Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2149455540> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 78 of
78
with 100 items per page.
- W2149455540 endingPage "745" @default.
- W2149455540 startingPage "745" @default.
- W2149455540 abstract "among lawyers. Most of this debate has focused on questions of jus ad bellum, in particular the legality of the attack on Iraq by the United States (US), the United Kingdom (UK) and their allies in March 2003. Questions of jus in bello have received less attention. This is unfortunate, because the occupation of Iraq by the US and the UK is one of the few instances in which States have accepted that the law of occupation is applicable to them. Hitherto the law of occupation has mostly been addressed in the context of the Israelioccupied territories. Israel denies that the law of occupation applies to those territories de jure, although it has stated that it applies the law de facto. In the case of Iraq, the situation was governed not only by the law of occupation but also by United Nations Security Council resolutions. The question is how these two legal instruments relate to each other. It is argued in this article that Resolution 1483 may have made certain inroads on the law of occupation. The goals set for the occupying powers in the resolution with regard to the political and economic transformation of Iraq, as well as the resolution’s reference to States contributing troops to the multinational stabilization force, opened up the possibility to go beyond some of the limits set by the law of occupation or even not to apply that law at all. A number of concrete examples are discussed below. This argument is based on the premise that the UN Security Council may derogate from international law when it is acting under Chapter VII of the UN Charter. The question whether and" @default.
- W2149455540 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W2149455540 creator A5085432441 @default.
- W2149455540 date "2004-12-01" @default.
- W2149455540 modified "2023-09-25" @default.
- W2149455540 title "Existentialism in Iraq: Security Council Resolution 1483 and the law of occupation" @default.
- W2149455540 cites W102484220 @default.
- W2149455540 cites W1508228007 @default.
- W2149455540 cites W1531879555 @default.
- W2149455540 cites W1964601677 @default.
- W2149455540 cites W1978603526 @default.
- W2149455540 cites W2038747104 @default.
- W2149455540 cites W2056708581 @default.
- W2149455540 cites W2079234278 @default.
- W2149455540 cites W2080805772 @default.
- W2149455540 cites W2085629214 @default.
- W2149455540 cites W2113966318 @default.
- W2149455540 cites W2140371437 @default.
- W2149455540 cites W2151677464 @default.
- W2149455540 cites W2253469339 @default.
- W2149455540 cites W2330716654 @default.
- W2149455540 cites W2505157640 @default.
- W2149455540 cites W2796330779 @default.
- W2149455540 cites W2801011348 @default.
- W2149455540 cites W2919180078 @default.
- W2149455540 cites W614251195 @default.
- W2149455540 doi "https://doi.org/10.1017/s1560775500180447" @default.
- W2149455540 hasPublicationYear "2004" @default.
- W2149455540 type Work @default.
- W2149455540 sameAs 2149455540 @default.
- W2149455540 citedByCount "15" @default.
- W2149455540 countsByYear W21494555402012 @default.
- W2149455540 countsByYear W21494555402013 @default.
- W2149455540 countsByYear W21494555402014 @default.
- W2149455540 countsByYear W21494555402015 @default.
- W2149455540 countsByYear W21494555402017 @default.
- W2149455540 countsByYear W21494555402019 @default.
- W2149455540 countsByYear W21494555402020 @default.
- W2149455540 countsByYear W21494555402022 @default.
- W2149455540 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2149455540 hasAuthorship W2149455540A5085432441 @default.
- W2149455540 hasConcept C127882523 @default.
- W2149455540 hasConcept C138268822 @default.
- W2149455540 hasConcept C154945302 @default.
- W2149455540 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
- W2149455540 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
- W2149455540 hasConcept C2991800021 @default.
- W2149455540 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
- W2149455540 hasConcept C94625758 @default.
- W2149455540 hasConceptScore W2149455540C127882523 @default.
- W2149455540 hasConceptScore W2149455540C138268822 @default.
- W2149455540 hasConceptScore W2149455540C154945302 @default.
- W2149455540 hasConceptScore W2149455540C17744445 @default.
- W2149455540 hasConceptScore W2149455540C199539241 @default.
- W2149455540 hasConceptScore W2149455540C2991800021 @default.
- W2149455540 hasConceptScore W2149455540C41008148 @default.
- W2149455540 hasConceptScore W2149455540C94625758 @default.
- W2149455540 hasIssue "856" @default.
- W2149455540 hasLocation W21494555401 @default.
- W2149455540 hasOpenAccess W2149455540 @default.
- W2149455540 hasPrimaryLocation W21494555401 @default.
- W2149455540 hasRelatedWork W1975745761 @default.
- W2149455540 hasRelatedWork W1976071287 @default.
- W2149455540 hasRelatedWork W1978071092 @default.
- W2149455540 hasRelatedWork W2016717044 @default.
- W2149455540 hasRelatedWork W2060473329 @default.
- W2149455540 hasRelatedWork W3153083994 @default.
- W2149455540 hasRelatedWork W4234480004 @default.
- W2149455540 hasRelatedWork W4239365760 @default.
- W2149455540 hasRelatedWork W4249232586 @default.
- W2149455540 hasRelatedWork W4252243707 @default.
- W2149455540 hasVolume "86" @default.
- W2149455540 isParatext "false" @default.
- W2149455540 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W2149455540 magId "2149455540" @default.
- W2149455540 workType "article" @default.