FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2155331972> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2155331972 endingPage "289" @default.
• W2155331972 startingPage "281" @default.
• W2155331972 abstract "BackgroundThe safety of patient-controlled i.v. analgesia (PCA) with remifentanil for obstetrical analgesia remains a matter of concern. The efficacy of remifentanil bolus application, that is, the coincidence between pain and remifentanil effect-site concentration, may be improved by forecasting contractions, but it is not known whether such a technique would also improve safety.MethodsWe recorded pain intensity during labour continuously using a handheld dynamometer in 43 parturients. Using these data, we compared different models in their ability to predict future contractions. In addition, we modelled remifentanil effect-site concentration using three simulated modes of bolus administration, with and without prediction of future contractions.ResultsThe average duration of pain during contractions recorded by the dynamometer was 45 [14 standard deviation (sd)] s. The time interval between painful contractions was highly variable, with a mean of 151 (31 sd) s during the first and 154 (52 sd) s during the second recording. Using a simple algorithm (three-point moving average), the sd of the difference between predicted and observed inter-contraction intervals can be reduced from 0.95 to 0.79 min. However, the coincidence between remifentanil concentration and pain during contraction is not substantially improved when using these models to guide remifentanil bolus application.ConclusionsBecause of the large variability of inter-contraction intervals, the use of prediction models will not influence the mean remifentanil concentration in-between contractions. Using models predicting future contractions to improve the timing of remifentanil PCA bolus administration will not diminish the need of continuous clinical surveillance and other safety measures. The safety of patient-controlled i.v. analgesia (PCA) with remifentanil for obstetrical analgesia remains a matter of concern. The efficacy of remifentanil bolus application, that is, the coincidence between pain and remifentanil effect-site concentration, may be improved by forecasting contractions, but it is not known whether such a technique would also improve safety. We recorded pain intensity during labour continuously using a handheld dynamometer in 43 parturients. Using these data, we compared different models in their ability to predict future contractions. In addition, we modelled remifentanil effect-site concentration using three simulated modes of bolus administration, with and without prediction of future contractions. The average duration of pain during contractions recorded by the dynamometer was 45 [14 standard deviation (sd)] s. The time interval between painful contractions was highly variable, with a mean of 151 (31 sd) s during the first and 154 (52 sd) s during the second recording. Using a simple algorithm (three-point moving average), the sd of the difference between predicted and observed inter-contraction intervals can be reduced from 0.95 to 0.79 min. However, the coincidence between remifentanil concentration and pain during contraction is not substantially improved when using these models to guide remifentanil bolus application. Because of the large variability of inter-contraction intervals, the use of prediction models will not influence the mean remifentanil concentration in-between contractions. Using models predicting future contractions to improve the timing of remifentanil PCA bolus administration will not diminish the need of continuous clinical surveillance and other safety measures." @default.
• W2155331972 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2155331972 creator A5036714964 @default.
• W2155331972 creator A5065205823 @default.
• W2155331972 creator A5066538734 @default.
• W2155331972 creator A5078744389 @default.
• W2155331972 date "2015-02-01" @default.
• W2155331972 modified "2023-10-18" @default.
• W2155331972 title "Can remifentanil use in obstetrics be improved by optimal patient-controlled analgesia bolus timing?" @default.
• W2155331972 cites W1480660477 @default.
• W2155331972 cites W1555443165 @default.
• W2155331972 cites W1558490634 @default.
• W2155331972 cites W1965879639 @default.
• W2155331972 cites W1973402969 @default.
• W2155331972 cites W1982325404 @default.
• W2155331972 cites W1996642244 @default.
• W2155331972 cites W2019121819 @default.
• W2155331972 cites W2032812419 @default.
• W2155331972 cites W2056563604 @default.
• W2155331972 cites W2056954016 @default.
• W2155331972 cites W2082641223 @default.
• W2155331972 cites W2083189189 @default.
• W2155331972 cites W2083737567 @default.
• W2155331972 cites W2086192413 @default.
• W2155331972 cites W2113543646 @default.
• W2155331972 cites W2116512828 @default.
• W2155331972 cites W2122614564 @default.
• W2155331972 cites W2132839799 @default.
• W2155331972 cites W2158248418 @default.
• W2155331972 cites W2488700677 @default.
• W2155331972 cites W2914684004 @default.
• W2155331972 cites W4362115503 @default.
• W2155331972 doi "https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aeu368" @default.
• W2155331972 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25481224" @default.
• W2155331972 hasPublicationYear "2015" @default.
• W2155331972 type Work @default.
• W2155331972 sameAs 2155331972 @default.
• W2155331972 citedByCount "10" @default.
• W2155331972 countsByYear W21553319722015 @default.
• W2155331972 countsByYear W21553319722016 @default.
• W2155331972 countsByYear W21553319722017 @default.
• W2155331972 countsByYear W21553319722018 @default.
• W2155331972 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2155331972 hasAuthorship W2155331972A5036714964 @default.
• W2155331972 hasAuthorship W2155331972A5065205823 @default.
• W2155331972 hasAuthorship W2155331972A5066538734 @default.
• W2155331972 hasAuthorship W2155331972A5078744389 @default.
• W2155331972 hasBestOaLocation W21553319721 @default.
• W2155331972 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2155331972 hasConcept C2776277131 @default.
• W2155331972 hasConcept C2778891214 @default.
• W2155331972 hasConcept C42219234 @default.
• W2155331972 hasConcept C43376680 @default.
• W2155331972 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2155331972 hasConceptScore W2155331972C141071460 @default.
• W2155331972 hasConceptScore W2155331972C2776277131 @default.
• W2155331972 hasConceptScore W2155331972C2778891214 @default.
• W2155331972 hasConceptScore W2155331972C42219234 @default.
• W2155331972 hasConceptScore W2155331972C43376680 @default.
• W2155331972 hasConceptScore W2155331972C71924100 @default.
• W2155331972 hasIssue "2" @default.
• W2155331972 hasLocation W21553319721 @default.
• W2155331972 hasLocation W21553319722 @default.
• W2155331972 hasLocation W21553319723 @default.
• W2155331972 hasOpenAccess W2155331972 @default.
• W2155331972 hasPrimaryLocation W21553319721 @default.
• W2155331972 hasRelatedWork W1506416527 @default.
• W2155331972 hasRelatedWork W1561891400 @default.
• W2155331972 hasRelatedWork W197770529 @default.
• W2155331972 hasRelatedWork W1985810678 @default.
• W2155331972 hasRelatedWork W2074175305 @default.
• W2155331972 hasRelatedWork W2111768297 @default.
• W2155331972 hasRelatedWork W2314565837 @default.
• W2155331972 hasRelatedWork W2346506650 @default.
• W2155331972 hasRelatedWork W2550758184 @default.
• W2155331972 hasRelatedWork W3201110919 @default.
• W2155331972 hasVolume "114" @default.
• W2155331972 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2155331972 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2155331972 magId "2155331972" @default.
• W2155331972 workType "article" @default.