Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2149732445> ?p ?o ?g. }
- W2149732445 endingPage "414" @default.
- W2149732445 startingPage "406" @default.
- W2149732445 abstract "Objectives The primary objective was to determine the diagnostic accuracy of a serial ultrasound (US) clinical diagnostic pathway to detect appendicitis in children presenting to the emergency department (ED). The secondary objective was to examine the diagnostic performance of the initial and interval US and to compare the accuracy of the pathway to that of the initial US. Methods This was a prospective cohort study of 294 previously healthy children 4 to 17 years old with suspected appendicitis and baseline pediatric appendicitis scores of ≥2, who were managed with the serial US clinical diagnostic pathway. This pathway consisted of an initial US followed by a clinical reassessment in each patient and an interval US and surgical consultation in patients with equivocal initial US and persistent concern about appendicitis. The USs were interpreted by published criteria as positive, negative, or equivocal for appendicitis. Children in whom this pathway did not rule in or rule out appendicitis underwent computed tomography (CT). Cases with missed appendicitis, negative operations, and CTs after the pathway were considered inaccurate. The primary outcome was the diagnostic accuracy of the serial US clinical diagnostic pathway. The secondary outcomes included the test performance of the initial and interval US imaging studies. Results Of the 294 study children, 111 (38%) had appendicitis. Using the serial US clinical diagnostic pathway, 274 of 294 children (93%, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 90% to 96%) had diagnostically accurate results: 108 of the 111 (97%) appendicitis cases were successfully identified by the pathway without CT scans (two missed and one CT), and 166 of the 183 (91%) negative cases were ruled out without CT scans (14 negative operations and three CTs). The sensitivity of this pathway was 108 of 111 (97%, 95% CI = 94% to 100%), specificity 166 of 183 (91%, 95% CI = 87% to 95%), positive predictive value 108 of 125 (86%; 95% CI = 79% to 92%), and negative predictive value 166 of 169 (98%, 95% CI = 96% to 100%). The diagnostic accuracy of the pathway was higher than that of the initial US alone (274 of 294 vs. 160 of 294; p < 0.0001). Of 123 patients with equivocal initial US, concern about appendicitis subsided on clinical reassessment in 73 (no surgery and no missed appendicitis). Of 50 children with persistent symptoms, 40 underwent interval US and 10 had surgical consultation alone. The interval US confirmed or ruled out appendicitis in 22 of 40 children (55.0%) with equivocal initial US, with one false-positive interval US. Conclusions The serial US clinical diagnostic pathway in suspected appendicitis has an acceptable diagnostic accuracy that is significantly higher than that of the initial US and results in few CT scans. This approach appears most useful in children with equivocal initial US, in whom the majority of negative cases were identified at clinical reassessment and appendicitis was diagnosed by interval US or surgical consultation in most study patients." @default.
- W2149732445 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W2149732445 creator A5005366116 @default.
- W2149732445 creator A5016821733 @default.
- W2149732445 creator A5032680227 @default.
- W2149732445 creator A5040354077 @default.
- W2149732445 creator A5050161906 @default.
- W2149732445 creator A5058275252 @default.
- W2149732445 creator A5065599416 @default.
- W2149732445 creator A5076927902 @default.
- W2149732445 creator A5077919648 @default.
- W2149732445 creator A5080392443 @default.
- W2149732445 date "2015-03-24" @default.
- W2149732445 modified "2023-09-25" @default.
- W2149732445 title "Properties of Serial Ultrasound Clinical Diagnostic Pathway in Suspected Appendicitis and Related Computed Tomography Use" @default.
- W2149732445 cites W1568413805 @default.
- W2149732445 cites W1595735513 @default.
- W2149732445 cites W1970536721 @default.
- W2149732445 cites W1979854929 @default.
- W2149732445 cites W1985270826 @default.
- W2149732445 cites W1988913973 @default.
- W2149732445 cites W1996031868 @default.
