FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2152915280> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2152915280 endingPage "5447" @default.
• W2152915280 startingPage "5442" @default.
• W2152915280 abstract "Purpose: Because the small-radius photon beams shaped by cones in stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) lack lateral electronic equilibrium and a detector's finite cross section, direct experimental measurement of dosimetric data for these beams can be subject to large uncertainties. As the dose calculation accuracy of a treatment planning system largely depends on how well the dosimetric data are measured during the machine's commissioning, there is a critical need for an independent method to validate measured results. Therefore, the authors studied the model-based calculation as an approach to validate measured off-axis ratios (OARs). Methods: The authors previously used a two-component analytical model to calculate central axis dose and associated dosimetric data (e.g., scatter factors and tissue-maximum ratio) in a water phantom and found excellent agreement between the calculated and the measured central axis doses for small 6 MV SRS conic beams. The model was based on that of Nizin and Mooij [“An approximation of central-axis absorbed dose in narrow photon beams,” Med. Phys. 24, 1775–1780 (1997)] but was extended to account for apparent attenuation, spectral differences between broad and narrow beams, and the need for stricter scatter dose calculations for clinical beams. In this study, the authors applied Clarkson integration to this model to calculate OARs for conic beams. OARs were calculated for selected cones with radii from 0.2 to 1.0 cm. To allow comparisons, the authors also directly measured OARs using stereotactic diode (SFD), microchamber, and film dosimetry techniques. The calculated results were machine-specific and independent of direct measurement data for these beams. Results: For these conic beams, the calculated OARs were in excellent agreement with the data measured using an SFD. The discrepancies in radii and in 80%–20% penumbra were within 0.01 cm, respectively. Using SFD-measured OARs as the reference data, the authors found that the calculated OARs were more accurate than those measured with a microchamber or film dosimetry. Conclusions: The model produces sufficiently accurate conic beam dosimetric data that can be used to validate direct measurement results for such beams." @default.
• W2152915280 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2152915280 creator A5028611685 @default.
• W2152915280 creator A5068845250 @default.
• W2152915280 creator A5069170768 @default.
• W2152915280 creator A5073275198 @default.
• W2152915280 date "2010-09-28" @default.
• W2152915280 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W2152915280 title "Model-based calculations of off-axis ratio of conic beams for a dedicated 6 MV radiosurgery unit" @default.
• W2152915280 cites W1967798147 @default.
• W2152915280 cites W1971297756 @default.
• W2152915280 cites W1975081105 @default.
• W2152915280 cites W1980268171 @default.
• W2152915280 cites W1981196781 @default.
• W2152915280 cites W2004425829 @default.
• W2152915280 cites W2016066255 @default.
• W2152915280 cites W2028204176 @default.
• W2152915280 cites W2032558818 @default.
• W2152915280 cites W2037185998 @default.
• W2152915280 cites W2044617178 @default.
• W2152915280 cites W2046966273 @default.
• W2152915280 cites W2047352699 @default.
• W2152915280 cites W2054182996 @default.
• W2152915280 cites W2056534516 @default.
• W2152915280 cites W2060549055 @default.
• W2152915280 cites W2064419667 @default.
• W2152915280 cites W2067126010 @default.
• W2152915280 cites W2070048761 @default.
• W2152915280 cites W2073955944 @default.
• W2152915280 cites W2082374579 @default.
• W2152915280 cites W2083417191 @default.
• W2152915280 cites W2087317597 @default.
• W2152915280 cites W2102904513 @default.
• W2152915280 cites W2155111756 @default.
• W2152915280 cites W2499236741 @default.
• W2152915280 doi "https://doi.org/10.1118/1.3488900" @default.
• W2152915280 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21089780" @default.
• W2152915280 hasPublicationYear "2010" @default.
• W2152915280 type Work @default.
• W2152915280 sameAs 2152915280 @default.
• W2152915280 citedByCount "4" @default.
• W2152915280 countsByYear W21529152802012 @default.
• W2152915280 countsByYear W21529152802014 @default.
• W2152915280 countsByYear W21529152802023 @default.
• W2152915280 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2152915280 hasAuthorship W2152915280A5028611685 @default.
• W2152915280 hasAuthorship W2152915280A5068845250 @default.
• W2152915280 hasAuthorship W2152915280A5069170768 @default.
• W2152915280 hasAuthorship W2152915280A5073275198 @default.
• W2152915280 hasConcept C104293457 @default.
• W2152915280 hasConcept C108598597 @default.
• W2152915280 hasConcept C120665830 @default.
• W2152915280 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
• W2152915280 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2152915280 hasConcept C151337348 @default.
• W2152915280 hasConcept C153385146 @default.
• W2152915280 hasConcept C159317903 @default.
• W2152915280 hasConcept C168834538 @default.
• W2152915280 hasConcept C178635117 @default.
• W2152915280 hasConcept C2524010 @default.
• W2152915280 hasConcept C2780387249 @default.
• W2152915280 hasConcept C2781266606 @default.
• W2152915280 hasConcept C2989005 @default.
• W2152915280 hasConcept C30475298 @default.
• W2152915280 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W2152915280 hasConcept C34445779 @default.
• W2152915280 hasConcept C38652104 @default.
• W2152915280 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2152915280 hasConcept C509974204 @default.
• W2152915280 hasConcept C520434653 @default.
• W2152915280 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2152915280 hasConcept C75088862 @default.
• W2152915280 hasConcept C94915269 @default.
• W2152915280 hasConceptScore W2152915280C104293457 @default.
• W2152915280 hasConceptScore W2152915280C108598597 @default.
• W2152915280 hasConceptScore W2152915280C120665830 @default.
• W2152915280 hasConceptScore W2152915280C121332964 @default.
• W2152915280 hasConceptScore W2152915280C126322002 @default.
• W2152915280 hasConceptScore W2152915280C151337348 @default.
• W2152915280 hasConceptScore W2152915280C153385146 @default.
• W2152915280 hasConceptScore W2152915280C159317903 @default.
• W2152915280 hasConceptScore W2152915280C168834538 @default.
• W2152915280 hasConceptScore W2152915280C178635117 @default.
• W2152915280 hasConceptScore W2152915280C2524010 @default.
• W2152915280 hasConceptScore W2152915280C2780387249 @default.
• W2152915280 hasConceptScore W2152915280C2781266606 @default.
• W2152915280 hasConceptScore W2152915280C2989005 @default.
• W2152915280 hasConceptScore W2152915280C30475298 @default.
• W2152915280 hasConceptScore W2152915280C33923547 @default.
• W2152915280 hasConceptScore W2152915280C34445779 @default.
• W2152915280 hasConceptScore W2152915280C38652104 @default.
• W2152915280 hasConceptScore W2152915280C41008148 @default.
• W2152915280 hasConceptScore W2152915280C509974204 @default.
• W2152915280 hasConceptScore W2152915280C520434653 @default.
• W2152915280 hasConceptScore W2152915280C71924100 @default.
• W2152915280 hasConceptScore W2152915280C75088862 @default.
• W2152915280 hasConceptScore W2152915280C94915269 @default.
• W2152915280 hasIssue "10" @default.

• next