Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2151583375> ?p ?o ?g. }
- W2151583375 endingPage "93" @default.
- W2151583375 startingPage "86" @default.
- W2151583375 abstract "Immunoassays are commonly used to screen samples prior to confirmation by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS). This serves two purposes: it provides a second method for positive samples, and it allows exclusion of negative samples from further confirmatory testing. In addition, immunoassay results can be used in some cases to determine if dilution of the sample will be required during the confirmatory assay. We used 878 sweat patches worn by 38 subjects receiving treatment for cocaine dependence to compare analysis of the extracts of the patches for cocaine immuno-equivalents by radioimmunoassay (RIA) with determination of cocaine, benzoylecgonine (BE), and ecgonine methyl ester (EME) by GC-MS. Preliminary validation experiments demonstrate that the GC-MS method using positive ion chemical ionization had sufficient specificity and recovery to support a lower limit of quantitation (LLOQ) of 4 ng/patch and was precise and accurate across a linear range up to 500 ng/patch. Cocaine ranging from the LLOQ to 31,900 ng/patch was found in 660 of the samples; BE ranging from the LLOQ to 3470 ng/patch was found in 530 of the samples; and EME ranging from the LLOQ to 2280 ng/patch was found in 476 of the samples. In a subset of 238 samples semiquantitative use of the RIA gave results that agreed with GC-MS with a correlation coefficient of 0.986, but averaged approximately 23% lower. Although this accuracy of the RIA supported its use as a sole quantitative assay, the limited linear range of the RIA (4–200 ng/patch) proved impractical for this purpose. Receiver operator characteristic analysis of the cutoffs of the RIA and GC-MS suggested optimal cutoffs of 5 and 4 ng/patch, respectively. At these cutoffs, the RIA had sensitivity of 90.0% and specificity of 92.2%. For samples that had RIA results greater than the high calibrator (N = 228), various dilution schemes were assessed for their ability to predict retention of either cocaine alone or cocaine and both metabolites within the linear range of the GC-MS. When cocaine was the only analyte of interest, a single 20-fold dilution retained 200 (87.7%) of the samples. This compared to an optimal scheme where a different dilution was selected for each one-tenth ratio (< 0.1, 0.1–0.2, etc.) where 211 (92.5%) of the samples were retained. When trying to retain cocaine and both metabolites, dilution schemes were less successful as BE and EME would often fall below the LLOQ of the GC-MS. A single fivefold dilution of all samples retained 115 (50.4%) compared to an optimum of 143 (62.7%). The optimum could be approached with four dilution sets retaining 142 of the samples. Time expended on performing RIA analysis of all the samples was cost-effective when the results were used to exclude negatives from and predict dilutions required for GC-MS analysis. RIA offers a cost-effective, sensitive, and specific alternative initial test for cocaine determination in extracts of sweat patches." @default.
- W2151583375 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W2151583375 creator A5013718948 @default.
- W2151583375 creator A5014340182 @default.
- W2151583375 creator A5031442075 @default.
- W2151583375 creator A5073224529 @default.
- W2151583375 date "2004-03-01" @default.
- W2151583375 modified "2023-10-10" @default.
- W2151583375 title "Comparative Analysis of Sweat Patches for Cocaine (and Metabolites) by Radioimmunoassay and Gas Chromatography-Positive Ion Chemical Ionization-Mass Spectrometry" @default.
- W2151583375 cites W1917711216 @default.
- W2151583375 cites W1965293077 @default.
- W2151583375 cites W2004472190 @default.
- W2151583375 cites W2023824729 @default.
- W2151583375 cites W2044364035 @default.
- W2151583375 cites W2081997001 @default.
- W2151583375 cites W2083103688 @default.
- W2151583375 cites W2084770770 @default.
- W2151583375 cites W209097675 @default.
- W2151583375 cites W2098802302 @default.
- W2151583375 cites W2099726177 @default.
- W2151583375 cites W2105588659 @default.
- W2151583375 cites W2106645066 @default.
- W2151583375 cites W2109106723 @default.
- W2151583375 cites W2109413910 @default.
- W2151583375 cites W2111718145 @default.
- W2151583375 cites W2113041885 @default.
