FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2149580959> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2149580959 endingPage "E960" @default.
• W2149580959 startingPage "E950" @default.
• W2149580959 abstract "In Brief Study Design. A systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Objective. To determine which technique of anterior cervical interbody fusion (ACIF) gives the best outcome in patients with cervical degenerative disc disease. Summary of Background Data. The number of surgical techniques for decompression and ACIF as treatment for cervical degenerative disc disease has increased rapidly, but the rationale for the choice between different techniques remains unclear. Methods. From a comprehensive search, we selected randomized studies that compared anterior cervical decompression and ACIF techniques, in patients with chronic single- or double-level degenerative disc disease or disc herniation. Risk of bias was assessed using the criteria of the Cochrane back review group. Results. Thirty-three studies with 2267 patients were included. The major treatments were discectomy alone and addition of an ACIF procedure (graft, cement, cage, and plates). At best, there was very low-quality evidence of little or no difference in pain relief between the techniques. We found moderate quality evidence for few secondary outcomes. Odom's criteria were not different between iliac crest autograft and a metal cage (risk ratio [RR]: 1.11; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.99–1.24). Bone graft produced more fusion than discectomy (RR: 0.22; 95% CI: 0.17–0.48). Complication rates were not different between discectomy and iliac crest autograft (RR: 1.56; 95% CI: 0.71–3.43). Low-quality evidence was found that iliac crest autograft results in better fusion than a cage (RR: 1.87; 95% CI: 1.10–3.17); but more complications (RR: 0.33; 95% CI: 0.12–0.92). Conclusion. When fusion of the motion segment is considered to be the working mechanism for pain relief and functional improvement, iliac crest autograft appears to be the golden standard. When ignoring fusion rates and looking at complication rates, a cage as a golden standard has a weak evidence base over iliac crest autograft, but not over discectomy. Thirty-three studies were found in a review on cervical discectomy and interbody fusion for degenerative discs. No conclusions could be made about effect on pain. No difference was found in Odom's criteria between autograft and a cage. For achieving fusion, autograft appears to be the golden standard." @default.
• W2149580959 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2149580959 creator A5014193186 @default.
• W2149580959 creator A5015290220 @default.
• W2149580959 creator A5042500120 @default.
• W2149580959 creator A5052556481 @default.
• W2149580959 creator A5052746703 @default.
• W2149580959 creator A5066343815 @default.
• W2149580959 creator A5069399106 @default.
• W2149580959 creator A5072675038 @default.
• W2149580959 date "2011-06-01" @default.
• W2149580959 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W2149580959 title "Systematic Review of Anterior Interbody Fusion Techniques for Single- and Double-Level Cervical Degenerative Disc Disease" @default.
• W2149580959 cites W1247968195 @default.
• W2149580959 cites W1495026300 @default.
• W2149580959 cites W1963552870 @default.
• W2149580959 cites W1968672869 @default.
• W2149580959 cites W1971663647 @default.
• W2149580959 cites W1978683770 @default.
• W2149580959 cites W1979094153 @default.
• W2149580959 cites W1979322656 @default.
• W2149580959 cites W1993402171 @default.
• W2149580959 cites W1995544188 @default.
• W2149580959 cites W1997931271 @default.
• W2149580959 cites W1998507639 @default.
• W2149580959 cites W2000647931 @default.
• W2149580959 cites W2002439052 @default.
• W2149580959 cites W2006450197 @default.
• W2149580959 cites W2007818305 @default.
• W2149580959 cites W2015986868 @default.
• W2149580959 cites W2021338788 @default.
• W2149580959 cites W2033940599 @default.
• W2149580959 cites W2036007305 @default.
• W2149580959 cites W2037170571 @default.
• W2149580959 cites W2047850545 @default.
• W2149580959 cites W2056324684 @default.
• W2149580959 cites W2068856737 @default.
• W2149580959 cites W2070070132 @default.
• W2149580959 cites W2072616254 @default.
• W2149580959 cites W2073078796 @default.
• W2149580959 cites W2078823688 @default.
• W2149580959 cites W2086814388 @default.
• W2149580959 cites W2088289804 @default.
• W2149580959 cites W2090489581 @default.
• W2149580959 cites W2093488867 @default.
• W2149580959 cites W2094215776 @default.
• W2149580959 cites W2095298446 @default.
• W2149580959 cites W2098186926 @default.
• W2149580959 cites W2122812892 @default.
• W2149580959 cites W2151684674 @default.
• W2149580959 cites W2315792534 @default.
• W2149580959 cites W2470864563 @default.
• W2149580959 cites W4361867989 @default.
• W2149580959 doi "https://doi.org/10.1097/brs.0b013e31821cbba5" @default.
• W2149580959 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21522044" @default.
• W2149580959 hasPublicationYear "2011" @default.
• W2149580959 type Work @default.
• W2149580959 sameAs 2149580959 @default.
• W2149580959 citedByCount "95" @default.
• W2149580959 countsByYear W21495809592012 @default.
• W2149580959 countsByYear W21495809592013 @default.
• W2149580959 countsByYear W21495809592014 @default.
• W2149580959 countsByYear W21495809592015 @default.
• W2149580959 countsByYear W21495809592016 @default.
• W2149580959 countsByYear W21495809592017 @default.
• W2149580959 countsByYear W21495809592018 @default.
• W2149580959 countsByYear W21495809592019 @default.
• W2149580959 countsByYear W21495809592020 @default.
• W2149580959 countsByYear W21495809592021 @default.
• W2149580959 countsByYear W21495809592022 @default.
• W2149580959 countsByYear W21495809592023 @default.
• W2149580959 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2149580959 hasAuthorship W2149580959A5014193186 @default.
• W2149580959 hasAuthorship W2149580959A5015290220 @default.
• W2149580959 hasAuthorship W2149580959A5042500120 @default.
• W2149580959 hasAuthorship W2149580959A5052556481 @default.
• W2149580959 hasAuthorship W2149580959A5052746703 @default.
• W2149580959 hasAuthorship W2149580959A5066343815 @default.
• W2149580959 hasAuthorship W2149580959A5069399106 @default.
• W2149580959 hasAuthorship W2149580959A5072675038 @default.
• W2149580959 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2149580959 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2149580959 hasConcept C168563851 @default.
• W2149580959 hasConcept C2776008035 @default.
• W2149580959 hasConcept C2778051963 @default.
• W2149580959 hasConcept C2779079599 @default.
• W2149580959 hasConcept C2779480328 @default.
• W2149580959 hasConcept C2781430139 @default.
• W2149580959 hasConcept C2985379065 @default.
• W2149580959 hasConcept C44249647 @default.
• W2149580959 hasConcept C44575665 @default.
• W2149580959 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2149580959 hasConcept C82789193 @default.
• W2149580959 hasConcept C95190672 @default.
• W2149580959 hasConceptScore W2149580959C126322002 @default.
• W2149580959 hasConceptScore W2149580959C141071460 @default.
• W2149580959 hasConceptScore W2149580959C168563851 @default.
• W2149580959 hasConceptScore W2149580959C2776008035 @default.

• next