FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2151215989> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2151215989 endingPage "1491" @default.
• W2151215989 startingPage "1481" @default.
• W2151215989 abstract "Recent advances in field-shaping technology and linac multileaf collimator (MLC) integration have resulted in new approaches to performing stereotactic radiosurgery. We present a modeling study comparing the absolute dose distributions from three radiosurgery delivery techniques: a conventional approach utilizing noncoplanar circular arcs, a static field conformal approach, and a dynamic arc field-shaping approach. In the latter, the MLC leaves more in a continuous fashion, conforming to the beam's-eye-view projection of the target at every increment along the path of an arc.For the analysis, we devised a simulated target consisting of three overlapping spheres. This was chosen because it offered a straightforward planning approach for all three techniques, primarily the multiple isocenter approach. In addition, three representative cases were selected from the prior radiosurgery experience. These range in increasing size, from 0.50 to 9.79 cm(3), and in complexity, requiring from 3 isocenters to 16 in the case of circular arcs. In each situation, the goals were twofold: (1) to cover the entire volume with as high an appropriate isodose level (90% in the case of the conformal and dynamic arc techniques, 50% in the case of circular collimators) while (2) minimizing the dose to normal brain and where applicable, any adjacent radiation-sensitive structures. Because of the latter requirement, a single isocenter circular arc approach was ruled out for the analysis.In the case of large or irregularly shaped lesions, the circular arc technique requires multiple isocenters, producing a high level of dose heterogeneity within the target volume. Both the static field and dynamic arc conformal techniques, as with all single isocenter approaches, produce a highly homogeneous dose throughout the target region. For a given large dose, peripheral dose is decreased as additional beams or arc degrees are added with either of the conformal approaches. Dose--volume histogram analysis evaluating the peripheral dose shows that, in many cases, dose to surrounding structures can be reduced through the use of a conformal static or dynamic arc approach over the conventional multiple isocenter, circular arc techniques.Dynamic arc shaping is an efficient and effective method for accurately delivering a homogeneous target dose while simultaneously minimizing peripheral dose in radiosurgery applications." @default.
• W2151215989 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2151215989 creator A5014504861 @default.
• W2151215989 creator A5027141394 @default.
• W2151215989 creator A5035973430 @default.
• W2151215989 creator A5049692719 @default.
• W2151215989 creator A5087025992 @default.
• W2151215989 date "2001-04-01" @default.
• W2151215989 modified "2023-10-14" @default.
• W2151215989 title "Dynamic arc radiosurgery field shaping: a comparison with static field conformal and noncoplanar circular arcs" @default.
• W2151215989 cites W1575317400 @default.
• W2151215989 cites W1966522026 @default.
• W2151215989 cites W1978722213 @default.
• W2151215989 cites W1987246334 @default.
• W2151215989 cites W1993951726 @default.
• W2151215989 cites W1997764459 @default.
• W2151215989 cites W2003968022 @default.
• W2151215989 cites W2008292566 @default.
• W2151215989 cites W2013453326 @default.
• W2151215989 cites W2026844367 @default.
• W2151215989 cites W2027835608 @default.
• W2151215989 cites W2028745088 @default.
• W2151215989 cites W2031034798 @default.
• W2151215989 cites W2035109934 @default.
• W2151215989 cites W2037276564 @default.
• W2151215989 cites W2037839407 @default.
• W2151215989 cites W2038476892 @default.
• W2151215989 cites W2057833539 @default.
• W2151215989 cites W2063278239 @default.
• W2151215989 cites W2064761900 @default.
• W2151215989 cites W2067100792 @default.
• W2151215989 cites W2075479728 @default.
• W2151215989 cites W2077395547 @default.
• W2151215989 cites W2087170273 @default.
• W2151215989 cites W2088313117 @default.
• W2151215989 cites W2090513259 @default.
• W2151215989 cites W2097615309 @default.
• W2151215989 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/s0360-3016(00)01537-6" @default.
• W2151215989 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11286857" @default.
• W2151215989 hasPublicationYear "2001" @default.
• W2151215989 type Work @default.
• W2151215989 sameAs 2151215989 @default.
• W2151215989 citedByCount "103" @default.
• W2151215989 countsByYear W21512159892012 @default.
• W2151215989 countsByYear W21512159892013 @default.
• W2151215989 countsByYear W21512159892014 @default.
• W2151215989 countsByYear W21512159892015 @default.
• W2151215989 countsByYear W21512159892016 @default.
• W2151215989 countsByYear W21512159892017 @default.
• W2151215989 countsByYear W21512159892018 @default.
• W2151215989 countsByYear W21512159892019 @default.
• W2151215989 countsByYear W21512159892020 @default.
• W2151215989 countsByYear W21512159892021 @default.
• W2151215989 countsByYear W21512159892022 @default.
• W2151215989 countsByYear W21512159892023 @default.
• W2151215989 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2151215989 hasAuthorship W2151215989A5014504861 @default.
• W2151215989 hasAuthorship W2151215989A5027141394 @default.
• W2151215989 hasAuthorship W2151215989A5035973430 @default.
• W2151215989 hasAuthorship W2151215989A5049692719 @default.
• W2151215989 hasAuthorship W2151215989A5087025992 @default.
• W2151215989 hasConcept C104293457 @default.
• W2151215989 hasConcept C11413529 @default.
• W2151215989 hasConcept C120665830 @default.
• W2151215989 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
• W2151215989 hasConcept C126838900 @default.
• W2151215989 hasConcept C161471255 @default.
• W2151215989 hasConcept C168834538 @default.
• W2151215989 hasConcept C180048950 @default.
• W2151215989 hasConcept C181401712 @default.
• W2151215989 hasConcept C2524010 @default.
• W2151215989 hasConcept C2779200277 @default.
• W2151215989 hasConcept C2780387249 @default.
• W2151215989 hasConcept C2989005 @default.
• W2151215989 hasConcept C31601959 @default.
• W2151215989 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W2151215989 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2151215989 hasConcept C509974204 @default.
• W2151215989 hasConcept C57493831 @default.
• W2151215989 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2151215989 hasConcept C83415579 @default.
• W2151215989 hasConcept C9267231 @default.
• W2151215989 hasConcept C98214594 @default.
• W2151215989 hasConceptScore W2151215989C104293457 @default.
• W2151215989 hasConceptScore W2151215989C11413529 @default.
• W2151215989 hasConceptScore W2151215989C120665830 @default.
• W2151215989 hasConceptScore W2151215989C121332964 @default.
• W2151215989 hasConceptScore W2151215989C126838900 @default.
• W2151215989 hasConceptScore W2151215989C161471255 @default.
• W2151215989 hasConceptScore W2151215989C168834538 @default.
• W2151215989 hasConceptScore W2151215989C180048950 @default.
• W2151215989 hasConceptScore W2151215989C181401712 @default.
• W2151215989 hasConceptScore W2151215989C2524010 @default.
• W2151215989 hasConceptScore W2151215989C2779200277 @default.
• W2151215989 hasConceptScore W2151215989C2780387249 @default.
• W2151215989 hasConceptScore W2151215989C2989005 @default.
• W2151215989 hasConceptScore W2151215989C31601959 @default.
• W2151215989 hasConceptScore W2151215989C33923547 @default.

• next