FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2149103136> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2149103136 endingPage "508" @default.
• W2149103136 startingPage "483" @default.
• W2149103136 abstract "Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and ManagementVol. 03, No. 04, pp. 483-508 (2001) No AccessTOWARDS A STRUCTURED APPROACH TO STRATEGIC ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENTBRAM F. NOBLE and KEITH STOREYBRAM F. NOBLEDepartment of Geography, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, Newfoundland, Canada, A1B 3X9, Canada Search for more papers by this author and KEITH STOREYDepartment of Geography, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, Newfoundland, Canada, A1B 3X9, Canada Search for more papers by this author https://doi.org/10.1142/S1464333201000832Cited by:41 PreviousNext AboutSectionsPDF/EPUB ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsRecommend to Library ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditEmail AbstractConsiderable attention has been given to the role of strategic environmental assessment (SEA) in policy, plan and program assessment; however, there is very little consensus on an appropriate methodology for SEA. Two basic perspectives on SEA methodology emerge from the literature: first, that appropriate SEA methodologies are readily available based on the application of project-level EIA approaches to strategic assessment questions and second, that SEA requires a different, more broad-brush approach than project-level EIA. If SEA is to advance in application and effectiveness, then appropriate SEA methodologies need to be established. Despite calls for SEA to develop more independently of project-level assessment, existing SEA methodologies tend to be based on project-level EIA principles. It is argued here that while SEA can perhaps utilise many of the existing methods from project-level EIA, it requires a different, more broad-brush, but structured methodological approach. This paper reviews the current state-of-the-art of SEA methodology, and presents a generic SEA methodological framework and example based on the notion of the best practicable environmental option.Keywords:strategic environmental assessment methodologymethodstechniques and methodologySEA principles and characteristicsSEA frameworkmulti-criteria problemsDelphi technique FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited By 41Integrating low-carbon development issues into strategic environmental assessment: insights from TanzaniaAmani G. Rweyendela, Noah M. Pauline and Godwin A. Lema4 December 2022 | Climate and Development, Vol. 11Transparent and consistent? Aquaculture impact assessments and trade-offs in coastal zone planning in NorwayEirik Mikkelsen, Patrick Berg Sørdahl and Ann-Magnhild Solås1 Jun 2022 | Ocean & Coastal Management, Vol. 225ELECTRE III for Strategic Environmental Assessment: A “Phantom” ApproachFabrizio Battisti20 May 2022 | Sustainability, Vol. 14, No. 10The Potential of Strategic Environmental Assessment to Improve Urban Planning in Sierra LeonePrince T. Mabey, Wei Li, Abu J. Sundufu and Akhtar H. Lashari8 September 2021 | International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, Vol. 18, No. 18Licensing sustainability related aspects in Strategic Environmental Assessment. Evidence from Romania’s urban areasCristina-Gabriela Mitincu, Ioan-Cristian Ioja, Constantina-Alina Hossu, Martina Artmann and Andreea Nita et al.1 Sep 2021 | Land Use Policy, Vol. 108The Methods and Techniques of Strategic Environmental Assessment. Comparative Evaluation of Greek and International ExperienceAntonios Souloutzoglou and Anastasia Tasopoulou18 April 2020 | Sustainability, Vol. 12, No. 8Quality Criteria to Evaluate Performance and Scope of 2030 Agenda in Metropolitan Areas: Case Study on Strategic Planning of Environmental Municipality ManagementMaría de Fátima Poza-Vilches, José Gutiérrez-Pérez and María Teresa Pozo-Llorente8 January 2020 | International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, Vol. 17, No. 2The potential of strategic environmental assessment to reduce disaster risks through climate change adaptation in