Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2153228112> ?p ?o ?g. }
- W2153228112 endingPage "14828" @default.
- W2153228112 startingPage "14821" @default.
- W2153228112 abstract "Many aspects of neurogenesis and neuronal differentiation are controlled by basic helix-loop-helix (bHLH) proteins. One such factor is SHARP-1, initially identified on the basis of its sequence similarity to hairy. Unlikehairy, and atypically for bHLHs, SHARP-1 is expressed late in development, suggestive of a role in terminal aspects of differentiation. Nevertheless, the role of SHARP-1 and the identity of its target genes remain unknown. During the course of a one-hybrid screen for transcription factors that bind to regulatory domains of the M1 muscarinic acetylcholine receptor gene, we isolated the bHLH transcription factor SHARP-1. In this study, we investigated the functional role of SHARP-1 in regulating transcription. Fusion proteins of SHARP-1 tethered to the gal4 DNA binding domain repress both basal and activated transcription when recruited to either a TATA-containing or a TATAless promoter. Furthermore, we identified two independent repression domains that operate via distinct mechanisms. Repression by a domain in the C terminus is sensitive to the histone deacetylase inhibitor trichostatin A, whereas repression by the bHLH domain is insensitive to TSA. Furthermore, overexpression of SHARP-1 represses transcription from the M1 promoter. This study represents the first report to assign a function to, and to identify a target gene for, the bHLH transcription factor SHARP-1. Many aspects of neurogenesis and neuronal differentiation are controlled by basic helix-loop-helix (bHLH) proteins. One such factor is SHARP-1, initially identified on the basis of its sequence similarity to hairy. Unlikehairy, and atypically for bHLHs, SHARP-1 is expressed late in development, suggestive of a role in terminal aspects of differentiation. Nevertheless, the role of SHARP-1 and the identity of its target genes remain unknown. During the course of a one-hybrid screen for transcription factors that bind to regulatory domains of the M1 muscarinic acetylcholine receptor gene, we isolated the bHLH transcription factor SHARP-1. In this study, we investigated the functional role of SHARP-1 in regulating transcription. Fusion proteins of SHARP-1 tethered to the gal4 DNA binding domain repress both basal and activated transcription when recruited to either a TATA-containing or a TATAless promoter. Furthermore, we identified two independent repression domains that operate via distinct mechanisms. Repression by a domain in the C terminus is sensitive to the histone deacetylase inhibitor trichostatin A, whereas repression by the bHLH domain is insensitive to TSA. Furthermore, overexpression of SHARP-1 represses transcription from the M1 promoter. This study represents the first report to assign a function to, and to identify a target gene for, the bHLH transcription factor SHARP-1. basic helix-loop-helix Enhancer of Split h airy and E nhancer of S plit DNA binding domain trichostatin A polymerase chain reaction hypoxanthine-guanine phosphoribosyl transferase Tet-responsive element histone deacetylase Transcription factors of the basic helix-loop-helix (bHLH)1 family play an important role in neuronal determination and early differentiation in all phyla that have been examined. Numerous vertebrate bHLHs (for reviews see Refs. 1Kageyama R. Ishibashi M. Takebayashi K. Tomita K. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 1997; 29: 1389-1399Crossref PubMed Scopus (169) Google Scholar, 2Brunet J.F. Ghysen A. Bioessays. 1999; 21: 313-318Crossref PubMed Scopus (111) Google Scholar, 3Anderson D.J. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 1999; 9: 517-524Crossref PubMed Scopus (122) Google Scholar) have been identified on the basis of homology to their Drosophila counterparts (reviewed in Refs. 4Campos-Ortega J.A. Mol. Neurobiol. 1995; 10: 75-89Crossref PubMed Scopus (119) Google Scholar, 5Fisher A.L. Caudy M. Genes Dev. 1998; 12: 1931-1940Crossref PubMed Scopus (255) Google Scholar, 6Campuzano S. Modolell J. Trends Genet. 