FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2151852593> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2151852593 abstract "There is ongoing debate about the frequency with which patients should attend for a dental check-up and the effects on oral health of the interval between check-ups. Recommendations regarding optimal recall intervals vary between countries and dental healthcare systems, but 6-month dental check-ups have traditionally been advocated by general dental practitioners in many high-income countries. This review updates a version first published in 2005, and updated in 2007 and 2013.To determine the optimal recall interval of dental check-up for oral health in a primary care setting.Cochrane Oral Health's Information Specialist searched the following databases: Cochrane Oral Health's Trials Register (to 17 January 2020), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL; in the Cochrane Library, 2019, Issue 12), MEDLINE Ovid (1946 to 17 January 2020), and Embase Ovid (1980 to 17 January 2020). We also searched the US National Institutes of Health Trials Registry (ClinicalTrials.gov) and the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform for ongoing trials. We placed no restrictions on the language or date of publication when searching.We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the effects of different dental recall intervals in a primary care setting.Two review authors screened search results against inclusion criteria, extracted data and assessed risk of bias, independently and in duplicate. We contacted study authors for clarification or further information where necessary and feasible. We expressed the estimate of effect as mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for continuous outcomes and risk ratios (RR) with 95% CIs for dichotomous outcomes. We assessed the certainty of the evidence using GRADE.We included two studies with data from 1736 participants. One study was conducted in a public dental service clinic in Norway and involved participants under 20 years of age who were regular attenders at dental appointments. It compared 12-month with 24-month recall intervals and measured outcomes at two years. The other study was conducted in UK general dental practices and involved adults who were regular attenders, which was defined as having attended the dentist at least once in the previous two years. It compared the effects of 6-month, 24-month and risk-based recall intervals, and measured outcomes at four years. The main outcomes we considered were dental caries, gingival bleeding and oral-health-related quality of life. Neither study measured other potential adverse effects. 24-month versus 12-month recall at 2 years' follow-up Due to the very low certainty of evidence from one trial, it is unclear if there is an important difference in caries experience between assignment to a 24-month or a 12-month recall. For 3- to 5-year-olds with primary teeth, the mean difference (MD) in dmfs (decayed, missing, and filled tooth surfaces) increment was 0.90 (95% CI -0.16 to 1.96; 58 participants). For 16- to 20-year-olds with permanent teeth, the MD in DMFS increment was 0.86 (95% CI -0.03 to 1.75; 127 participants). The trial did not assess other clinical outcomes of relevance to this review. Risk-based recall versus 6-month recall at 4 years' follow-up We found high-certainty evidence from one trial of adults that there is little to no difference between risk-based and 6-month recall intervals for the outcomes: number of tooth surfaces with any caries (ICDAS 1 to 6; MD 0.15, 95% CI -0.77 to 1.08; 1478 participants); proportion of sites with gingival bleeding (MD 0.78%, 95% CI -1.17% to 2.73%; 1472 participants); oral-health-related quality of life (MD in OHIP-14 scores -0.35, 95% CI -1.02 to 0.32; 1551 participants). There is probably little to no difference in the prevalence of moderate to extensive caries (ICDAS 3 to 6) between the groups (RR 1.04, 95% CI 0.99 to 1.09; 1478 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). 24-month recall versus 6-month recall at 4 years' follow-up We found moderate-certainty evidence from one trial of adults that there is probably little to no difference between 24-month and 6-month recall intervals for the outcomes: number of tooth surfaces with any caries (MD -0.60, 95% CI -2.54 to 1.34; 271 participants); percentage of sites with gingival bleeding (MD -0.91%, 95% CI -5.02% to 3.20%; 271 participants). There may be little to no difference between the groups in the prevalence of moderate to extensive caries (RR 1.05, 95% CI 0.92 to 1.20; 271 participants; low-certainty evidence). We found high-certainty evidence that there is little to no difference in oral-health-related quality of life between the groups (MD in OHIP-14 scores -0.24, 95% CI -1.55 to 1.07; 305 participants). Risk-based recall versus 24-month recall at 4 years' follow-up We found moderate-certainty evidence from one trial of adults that there is probably little to no difference between risk-based and 24-month recall intervals for the outcomes: prevalence of moderate to extensive caries (RR 1.06, 95% CI 0.95 to 1.19; 279 participants); number of tooth surfaces with any caries (MD 1.40, 95% CI -0.69 to 3.49; 279 participants). We found high-certainty evidence that there is no important difference between the groups in the percentage of sites with gingival bleeding (MD -0.07%, 95% CI -4.10% to 3.96%; 279 participants); or in oral-health-related quality of life (MD in OHIP-14 scores -0.37, 95% CI -1.69 to 0.95; 298 participants).For adults attending dental check-ups in primary care settings, there is little to no difference between risk-based and 6-month recall intervals in the number of tooth surfaces with any caries, gingival bleeding and oral-health-related quality of life over a 4-year period (high-certainty evidence). There is probably little to no difference between the recall strategies in the prevalence of moderate to extensive caries (moderate-certainty evidence). When comparing 24-month with either 6-month or risk-based recall intervals for adults, there is moderate- to high-certainty evidence that there is little to no difference in the number of tooth surfaces with any caries, gingival bleeding and oral-health-related quality of life over a 4-year period. The available evidence on recall intervals between dental check-ups for children and adolescents is uncertain. The two trials we included in the review did not assess adverse effects of different recall strategies." @default.
