FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2150872452> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2150872452 endingPage "1328" @default.
• W2150872452 startingPage "1328" @default.
• W2150872452 abstract "The subtle improvements in skin texture and wrinkling after nonablative laser treatment are preferred by many patients to the more obvious improvements after ablative laser resurfacing, because the nonablative laser treatment has a lower risk of complications, shorter recovery time, and less disruption of regular activities. In 1993, the first highenergy resurfacing carbon dioxide lasers became available for skin resurfacing. These carbon dioxide resurfacing lasers effectively treat facial rhytids and actinic changes. They are used to ablate the epidermis and partially ablate the dermis, removing skin changes due to photoaging. They stimulate neocollagen formation and tissue tightening, resulting in long-term skin texture and wrinkle improvement. These and subsequent resurfacing lasers have continued to use high fluence (power density) coupled with a short pulse duration or a scanning mechanism to achieve similar improvement. These lasers, classified as ablative because they remove epidermis and some dermis, rapidly vaporize the skin’s surface with relatively minimal adjacent tissue injury. They differ significantly from the prior surgical carbon dioxide lasers, which used lower fluence and either continuous or interrupted laser energy. Their significantly longer dwell time caused greater tissue trauma and a greater adjacent zone of thermal necrosis. As surgeons gained experience with carbon dioxide lasers by 1995, they also noticed the typical long recovery time (prolonged erythema) and associated complications. At that time, one of us initiated a technique alteration to decrease the risks of carbon dioxide laser resurfacing and reduce recovery time. Laser surgeons had been advised to resurface down into the reticular dermis until a uniform chamois appearance was achieved. Using the new technique, resurfacing was continued only down to the necessary depth to treat the condition or until a chamois appearance occurred. Surgeons were still cautioned not to resurface after the chamois appearance was present, even if the condition was not completely eradicated. This revised technique reduced the incidence of postresurfacing scarring and delayed hypopigmentation and eased postresurfacing recovery. Within a year, this new technique was adopted by many practitioners. By 1998, the erbium:YAG laser was also being used for resurfacing. Comprehensive publications on laser skin rejuvenation provided information about both types of lasers. The erbium laser is effective for treating milder rhytids and photoaging. Compared with carbon dioxide resurfacing lasers, it causes less adjacent thermal injury and has a shorter recovery time and less neocollagen formation. Recovery time after resurfacing with the short-pulse-duration erbium laser is influenced by resurfacing depth and the particular laser and technique used. Significantly less collagen contracture occurs than after carbon dioxide laser resurfacing. Paul J. Carniol, MD Brad A. Greene, MD" @default.
• W2150872452 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2150872452 creator A5041180121 @default.
• W2150872452 creator A5082981273 @default.
• W2150872452 date "2004-11-01" @default.
• W2150872452 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W2150872452 title "What Are the Optimal Techniques for Skin Rejuvenation?" @default.
• W2150872452 cites W1593749113 @default.
• W2150872452 cites W172552144 @default.
• W2150872452 cites W1968069105 @default.
• W2150872452 cites W1973725574 @default.
• W2150872452 cites W2012017658 @default.
• W2150872452 cites W2020866776 @default.
• W2150872452 cites W2030293894 @default.
• W2150872452 cites W2037246823 @default.
• W2150872452 cites W2055999471 @default.
• W2150872452 cites W207293242 @default.
• W2150872452 cites W2085558187 @default.
• W2150872452 cites W2124546637 @default.
• W2150872452 cites W2129710849 @default.
• W2150872452 cites W2135722462 @default.
• W2150872452 cites W2146110041 @default.
• W2150872452 cites W2161323646 @default.
• W2150872452 cites W2396064749 @default.
• W2150872452 cites W2408983701 @default.
• W2150872452 cites W2439501591 @default.
• W2150872452 cites W566899800 @default.
• W2150872452 doi "https://doi.org/10.1001/archotol.130.11.1328" @default.
• W2150872452 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15545591" @default.
• W2150872452 hasPublicationYear "2004" @default.
• W2150872452 type Work @default.
• W2150872452 sameAs 2150872452 @default.
• W2150872452 citedByCount "1" @default.
• W2150872452 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2150872452 hasAuthorship W2150872452A5041180121 @default.
• W2150872452 hasAuthorship W2150872452A5082981273 @default.
• W2150872452 hasConcept C112224295 @default.
• W2150872452 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2150872452 hasConcept C54355233 @default.
• W2150872452 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W2150872452 hasConceptScore W2150872452C112224295 @default.
• W2150872452 hasConceptScore W2150872452C41008148 @default.
• W2150872452 hasConceptScore W2150872452C54355233 @default.
• W2150872452 hasConceptScore W2150872452C86803240 @default.
• W2150872452 hasIssue "11" @default.
• W2150872452 hasLocation W21508724521 @default.
• W2150872452 hasLocation W21508724522 @default.
• W2150872452 hasOpenAccess W2150872452 @default.
• W2150872452 hasPrimaryLocation W21508724521 @default.
• W2150872452 hasRelatedWork W2001988634 @default.
• W2150872452 hasRelatedWork W2270817182 @default.
• W2150872452 hasRelatedWork W2590062786 @default.
• W2150872452 hasRelatedWork W269532133 @default.
• W2150872452 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.
• W2150872452 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
• W2150872452 hasRelatedWork W2996645995 @default.
• W2150872452 hasRelatedWork W347929580 @default.
• W2150872452 hasRelatedWork W644158932 @default.
• W2150872452 hasRelatedWork W2261226822 @default.
• W2150872452 hasVolume "130" @default.
• W2150872452 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2150872452 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2150872452 magId "2150872452" @default.
• W2150872452 workType "article" @default.