1992; 8: 202-208Abstract Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (342) Google Scholar). Some, such as Mash-1 (mouse a chaete s cute homologue), are transcriptional activators and act as positive regulators of neurogenesis, whereas others, such as HES-1 (homologue of H airy and E nhancer of S plit), are transcriptional repressors and act as negative regulators of neurogenesis. Structurally, bHLH proteins share a number of common features. The HLH domain mediates homomeric or heteromeric dimerization (7Murre C. McCaw P.S. Baltimore D. Cell. 1989; 56: 777-783Abstract Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (1862) Google Scholar), and the adjacent basic region mediates DNA binding. Three groups of bHLH proteins can be recognized, according to the target binding site they recognize (8Blackwell T.K. Weintraub H. Science. 1990; 250: 1104-1110Crossref PubMed Scopus (759) Google Scholar, 9Dang C.V. Dolde C. Gillison M.L. Kato G.J. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1992; 89: 599-602Crossref PubMed Scopus (140) Google Scholar, 10Ohsako S. Hyer J. Panganiban G. Oliver I. Caudy M. Genes Dev. 1994; 8: 2743-2755Crossref PubMed Scopus (230) Google Scholar). Class A and Class C bHLHs function as transcriptional activators and repressors, respectively, whereas class B bHLH proteins can be either activators or repressors. Recently, the cDNA for SHARP-1, a novel bHLH protein, was isolated on the basis of its homology to Hairy and Enhancer of Split (11Rossner M.J. Dorr J. Gass P. Schwab M.H. Nave K.A. Mol. Cell Neurosci. 1997; 10: 460-475Crossref PubMed Scopus (109) Google Scholar). However, sequence alignment showed that SHARP-1 is only distantly related to these proteins, exhibiting 37–42% sequence identity within the bHLH domain. Unlike most bHLH proteins, SHARP-1 is not expressed in neuronal progenitor cells or early differentiating neurons but is restricted to a subset of neurons of the postnatal central nervous system (11Rossner M.J. Dorr J. Gass P. Schwab M.H. Nave K.A. Mol. Cell Neurosci. 1997; 10: 460-475Crossref PubMed Scopus (109) Google Scholar), suggestive of a role in terminal neuronal differentiation rather than in neural determination. Unlike all other HAIRY/E(spl)/HES proteins, SHARP-1 lacks the hallmark WRPW domain, which binds the co-repressor GROUCHO (or GROUCHO-like proteins) and is required for both transcriptional repression and suppression of neurogenesis. Absence of the WRPW motif suggests that SHARP-1 functions by recruiting transcriptional machinery other than GROUCHO. All class B bHLH proteins contain an arginine at position 13 in the basic region, essential for these proteins to bind to class B sites. The presence of an arginine at this position in SHARP-1 suggests that it belongs in this group, but because this group contains both activators and repressors, SHARP-1 function cannot be predicted on the basis of protein sequence. At present, almost nothing is known about the role of bHLH proteins in differentiated neurons, and in common with many other bHLH proteins, no target genes of SHARP-1 are known. In the present study, we ascribe a transcriptional function to SHARP-1 and identify the M1muscarinic acetylcholine receptor gene as a target gene. We show that SHARP-1 is able to repress transcription of both TATA-containing and TATAless promoters when recruited via a Gal4 DNA binding domain (DBD). Repression occurs when SHARP-1 is bound either proximally or more distally to the promoter. Furthermore, we show that repression by SHARP-1 is bimodal. One mode of repression requires the bHLH domain and is insensitive to the histone deacetylase inhibitor, TSA, whereas the other is mediated via the C-terminal domain and represses transcription through a TSA-sensitive mechanism. We also show that overexpression of SHARP-1 represses transcription of a reporter construct containing the M1 promoter. These results show that within the HAIRY-related/HES family, SHARP-1 is unique in its combination of presumed biological function and transcriptional mechanism. The plasmid pBM2389 +417/+166 M1 was generated as follows. A PCR product generated by using as template pGL3 +166/+603 M1 and the primers M1 235 (12Pepitoni S. Wood I.C. Buckley N.J. J. Biol. Chem. 1997; 272: 17112-17117Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (34) Google Scholar) and RV3 (Promega) was cloned into pGem-T easy (Promega). The fragment was excised with EcoRI and cloned into pBM2389 (13Liu J. Wilson T.E. Milbrandt J. Johnston M. Methods Enzymol. 1993; 5: 125-137Crossref Scopus (46) Google Scholar). The SHARP-1 coding region was generated by PCR with the primers SHARP-1.