the coastal zone of BangladeshMd. Suzaul Islam and Yanrong Zhang14 Jan 2019 | International Journal of Climate Change Strategies and Management, Vol. 11, No. 1Conceptualizing strategic environmental assessment: Principles, approaches and research directionsBram Noble and Kelechi Nwanekezie1 Jan 2017 | Environmental Impact Assessment Review, Vol. 62Progressive Trends in the Uptake of SEA in South AsiaAkanksha Saxena, Asha Rajvanshi, and V. B. Mathur20 July 2016 | Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management, Vol. 18, No. 02First steps toward best practice SEA in a developing nation: lessons from the central Namib uranium rush SEAAyodele Olagunju and Jill A.E. Gunn21 August 2014 | Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, Vol. 33, No. 1PRESENT STATUS OF THE IMPLEMENTATION OF STRATEGIC ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT IN MEXICOJUAN CARLOS TEJEDA GONZÁLEZ, MA. CATALINA ALFARO DE LA TORRE, and PEDRO MEDELLÍN MILÁN10 July 2014 | Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management, Vol. 16, No. 02STRATEGIC ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT (SEA) OF SOCIO-ECONOMIC SYSTEMS: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEWJolanta Tamošaitienė and Oleg Kapliński12 Dec 2013 | Technological and Economic Development of Economy, Vol. 19, No. 4STRATEGIC ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT BEST PRACTICE PROCESS ELEMENTS AND OUTCOMES IN THE INTERNATIONAL ELECTRICITY SECTORLISA NICOLE WHITE and BRAM F. NOBLE3 June 2013 | Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management, Vol. 15, No. 02Integrazione della VAS nei processi di pianificazione: il PTCP di BeneventoMaria Cerreta and Pasquale De Toro1 Jun 2013 | SCIENZE REGIONALI, No. 2ADVANCING REGIONAL STRATEGIC ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT IN CANADA'S WESTERN ARCTIC: IMPLEMENTATION OPPORTUNITIES AND CHALLENGESCOURTNEY FIDLER and BRAM F. NOBLE24 March 2013 | Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management, Vol. 15, No. 01Strategic environmental assessment in the electricity sector: an application to electricity supply planning, Saskatchewan, CanadaLisa White and Bram Noble1 Dec 2012 | Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, Vol. 30, No. 4Survey of current methods and guidance for strategic environmental assessmentBram F. Noble, Jill Gunn and Jackie Martin1 Sep 2012 | Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, Vol. 30, No. 3Major Ecosystems in China: Dynamics and Challenges for Sustainable ManagementYihe Lü, Bojie Fu, Wei Wei, Xiubo Yu and Ranhao Sun7 May 2011 | Environmental Management, Vol. 48, No. 1Strategic environmental assessment application for sustainable transport-related air quality policies: a case study in Hanoi City, VietnamDuc Luong Nguyen and Nowarat Coowanitwong18 December 2010 | Environment, Development and Sustainability, Vol. 13, No. 3A conceptual basis and methodological framework for regional strategic environmental assessment (R-SEA)Jill Harriman Gunn and Bram F. Noble1 Dec 2009 | Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, Vol. 27, No. 4Integrating strategic environmental assessment into the review process of a development plan in IrelandLianda d'Auria and Micheál Ó Cinnéide1 Dec 2009 | Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, Vol. 27, No. 4INTEGRATING CUMULATIVE EFFECTS IN REGIONAL STRATEGIC ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FRAMEWORKS: LESSONS FROM PRACTICEJILL HARRIMAN GUNN and BRAM F. NOBLE21 November 2011 | Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management, Vol. 11, No. 03Environmental impact assessment framework by integrating scientific analysis and subjective perceptionC. C. Chen1 September 2009 | International Journal of Environmental Science & Technology, Vol. 6, No. 4STRATEGIC ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT IN FINLAND: AN EVALUATION OF THE SEA ACT APPLICATIONTARJA SÖDERMAN and TUOMAS KALLIO21 November 2011 | Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management, Vol. 11, No. 01Following-up in strategic environmental assessment: a case study of 20-year forest management planning in Saskatchewan, CanadaMaia