FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2153893721> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2153893721 endingPage "440.e6" @default.
• W2153893721 startingPage "440.e1" @default.
• W2153893721 abstract "Objective We sought to assess the relationship between strength of preference for vaginal birth and likelihood of vaginal delivery among women attempting this delivery mode. Study Design We conducted a longitudinal study of mode of delivery preferences among women who were <36 weeks' pregnant. Participants completed a sociodemographic and clinical questionnaire and were asked if they preferred vaginal or cesarean delivery. Participants who preferred vaginal delivery completed a standard gamble exercise to assess the strength of this preference on a 0-to-1 scale (higher scores indicate stronger preference for vaginal delivery); those preferring cesarean delivery were assigned a value of 0. Data on clinical characteristics and delivery mode were obtained via telephone interview or chart review. Logistic regression was used to identify predictors of delivery mode among women who attempted a vaginal delivery. Results Of 210 participants, 156 attempted a vaginal delivery. Their mean and median vaginal delivery preference scores were 0.70 (SD 0.31) and 0.75 (interquartile range, 0.50–0.99), respectively. In multivariate analyses, women with a prior cesarean delivery (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.08; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.02–0.39) or who delivered an infant ≥4000 g (aOR, 0.04; 95% CI, 0.01–0.28) had significantly lower odds of having a vaginal delivery. After controlling for potential confounders, participants with a stronger preference for vaginal delivery were at significantly higher odds of having a vaginal delivery (aOR, 1.54; 95% CI, 1.01–2.34 for every 0.2 increase on the 0-to-1 scale). Conclusion Among women who attempt a vaginal delivery, the strength of preference for vaginal birth is predictive of the delivery mode ultimately undergone. We sought to assess the relationship between strength of preference for vaginal birth and likelihood of vaginal delivery among women attempting this delivery mode. We conducted a longitudinal study of mode of delivery preferences among women who were <36 weeks' pregnant. Participants completed a sociodemographic and clinical questionnaire and were asked if they preferred vaginal or cesarean delivery. Participants who preferred vaginal delivery completed a standard gamble exercise to assess the strength of this preference on a 0-to-1 scale (higher scores indicate stronger preference for vaginal delivery); those preferring cesarean delivery were assigned a value of 0. Data on clinical characteristics and delivery mode were obtained via telephone interview or chart review. Logistic regression was used to identify predictors of delivery mode among women who attempted a vaginal delivery. Of 210 participants, 156 attempted a vaginal delivery. Their mean and median vaginal delivery preference scores were 0.70 (SD 0.31) and 0.75 (interquartile range, 0.50–0.99), respectively. In multivariate analyses, women with a prior cesarean delivery (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.08; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.02–0.39) or who delivered an infant ≥4000 g (aOR, 0.04; 95% CI, 0.01–0.28) had significantly lower odds of having a vaginal delivery. After controlling for potential confounders, participants with a stronger preference for vaginal delivery were at significantly higher odds of having a vaginal delivery (aOR, 1.54; 95% CI, 1.01–2.34 for every 0.2 increase on the 0-to-1 scale). Among women who attempt a vaginal delivery, the strength of preference for vaginal birth is predictive of the delivery mode ultimately undergone." @default.
• W2153893721 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2153893721 creator A5017111194 @default.
• W2153893721 creator A5050203379 @default.
• W2153893721 creator A5080905135 @default.
• W2153893721 creator A5086537473 @default.
• W2153893721 creator A5089582462 @default.
• W2153893721 creator A5008905247 @default.
• W2153893721 date "2014-05-01" @default.
• W2153893721 modified "2023-10-16" @default.
• W2153893721 title "Strength of preference for vaginal birth as a predictor of delivery mode among women who attempt a vaginal delivery" @default.
• W2153893721 cites W1537598136 @default.
• W2153893721 cites W1577696399 @default.
• W2153893721 cites W1971025903 @default.
• W2153893721 cites W1972823986 @default.
• W2153893721 cites W1984873231 @default.
• W2153893721 cites W1986051437 @default.
• W2153893721 cites W1989573832 @default.
• W2153893721 cites W1992634872 @default.
• W2153893721 cites W1993424123 @default.
• W2153893721 cites W2011364614 @default.