-11s and SHARP-1.762a (numbers are relative to the translation start site of SHARP-1) containing NcoI linkers and cloned in frame into the NcoI site of pCS2+MT (14Turner E.E. Jenne K.J. Rosenfeld M.G. Neuron. 1994; 12: 205-218Abstract Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (161) Google Scholar) to give pMT SHARP-1. To generate pMT G4 SHARP-1, a PCR product obtained using the primers SHARP-1.4s and SHARP-1.763a, consisting of the SHARP-1 coding region flanked by EcoRI linkers, was cloned into the EcoRI site of pMT G4 (15Roopra A. Sharling L. Wood I.C. Briggs T. Bachfischer U. Paquette A.J. Buckley N.J. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2000; 20: 2147-2157Crossref PubMed Scopus (183) Google Scholar). PCR products withEcoRI linkers were generated using the sense primer SHARP-1.4s, and the antisense primers SHARP-1.519a, SHARP-1.306a, or SHARP-1.147a (numbers are relative to the translation start site of SHARP-1) were similarly used to generate pMT G4 NbHO-SHARP-1 (residues 1–173), pMT G4 NbH-SHARP-1 (residues 1–102), and pMT G4 N-SHARP-1 (residues 1–49), respectively. PCR products containing SHARP-1 fragments between positions 520 and 762, 307 and 519, and 127 and 306 with EcoRI linkers were cloned into pMT G4 to generate pMT G4 C-SHARP-1 (residues 174–253), pMT G4 O-SHARP-1 (residues 103–173), and pMT G4 bH-SHARP-1 (residues 43–102), respectively. To clone pSHARP-1 myc, a PCR fragment containing the open reading frame of SHARP-1 was generated using a sense primer containing aBamHI linker and an antisense primer containing anEcoRI linker and cloned into pCS2+MT (14Turner E.E. Jenne K.J. Rosenfeld M.G. Neuron. 1994; 12: 205-218Abstract Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (161) Google Scholar). The reporter plasmid pGL3–372/+602 M1 has been reported previously (12Pepitoni S. Wood I.C. Buckley N.J. J. Biol. Chem. 1997; 272: 17112-17117Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (34) Google Scholar). The reporter plasmids pTRE UAS TATA, pGL3 UAS TRE TATA, and pGL3 UAS TRE Inr have been described previously (15Roopra A. Sharling L. Wood I.C. Briggs T. Bachfischer U. Paquette A.J. Buckley N.J. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2000; 20: 2147-2157Crossref PubMed Scopus (183) Google Scholar). pBM2389 +417/+166 M1was transformed into the yeast strain SFY526 (16Bartel P.L. Chien C.-T. Sternglanz R. Fields S. Hartley D.A. Cellular Interactions in Development: A Practical Approach. Oxford University Press, Oxford1993: 153-179Google Scholar). This yeast strain was then transformed with DNA from an adult rat brain cDNA yeast expression library (CLONTECH), using the protocol of Schiestl and Gietz (17Schiestl R.H. Gietz R.D. Curr. Genet. 1989; 16: 339-346Crossref PubMed Scopus (1776) Google Scholar), and transformants were grown on complete supplement mixture −His/−Leu/−Trp (Bio 101, Vista, CA), containing 5 mm 3-amino-1,2,4-triazole (Sigma) to select for interactions. Library candidates were tested for their ability to specifically activate the M1-containing reporter plasmid by retransforming back into SFY526. Library plasmids producing interacting proteins were sequenced for identification. RNA was extracted from cell lines and brain tissue using Tri reagent (Sigma) and reverse-transcribed using oligo(dT) and Moloney murine leukemia virus reverse transcriptase (Promega). Oligonucleotides used to amplify the SHARP-1 gene were as follows: SHARP-1.125s, 5′-AGGATACCTACAAATTACCGC; and SHARP-1.441a, 5′-CGCGAGGTATTGCAAGAC. Numbers are relative to the translation start site of SHARP-1. The oligonucleotides used to amplify the hypoxanthine-guanine phosphoribosyl transferase (hprt) gene were as follows:hprt 231s, 5′-CCTGCTGGATTACATTAAAGCACTG; and hprt567a, 5′-CCTGAAGTACTCATTATAGTCAAGG. Aliquots of the reaction mixture were electrophoresed on a 2% agarose gel. Cell lines were cultured in 5% CO2 at 37 °C in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (Life Technologies, Inc.) supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum, 6 g/liter penicillin, 10 g/liter streptomycin, and 2 mml-glutamine. Qiagen column-purified DNA was transfected into cells using Tfx™ 50 (Promega) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Briefly, cells were plated onto 10-mm wells to a density of 50%. For IMR32 and 3T3 cells, 750 ng of plasmid (for amounts of individual plasmids see the figure legends), 3 ng of pRL-CMV, and 1.5 μl of Tfx™ 50 were mixed and made up to a total volume of 200 μl with Opti-MEM (Life Technologies, Inc.) and applied