FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2152499424> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2152499424 endingPage "623" @default.
• W2152499424 startingPage "619" @default.
• W2152499424 abstract "To understand constraints on the evolution of cooperation, we compared the ability of bonobos and chimpanzees to cooperatively solve a food-retrieval problem. We addressed two hypotheses. The “emotional-reactivity hypothesis” predicts that bonobos will cooperate more successfully because tolerance levels are higher in bonobos. This prediction is inspired by studies of domesticated animals; such studies suggest that selection on emotional reactivity can influence the ability to solve social problems [1Hare B. Plyusnina I. Ignacio N. Schepina O. Stepika A. Wrangham R. Trut L. Social cognitive evolution in captive foxes is a correlated by-product of experimental domestication.Curr. Biol. 2005; 15: 226-230Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (222) Google Scholar, 2Hare B. Tomasello M. Human-like social skills in dogs?.Trends Cogn. Scin. 2005; 9: 439-444Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (557) Google Scholar]. In contrast, the “hunting hypothesis” predicts that chimpanzees will cooperate more successfully because only chimpanzees have been reported to cooperatively hunt in the wild [3Mitani J. Watts D. Why do chimpanzees hunt and share meat?.Anim. Behav. 2001; 61: 915-924Crossref Scopus (283) Google Scholar, 4Boesch C. Boesch-Achermann H. The Chimpanzees of the Tai Forest. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK2000Google Scholar, 5Fruth B. Hohmann G. How bonobos handle hunts and harvests: Why share food?.in: Boesch C. Hohmann G. Marchant L. Behavioral Diversity in Chimpanzees and Bonobos. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK2002: 231-243Crossref Google Scholar]. We indexed emotional reactivity by measuring social tolerance while the animals were cofeeding and found that bonobos were more tolerant of cofeeding than chimpanzees. In addition, during cofeeding tests only bonobos exhibited socio-sexual behavior, and they played more. When presented with a task of retrieving food that was difficult to monopolize, bonobos and chimpanzees were equally cooperative. However, when the food reward was highly monopolizable, bonobos were more successful than chimpanzees at cooperating to retrieve it. These results support the emotional-reactivity hypothesis. Selection on temperament may in part explain the variance in cooperative ability across species, including hominoids." @default.
• W2152499424 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2152499424 creator A5021053378 @default.
• W2152499424 creator A5023868868 @default.
• W2152499424 creator A5027284533 @default.
• W2152499424 creator A5071739156 @default.
• W2152499424 creator A5089779613 @default.
• W2152499424 date "2007-04-01" @default.
• W2152499424 modified "2023-10-17" @default.
• W2152499424 title "Tolerance Allows Bonobos to Outperform Chimpanzees on a Cooperative Task" @default.
• W2152499424 cites W1965365550 @default.
• W2152499424 cites W1977278056 @default.
• W2152499424 cites W1999516944 @default.
• W2152499424 cites W2007392583 @default.
• W2152499424 cites W2038185810 @default.
• W2152499424 cites W2062010098 @default.
• W2152499424 cites W2067201279 @default.
• W2152499424 cites W2088209859 @default.
• W2152499424 cites W2101548886 @default.
• W2152499424 cites W2111998739 @default.
• W2152499424 cites W2123450927 @default.
• W2152499424 cites W2126864662 @default.
• W2152499424 cites W2127401672 @default.
• W2152499424 cites W2144909109 @default.
• W2152499424 cites W2146347459 @default.
• W2152499424 cites W2151550426 @default.
• W2152499424 cites W2440691835 @default.
• W2152499424 cites W4238728481 @default.
• W2152499424 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2007.02.040" @default.
• W2152499424 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17346970" @default.
• W2152499424 hasPublicationYear "2007" @default.
• W2152499424 type Work @default.
• W2152499424 sameAs 2152499424 @default.
• W2152499424 citedByCount "393" @default.
• W2152499424 countsByYear W21524994242012 @default.
• W2152499424 countsByYear W21524994242013 @default.
• W2152499424 countsByYear W21524994242014 @default.
• W2152499424 countsByYear W21524994242015 @default.
• W2152499424 countsByYear W21524994242016 @default.
• W2152499424 countsByYear W21524994242017 @default.
• W2152499424 countsByYear W21524994242018 @default.
• W2152499424 countsByYear W21524994242019 @default.
• W2152499424 countsByYear W21524994242020 @default.
• W2152499424 countsByYear W21524994242021 @default.
• W2152499424 countsByYear W21524994242022 @default.
• W2152499424 countsByYear W21524994242023 @default.
• W2152499424 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2152499424 hasAuthorship W2152499424A5021053378 @default.
• W2152499424 hasAuthorship W2152499424A5023868868 @default.
• W2152499424 hasAuthorship W2152499424A5027284533 @default.
• W2152499424 hasAuthorship W2152499424A5071739156 @default.
• W2152499424 hasAuthorship W2152499424A5089779613 @default.
• W2152499424 hasBestOaLocation W21524994241 @default.
• W2152499424 hasConcept C134387633 @default.
• W2152499424 hasConcept C142362112 @default.
• W2152499424 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
• W2152499424 hasConcept C15708023 @default.
• W2152499424 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2152499424 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W2152499424 hasConcept C175909808 @default.
• W2152499424 hasConcept C180747234 @default.
• W2152499424 hasConcept C187736073 @default.
• W2152499424 hasConcept C18903297 @default.
• W2152499424 hasConcept C204787440 @default.
• W2152499424 hasConcept C2776910235 @default.
• W2152499424 hasConcept C2779473830 @default.
• W2152499424 hasConcept C2780451532 @default.
• W2152499424 hasConcept C55493867 @default.
• W2152499424 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2152499424 hasConcept C78458016 @default.
• W2152499424 hasConcept C83867959 @default.
• W2152499424 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W2152499424 hasConceptScore W2152499424C134387633 @default.
• W2152499424 hasConceptScore W2152499424C142362112 @default.
• W2152499424 hasConceptScore W2152499424C142724271 @default.
• W2152499424 hasConceptScore W2152499424C15708023 @default.
• W2152499424 hasConceptScore W2152499424C15744967 @default.
• W2152499424 hasConceptScore W2152499424C162324750 @default.
• W2152499424 hasConceptScore W2152499424C175909808 @default.
• W2152499424 hasConceptScore W2152499424C180747234 @default.
• W2152499424 hasConceptScore W2152499424C187736073 @default.
• W2152499424 hasConceptScore W2152499424C18903297 @default.
• W2152499424 hasConceptScore W2152499424C204787440 @default.
• W2152499424 hasConceptScore W2152499424C2776910235 @default.
• W2152499424 hasConceptScore W2152499424C2779473830 @default.
• W2152499424 hasConceptScore W2152499424C2780451532 @default.
• W2152499424 hasConceptScore W2152499424C55493867 @default.
• W2152499424 hasConceptScore W2152499424C71924100 @default.
• W2152499424 hasConceptScore W2152499424C78458016 @default.
• W2152499424 hasConceptScore W2152499424C83867959 @default.
• W2152499424 hasConceptScore W2152499424C86803240 @default.
• W2152499424 hasIssue "7" @default.
• W2152499424 hasLocation W21524994241 @default.
• W2152499424 hasLocation W21524994242 @default.
• W2152499424 hasOpenAccess W2152499424 @default.
• W2152499424 hasPrimaryLocation W21524994241 @default.
• W2152499424 hasRelatedWork W1607814224 @default.
• W2152499424 hasRelatedWork W1910920621 @default.

• next