Gachechiladze, Bram F. Noble and Brent W. Bitter1 Mar 2009 | Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, Vol. 27, No. 1Strategic approaches to regional cumulative effects assessmet: a case study of the Great Sand Hills, CanadaBram Noble1 Jun 2008 | Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, Vol. 26, No. 2Strategic Environmental Assessment of Greenhouse Gas Mitigation Options in the Canadian Agricultural SectorBram F. Noble and Lisa M. Christmas11 September 2007 | Environmental Management, Vol. 41, No. 1A QUALITY AND EFFECTIVENESS REVIEW PROTOCOL FOR STRATEGIC ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT (SEA) IN DEVELOPING COUNTRIESFRANCOIS RETIEF21 November 2011 | Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management, Vol. 09, No. 04A critical review of the dominant lines of argumentation on the need for strategic environmental assessmentOlivia Bina1 Oct 2007 | Environmental Impact Assessment Review, Vol. 27, No. 7The Rationale for SEA to Overcome the Inadequacy of Environmental Assessment in BangladeshHabib M. Alshuwaikhat, Syed Masiur Rahman and Yusuf Adedoyin Aina24 July 2016 | The Journal of Environment & Development, Vol. 16, No. 2Strategic environmental assessment (sea): A tool for environmental decision‐making.Margaret Desmond1 Jan 2007 | Irish Geography, Vol. 40, No. 1SUSTAINABILITY ASSESSMENT IN CONTEXT: ISSUES OF PROCESS, POLICY AND GOVERNANCEJENNY POPE and WILLIAM GRACE21 November 2011 | Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management, Vol. 08, No. 03CONTEXTUALISING AND CONCEPTUALISING THE REFORM OF ENVIRONMENTALLY HARMFUL SUBSIDIES IN GERMANYTILMANN RAVE21 November 2011 | Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management, Vol. 07, No. 04The place of strategic environmental assessment in the privatised electricity industryStephen Jay and Ross Marshall1 Dec 2005 | Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, Vol. 23, No. 4HAVING AN IMPACT? CONTEXT ELEMENTS FOR EFFECTIVE SEA APPLICATION IN TRANSPORT POLICY, PLAN AND PROGRAMME MAKINGTHOMAS B. FISCHER21 November 2011 | Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management, Vol. 07, No. 03AUDITING STRATEGIC ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT PRACTICE IN CANADABRAM F. NOBLE21 November 2011 | Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management, Vol. 05, No. 02Strategic environmental assessment of Canadian energy policyBram F. Noble1 Sep 2002 | Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, Vol. 20, No. 3AN INTERNATIONAL OVERVIEW OF STRATEGIC ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT, WITH REFERENCE TO WORLD HERITAGE AREAS GLOBALLY AND IN AUSTRALIAN COASTAL ZONESSIMON MARSDEN21 November 2011 | Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management, Vol. 04, No. 01SEA in CanadaNorma PowellBest Practice Use of SEA — Industry, Energy and Sustainable DevelopmentRoss Marshall and Thomas B. Fischer Recommended Vol. 03, No. 04 Metrics History Received 30 January 2001 Revised 12 October 2001 Accepted 12 October 2001 Keywordsstrategic environmental assessment methodologymethodstechniques and methodologySEA principles and characteristicsSEA frameworkmulti-criteria problemsDelphi techniquePDF download" @default.
• W2149103136 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2149103136 creator A5016477196 @default.
• W2149103136 creator A5027676058 @default.
• W2149103136 date "2001-12-01" @default.
• W2149103136 modified "2023-09-25" @default.
• W2149103136 title "Towards a Structured Approach to Strategic Environmental Assessment" @default.
• W2149103136 cites W141973991 @default.
• W2149103136 cites W1485924774 @default.
• W2149103136 cites W1513193450 @default.
• W2149103136 cites W1571084458 @default.
• W2149103136 cites W1579410671 @default.
• W2149103136 cites W1736698743 @default.
• W2149103136 cites W1979233339 @default.
• W2149103136 cites W1983131777 @default.
• W2149103136 cites W1984314602 @default.
• W2149103136 cites W1987608174 @default.
• W2149103136 cites W198952598 @default.
• W2149103136 cites W2017599891 @default.
• W2149103136 cites W2024030400 @default.
• W2149103136 cites W2027393004 @default.
• W2149103136 cites W2029226738 @default.