to cells for 3–4 h. For Neuro 2a cells, 250 ng of plasmid (for amounts of individual plasmids see the figure legends), 1 ng of pRL-CMV, and 0.5 μl of Tfx™ 50 were used. Cells were harvested 24 h later into 60 μl Passive lysis buffer (Promega), of which 30 μl were used in the Promega DLR™ assay system. Luminescence was measured using a Mediators PhL 1.8 luminometer, firefly luciferase was normalized to Renilla luciferase, and the results were expressed as a percentage of normalized expression in the presense of pMT G4. For transfections in the presence of TSA (Wako Chemical), cells were treated with the indicated concentrations of TSA for 24 h prior to transfection and fed with media containing TSA for 24 h. Neuro 2a cells were plated onto 10-cm plates to a density of 50%. Cells were incubated for 3–4 h with 10 μg of DNA and 22.5 μl of Tfx™ 50 in a final volume of 4.8 ml. Cells were harvested after 2 days into 1 ml of 1× phosphate-buffered saline containing 0.5% Nonidet P-40 and protease inhibitors Block (Roche Molecular Biochemicals), sonicated for 90 s, and centrifuged at maximum speed for 10 min at 4 °C. The supernatant was precleared for 2 h with 80 μl of protein G-Sepharose. For each immunoprecipitation, half of the total sample was incubated with 3 μl of Gal4 DBD antiserum (Santa Cruz Biotechnology) overnight. Beads were added, and samples were incubated for an additional 2 h. Samples were washed four times with 20 mm Tris, pH 8.0, 1 mm EDTA, 100 mmNaCl, 0.5 mm Nonidet P-40, 10% glycerol, and 0.1% SDS. Proteins were eluted with 15 μl of loading dye. Samples were run on a 10% SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis gel and blotted onto a Hybond C+ nylon membrane (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). The membrane was subjected to Western blot analysis using a 1/1000 dilution ofc-myc antiserum (Santa Cruz Biotechnology). In our previous studies, we have shown that transcription of the M1muscarinic acetylcholine receptor gene is regulated by several domains within the first exon (12Pepitoni S. Wood I.C. Buckley N.J. J. Biol. Chem. 1997; 272: 17112-17117Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (34) Google Scholar, 18Wood I.C. Garriga-Canut M. Palmer C.L. Pepitoni S. Buckley N.J. Biochem. J. 1999; 340: 475-483Crossref PubMed Scopus (11) Google Scholar). In particular, the region between +166 and +412 (relative to the transcription start site) appears to contain both enhancer and repressor elements. To identify transcription factors that bind to this region of the M1 gene we used the yeast one-hybrid approach (19Wang R. Reed R. Nature. 1993; 364: 121-126Crossref PubMed Scopus (371) Google Scholar, 20Chong J.A. Tapia-Ramirez J. Kim S. Toledo-Arai J.J. Zheng Y. Boutros M.C. Altshuller Y.M. Frohman M.A. Kraner S.D. Mandel G. Cell. 1995; 80: 949-957Abstract Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (934) Google Scholar). Using the +166/+417 domain as bait to screen an adult rat brain cDNA library, we isolated two independent positive clones (Fig.1 a, colonies 3 and 10). Digestion of the isolated clones showed that they both contain an insert of 1.5 kilobases (Fig.1 b). Sequencing of the inserts in these clones showed that they were identical and contained the entire open reading frame of the previously identified transcription factor SHARP-1 (11Rossner M.J. Dorr J. Gass P. Schwab M.H. Nave K.A. Mol. Cell Neurosci. 1997; 10: 460-475Crossref PubMed Scopus (109) Google Scholar). Growth of yeast on plates containing 10 mm 3-amino-1,2,4-triazole was dependent upon the binding of SHARP-1 to the M1 sequence, because no growth was seen in the absence of either bait or SHARP-1 (Fig. 1 a). SHARP-1 was originally isolated during the course of a search for mammalian bHLH proteins expressed in differentiated neurons (11Rossner M.J. Dorr J. Gass P. Schwab M.H. Nave K.A. Mol. Cell Neurosci. 1997; 10: 460-475Crossref PubMed Scopus (109) Google Scholar). Although SHARP-1 was isolated by homology to hairy andEnhancer of Split, sequence alignment with these proteins shows that they are quite distantly related, sharing only 37–42% homology within the bHLH domain (11Rossner M.J. Dorr J. Gass P. Schwab M.H. Nave K.A. Mol. Cell Neurosci. 1997; 10: 460-475Crossref PubMed Scopus (109) Google Scholar). As a first step toward identification of a function for SHARP-1, we carried out a data base search for proteins with homology to SHARP-1 and identified three proteins: SHARP-2, Stra13, and DEC1 (Fig.2). SHARP-2 is a bHLH protein isolated in the same screen as that used to identify SHARP-1 (11Rossner M.J. Dorr J. Gass P. Schwab M.H. Nave K.A. Mol. Cell Neurosci. 