FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2149881490> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2149881490 endingPage "768" @default.
• W2149881490 startingPage "760" @default.
• W2149881490 abstract "Study Type – Therapy (case series) Level of Evidence 4 What's known on the subject? and What does the study add? Open partial nephrectomy has been defined as the standard of care for the treatment of small renal masses. Robotic platforms may offer the solution to bridge the gap between open and laparoscopic approaches, providing similar oncological and functional results via a shorter learning curve. This study reviews the current literature, and reports developments in robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy (RPN). It highlights the important results from various studies which investigate the oncological and functional efficacy of RPN, and establishes its current status as at least equivalent to the laparoscopic approach. Trends are emerging that highlight the advantage of the robotic interface in facilitating this approach, and we postulate that this may become more apparent in future studies. OBJECTIVE • To establish its current status, this study reviews the literature, and reports developments in robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy (RPN), highlighting results from various studies that investigate the oncological and functional efficacy of RPN. Partial nephrectomy has become the standard therapy for the management of small renal masses. In an effort to overcome the perioperative morbidity associated with an open approach, and the extended warm ischaemia times associated with a laparoscopic approach, robotic platforms have been introduced. PATIENTS AND METHODS • A search of Medline, EMBASE and Cochrane library databases was completed in July 2010 and used to identify pertinent original articles, editorials, comments and reviews, using the search term ‘partial nephrectomy’. Links to related references were surveyed, and all articles finally included were based on relevance and importance of content, as determined by the authors. RESULTS • The robotic platform may offer the solution to bridge the gap between open and laparoscopic approaches, achieving warm ischaemia times that consistently average 20 minutes, and providing similar oncological and functional results via a shorter learning curve. It offers cosmesis and convalescence equivalent to that from laparoscopic partial nephrectomy, but with potentially fewer postoperative complications. CONCLUSION • In terms of oncological and functional outcomes, the early experiences of RPN in selected series of patients appear at least equivalent to open and laparoscopic partial nephrectomy series. Randomized comparisons between the approaches are lacking, as are longer-term follow-up data for the robotic technique and formal cost analysis; these will be necessary before RPN can replace open partial nephrectomy as the new standard for the management of small renal masses. Trends continue to emerge that highlight the advantage of using the robotic platform to achieve a minimally invasive approach for partial nephrectomy, and with time and increasing expertise, this may become further apparent." @default.
• W2149881490 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2149881490 creator A5008075197 @default.
• W2149881490 creator A5025426969 @default.
• W2149881490 creator A5032891712 @default.
• W2149881490 creator A5052489752 @default.
• W2149881490 date "2011-09-21" @default.
• W2149881490 modified "2023-09-25" @default.
• W2149881490 title "Is robotic technology facilitating the minimally invasive approach to partial nephrectomy?" @default.
• W2149881490 cites W1903964721 @default.
• W2149881490 cites W1918015358 @default.
• W2149881490 cites W1966183813 @default.
• W2149881490 cites W1967589348 @default.
• W2149881490 cites W1967665741 @default.
• W2149881490 cites W1968760603 @default.
• W2149881490 cites W1970112882 @default.
• W2149881490 cites W1973259395 @default.
• W2149881490 cites W1973572446 @default.
• W2149881490 cites W1975979241 @default.
• W2149881490 cites W1978361694 @default.
• W2149881490 cites W1987577794 @default.
• W2149881490 cites W1992287509 @default.
• W2149881490 cites W2000587976 @default.
• W2149881490 cites W2006058699 @default.
• W2149881490 cites W2009652349 @default.
• W2149881490 cites W2012763872 @default.
• W2149881490 cites W2018161120 @default.
• W2149881490 cites W2025262291 @default.
• W2149881490 cites W2026586411 @default.
• W2149881490 cites W2027358625 @default.
• W2149881490 cites W2031087535 @default.
• W2149881490 cites W2031832380 @default.
• W2149881490 cites W2031980336 @default.
• W2149881490 cites W2032994944 @default.
• W2149881490 cites W2040256192 @default.
• W2149881490 cites W2041107570 @default.
• W2149881490 cites W2041134319 @default.
• W2149881490 cites W2041866963 @default.
• W2149881490 cites W2045635808 @default.
• W2149881490 cites W2047597573 @default.
• W2149881490 cites W2047597958 @default.
• W2149881490 cites W2050704087 @default.
• W2149881490 cites W2059036926 @default.
• W2149881490 cites W2059580950 @default.
• W2149881490 cites W2062770299 @default.
• W2149881490 cites W2062975292 @default.
• W2149881490 cites W2065848562 @default.
• W2149881490 cites W2075084346 @default.
• W2149881490 cites W2076676382 @default.
• W2149881490 cites W2077358508 @default.
• W2149881490 cites W2081613731 @default.
• W2149881490 cites W2082482112 @default.
• W2149881490 cites W2082505001 @default.
• W2149881490 cites W2083893894 @default.
• W2149881490 cites W2093323595 @default.
• W2149881490 cites W2095185551 @default.
• W2149881490 cites W2117666792 @default.
• W2149881490 cites W2121919182 @default.
• W2149881490 cites W2123344349 @default.
• W2149881490 cites W2123602223 @default.
• W2149881490 cites W2129293501 @default.
• W2149881490 cites W2135414181 @default.
• W2149881490 cites W2138613779 @default.
• W2149881490 cites W2140020334 @default.
• W2149881490 cites W2145632027 @default.
• W2149881490 cites W2147684280 @default.
• W2149881490 cites W2155255836 @default.
• W2149881490 cites W2167023871 @default.
• W2149881490 cites W2168950109 @default.
• W2149881490 cites W2911611736 @default.
• W2149881490 cites W4321059970 @default.
• W2149881490 doi "https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410x.2011.10549.x" @default.
• W2149881490 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21939489" @default.
• W2149881490 hasPublicationYear "2011" @default.
• W2149881490 type Work @default.
• W2149881490 sameAs 2149881490 @default.
• W2149881490 citedByCount "16" @default.
• W2149881490 countsByYear W21498814902012 @default.
• W2149881490 countsByYear W21498814902015 @default.
• W2149881490 countsByYear W21498814902016 @default.
• W2149881490 countsByYear W21498814902018 @default.
• W2149881490 countsByYear W21498814902019 @default.
• W2149881490 countsByYear W21498814902021 @default.
• W2149881490 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2149881490 hasAuthorship W2149881490A5008075197 @default.
• W2149881490 hasAuthorship W2149881490A5025426969 @default.
• W2149881490 hasAuthorship W2149881490A5032891712 @default.
• W2149881490 hasAuthorship W2149881490A5052489752 @default.
• W2149881490 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2149881490 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2149881490 hasConcept C168563851 @default.
• W2149881490 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2149881490 hasConcept C19527891 @default.
• W2149881490 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2149881490 hasConcept C2776478404 @default.
• W2149881490 hasConcept C2779473830 @default.
• W2149881490 hasConcept C2780047204 @default.
• W2149881490 hasConcept C2780091579 @default.

• next