will be that Americans talk less about sex in the workplace than they did before he came to office. It might have been preferable, therefore, to explore the President's willingness to go along with the Communications Decency Act (CDA). [3] Alternatively, we might have delved into the Administration's efforts to defend the CDA in Reno v. that reduced Justice Stevens to sounding like he had borrowed Justice Scalia's word processor. Stevens characterized the government's position as singularly unpersuasive, [5] seriously flawed, [6] based on incorrect factual premises, [7] reaching a breadth of ... coverage ... wholly unprecedented, [8] and casting ... dark shadow over free speech [9] in the United States. We might also productively have criticized the President's hugely unfortunate ask, don't tell policy. [10] Even if well motivated, ask now results in about twice as many exclusions of lesbians and gay men from the Armed Forces as occurred before its implementation. [11] In stark terms, it tells people who are not unfit to serve their country that they are. [12] Now, ask is apparently being applied against gay, Republican Arizona legislator--effectively punishing him for statements made in open debate, on the floor of the statehouse. [13] One wonders what Alexander Mieklejohn would have thought of that. [14] Unlike the harassment strains Professor Volokh decries, the embrace of the CDA and the development and enforcement of ask, don't tell are clear Clinton Administration policies aimed at dramatically curtailing freedom of expression. There is also much to applaud in Professor Wax's paper. [15] She presents powerful arguments, for example, that the brief against government involvement in welfare is overblown. [16] However, as she indicates, the focus of her effort is to defeat the normative claim that right to basic economic security should be included in the federal Constitution. [17] People can accuse President Clinton of many things, and they have, but attempting to privilege and to constitutionalize welfare entitlements is surely not one of them. I am notoriously bad political pundit, but even I am confident that few political movements in the United States enjoy more profound and unshakable dormancy than the effort to constitutionalize right to subsistence welfare. The argument that Professor Wax goes to such profound lengths to defeat, partially based somehow on her reported perceptions of actual popular sentiment, has about as much vitality in American political discourse as the move to establish monarchy on this side of the Atlantic. It is unlikely that it even rises to the level of straw man. In my opinion, it might have been more useful to discuss the President's decisions on welfare reform. More specifically, it would have been interesting to explore the Administration's feverish efforts to defend Governor Pete Wilson's scheme to discriminate against newly arrived California welfare recipients. [18] The Wilson plan, which relegated welfare candidates who had lived in California less than one year to the amount of funding they could have obtained in their prior state of residence, was thrown out rather unceremoniously by the Supreme Court in Saenz v. …" @default.
• W2148942576 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2148942576 creator A5091653187 @default.
• W2148942576 date "2000-01-01" @default.
• W2148942576 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W2148942576 title "Taking Economic Equality Off the Table" @default.
• W2148942576 hasPublicationYear "2000" @default.
• W2148942576 type Work @default.
• W2148942576 sameAs 2148942576 @default.
• W2148942576 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W2148942576 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2148942576 hasAuthorship W2148942576A5091653187 @default.
• W2148942576 hasConcept C111919701 @default.
• W2148942576 hasConcept C117797892 @default.
• W2148942576 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W2148942576 hasConcept C139621336 @default.
• W2148942576 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W2148942576 hasConcept C144559511 @default.
• W2148942576 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2148942576 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2148942576 hasConcept C190253527 @default.
• W2148942576 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2148942576 hasConcept C2778137410 @default.
• W2148942576 hasConcept C2778976716 @default.
• W2148942576 hasConcept C2779173956 @default.
• W2148942576 hasConcept C2780765947 @default.
• W2148942576 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2148942576 hasConcept C41895202 @default.
• W2148942576 hasConcept C542102704 @default.
• W2148942576 hasConceptScore W2148942576C111919701 @default.
• W2148942576 hasConceptScore W2148942576C117797892 @default.
• W2148942576 hasConceptScore W2148942576C138885662 @default.
• W2148942576 hasConceptScore W2148942576C139621336 @default.
• W2148942576 hasConceptScore W2148942576C144024400 @default.
• W2148942576 hasConceptScore W2148942576C144559511 @default.
• W2148942576 hasConceptScore W2148942576C15744967 @default.
• W2148942576 hasConceptScore W2148942576C17744445 @default.
• W2148942576 hasConceptScore W2148942576C190253527 @default.
• W2148942576 hasConceptScore W2148942576C199539241 @default.
• W2148942576 hasConceptScore W2148942576C2778137410 @default.
• W2148942576 hasConceptScore W2148942576C2778976716 @default.
• W2148942576 hasConceptScore W2148942576C2779173956 @default.
• W2148942576 hasConceptScore W2148942576C2780765947 @default.
• W2148942576 hasConceptScore W2148942576C41008148 @default.
• W2148942576 hasConceptScore W2148942576C41895202 @default.
• W2148942576 hasConceptScore W2148942576C542102704 @default.
• W2148942576 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W2148942576 hasLocation W21489425761 @default.
• W2148942576 hasOpenAccess W2148942576 @default.
• W2148942576 hasPrimaryLocation W21489425761 @default.
• W2148942576 hasRelatedWork W1985943696 @default.
• W2148942576 hasRelatedWork W2114177905 @default.
• W2148942576 hasRelatedWork W2141267101 @default.
• W2148942576 hasRelatedWork W228598057 @default.
• W2148942576 hasRelatedWork W2329154810 @default.
• W2148942576 hasRelatedWork W2333852757 @default.
• W2148942576 hasRelatedWork W2479345069 @default.
• W2148942576 hasRelatedWork W2649137250 @default.
• W2148942576 hasRelatedWork W2728191287 @default.
• W2148942576 hasRelatedWork W283228578 @default.
• W2148942576 hasRelatedWork W307833125 @default.
• W2148942576 hasRelatedWork W3123742093 @default.
• W2148942576 hasRelatedWork W317059631 @default.
• W2148942576 hasRelatedWork W3180940892 @default.
• W2148942576 hasRelatedWork W334528045 @default.
• W2148942576 hasRelatedWork W341549828 @default.
• W2148942576 hasRelatedWork W790525290 @default.
• W2148942576 hasRelatedWork W1484411063 @default.
• W2148942576 hasRelatedWork W2593534809 @default.
• W2148942576 hasRelatedWork W259703912 @default.
• W2148942576 hasVolume "63" @default.
• W2148942576 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2148942576 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2148942576 magId "2148942576" @default.
• W2148942576 workType "article" @default.