1997; 10: 460-475Crossref PubMed Scopus (109) Google Scholar), and its function is also unknown. Stra13 was isolated as a retinoic acid-inducible gene in mouse P19 embryonic carcinoma cells and has been shown to be able to repress the thymidine kinase promoter when fused to Gal4 DBD (21Boudjelal M. Taneja R. Matsubara S. Bouillet P. Dolle P. Chambon P. Genes Dev. 1997; 11: 2052-2065Crossref PubMed Scopus (218) Google Scholar). Finally, DEC1 is a protein that was cloned by subtractive hybridization to identify mRNAs expressed in cAMP-differentiated human embryo chondrocytes (22Shen M. Kawamoto T. Yan W. Nakamasu K. Tamagami M. Koyano Y. Noshiro M. Kato Y. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1997; 236: 294-298Crossref PubMed Scopus (145) Google Scholar). Again, no function for DEC1 has been reported. Inspection of amino acid sequences shows that SHARP-2, Stra13, and DEC1 contain 411 or 412 amino acids, of which 366 are conserved, showing a sequence identity between them of 89%, suggesting that they are, in fact, rat, mouse, and human homologues. SHARP-1 is more divergent and contains only 253 amino acids. The highest sequence identity is seen in the bHLH domain and in helices 3 and 4 (also called Orange domain (23Dawson S.R. Turner D.L. Weintraub H. Parkhurst S.M. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1995; 15: 6923-6931Crossref PubMed Scopus (183) Google Scholar,24Giebel B. Campos-Ortega J.A. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1997; 94: 6250-6254Crossref PubMed Scopus (67) Google Scholar)), whereas within the C-terminal domain only two stretches of 8 and 11 amino acids are conserved. All bHLH proteins dimerize to bind DNA (25Murre C. McCaw P.S. Vaessin H. Caudy M. Jan L.Y. Jan Y.N. Cabrera C.V. Buskin J.N. Hauschka S.D. Lassar A.B. Cell. 1989; 58: 537-544Abstract Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (1302) Google Scholar). Because SHARP-1 was identified in the present study using a yeast one-hybrid screen, it seemed likely that SHARP-1 could either homodimerize or heterodimerize with a yeast partner. To distinguish between these possibilities, we carried out an immunoprecipitation assay using differentially tagged recombinant SHARP-1. Neuro 2a cells were transfected with either a combination of myc-tagged SHARP-1 (pMT SHARP-1) and myc-tagged Gal4 DBD (pMT G4) (Fig.3, lanes 1 and 3) or a combination of myc-tagged SHARP-1 (pMT SHARP-1) and amyc-tagged fusion of Gal4 DBD and SHARP-1 (pMT G4 SHARP-1) (Fig. 3, lanes 2 and 4). Cell extracts were immunoprecipitated with Gal4 DBD antiserum and subjected to polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, and the results were visualized by Western blot analysis using c-myc antiserum. An antibody to Gal4 was able to co-immunoprecipitate SHARP-1 only in the presence of a GAL4-SHARP-1 fusion protein (Fig. 3, compare lanes 4 and3), demonstrating that SHARP-1 is able to homodimerize. It has been shown previously that expression of SHARP-1 is largely restricted to differentiated neurons in the postnatal central nervous system, predominantly in the cerebellum and hippocampus, although it is also detectable at a reduced level in heart, muscle, and lung (11Rossner M.J. Dorr J. Gass P. Schwab M.H. Nave K.A. Mol. Cell Neurosci. 1997; 10: 460-475Crossref PubMed Scopus (109) Google Scholar). We examined expression of SHARP-1 in different cell lines and cerebellum using reverse transcription-PCR. As seen in Fig.4 a, SHARP-1 is highly expressed in IMR32 cells, a human neuroblastoma cell line that also expresses M1, Neuro 2a cells, and NB4 1A3, two mouse M1 non-expressing neuroblastoma cell lines. Low levels of expression were detected in the 3T3 fibroblast cell line. PCR was carried out using hprt primers as a cDNA loading control (Fig.4 b). bHLH proteins can act as transcriptional activators or repressors (reviewed in Ref. 1Kageyama R. Ishibashi M. Takebayashi K. Tomita K. