FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2155165235> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2155165235 endingPage "245" @default.
• W2155165235 startingPage "238" @default.
• W2155165235 abstract "Introduction In the present investigation, we applied the whole-hand transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) therapy to two incomplete tetraplegic subjects and assessed their progress with four evaluation methods. Methods Two spinal cord injured subjects with spastic upper extremities participated in the study. The TENS therapy was added to their regular treatment. The TENS was delivered to the subject’s hands by a conductive glove. The therapy consisted of 20-min sessions each working day during a period of four weeks. The used assessment methods were: maximal force test, force tracking task, Jebsen-Taylor hand function test, and modified Ashworth scale. Results The results show increased finger muscle strength, improved motor control and hand function in both patients. The reduction of muscle tone, as assessed by the modified Ashworth scale, was observed in one subject. Discussion There was no correlation found between the Jebsen-Taylor test and the maximal force test or force tracking task in this investigation. Assessment methods are complementary to each other as each one adds new or more detailed information about level of impairment. Conclusion From the comparison of four evaluation methods, it is evident that different assessments and measurements should be used in order to get better picture of patient’s upper extremity impairment. In the present investigation, we applied the whole-hand transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) therapy to two incomplete tetraplegic subjects and assessed their progress with four evaluation methods. Two spinal cord injured subjects with spastic upper extremities participated in the study. The TENS therapy was added to their regular treatment. The TENS was delivered to the subject’s hands by a conductive glove. The therapy consisted of 20-min sessions each working day during a period of four weeks. The used assessment methods were: maximal force test, force tracking task, Jebsen-Taylor hand function test, and modified Ashworth scale. The results show increased finger muscle strength, improved motor control and hand function in both patients. The reduction of muscle tone, as assessed by the modified Ashworth scale, was observed in one subject. There was no correlation found between the Jebsen-Taylor test and the maximal force test or force tracking task in this investigation. Assessment methods are complementary to each other as each one adds new or more detailed information about level of impairment. From the comparison of four evaluation methods, it is evident that different assessments and measurements should be used in order to get better picture of patient’s upper extremity impairment." @default.
• W2155165235 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2155165235 creator A5006688148 @default.
• W2155165235 creator A5013448988 @default.
• W2155165235 creator A5020257077 @default.
• W2155165235 creator A5021579245 @default.
• W2155165235 creator A5040932100 @default.
• W2155165235 creator A5080451202 @default.
• W2155165235 creator A5082028947 @default.
• W2155165235 date "2010-07-01" @default.
• W2155165235 modified "2023-10-01" @default.
• W2155165235 title "Comparison of Four Evaluation Approaches in Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation Treatment in Two Incomplete Tetraplegic Subjects" @default.
• W2155165235 cites W1512299212 @default.
• W2155165235 cites W1763053069 @default.
• W2155165235 cites W1978225369 @default.
• W2155165235 cites W2039281713 @default.
• W2155165235 cites W2060597775 @default.
• W2155165235 cites W2068077411 @default.
• W2155165235 cites W2072054888 @default.
• W2155165235 cites W2117066224 @default.
• W2155165235 cites W2122353929 @default.
• W2155165235 cites W2123964553 @default.
• W2155165235 cites W2127253760 @default.
• W2155165235 cites W2129461449 @default.
• W2155165235 cites W2130873978 @default.
• W2155165235 cites W2135054768 @default.
• W2155165235 cites W2158844563 @default.
• W2155165235 cites W2159108226 @default.
• W2155165235 cites W2167337513 @default.
• W2155165235 cites W2184858132 @default.
• W2155165235 cites W4377985971 @default.
• W2155165235 doi "https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-1403.2009.00266.x" @default.
• W2155165235 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21992839" @default.
• W2155165235 hasPublicationYear "2010" @default.
• W2155165235 type Work @default.
• W2155165235 sameAs 2155165235 @default.
• W2155165235 citedByCount "2" @default.
• W2155165235 countsByYear W21551652352019 @default.
• W2155165235 countsByYear W21551652352022 @default.
• W2155165235 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2155165235 hasAuthorship W2155165235A5006688148 @default.
• W2155165235 hasAuthorship W2155165235A5013448988 @default.
• W2155165235 hasAuthorship W2155165235A5020257077 @default.
• W2155165235 hasAuthorship W2155165235A5021579245 @default.
• W2155165235 hasAuthorship W2155165235A5040932100 @default.
• W2155165235 hasAuthorship W2155165235A5080451202 @default.
• W2155165235 hasAuthorship W2155165235A5082028947 @default.
• W2155165235 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
• W2155165235 hasConcept C1862650 @default.
• W2155165235 hasConcept C204787440 @default.
• W2155165235 hasConcept C2776195251 @default.
• W2155165235 hasConcept C2776660947 @default.
• W2155165235 hasConcept C2778818304 @default.
• W2155165235 hasConcept C2779012798 @default.
• W2155165235 hasConcept C2779421357 @default.
• W2155165235 hasConcept C2780118021 @default.
• W2155165235 hasConcept C2780566999 @default.
• W2155165235 hasConcept C2781375409 @default.
• W2155165235 hasConcept C514863369 @default.
• W2155165235 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2155165235 hasConcept C99508421 @default.
• W2155165235 hasConceptScore W2155165235C142724271 @default.
• W2155165235 hasConceptScore W2155165235C1862650 @default.
• W2155165235 hasConceptScore W2155165235C204787440 @default.
• W2155165235 hasConceptScore W2155165235C2776195251 @default.
• W2155165235 hasConceptScore W2155165235C2776660947 @default.
• W2155165235 hasConceptScore W2155165235C2778818304 @default.
• W2155165235 hasConceptScore W2155165235C2779012798 @default.
• W2155165235 hasConceptScore W2155165235C2779421357 @default.
• W2155165235 hasConceptScore W2155165235C2780118021 @default.
• W2155165235 hasConceptScore W2155165235C2780566999 @default.
• W2155165235 hasConceptScore W2155165235C2781375409 @default.
• W2155165235 hasConceptScore W2155165235C514863369 @default.
• W2155165235 hasConceptScore W2155165235C71924100 @default.
• W2155165235 hasConceptScore W2155165235C99508421 @default.
• W2155165235 hasIssue "3" @default.
• W2155165235 hasLocation W21551652351 @default.
• W2155165235 hasLocation W21551652352 @default.
• W2155165235 hasOpenAccess W2155165235 @default.
• W2155165235 hasPrimaryLocation W21551652351 @default.
• W2155165235 hasRelatedWork W2274665951 @default.
• W2155165235 hasRelatedWork W2319473292 @default.
• W2155165235 hasRelatedWork W23597249 @default.
• W2155165235 hasRelatedWork W2392724176 @default.
• W2155165235 hasRelatedWork W2466098543 @default.
• W2155165235 hasRelatedWork W2944362226 @default.
• W2155165235 hasRelatedWork W3048880384 @default.
• W2155165235 hasRelatedWork W4225710990 @default.
• W2155165235 hasRelatedWork W4310219774 @default.
• W2155165235 hasRelatedWork W2740739167 @default.
• W2155165235 hasVolume "13" @default.
• W2155165235 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2155165235 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2155165235 magId "2155165235" @default.
• W2155165235 workType "article" @default.