- W2151583375 cites W2120812092 @default.
- W2151583375 cites W2121633571 @default.
- W2151583375 cites W2125037719 @default.
- W2151583375 cites W2131956424 @default.
- W2151583375 cites W2143903342 @default.
- W2151583375 cites W2148207596 @default.
- W2151583375 cites W2158217002 @default.
- W2151583375 cites W2160951877 @default.
- W2151583375 cites W2166447314 @default.
- W2151583375 cites W2170586286 @default.
- W2151583375 cites W2316224001 @default.
- W2151583375 cites W2406376763 @default.
- W2151583375 cites W48769361 @default.
- W2151583375 cites W65303663 @default.
- W2151583375 doi "https://doi.org/10.1093/jat/28.2.86" @default.
- W2151583375 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15068561" @default.
- W2151583375 hasPublicationYear "2004" @default.
- W2151583375 type Work @default.
- W2151583375 sameAs 2151583375 @default.
- W2151583375 citedByCount "26" @default.
- W2151583375 countsByYear W21515833752013 @default.
- W2151583375 countsByYear W21515833752014 @default.
- W2151583375 countsByYear W21515833752016 @default.
- W2151583375 countsByYear W21515833752018 @default.
- W2151583375 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2151583375 hasAuthorship W2151583375A5013718948 @default.
- W2151583375 hasAuthorship W2151583375A5014340182 @default.
- W2151583375 hasAuthorship W2151583375A5031442075 @default.
- W2151583375 hasAuthorship W2151583375A5073224529 @default.
- W2151583375 hasConcept C119128265 @default.
- W2151583375 hasConcept C123460561 @default.
- W2151583375 hasConcept C145148216 @default.
- W2151583375 hasConcept C159654299 @default.
- W2151583375 hasConcept C162356407 @default.
- W2151583375 hasConcept C176685330 @default.
- W2151583375 hasConcept C178790620 @default.
- W2151583375 hasConcept C185592680 @default.
- W2151583375 hasConcept C198291218 @default.
- W2151583375 hasConcept C203014093 @default.
- W2151583375 hasConcept C205345274 @default.
- W2151583375 hasConcept C2777537440 @default.
- W2151583375 hasConcept C2780026642 @default.
- W2151583375 hasConcept C2780420688 @default.
- W2151583375 hasConcept C43617362 @default.
- W2151583375 hasConcept C51884965 @default.
- W2151583375 hasConcept C55493867 @default.
- W2151583375 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W2151583375 hasConceptScore W2151583375C119128265 @default.
- W2151583375 hasConceptScore W2151583375C123460561 @default.
- W2151583375 hasConceptScore W2151583375C145148216 @default.
- W2151583375 hasConceptScore W2151583375C159654299 @default.
- W2151583375 hasConceptScore W2151583375C162356407 @default.
- W2151583375 hasConceptScore W2151583375C176685330 @default.
- W2151583375 hasConceptScore W2151583375C178790620 @default.
- W2151583375 hasConceptScore W2151583375C185592680 @default.
- W2151583375 hasConceptScore W2151583375C198291218 @default.
- W2151583375 hasConceptScore W2151583375C203014093 @default.
- W2151583375 hasConceptScore W2151583375C205345274 @default.
- W2151583375 hasConceptScore W2151583375C2777537440 @default.
- W2151583375 hasConceptScore W2151583375C2780026642 @default.
- W2151583375 hasConceptScore W2151583375C2780420688 @default.
- W2151583375 hasConceptScore W2151583375C43617362 @default.
- W2151583375 hasConceptScore W2151583375C51884965 @default.
- W2151583375 hasConceptScore W2151583375C55493867 @default.
- W2151583375 hasConceptScore W2151583375C71924100 @default.
- W2151583375 hasIssue "2" @default.
- W2151583375 hasLocation W21515833751 @default.
- W2151583375 hasLocation W21515833752 @default.
- W2151583375 hasOpenAccess W2151583375 @default.
- W2151583375 hasPrimaryLocation W21515833751 @default.
- W2151583375 hasRelatedWork W1969688909 @default.
- W2151583375 hasRelatedWork W1994420353 @default.