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 1997; 29: 1389-1399Crossref PubMed Scopus (169) Google Scholar). Because the transcriptional function of SHARP-1 is unknown, we assessed its ability to (a) regulate transcription from both TATA-containing and TATAless promoters, (b) regulate transcription when bound either proximally or distally, and (c) regulate basal and activated transcription. IMR32, 3T3, and Neuro 2a cells were transfected with plasmids expressing SHARP-1 fused to Gal4 DBD with each of the reporter genes showed in Fig. 5. pTRE UAS TATA contains seven TRE and five Gal4 binding sites 21 base pairs upstream of the E1b TATA box. pGL3 UAS TRE TATA contains five Gal4 binding sites (placed 350 base pairs from the TATA box) and seven TRE upstream of the TATA box. In pGL3 TRE UAS Inr, the TATA box from pGL3 TRE UAS TATA, was replaced by the adenovirus major late promoter initiator. Expression values of all reporter constructs were normalized to expression in the presence of Gal4 DBD alone. SHARP-1 was able to repress transcription of a TATA-containing promoter when bound proximally to the transcription start site in all cell lines (Fig. 5 a,left). SHARP-1 was also able to repress activated transcription by Tet-VP16 (activation domain of the herpes simplex virus transcriptional activator VP-16 fused to the binding domain of the tetracycline-responsive factor) in all cell lines (Fig.5 a, right). In addition, SHARP-1 was able to repress both basal and activated transcription from a TATA-containing promoter when bound distally to the transcription start site (Fig.5 b). We also tested the ability of SHARP-1 to regulate transcription from a TATAless promoter. As can be seen in Fig.5 c, SHARP-1 can repress basal and activated transcription from a TATAless promoter. We therefore conclude that SHARP-1 acts as a repressor of both basal and activated transcription of both TATA-containing and TATAless promoters. In the case of a TATA-containing promoter, repression is evident when SHARP-1 is bound either proximally or distally to the promoter, although the degree of repression is more marked when SHARP-1 is tethered proximally. To map the domain(s) responsible for the repression function of SHARP-1, we generated deletion mutants of the Gal4-SHARP-1 fusion protein. The ability of these fusion proteins to repress transcription was analyzed using the reporter gene driven by a TATA-containing promoter with five Gal4 binding sites proximal to the transcription start site (pTRE UAS TATA) in Neuro 2a cells (Fig.6). Results were normalized to expression of the reporter gene in the presence of Gal4 DBD alone. Western blot analysis showed that all constructs were expressed at similar levels (data not shown). Deletion of the C-terminal domain of SHARP-1 (to give pMT G4 NbHO-SHARP-1) slightly relieved repression by SHARP-1, but the C-terminal domain (residues 174–253) of SHARP-1 fused to Gal4 DBD (pMT G4 C-SHARP-1) was able to repress transcription as robustly as full-length SHARP-1. Therefore, it would appear that SHARP-1 must contain at least two independent repression domains, one in the C-terminal domain and another in the remaining fragment. To map the second repression domain of SHARP-1, more deletion mutants were examined. Deletion of the Orange domain and C-terminal domain to give pMT G4 NbH-SHARP-1 still gave robust repression, but further deletion of the bHLH domain to leave only the N-terminal domain (pMT G4 N-SHARP-1) led to relief of most of the repression activity, suggesting that the bHLH domain also mediates repression. This was confirmed by analysis of two further constructs. Fusion of the Orange domain and flanking sequence (residues 103–173) and the Gal4 DBD (pMT G4 O-SHARP-1) showed some degree of repression, but fusion of the bHLH domain (residues 43–102) and Gal4 DBD (pMT G4 bH-SHARP-1) indicated that the bulk of repression in this second region was mediated by the bHLH domain. In summary, we identified two independent repression domains in SHARP-1, one in the bHLH domain and the other in the C terminus. Recent studies have shown that many transcriptional repressors exert their action through recruitment of histone deacetylase activity (see Ref. 26Ayer D.E. Trends Cell Biol. 1999; 9: 193-198Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (250) Google Scholar for review). To test whether SHARP-1 represses transcription through such a mechanism, we treated Neuro 2a cells with the histone deacetylase inhibitor TSA (27Yoshida M. Horinouchi S. Beppu T. Bioessays. 