FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2150061254> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2150061254 endingPage "418" @default.
• W2150061254 startingPage "411" @default.
• W2150061254 abstract "Background To design a volumetric method for the assessment of carotid atheromatosis (CA) based on computed tomography (CT) angiography and three-dimensional (3D) reconstructions; to analyze the accuracy and optimal threshold values to differentiate between equivalent degrees of severity by duplex scanning and CT angiography (two-dimensional maximum intensity projection [2D MIP]; internal carotid artery stenosis [ICS] <50%; ICS >50%); and to assess the method's suitability to detect progression of CA. Methods Design: suitability and accuracy of a new diagnostic method. Population: 90 carotid bifurcations (45 patients) were assessed with duplex scanning and CT angiography, and reevaluated after 12 ± 2 months follow-up. Determinations: Assessment of internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis degree with duplex scanning and 2D MIP CT angiography projections. Volumetric assessment of carotid bifurcation by CT angiography (contrast volume [mm3] and density [Hounsfield units, H.U.] between 2-cm below and 1-cm above the anatomic bifurcation of the carotid artery [BifV], and its ratio with 1-cm segment of the common carotid artery [CCV]). Statistical analysis: descriptive statistics; intraobserver and interobserver agreement (Bland–Altman plot and intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC], accuracy of 3D volumetry and duplex scanning as referred to MIP 2D CT angiography as gold standard: sensitivity (Sens), specificity (Sp), kappa index, and receiver operating characteristic curves (ROCs). Results Estimation of MIP 2D images (CT angiography) confirmed the findings of duplex scanning in 23 of 30 ICS <50% and 48 of 53 ICS >50% (Sens, 0.91; Sp, 0.77% kappa = 0.68). Three-dimensional volumetric assessment of carotid bifurcation showed an intraobserver and interobserver agreement with an ICC of 0.96 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.904–0.985) and 0.94 (95% CI, 0.822–0.977), respectively. The BifV-to-CCV ratio was 5.2 ± 1.8 in the ICS <50% group versus 3.8 ± 1.3 in the ICS >50% group (P = 0.001). The optimal cutoff point of the BifV-to-CCV relationship was identified from the ROC curve in 4.1 (Sens, 0.75; Sp, 0.75; kappa, 0.46). At 12 months, a decrease of the average BifV with regard to the baseline value (475.45 [155.6] mm3 × H.U. vs. 501.3 [171.9] mm3 × H.U.; P = 0.04) was observed. CA progression was detected in 32 bifurcations (14 ICS <50%; 18 ICS> 50%), with a reduced bifurcation volume of 137.8 (71.4) mm3 × H.U.; P < 0.001. Conclusions Volumetric assessment of carotid bifurcation is a new concept based on assessing plaque burden rather than its hemodynamic effect or maximum stenosis; thus, justifying its moderate accuracy with regard to ICS conventional ICA grading based on biplanar images. This method can be especially useful in plaque progression studies given its accuracy to detect minor changes in the arterial lumen. To design a volumetric method for the assessment of carotid atheromatosis (CA) based on computed tomography (CT) angiography and three-dimensional (3D) reconstructions; to analyze the accuracy and optimal threshold values to differentiate between equivalent degrees of severity by duplex scanning and CT angiography (two-dimensional maximum intensity projection [2D MIP]; internal carotid artery stenosis [ICS] <50%; ICS >50%); and to assess the method's suitability to detect progression of CA. Design: suitability and accuracy of a new diagnostic method. Population: 90 carotid bifurcations (45 patients) were assessed with duplex scanning and CT angiography, and reevaluated after 12 ± 2 months follow-up. Determinations: Assessment of internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis degree with duplex scanning and 2D MIP CT angiography projections. Volumetric assessment of carotid bifurcation by CT angiography (contrast volume [mm3] and density [Hounsfield units, H.U.] between 2-cm below and 1-cm above the anatomic bifurcation of the carotid artery [BifV], and its ratio with 1-cm segment of the common carotid artery [CCV]). Statistical analysis: descriptive statistics; intraobserver and interobserver agreement (Bland–Altman plot and intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC], accuracy of 3D volumetry and duplex scanning as referred to MIP 2D CT angiography as gold standard: sensitivity (Sens), specificity (Sp), kappa index, and receiver operating characteristic curves (ROCs). Estimation of MIP 2D images (CT angiography) confirmed the findings of duplex scanning in 23 of 30 ICS <50% and 48 of 53 ICS >50% (Sens, 0.91; Sp, 0.77% kappa = 0.68). Three-dimensional volumetric assessment of carotid bifurcation showed an intraobserver and interobserver agreement with an ICC of 0.96 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.904–0.985) and 0.94 (95% CI, 0.822–0.977), respectively. The BifV-to-CCV ratio was 5.2 ± 1.8 in the ICS <50% group versus 3.8 ± 1.3 in the ICS >50% group (P = 0.001). The optimal cutoff point of the BifV-to-CCV relationship was identified from the ROC curve in 4.1 (Sens, 0.75; Sp, 0.75; kappa, 0.46). At 12 months, a decrease of the average BifV with regard to the baseline value (475.45 [155.6] mm3 × H.U. vs. 501.3 [171.9] mm3 × H.U.; P = 0.04) was observed. CA progression was detected in 32 bifurcations (14 ICS <50%; 18 ICS> 50%), with a reduced bifurcation volume of 137.8 (71.4) mm3 × H.U.; P < 0.001. Volumetric assessment of carotid bifurcation is a new concept based on assessing plaque burden rather than its hemodynamic effect or maximum stenosis; thus, justifying its moderate accuracy with regard to ICS conventional ICA grading based on biplanar images. This method can be especially useful in plaque progression studies given its accuracy to detect minor changes in the arterial lumen." @default.
