FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2149201805> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2149201805 endingPage "1348" @default.
• W2149201805 startingPage "1337" @default.
• W2149201805 abstract "Abstract Aim Twelve per cent of the Earth’s terrestrial surface is covered by protected areas, but neither these areas nor the biodiversity they contain are evenly distributed spatially. To guide future establishment of protected areas, it is important to understand the factors that have shaped the spatial arrangement of the current protected area system. We used an information‐theoretic approach to assess the ability of vertebrate biodiversity measures, resource consumption and agricultural potential to explain the global coverage pattern of protected areas. Location Global. Methods For each of 762 World Wildlife Fund terrestrial ecoregions of the world, we measured protected area coverage, resource consumption, terrestrial vertebrate species richness, number of endemic species, number of threatened species, net primary production, elevation and topographic heterogeneity. We combined these variables into 39 a priori models to describe protected area coverage at the global scale, and for six biogeographical realms. Using the Akaike information criterion and Akaike weights, we identified the relative importance and influence of each variable in describing protected area coverage. Results Globally, the number of endemic species was the best variable describing protected area coverage, followed by the number of threatened species. Species richness and resource consumption were of moderate importance and agricultural potential had weak support for describing protected area coverage at a global scale. Yet, the relative importance of these factors varied among biogeographical realms. Measures of vertebrate biodiversity (species richness, endemism and threatened species) were among the most important variables in all realms, except the Indo‐Malayan, but had a wide range of relative importance and influence. Resource consumption was inversely related to protected area coverage across all but one realm (the Palearctic), most strongly in the Nearctic realm. Agricultural potential, despite having little support in describing protected area coverage globally, was strongly and positively related to protection in the Palearctic and Neotropical realms, as well as in the Indo‐Malayan realm. The Afrotropical, Indo‐Malayan and Australasian realms showed no clear, strong relationships between protected area coverage and the independent variables. Main conclusions Globally, the existing protected area network is more strongly related to biodiversity measures than to patterns of resource consumption or agricultural potential. However, the relative importance of these factors varies widely among the world’s biogeographical realms. Understanding the biases of the current protected area system may help to correct for them as future protected areas are added to the global network." @default.
• W2149201805 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2149201805 creator A5009887999 @default.
• W2149201805 creator A5042856750 @default.
• W2149201805 creator A5067207898 @default.
• W2149201805 creator A5067304506 @default.
• W2149201805 creator A5077954412 @default.
• W2149201805 date "2008-07-25" @default.
• W2149201805 modified "2023-09-30" @default.
• W2149201805 title "Explaining the global pattern of protected area coverage: relative importance of vertebrate biodiversity, human activities and agricultural suitability" @default.
• W2149201805 cites W1511066816 @default.
• W2149201805 cites W1966269030 @default.
• W2149201805 cites W1966498037 @default.
• W2149201805 cites W1970804419 @default.
• W2149201805 cites W1979086694 @default.
• W2149201805 cites W1979918324 @default.
• W2149201805 cites W1980362959 @default.
• W2149201805 cites W1982983840 @default.
• W2149201805 cites W1991383976 @default.
• W2149201805 cites W1996693176 @default.
• W2149201805 cites W2005515731 @default.
• W2149201805 cites W2011777898 @default.
• W2149201805 cites W2020382135 @default.
• W2149201805 cites W2022770993 @default.
• W2149201805 cites W2024439320 @default.
• W2149201805 cites W2025298183 @default.
• W2149201805 cites W2031104100 @default.
• W2149201805 cites W2040432283 @default.
• W2149201805 cites W2047002876 @default.
• W2149201805 cites W2062137739 @default.
• W2149201805 cites W2085991080 @default.
• W2149201805 cites W2091395676 @default.
• W2149201805 cites W2095240644 @default.
• W2149201805 cites W2103428199 @default.
• W2149201805 cites W2103819062 @default.
• W2149201805 cites W2108173127 @default.
• W2149201805 cites W2118472888 @default.
• W2149201805 cites W2119770676 @default.
• W2149201805 cites W2120294131 @default.
• W2149201805 cites W2121135734 @default.
• W2149201805 cites W2123880245 @default.
• W2149201805 cites W2145340043 @default.
• W2149201805 cites W2146904764 @default.
• W2149201805 cites W2148185586 @default.
• W2149201805 cites W2151688413 @default.
• W2149201805 cites W2152055504 @default.
• W2149201805 cites W2152944646 @default.
• W2149201805 cites W2155475871 @default.
• W2149201805 cites W2175151341 @default.
• W2149201805 cites W2272473773 @default.
• W2149201805 cites W2503801479 @default.
• W2149201805 doi "https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2699.2008.01899.x" @default.
• W2149201805 hasPublicationYear "2008" @default.
• W2149201805 type Work @default.
• W2149201805 sameAs 2149201805 @default.
• W2149201805 citedByCount "76" @default.
• W2149201805 countsByYear W21492018052012 @default.
• W2149201805 countsByYear W21492018052013 @default.
• W2149201805 countsByYear W21492018052014 @default.
• W2149201805 countsByYear W21492018052015 @default.
• W2149201805 countsByYear W21492018052017 @default.
• W2149201805 countsByYear W21492018052018 @default.
• W2149201805 countsByYear W21492018052019 @default.
• W2149201805 countsByYear W21492018052020 @default.
• W2149201805 countsByYear W21492018052021 @default.
• W2149201805 countsByYear W21492018052022 @default.
• W2149201805 countsByYear W21492018052023 @default.
• W2149201805 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2149201805 hasAuthorship W2149201805A5009887999 @default.
• W2149201805 hasAuthorship W2149201805A5042856750 @default.
• W2149201805 hasAuthorship W2149201805A5067207898 @default.
• W2149201805 hasAuthorship W2149201805A5067304506 @default.
• W2149201805 hasAuthorship W2149201805A5077954412 @default.
• W2149201805 hasConcept C130217890 @default.
• W2149201805 hasConcept C185933670 @default.
• W2149201805 hasConcept C187604713 @default.
• W2149201805 hasConcept C18903297 @default.
• W2149201805 hasConcept C205649164 @default.
• W2149201805 hasConcept C24518262 @default.
• W2149201805 hasConcept C2779223538 @default.
• W2149201805 hasConcept C53565203 @default.
• W2149201805 hasConcept C54286561 @default.
• W2149201805 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W2149201805 hasConceptScore W2149201805C130217890 @default.
• W2149201805 hasConceptScore W2149201805C185933670 @default.
• W2149201805 hasConceptScore W2149201805C187604713 @default.
• W2149201805 hasConceptScore W2149201805C18903297 @default.
• W2149201805 hasConceptScore W2149201805C205649164 @default.
• W2149201805 hasConceptScore W2149201805C24518262 @default.
• W2149201805 hasConceptScore W2149201805C2779223538 @default.
• W2149201805 hasConceptScore W2149201805C53565203 @default.
• W2149201805 hasConceptScore W2149201805C54286561 @default.
• W2149201805 hasConceptScore W2149201805C86803240 @default.
• W2149201805 hasIssue "8" @default.
• W2149201805 hasLocation W21492018051 @default.
• W2149201805 hasOpenAccess W2149201805 @default.
• W2149201805 hasPrimaryLocation W21492018051 @default.
• W2149201805 hasRelatedWork W1981422546 @default.

• next