• W2149103136 cites W2039126250 @default.
• W2149103136 cites W2048937788 @default.
• W2149103136 cites W2050830574 @default.
• W2149103136 cites W2066533592 @default.
• W2149103136 cites W2068418180 @default.
• W2149103136 cites W2080297282 @default.
• W2149103136 cites W2085236647 @default.
• W2149103136 cites W2097393095 @default.
• W2149103136 cites W2100885023 @default.
• W2149103136 cites W2109679221 @default.
• W2149103136 cites W2115897395 @default.
• W2149103136 cites W2149657532 @default.
• W2149103136 cites W2150872285 @default.
• W2149103136 cites W2161109234 @default.
• W2149103136 cites W2161221668 @default.
• W2149103136 cites W2269826156 @default.
• W2149103136 cites W2408714605 @default.
• W2149103136 cites W2798684589 @default.
• W2149103136 cites W3005115464 @default.
• W2149103136 cites W3083909202 @default.
• W2149103136 cites W574698989 @default.
• W2149103136 cites W636233281 @default.
• W2149103136 cites W657448877 @default.
• W2149103136 cites W2613590530 @default.
• W2149103136 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/s1464-3332(01)00083-2" @default.
• W2149103136 hasPublicationYear "2001" @default.
• W2149103136 type Work @default.
• W2149103136 sameAs 2149103136 @default.
• W2149103136 citedByCount "34" @default.
• W2149103136 countsByYear W21491031362012 @default.
• W2149103136 countsByYear W21491031362013 @default.
• W2149103136 countsByYear W21491031362014 @default.
• W2149103136 countsByYear W21491031362015 @default.
• W2149103136 countsByYear W21491031362020 @default.
• W2149103136 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2149103136 hasAuthorship W2149103136A5016477196 @default.
• W2149103136 hasAuthorship W2149103136A5027676058 @default.
• W2149103136 hasConcept C107826830 @default.
• W2149103136 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W2149103136 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
• W2149103136 hasConcept C164749845 @default.
• W2149103136 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2149103136 hasConcept C195094911 @default.
• W2149103136 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2149103136 hasConcept C2780136672 @default.
• W2149103136 hasConcept C39432304 @default.
• W2149103136 hasConcept C539667460 @default.
• W2149103136 hasConcept C91375879 @default.
• W2149103136 hasConceptScore W2149103136C107826830 @default.
• W2149103136 hasConceptScore W2149103136C127413603 @default.
• W2149103136 hasConceptScore W2149103136C144133560 @default.
• W2149103136 hasConceptScore W2149103136C164749845 @default.
• W2149103136 hasConceptScore W2149103136C17744445 @default.
• W2149103136 hasConceptScore W2149103136C195094911 @default.
• W2149103136 hasConceptScore W2149103136C199539241 @default.
• W2149103136 hasConceptScore W2149103136C2780136672 @default.
• W2149103136 hasConceptScore W2149103136C39432304 @default.
• W2149103136 hasConceptScore W2149103136C539667460 @default.
• W2149103136 hasConceptScore W2149103136C91375879 @default.
• W2149103136 hasIssue "4" @default.
• W2149103136 hasLocation W21491031361 @default.
• W2149103136 hasOpenAccess W2149103136 @default.
• W2149103136 hasPrimaryLocation W21491031361 @default.
• W2149103136 hasRelatedWork W1970842528 @default.
• W2149103136 hasRelatedWork W1971747755 @default.
• W2149103136 hasRelatedWork W1993085404 @default.
• W2149103136 hasRelatedWork W2084895943 @default.
• W2149103136 hasRelatedWork W2142799383 @default.
• W2149103136 hasRelatedWork W2160911843 @default.
• W2149103136 hasRelatedWork W2404009542 @default.
• W2149103136 hasRelatedWork W267285166 @default.
• W2149103136 hasRelatedWork W285350595 @default.
• W2149103136 hasRelatedWork W4223635075 @default.
• W2149103136 hasVolume "3" @default.
• W2149103136 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2149103136 isRetracted "false" @default.

• next