FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2151172054> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2151172054 endingPage "326" @default.
• W2151172054 startingPage "310" @default.
• W2151172054 abstract "Abstract Abstract Haas's original neofunctionalist theory did not give express consideration to the role of law in the integration process. However, neofunctionalism had an intuitive resonance for legal scholars who generally assumed that law played an important part in advancing European integration. Political science scholarship which has addressed the role of law, on the other hand, has usually either (e.g. in neorealist accounts) taken law to be a functional tool serving the political process, or (e.g. in neofunctionalist analyses) examined only a limited dimension of law, focusing primarily on courts and on legal rather than political integration. However, a promising research agenda on the dynamics of European integration – examples of which, building on Haas's work, have recently begun to appear – could develop if legal scholars paid more attention to the empirical methodologies and explanatory theories of political science, and if political scientists adopted a less reductionist and more nuanced account of law. Keywords: Courtslawlegal integrationneofunctionalismpolitical integration. Acknowledgements Thanks are due to Neil Walker, Tanja Börzel and the anonymous referee for helpful comments on an earlier draft. Notes 1. The key obligatory references here are to legal scholars Joseph Weiler and Eric Stein, and to political science scholars Stuart Scheingold and Mary Volcansek. 2. For a somewhat sceptical comment on their analysis, see Schmitter (2003 Schmitter, P. 2003. “Neo-neofunctionalism”. In European Integration Theory, Edited by: Wiener, A. and Diez, T. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 72–73. [Google Scholar], n. 12). 3. For a classic example, see Hallstein (1972 Hallstein, W. 1972. Europe in the Making, London: Allen & Unwin. (Original publication in German, Duesseldorf, 1969.) [Google Scholar], particularly ch. 2). 4. Haas himself in 1964 referred to the fact that several of the member state governments concerned had ‘faithfully complied with' the ruling of the ECJ in Van Gend en Loos against them as an example of political spillover (Haas 1964b Haas, E. B. 1964b. “Technocracy, pluralism and the new Europe”. In A New Europe, Edited by: Graubard, S. B. 62–88. Boston: Beacon. [Google Scholar]). 5. Case 186/87, Cowan v. Le Trésor Public 1989 ECR 195. 6. C-159/90, SPUC v. Grogan 1991 ECR I-4685. 7. Case C-415/93, URBSFA v. Bosman 1995 ECR I-4921. 8. Case 293/83, Gravier v. City of Liège 1985 ECR 593. 9. Cases C-120/95 Decker 1998 ECR I-1831, C-158/96 Kohll v. Union des Caisses de Maladie 1998 ECR I-1931, C-368/98 Vanbraekel v. ANMC 2001 ECR I-5363, C-157/99 Geraets-Smits v. Stichting Ziekenfonds, Peerbooms v. Stichting CZ Groep Zorgverzekeringen 2001 ECR I-5473 and C-385/99 Müller-Fauré 2003 ECR I-4509. 10. For an analysis of how the differing legal bases of internal market regulation and environmental regulation shaped governance in the field of waste transfer, see Armstrong and Bulmer (1998 Armstrong, K. A. 1998. Legal integration: theorizing the legal dimension of European integration. Journal of Common Market Studies, 36(2): 155–74. [Crossref], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]: ch. 8). 11. The fact that social actors and interest groups see the choice of legal basis as highly significant is evidenced in a recent memorandum of Greenpeace calling for a change in the legal basis for an environmental measure from Article 95 (internal market) to Article 175 (environment): http://eu.greenpeace.org/downloads/climate/PaperWithKeyImprovementsRegulation.pdf (last visited 21 September 2004). 12. Case C-376/98, Germany v. Parliament and Council 2000 ECR I-8419. 13. Case C-317/04, Parliament v. Council, pending. 14. See the Report of the Parliament's Committee on Citizens' Freedoms and Rights, Justice and Home Affairs, 30 March 2004, http://www.europarl.eu.int/meetdocs/committees/libe/20040405/530949en.pdf 15. There is a large and rich jurisprudential (legal-philosophical) literature on law's normativity. For a recent account arguing for a third and more temporally sensitive dimension of law's normativity, in addition to nomos and thesmos (reason and command), see Postema (2004 Postema, G. 2004. Melody and law's mindfulness of time. Ratio Juris, 17(2): 203–26. [Crossref] , [Google Scholar]: 207). 16. For a thorough treatment of how the legal principle of equal treatment evolved and was expanded over time in EC law, see More (1999) More, G. 1999. “The principle of equal treatment: from market unifier to fundamental right”. In The Evolution of EU Law, Edited by: Craig, P. and de Búrca, G. Oxford: Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar]. 17. C-13/94, P v. S and Cornwall County Council 1996 ECR I-2143 and C-117/01, K v. NHS Pensions Agency, 7 January 2004. The attempt to extend the principle to the issue of discrimination on grounds of sexual orientation failed because the ECJ deemed that issue to lie outside the EU's field of competence. For a critique of the latter, see Armstrong (1998) Armstrong, K. A. 1998. Legal integration: theorizing the legal dimension of European integration. Journal of Common Market Studies, 36(2): 155–74. [Crossref], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]. 18. See COM (2001) 127 and COM (1999) 638. 19. Directive 2003/86 2003 OJ L 251/12 on family reunion, and Directive 2003/109 2004 OJ L 16/44 on long-term residents. 20. Case C-540/03, Parliament v. Council, pending." @default.
