FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2149477488> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2149477488 endingPage "64" @default.
• W2149477488 startingPage "49" @default.
• W2149477488 abstract "One problem with the inversion of transient well test data is that it can yield a non-unique solution. The uncertainty resulting from this type of approach can only be resolved by considering information from another source such as geology. Geological information will help to define the interpretation model which will ensure the correct analysis of the well test data. The results of well test analyses are of little value to reservoir characterisation and modelling unless they can be explained from a geological point of view. This last step is what we refer to here as geological interpretation. Other sources of information which can help with well test analyses come from seismic surveys and petrophysics. Modern well test interpretation therefore consists of two major steps: analysis of the well test data; and interpretation of the results. In detail, this should include the following: 1 definition of an interpretation model — this requires the integration of geological, seismic and petrophysical data with transient pressure data 2 analysis of the well test data based on the interpretation model defined 3 geological interpretation of the results, which is necessary in order to explain or give meaning to the results. In this paper, we present a case study from a fluvial gas reservoir in the Gulf of Thailand which demonstrates these procedures. In the context of a defined geological environment, a transient pressure test has been fully analysed. Newly-developed software based on the finite element method has been used to forward model the test scenarios. This allowed the results of seismic and petrophysical analyses to be integrated into the well test model. This case study illustrates the integrated use of geological, petrophysical, well test and seismic attribute data in defining a reservoir model which respects both the reservoir geometry at some distance from the well location and also the reservoir's heterogeneity. We focus on a particular well in the Pattani Basin at which conventional well test analyses have been conducted. By considering the results of these analyses, forward modelling was carried out in which the drainage area was “cut” out of the structural map defined by seismic interpretation; also, the formation's internal heterogeneity was modelled according to well logs and petrophysical analyses. Finally, analytical and simulation results were compared with the transient pressure data. We conclude that the integration of geological, seismic, petrophysical and well test data greatly reduced uncertainties in well test interpretation. The consistency of the results and the fact that they satisfied all the relevant disciplines meant that much more confidence could be given to their interpretation." @default.
• W2149477488 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2149477488 creator A5021922848 @default.
• W2149477488 creator A5037465897 @default.
• W2149477488 creator A5082329078 @default.
• W2149477488 date "2003-01-01" @default.
• W2149477488 modified "2023-10-18" @default.
• W2149477488 title "GEOLOGICAL INTERPRETATION OF WELL TEST ANALYSIS: A CASE STUDY FROM A FLUVIAL RESERVOIR IN THE GULF OF THAILAND" @default.
• W2149477488 cites W2031878827 @default.
• W2149477488 cites W2032129680 @default.
• W2149477488 cites W2079698910 @default.
• W2149477488 cites W2126750165 @default.
• W2149477488 cites W2329605659 @default.
• W2149477488 cites W2495246956 @default.
• W2149477488 doi "https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-5457.2003.tb00017.x" @default.
• W2149477488 hasPublicationYear "2003" @default.
• W2149477488 type Work @default.
• W2149477488 sameAs 2149477488 @default.
• W2149477488 citedByCount "15" @default.
• W2149477488 countsByYear W21494774882012 @default.
• W2149477488 countsByYear W21494774882015 @default.
• W2149477488 countsByYear W21494774882017 @default.
• W2149477488 countsByYear W21494774882018 @default.
• W2149477488 countsByYear W21494774882019 @default.
• W2149477488 countsByYear W21494774882020 @default.
• W2149477488 countsByYear W21494774882021 @default.
• W2149477488 countsByYear W21494774882023 @default.
• W2149477488 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2149477488 hasAuthorship W2149477488A5021922848 @default.
• W2149477488 hasAuthorship W2149477488A5037465897 @default.
• W2149477488 hasAuthorship W2149477488A5082329078 @default.
• W2149477488 hasConcept C109007969 @default.
• W2149477488 hasConcept C112959462 @default.
• W2149477488 hasConcept C114793014 @default.
• W2149477488 hasConcept C127313418 @default.
• W2149477488 hasConcept C151730666 @default.
• W2149477488 hasConcept C170152797 @default.
• W2149477488 hasConcept C187320778 @default.
• W2149477488 hasConcept C1893757 @default.
• W2149477488 hasConcept C199360897 @default.
• W2149477488 hasConcept C2776867696 @default.
• W2149477488 hasConcept C2777267654 @default.
• W2149477488 hasConcept C2779142798 @default.
• W2149477488 hasConcept C2779343474 @default.
• W2149477488 hasConcept C33556824 @default.
• W2149477488 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2149477488 hasConcept C46293882 @default.
• W2149477488 hasConcept C527412718 @default.
• W2149477488 hasConcept C6648577 @default.
• W2149477488 hasConcept C78762247 @default.
• W2149477488 hasConceptScore W2149477488C109007969 @default.
• W2149477488 hasConceptScore W2149477488C112959462 @default.
• W2149477488 hasConceptScore W2149477488C114793014 @default.
• W2149477488 hasConceptScore W2149477488C127313418 @default.
• W2149477488 hasConceptScore W2149477488C151730666 @default.
• W2149477488 hasConceptScore W2149477488C170152797 @default.
• W2149477488 hasConceptScore W2149477488C187320778 @default.
• W2149477488 hasConceptScore W2149477488C1893757 @default.
• W2149477488 hasConceptScore W2149477488C199360897 @default.
• W2149477488 hasConceptScore W2149477488C2776867696 @default.
• W2149477488 hasConceptScore W2149477488C2777267654 @default.
• W2149477488 hasConceptScore W2149477488C2779142798 @default.
• W2149477488 hasConceptScore W2149477488C2779343474 @default.
• W2149477488 hasConceptScore W2149477488C33556824 @default.
• W2149477488 hasConceptScore W2149477488C41008148 @default.
• W2149477488 hasConceptScore W2149477488C46293882 @default.
• W2149477488 hasConceptScore W2149477488C527412718 @default.
• W2149477488 hasConceptScore W2149477488C6648577 @default.
• W2149477488 hasConceptScore W2149477488C78762247 @default.
• W2149477488 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W2149477488 hasLocation W21494774881 @default.
• W2149477488 hasOpenAccess W2149477488 @default.
• W2149477488 hasPrimaryLocation W21494774881 @default.
• W2149477488 hasRelatedWork W1966921194 @default.
• W2149477488 hasRelatedWork W2064879222 @default.
• W2149477488 hasRelatedWork W2065610846 @default.
• W2149477488 hasRelatedWork W2110946462 @default.
• W2149477488 hasRelatedWork W2166047810 @default.
• W2149477488 hasRelatedWork W2272166797 @default.
• W2149477488 hasRelatedWork W2317713659 @default.
• W2149477488 hasRelatedWork W3209125779 @default.
• W2149477488 hasRelatedWork W4200602213 @default.
• W2149477488 hasRelatedWork W4234247384 @default.
• W2149477488 hasVolume "26" @default.
• W2149477488 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2149477488 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2149477488 magId "2149477488" @default.
• W2149477488 workType "article" @default.