1995; 17: 423-430Crossref PubMed Scopus (667) Google Scholar) and examined the effect on SHARP-1-mediated repression (Fig.7). For each concentration of TSA used, expression values of the reporter gene were normalized to those obtained in the presence of Gal4 DBD alone, and results were expressed as fold over untreated cells. Repression by full-length SHARP-1 is partially relieved by TSA, because expression of the reporter gene was derepressed 4-fold in the presence of 100 nm TSA. Deletion of the C-terminal domain of SHARP-1 (to give pMT G4 NbHLHO-SHARP-1) showed that repression mediated by the bHLH domains was much less sensitive to TSA, resulting in a 1.6-fold derepression by 100 nm TSA. However, repression by the C-terminal domain alone was relieved by 6.5-fold with 100 nm TSA, and 2-fold derepression could be seen in the presence of 10 nm TSA. These results show that the C-terminal domain of SHARP-1 represses transcription via a mechanism that is likely to involve histone deacetylase activity but that the bHLH domain represses transcription in a histone deacetylase-independent manner. To test the functional effect of SHARP-1 on M1 expression, IMR32, 3T3, and Neuro 2a cells were transfected with a reporter vector containing the region of the M1 gene between −372 and +602 (relative to the transcription start site). This construct has been shown before to be capable of driving expression in IMR32 cells, a neuronal cell line that expresses the M1 gene (18Wood I.C. Garriga-Canut M. Palmer C.L. Pepitoni S. Buckley N.J. Biochem. J. 1999; 340: 475-483Crossref PubMed Scopus (11) Google Scholar). The same construct does not drive expression in the non-M1-expressing neuronal cell line Neuro 2a and drives only low levels of expression in 3T3 cells (18Wood I.C. Garriga-Canut M. Palmer C.L. Pepitoni S. Buckley N.J. Biochem. J. 1999; 340: 475-483Crossref PubMed Scopus (11) Google Scholar). Overexpression of SHARP-1 (pSHARP-1 myc) had no effect on expression of the promoterless reporter vector pGL3 basic but reduced expression driven by the M1 promoter by 55% in IMR32 cells (Fig.8 a). A similar effect was seen in 3T3 cells (Fig. 8 b). No effect was seen in Neuro 2a, the neuronal cell line that does not express M1 (data not shown). These results show that SHARP-1 is able to repress expression of the M1 gene in an M1-expressing cell line. bHLH proteins are key players that regulate many aspects of development and differentiation in all tissues and phyla. To date, no target genes or function of SHARP-1 has been identified. SHARP-1 is unusual in two respects. First, SHARP-1 is related to, but distinct from, HAIRY/E(spl)/HES bHLH proteins. Second, expression of SHARP-1 appears to be restricted to postnatal neurons of the central nervous system, rather than neural progenitors, implying a role in late neuronal differentiation rather than neurogenesis. These features suggested that SHARP-1 may affect transcriptional regulation and target promoters distinct from those used by other members of the HAIRY/E(spl)/HES bHLH family. SHARP-1 contains an Arg in position 13 of the basic region present in all class B bHLH proteins. This residue is essential for class B proteins to bind the consensus sequence CA(C/T)GTG (9Dang C.V. Dolde C. Gillison M.L. Kato G.J. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1992; 89: 599-602Crossref PubMed Scopus (140) Google Scholar). Sequence analysis of the region between +166 and +417 of the M1 gene does not indicate the presence of any known recognition consensus motif (class A, B, or C) for bHLH (8Blackwell T.K. Weintraub H. Science. 1990; 250: 1104-1110Crossref PubMed Scopus (759) Google Scholar, 9Dang C.V. Dolde C. Gillison M.L. Kato G.J. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1992; 89: 599-602Crossref PubMed Scopus (140) Google Scholar, 10Ohsako S. Hyer J. Panganiban G. Oliver I. Caudy M. Genes Dev. 1994; 8: 2743-2755Crossref PubMed Scopus (230) Google Scholar), suggesting that SHARP-1 may recognize a novel binding site. Gel electrophoresis mobility shift assays have failed to demonstrate an ability of Stra13 to bind to either an E-box or N-b" @default.
- W2153228112 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W2153228112 creator A5001568429 @default.
- W2153228112 creator A5022023872 @default.
- W2153228112 creator A5034552370 @default.
- W2153228112 date "2001-01-01" @default.
- W2153228112 modified "2023-09-30" @default.
- W2153228112 title "The Basic Helix-Loop-Helix Protein, SHARP-1, Represses Transcription by a Histone Deacetylase-dependent and Histone Deacetylase-independent Mechanism" @default.
- W2153228112 cites W1597656413 @default.
- W2153228112 cites W1635667563 @default.