• W2151172054 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2151172054 creator A5083767658 @default.
• W2151172054 date "2005-04-01" @default.
• W2151172054 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W2151172054 title "Rethinking law in neofunctionalist theory" @default.
• W2151172054 cites W1978695724 @default.
• W2151172054 cites W1993317925 @default.
• W2151172054 cites W1994768071 @default.
• W2151172054 cites W1996677241 @default.
• W2151172054 cites W2004261792 @default.
• W2151172054 cites W2030796074 @default.
• W2151172054 cites W2038235501 @default.
• W2151172054 cites W2041566845 @default.
• W2151172054 cites W2086051659 @default.
• W2151172054 cites W2091484319 @default.
• W2151172054 cites W2115239379 @default.
• W2151172054 cites W2124651012 @default.
• W2151172054 cites W2128180755 @default.
• W2151172054 cites W2129092742 @default.
• W2151172054 cites W2130184970 @default.
• W2151172054 cites W2147040805 @default.
• W2151172054 cites W2321808287 @default.
• W2151172054 cites W2477905091 @default.
• W2151172054 cites W2496766987 @default.
• W2151172054 cites W2499657181 @default.
• W2151172054 cites W3124512006 @default.
• W2151172054 cites W4230724758 @default.
• W2151172054 cites W4247750369 @default.
• W2151172054 cites W4376542774 @default.
• W2151172054 cites W73216506 @default.
• W2151172054 doi "https://doi.org/10.1080/13501760500044082" @default.
• W2151172054 hasPublicationYear "2005" @default.
• W2151172054 type Work @default.
• W2151172054 sameAs 2151172054 @default.
• W2151172054 citedByCount "47" @default.
• W2151172054 countsByYear W21511720542012 @default.
• W2151172054 countsByYear W21511720542014 @default.
• W2151172054 countsByYear W21511720542015 @default.
• W2151172054 countsByYear W21511720542016 @default.
• W2151172054 countsByYear W21511720542017 @default.
• W2151172054 countsByYear W21511720542018 @default.
• W2151172054 countsByYear W21511720542019 @default.
• W2151172054 countsByYear W21511720542020 @default.
• W2151172054 countsByYear W21511720542021 @default.
• W2151172054 countsByYear W21511720542022 @default.
• W2151172054 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2151172054 hasAuthorship W2151172054A5083767658 @default.
• W2151172054 hasConcept C105639569 @default.
• W2151172054 hasConcept C111472728 @default.
• W2151172054 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W2151172054 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W2151172054 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W2151172054 hasConcept C173366509 @default.
• W2151172054 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2151172054 hasConcept C18296254 @default.
• W2151172054 hasConcept C190253527 @default.
• W2151172054 hasConcept C190974861 @default.
• W2151172054 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2151172054 hasConcept C2778061430 @default.
• W2151172054 hasConcept C2910001868 @default.
• W2151172054 hasConcept C79841651 @default.
• W2151172054 hasConcept C94625758 @default.
• W2151172054 hasConceptScore W2151172054C105639569 @default.
• W2151172054 hasConceptScore W2151172054C111472728 @default.
• W2151172054 hasConceptScore W2151172054C138885662 @default.
• W2151172054 hasConceptScore W2151172054C144024400 @default.
• W2151172054 hasConceptScore W2151172054C162324750 @default.
• W2151172054 hasConceptScore W2151172054C173366509 @default.
• W2151172054 hasConceptScore W2151172054C17744445 @default.
• W2151172054 hasConceptScore W2151172054C18296254 @default.
• W2151172054 hasConceptScore W2151172054C190253527 @default.
• W2151172054 hasConceptScore W2151172054C190974861 @default.
• W2151172054 hasConceptScore W2151172054C199539241 @default.
• W2151172054 hasConceptScore W2151172054C2778061430 @default.
• W2151172054 hasConceptScore W2151172054C2910001868 @default.
• W2151172054 hasConceptScore W2151172054C79841651 @default.
• W2151172054 hasConceptScore W2151172054C94625758 @default.
• W2151172054 hasIssue "2" @default.
• W2151172054 hasLocation W21511720541 @default.
• W2151172054 hasOpenAccess W2151172054 @default.
• W2151172054 hasPrimaryLocation W21511720541 @default.
• W2151172054 hasRelatedWork W158051421 @default.
• W2151172054 hasRelatedWork W1972508008 @default.
• W2151172054 hasRelatedWork W2027076985 @default.
• W2151172054 hasRelatedWork W2049993133 @default.
• W2151172054 hasRelatedWork W2139589370 @default.
• W2151172054 hasRelatedWork W2323400709 @default.
• W2151172054 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.
• W2151172054 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
• W2151172054 hasRelatedWork W4303982841 @default.
• W2151172054 hasRelatedWork W54785843 @default.
• W2151172054 hasVolume "12" @default.
• W2151172054 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2151172054 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2151172054 magId "2151172054" @default.
• W2151172054 workType "article" @default.