• W2150061254 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2150061254 creator A5040580544 @default.
• W2150061254 creator A5044730966 @default.
• W2150061254 creator A5048175678 @default.
• W2150061254 creator A5064762761 @default.
• W2150061254 creator A5081668122 @default.
• W2150061254 date "2015-04-01" @default.
• W2150061254 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W2150061254 title "Volumetric Assessment of the Carotid Bifurcation: An Alternative Concept to Stenosis Grading" @default.
• W2150061254 cites W1740376762 @default.
• W2150061254 cites W1966564237 @default.
• W2150061254 cites W1975293490 @default.
• W2150061254 cites W1976894246 @default.
• W2150061254 cites W2014557524 @default.
• W2150061254 cites W2037033559 @default.
• W2150061254 cites W2059272595 @default.
• W2150061254 cites W2082447097 @default.
• W2150061254 cites W2090873534 @default.
• W2150061254 cites W2094566437 @default.
• W2150061254 cites W2095178925 @default.
• W2150061254 cites W2104566530 @default.
• W2150061254 cites W2117206227 @default.
• W2150061254 cites W2138473492 @default.
• W2150061254 cites W2159740825 @default.
• W2150061254 cites W2161947945 @default.
• W2150061254 cites W2165553245 @default.
• W2150061254 cites W2316997036 @default.
• W2150061254 cites W2320210677 @default.
• W2150061254 cites W2612334191 @default.
• W2150061254 cites W3032791538 @default.
• W2150061254 cites W4211201192 @default.
• W2150061254 cites W2128537248 @default.
• W2150061254 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avsg.2014.11.005" @default.
• W2150061254 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25591486" @default.
• W2150061254 hasPublicationYear "2015" @default.
• W2150061254 type Work @default.
• W2150061254 sameAs 2150061254 @default.
• W2150061254 citedByCount "4" @default.
• W2150061254 countsByYear W21500612542016 @default.
• W2150061254 countsByYear W21500612542019 @default.
• W2150061254 countsByYear W21500612542022 @default.
• W2150061254 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2150061254 hasAuthorship W2150061254A5040580544 @default.
• W2150061254 hasAuthorship W2150061254A5044730966 @default.
• W2150061254 hasAuthorship W2150061254A5048175678 @default.
• W2150061254 hasAuthorship W2150061254A5064762761 @default.
• W2150061254 hasAuthorship W2150061254A5081668122 @default.
• W2150061254 hasConcept C104709138 @default.
• W2150061254 hasConcept C110021049 @default.
• W2150061254 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2150061254 hasConcept C126838900 @default.
• W2150061254 hasConcept C171606756 @default.
• W2150061254 hasConcept C187954543 @default.
• W2150061254 hasConcept C2524010 @default.
• W2150061254 hasConcept C2778333808 @default.
• W2150061254 hasConcept C2778724333 @default.
• W2150061254 hasConcept C2780007028 @default.
• W2150061254 hasConcept C2780643987 @default.
• W2150061254 hasConcept C2781038377 @default.
• W2150061254 hasConcept C2781347138 @default.
• W2150061254 hasConcept C2989005 @default.
• W2150061254 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W2150061254 hasConcept C40993552 @default.
• W2150061254 hasConcept C544519230 @default.
• W2150061254 hasConcept C58471807 @default.
• W2150061254 hasConcept C70410870 @default.
• W2150061254 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2150061254 hasConceptScore W2150061254C104709138 @default.
• W2150061254 hasConceptScore W2150061254C110021049 @default.
• W2150061254 hasConceptScore W2150061254C126322002 @default.
• W2150061254 hasConceptScore W2150061254C126838900 @default.
• W2150061254 hasConceptScore W2150061254C171606756 @default.
• W2150061254 hasConceptScore W2150061254C187954543 @default.
• W2150061254 hasConceptScore W2150061254C2524010 @default.
• W2150061254 hasConceptScore W2150061254C2778333808 @default.
• W2150061254 hasConceptScore W2150061254C2778724333 @default.
• W2150061254 hasConceptScore W2150061254C2780007028 @default.
• W2150061254 hasConceptScore W2150061254C2780643987 @default.
• W2150061254 hasConceptScore W2150061254C2781038377 @default.
• W2150061254 hasConceptScore W2150061254C2781347138 @default.
• W2150061254 hasConceptScore W2150061254C2989005 @default.
• W2150061254 hasConceptScore W2150061254C33923547 @default.
• W2150061254 hasConceptScore W2150061254C40993552 @default.
• W2150061254 hasConceptScore W2150061254C544519230 @default.
• W2150061254 hasConceptScore W2150061254C58471807 @default.
• W2150061254 hasConceptScore W2150061254C70410870 @default.
• W2150061254 hasConceptScore W2150061254C71924100 @default.
• W2150061254 hasIssue "3" @default.
• W2150061254 hasLocation W21500612541 @default.
• W2150061254 hasLocation W21500612542 @default.
• W2150061254 hasOpenAccess W2150061254 @default.
• W2150061254 hasPrimaryLocation W21500612541 @default.
• W2150061254 hasRelatedWork W1871355850 @default.
• W2150061254 hasRelatedWork W2012100342 @default.
• W2150061254 hasRelatedWork W2029089798 @default.
• W2150061254 hasRelatedWork W2061235848 @default.
• W2150061254 hasRelatedWork W2123541601 @default.

• next