FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2154562830> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2154562830 endingPage "317" @default.
• W2154562830 startingPage "315" @default.
• W2154562830 abstract "There are multiple “evidence-based” diabetes guidelines that are used to develop diabetes performance measures for diabetes by multiple stakeholders within the United States, Europe, and other countries.12 Similarly, there are multiple differing sets of performance measures. Although leading organisations that develop measures or endorse measures report their process, the explicit reasoning underlying the selection of the final measures is often not apparent.3 In the current issue of QSHC, Martirosyan et al report on their use of the RAND Panel Delphi methodology to develop valid prescribing quality indicators (PQIs) for persons with type 2 diabetes (see page 318) .4 This is a good step forward, although it is not without shortcomings. In their report, a panel of experts was given practice guidelines and the evidence base. A series of proposed PQIs were then evaluated in a two-round process. Their paper raises several issues about performance measures and how they are chosen.Experts clearly disagree on how to evaluate evidence, and the Delphi method is designed to achieve consensus during the decision-making process. The Delphi method provides a structure to organise group communication. It is an iterative process of repeated evaluations by a group of individuals whose opinions or judgements are of interest. It is designed to secure the benefits of group decision-making while insulating the process from its limitations, for example, dominant individual members, and is useful for situations when the decisive factors are subjective and not knowledge-based, that is, where individual judgements vary and there is incomplete knowledge. It is usually conducted as a series of sequential questionnaires or “rounds.” After the first round, each subsequent round is accompanied by anonymously presented information regarding the preceding round. Each panel member is thus encouraged to reconsider and, if appropriate, to change their previous reply in light …" @default.
• W2154562830 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2154562830 creator A5019433798 @default.
• W2154562830 creator A5046757708 @default.
• W2154562830 date "2008-10-01" @default.
• W2154562830 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W2154562830 title "Quality indicators for diabetes mellitus in the ambulatory setting: using the Delphi method to inform performance measurement development" @default.
• W2154562830 cites W1964149171 @default.
• W2154562830 cites W2002078774 @default.
• W2154562830 cites W2015429646 @default.
• W2154562830 cites W2039906750 @default.
• W2154562830 cites W2113398253 @default.
• W2154562830 cites W2120774442 @default.
• W2154562830 cites W2128943089 @default.
• W2154562830 cites W2143369784 @default.
• W2154562830 cites W2160976181 @default.
• W2154562830 cites W2997680860 @default.
• W2154562830 doi "https://doi.org/10.1136/qshc.2007.026161" @default.
• W2154562830 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18842967" @default.
• W2154562830 hasPublicationYear "2008" @default.
• W2154562830 type Work @default.
• W2154562830 sameAs 2154562830 @default.
• W2154562830 citedByCount "12" @default.
• W2154562830 countsByYear W21545628302012 @default.
• W2154562830 countsByYear W21545628302013 @default.
• W2154562830 countsByYear W21545628302014 @default.
• W2154562830 countsByYear W21545628302016 @default.
• W2154562830 countsByYear W21545628302020 @default.
• W2154562830 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2154562830 hasAuthorship W2154562830A5019433798 @default.
• W2154562830 hasAuthorship W2154562830A5046757708 @default.
• W2154562830 hasConcept C111472728 @default.
• W2154562830 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2154562830 hasConcept C134018914 @default.
• W2154562830 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W2154562830 hasConcept C154945302 @default.
• W2154562830 hasConcept C2779530757 @default.
• W2154562830 hasConcept C35785553 @default.
• W2154562830 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2154562830 hasConcept C555293320 @default.
• W2154562830 hasConcept C60641444 @default.
• W2154562830 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2154562830 hasConceptScore W2154562830C111472728 @default.
• W2154562830 hasConceptScore W2154562830C126322002 @default.
• W2154562830 hasConceptScore W2154562830C134018914 @default.
• W2154562830 hasConceptScore W2154562830C138885662 @default.
• W2154562830 hasConceptScore W2154562830C154945302 @default.
• W2154562830 hasConceptScore W2154562830C2779530757 @default.
• W2154562830 hasConceptScore W2154562830C35785553 @default.
• W2154562830 hasConceptScore W2154562830C41008148 @default.
• W2154562830 hasConceptScore W2154562830C555293320 @default.
• W2154562830 hasConceptScore W2154562830C60641444 @default.
• W2154562830 hasConceptScore W2154562830C71924100 @default.
• W2154562830 hasIssue "5" @default.
• W2154562830 hasLocation W21545628301 @default.
• W2154562830 hasLocation W21545628302 @default.
• W2154562830 hasOpenAccess W2154562830 @default.
• W2154562830 hasPrimaryLocation W21545628301 @default.
• W2154562830 hasRelatedWork W1563850031 @default.
• W2154562830 hasRelatedWork W2039467565 @default.
• W2154562830 hasRelatedWork W2312635070 @default.
• W2154562830 hasRelatedWork W2331515627 @default.
• W2154562830 hasRelatedWork W2383009242 @default.
• W2154562830 hasRelatedWork W2413067036 @default.
• W2154562830 hasRelatedWork W2415759662 @default.
• W2154562830 hasRelatedWork W2766832809 @default.
• W2154562830 hasRelatedWork W2969016624 @default.
• W2154562830 hasRelatedWork W3000734051 @default.
• W2154562830 hasVolume "17" @default.
• W2154562830 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2154562830 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2154562830 magId "2154562830" @default.
• W2154562830 workType "article" @default.