- W2149732445 cites W1999295674 @default.
- W2149732445 cites W2001928555 @default.
- W2149732445 cites W2017248676 @default.
- W2149732445 cites W2020288469 @default.
- W2149732445 cites W2021472964 @default.
- W2149732445 cites W2026191901 @default.
- W2149732445 cites W2026649078 @default.
- W2149732445 cites W2027908841 @default.
- W2149732445 cites W2046011144 @default.
- W2149732445 cites W2046230127 @default.
- W2149732445 cites W2046417365 @default.
- W2149732445 cites W2052379647 @default.
- W2149732445 cites W2057391555 @default.
- W2149732445 cites W2061755859 @default.
- W2149732445 cites W2063871976 @default.
- W2149732445 cites W2065473464 @default.
- W2149732445 cites W2065889159 @default.
- W2149732445 cites W2066238414 @default.
- W2149732445 cites W2067544431 @default.
- W2149732445 cites W2079682238 @default.
- W2149732445 cites W2099848524 @default.
- W2149732445 cites W2102651281 @default.
- W2149732445 cites W2108693695 @default.
- W2149732445 cites W2109112917 @default.
- W2149732445 cites W2111485448 @default.
- W2149732445 cites W2114002859 @default.
- W2149732445 cites W2125399762 @default.
- W2149732445 cites W2133521171 @default.
- W2149732445 cites W2137571255 @default.
- W2149732445 cites W2138025351 @default.
- W2149732445 cites W2140780207 @default.
- W2149732445 cites W2144897369 @default.
- W2149732445 cites W2148757180 @default.
- W2149732445 cites W2151807121 @default.
- W2149732445 cites W2151881532 @default.
- W2149732445 cites W2152613426 @default.
- W2149732445 cites W2154640775 @default.
- W2149732445 cites W2163607607 @default.
- W2149732445 cites W2164302518 @default.
- W2149732445 cites W2169932180 @default.
- W2149732445 cites W2183824338 @default.
- W2149732445 cites W2403415336 @default.
- W2149732445 cites W4248370127 @default.
- W2149732445 cites W4321428130 @default.
- W2149732445 doi "https://doi.org/10.1111/acem.12631" @default.
- W2149732445 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25808065" @default.
- W2149732445 hasPublicationYear "2015" @default.
- W2149732445 type Work @default.
- W2149732445 sameAs 2149732445 @default.
- W2149732445 citedByCount "43" @default.
- W2149732445 countsByYear W21497324452016 @default.
- W2149732445 countsByYear W21497324452017 @default.
- W2149732445 countsByYear W21497324452018 @default.
- W2149732445 countsByYear W21497324452019 @default.
- W2149732445 countsByYear W21497324452020 @default.
- W2149732445 countsByYear W21497324452021 @default.
- W2149732445 countsByYear W21497324452022 @default.
- W2149732445 countsByYear W21497324452023 @default.
- W2149732445 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2149732445 hasAuthorship W2149732445A5005366116 @default.
- W2149732445 hasAuthorship W2149732445A5016821733 @default.
- W2149732445 hasAuthorship W2149732445A5032680227 @default.
- W2149732445 hasAuthorship W2149732445A5040354077 @default.
- W2149732445 hasAuthorship W2149732445A5050161906 @default.
- W2149732445 hasAuthorship W2149732445A5058275252 @default.
- W2149732445 hasAuthorship W2149732445A5065599416 @default.
- W2149732445 hasAuthorship W2149732445A5076927902 @default.
- W2149732445 hasAuthorship W2149732445A5077919648 @default.
- W2149732445 hasAuthorship W2149732445A5080392443 @default.
- W2149732445 hasBestOaLocation W21497324451 @default.
- W2149732445 hasConcept C118552586 @default.
- W2149732445 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
- W2149732445 hasConcept C126838900 @default.
- W2149732445 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
- W2149732445 hasConcept C143753070 @default.
- W2149732445 hasConcept C159110408 @default.