• W2151852593 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2151852593 creator A5018082844 @default.
• W2151852593 creator A5040576917 @default.
• W2151852593 creator A5046412974 @default.
• W2151852593 creator A5070245802 @default.
• W2151852593 creator A5081974212 @default.
• W2151852593 creator A5090778531 @default.
• W2151852593 date "2020-10-14" @default.
• W2151852593 modified "2023-10-12" @default.
• W2151852593 title "Recall intervals for oral health in primary care patients" @default.
• W2151852593 cites W1247968195 @default.
• W2151852593 cites W1557474528 @default.
• W2151852593 cites W1967773688 @default.
• W2151852593 cites W1971840917 @default.
• W2151852593 cites W1972455447 @default.
• W2151852593 cites W1975778658 @default.
• W2151852593 cites W1995121359 @default.
• W2151852593 cites W2006594759 @default.
• W2151852593 cites W2009559153 @default.
• W2151852593 cites W2026250696 @default.
• W2151852593 cites W2028326133 @default.
• W2151852593 cites W2034711496 @default.
• W2151852593 cites W2039870011 @default.
• W2151852593 cites W2050068605 @default.
• W2151852593 cites W2052840616 @default.
• W2151852593 cites W2060787522 @default.
• W2151852593 cites W2061378095 @default.
• W2151852593 cites W2062525436 @default.
• W2151852593 cites W2068349795 @default.
• W2151852593 cites W2071686413 @default.
• W2151852593 cites W2073861943 @default.
• W2151852593 cites W2079335293 @default.
• W2151852593 cites W2095208678 @default.
• W2151852593 cites W2121493572 @default.
• W2151852593 cites W2123070721 @default.
• W2151852593 cites W2126339458 @default.
• W2151852593 cites W2127819717 @default.
• W2151852593 cites W2141917926 @default.
• W2151852593 cites W2151852593 @default.
• W2151852593 cites W2154654326 @default.
• W2151852593 cites W2157508850 @default.
• W2151852593 cites W2157823046 @default.
• W2151852593 cites W2163844180 @default.
• W2151852593 cites W2174916192 @default.
• W2151852593 cites W2182166876 @default.
• W2151852593 cites W2184582404 @default.
• W2151852593 cites W2186340725 @default.
• W2151852593 cites W2336975416 @default.
• W2151852593 cites W236412560 @default.
• W2151852593 cites W2411760313 @default.
• W2151852593 cites W2412062875 @default.
• W2151852593 cites W2413671492 @default.
• W2151852593 cites W2429331416 @default.
• W2151852593 cites W2461272690 @default.
• W2151852593 cites W2467867990 @default.
• W2151852593 cites W2499764468 @default.
• W2151852593 cites W2567362164 @default.
• W2151852593 cites W2791385172 @default.
• W2151852593 cites W2804017805 @default.
• W2151852593 cites W2887519544 @default.
• W2151852593 cites W2978795816 @default.
• W2151852593 cites W2983079501 @default.
• W2151852593 cites W3028270490 @default.
• W2151852593 cites W3044686860 @default.
• W2151852593 cites W4210297421 @default.
• W2151852593 cites W4210969597 @default.
• W2151852593 cites W4211050927 @default.
• W2151852593 cites W4211227086 @default.
• W2151852593 cites W4233785250 @default.
• W2151852593 cites W4291286897 @default.
• W2151852593 doi "https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.cd004346.pub5" @default.
• W2151852593 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/8256238" @default.
• W2151852593 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33053198" @default.
• W2151852593 hasPublicationYear "2020" @default.
• W2151852593 type Work @default.
• W2151852593 sameAs 2151852593 @default.
• W2151852593 citedByCount "78" @default.
• W2151852593 countsByYear W21518525932012 @default.
• W2151852593 countsByYear W21518525932013 @default.
• W2151852593 countsByYear W21518525932014 @default.
• W2151852593 countsByYear W21518525932015 @default.
• W2151852593 countsByYear W21518525932016 @default.
• W2151852593 countsByYear W21518525932017 @default.
• W2151852593 countsByYear W21518525932018 @default.
• W2151852593 countsByYear W21518525932019 @default.
• W2151852593 countsByYear W21518525932020 @default.
• W2151852593 countsByYear W21518525932021 @default.
• W2151852593 countsByYear W21518525932022 @default.
• W2151852593 countsByYear W21518525932023 @default.
• W2151852593 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2151852593 hasAuthorship W2151852593A5018082844 @default.
• W2151852593 hasAuthorship W2151852593A5040576917 @default.
• W2151852593 hasAuthorship W2151852593A5046412974 @default.
• W2151852593 hasAuthorship W2151852593A5070245802 @default.
• W2151852593 hasAuthorship W2151852593A5081974212 @default.
• W2151852593 hasAuthorship W2151852593A5090778531 @default.
• W2151852593 hasBestOaLocation W21518525932 @default.
• W2151852593 hasConcept C100660578 @default.
• W2151852593 hasConcept C126322002 @default.

• next