- W2153228112 cites W1665024321 @default.
- W2153228112 cites W1967192173 @default.
- W2153228112 cites W1968074908 @default.
- W2153228112 cites W1970207562 @default.
- W2153228112 cites W1971788926 @default.
- W2153228112 cites W1977690815 @default.
- W2153228112 cites W1978089479 @default.
- W2153228112 cites W1978116091 @default.
- W2153228112 cites W1985001103 @default.
- W2153228112 cites W1990342419 @default.
- W2153228112 cites W1991176878 @default.
- W2153228112 cites W1993984481 @default.
- W2153228112 cites W1999508901 @default.
- W2153228112 cites W1999874171 @default.
- W2153228112 cites W2000012280 @default.
- W2153228112 cites W2001404678 @default.
- W2153228112 cites W2003990690 @default.
- W2153228112 cites W2019673480 @default.
- W2153228112 cites W2022133841 @default.
- W2153228112 cites W2025657972 @default.
- W2153228112 cites W2036475318 @default.
- W2153228112 cites W2041425399 @default.
- W2153228112 cites W2041718959 @default.
- W2153228112 cites W2042818012 @default.
- W2153228112 cites W2050006662 @default.
- W2153228112 cites W2054696920 @default.
- W2153228112 cites W2057564306 @default.
- W2153228112 cites W2065280916 @default.
- W2153228112 cites W2069404867 @default.
- W2153228112 cites W2076411242 @default.
- W2153228112 cites W2080738247 @default.
- W2153228112 cites W2081710784 @default.
- W2153228112 cites W2082670705 @default.
- W2153228112 cites W2089306515 @default.
- W2153228112 cites W2091811407 @default.
- W2153228112 cites W2095115211 @default.
- W2153228112 cites W2104788426 @default.
- W2153228112 cites W2108490725 @default.
- W2153228112 cites W2112367847 @default.
- W2153228112 cites W2118862408 @default.
- W2153228112 cites W2146000333 @default.
- W2153228112 cites W2147386781 @default.
- W2153228112 cites W2152046097 @default.
- W2153228112 cites W2155365827 @default.
- W2153228112 cites W2156160936 @default.
- W2153228112 cites W2166984732 @default.
- W2153228112 cites W231822359 @default.
- W2153228112 cites W4300379228 @default.
- W2153228112 cites W50972535 @default.
- W2153228112 doi "https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.m011619200" @default.
- W2153228112 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11278948" @default.
- W2153228112 hasPublicationYear "2001" @default.
- W2153228112 type Work @default.
- W2153228112 sameAs 2153228112 @default.
- W2153228112 citedByCount "36" @default.
- W2153228112 countsByYear W21532281122012 @default.
- W2153228112 countsByYear W21532281122013 @default.
- W2153228112 countsByYear W21532281122014 @default.
- W2153228112 countsByYear W21532281122015 @default.
- W2153228112 countsByYear W21532281122018 @default.
- W2153228112 countsByYear W21532281122019 @default.
- W2153228112 countsByYear W21532281122020 @default.
- W2153228112 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2153228112 hasAuthorship W2153228112A5001568429 @default.
- W2153228112 hasAuthorship W2153228112A5022023872 @default.
- W2153228112 hasAuthorship W2153228112A5034552370 @default.
- W2153228112 hasBestOaLocation W21532281121 @default.
- W2153228112 hasConcept C104317684 @default.
- W2153228112 hasConcept C185592680 @default.
- W2153228112 hasConcept C27253355 @default.
- W2153228112 hasConcept C2778305200 @default.
- W2153228112 hasConcept C4951695 @default.
- W2153228112 hasConcept C552990157 @default.
- W2153228112 hasConcept C55493867 @default.
- W2153228112 hasConcept C58793620 @default.
- W2153228112 hasConcept C6174537 @default.
- W2153228112 hasConcept C64927066 @default.
- W2153228112 hasConcept C71723506 @default.
- W2153228112 hasConcept C85240754 @default.
- W2153228112 hasConcept C86339819 @default.
- W2153228112 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
- W2153228112 hasConcept C94966510 @default.
- W2153228112 hasConcept C95444343 @default.
- W2153228112 hasConceptScore W2153228112C104317684 @default.
- W2153228112 hasConceptScore W2153228112C185592680 @default.
- W2153228112 hasConceptScore W2153228112C27253355 @default.
- W2153228112 hasConceptScore W2153228112C2778305200 @default.
- W2153228112 hasConceptScore W2153228112C4951695 @default.