• W2153893721 cites W2021314031 @default.
• W2153893721 cites W2021893770 @default.
• W2153893721 cites W2024555251 @default.
• W2153893721 cites W2025097148 @default.
• W2153893721 cites W2035835116 @default.
• W2153893721 cites W2046205654 @default.
• W2153893721 cites W2048831060 @default.
• W2153893721 cites W2051123006 @default.
• W2153893721 cites W2065671030 @default.
• W2153893721 cites W2072356904 @default.
• W2153893721 cites W2084934352 @default.
• W2153893721 cites W2088992474 @default.
• W2153893721 cites W2094798800 @default.
• W2153893721 cites W2167290487 @default.
• W2153893721 cites W2171532579 @default.
• W2153893721 cites W2312486873 @default.
• W2153893721 cites W2402783003 @default.
• W2153893721 cites W2988116875 @default.
• W2153893721 cites W4235661499 @default.
• W2153893721 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2013.11.021" @default.
• W2153893721 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/4218776" @default.
• W2153893721 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24246523" @default.
• W2153893721 hasPublicationYear "2014" @default.
• W2153893721 type Work @default.
• W2153893721 sameAs 2153893721 @default.
• W2153893721 citedByCount "25" @default.
• W2153893721 countsByYear W21538937212015 @default.
• W2153893721 countsByYear W21538937212016 @default.
• W2153893721 countsByYear W21538937212017 @default.
• W2153893721 countsByYear W21538937212018 @default.
• W2153893721 countsByYear W21538937212019 @default.
• W2153893721 countsByYear W21538937212020 @default.
• W2153893721 countsByYear W21538937212021 @default.
• W2153893721 countsByYear W21538937212022 @default.
• W2153893721 countsByYear W21538937212023 @default.
• W2153893721 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2153893721 hasAuthorship W2153893721A5008905247 @default.
• W2153893721 hasAuthorship W2153893721A5017111194 @default.
• W2153893721 hasAuthorship W2153893721A5050203379 @default.
• W2153893721 hasAuthorship W2153893721A5080905135 @default.
• W2153893721 hasAuthorship W2153893721A5086537473 @default.
• W2153893721 hasAuthorship W2153893721A5089582462 @default.
• W2153893721 hasBestOaLocation W21538937212 @default.
• W2153893721 hasConcept C119060515 @default.
• W2153893721 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2153893721 hasConcept C131872663 @default.
• W2153893721 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2153893721 hasConcept C151956035 @default.
• W2153893721 hasConcept C156957248 @default.
• W2153893721 hasConcept C2777744392 @default.
• W2153893721 hasConcept C2778408130 @default.
• W2153893721 hasConcept C2779234561 @default.
• W2153893721 hasConcept C29456083 @default.
• W2153893721 hasConcept C44249647 @default.
• W2153893721 hasConcept C54355233 @default.
• W2153893721 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2153893721 hasConcept C77350462 @default.
• W2153893721 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W2153893721 hasConceptScore W2153893721C119060515 @default.
• W2153893721 hasConceptScore W2153893721C126322002 @default.
• W2153893721 hasConceptScore W2153893721C131872663 @default.
• W2153893721 hasConceptScore W2153893721C141071460 @default.
• W2153893721 hasConceptScore W2153893721C151956035 @default.
• W2153893721 hasConceptScore W2153893721C156957248 @default.
• W2153893721 hasConceptScore W2153893721C2777744392 @default.
• W2153893721 hasConceptScore W2153893721C2778408130 @default.
• W2153893721 hasConceptScore W2153893721C2779234561 @default.
• W2153893721 hasConceptScore W2153893721C29456083 @default.
• W2153893721 hasConceptScore W2153893721C44249647 @default.
• W2153893721 hasConceptScore W2153893721C54355233 @default.
• W2153893721 hasConceptScore W2153893721C71924100 @default.
• W2153893721 hasConceptScore W2153893721C77350462 @default.
• W2153893721 hasConceptScore W2153893721C86803240 @default.
• W2153893721 hasFunder F4320332161 @default.
• W2153893721 hasFunder F4320337375 @default.
• W2153893721 hasFunder F4320337472 @default.
• W2153893721 hasFunder F4320337645 @default.

• next