FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2155476965> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2155476965 endingPage "32" @default.
• W2155476965 startingPage "25" @default.
• W2155476965 abstract "No AccessPerspectives on Voice and Voice DisordersArticle1 Jul 2006Strategies for Excelling With Alaryngeal Speech Methods Minnie S. Graham Minnie S. Graham Department of Special Education, San Francisco State University San Francisco, CA Google Scholar More articles by this author https://doi.org/10.1044/vvd16.2.25 SectionsAboutFull TextPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationTrack Citations ShareFacebookTwitterLinked In References Amster, W. W., & Amster, J. B. (1994). Developing effective communication after laryngectomy.In R.L. Keith, & F.L. Darley, (Eds.), Laryngectomee rehabilitation (3rd ed., pp. 263–281). Austin, TX: PRO-ED. Google Scholar Bennett, S. & Weinberg, B. (1973). Acceptability ratings of normal, esophageal, and artificial larynx speech.Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 16, 608–615. LinkGoogle Scholar Blood, G. W., Luther, A. R., & Stemple, J. C. (1992). Coping and adjustment in alaryngeal speakers.American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 1, 63–69. LinkGoogle Scholar Bosone, Z. T. (1994). Tracheoesophageal fistulization/puncture for voice restoration: Presurgical considerations and troubleshooting procedures.In R.L. Keith & F.L. Darley, (Eds.), Laryngectomee rehabilitation (3rd ed., pp. 359–381). Austin, TX: PRO-ED. Google Scholar Bosone, Z. T. (1999). Tracheoesophageal speech: Treatment considerations before and after surgery.In S.J. Salmon (Ed.), Alaryngeal speech rehabilitation (2nd ed., pp. 105–150). Austin, TX: PRO-ED. Google Scholar Carpenter, M. A. (1999). Treatment decisions in alaryngeal speech.In S.J. Salmon (Ed.), Alaryngeal speech rehabilitation (2nd ed., pp. 55–77). Austin, TX: PRO-ED. Google Scholar Connor, N. P., Hamlet, S. L., & Joyce, J. C. (1985). Acoustic and physiologic correlates of the voicing distinction in esophageal speech.Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 50, 378–384. LinkGoogle Scholar Diedrich, W. M., & Youngstrom, K. A. (1966). Alaryngeal speech. Springfield, IL: Thomas. Google Scholar Doyle, P. C. (1994). Foundations of voice and speech rehabilitation following laryngeal cancer. San Diego: Singular Publishing. Google Scholar Doyle, P. C. (2005). Clinical procedures for training use of the electronic artificial larynx.In P.C. Doyle, & R.L. Keith, (Eds.), Contemporary considerations in the treatment and rehabilitation of head and neck cancer (pp. 545–570). Austin, TX: PRO-ED. Google Scholar Doyle, P. C., Danhauer, J. L., & Reed, C. G. (1988). Listeners’ perceptions of consonants produced by esoph-ageal and tracheoesophageal talkers.Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 53, 400–407. LinkGoogle Scholar Doyle, P. C., & Eadie, T. L. (2005). The perceptual nature of alaryngeal voice and speech.In P.C. Doyle & R.L. Keith (Eds.), Contemporary considerations in the treatment and rehabilitation of head and neck cancer (pp. 113–140). Austin, TX: PRO-ED. Google Scholar Doyle, P. C., & Haaf, R. G. (1989). Perception of pre-vocalic and post-vocalic consonants produce by tracheoe-sophageal speakers.Journal of Otolaryngology, 18, 350–353. Google Scholar Duffy, J. R. (1995). Motor speech disorders: Substrates, differential diagnosis, and management. St. Louis, MO: Mosby. Google Scholar Duguay, M. J. (1983). Teaching use of an artificial larynx.In W.H. Perkins, (Ed.), Voice disorders (pp. 127–135). New York: Thieme-Stratton. Google Scholar Duguay, M. J. (1999). Esophageal speech training: The initial phase.In S.J. Salmon (Ed.), Alaryngeal speech rehabilitation: For clinicians by clinicians (2nd ed., pp. 165–201). Austin, TX: PRO-ED. Google Scholar Filter, M. D., & Hyman, M. (1975). Relationship of acoustic parameters and perceptual ratings of esophageal speech.Perceptual and Motor Skills, 40, 60–68. Google Scholar Gardner, W. N. (1971). Laryngectomee speech and rehabilitation. Springfield, IL: Thomas. Google Scholar Gardner, W. N. & Harris, H. E. (1961). Aids and devices for laryngectomees.Archives of Otolaryngology, 73, 145–152. Google Scholar Gates, G. A., Ryan, W., Cooper, J. C., Lawlis, G. F., Cantu, E., Hayashi, T., Lauder, E., Welch, R. W., & Hearne, E. (1982). Current status of laryngectomee rehabilitation: I. Results of therapy.American Journal of Otolaryngology, 3, 1–7. CrossrefGoogle Scholar Gilmore, S. I. (1999). Failure in acquiring esophageal speech.In S.J. Salmon (Ed.), Alaryngeal speech rehabilitation for clinicians by clinicians (2nd ed., pp. 221–268). Austin, TX: PRO-ED. Google Scholar Glaze, L. E. (2005). Peer group support in laryngectomy rehabilitation.In P.C. Doyle & R.L. Keith (Eds.), Contemporary considerations in the treatment and rehabilitation of head and neck cancer (pp. 625–638). Austin, TX: PRO-ED. Google Scholar Graham, M. S. (1997). The clinician’s guide to alaryngeal speech therapy. Boston: Butterworth-Heinemann. Google Scholar Graham, M. S. (2005a). Accountability in alaryngeal speech rehabilitation.In P.C. Doyle & R.L. Keith (Eds.), Contemporary considerations in the treatment and rehabilitation of head and neck cancer (pp. 667–696). Austin, TX: PRO-ED. Google Scholar Graham, M. S. (2005b) Taking it to the limits: Achieving proficient esophageal speech.In P.C. Doyle & R.L. Keith (Eds.), Contemporary considerations in the treatment and rehabilitation of head and neck cancer (pp. 379–430). Austin, TX: PRO-ED. Google Scholar Gress, C. D., & Singer, M. I. (2005). Tracheoesophageal voice restoration.In P.C. Doyle & R.L. Keith (Eds.), Contemporary considerations in the treatment and rehabilitation of head and neck cancer (pp. 431–452). Austin, TX: PRO-ED. Google Scholar Haroldson, S. K. (1999). Toward advancing esophageal communication.In S.J. Salmon (Ed.), Alaryngeal speech rehabilitation for clinicians by clinicians (2nd ed., pp. 203–219). Austin, TX: PRO-ED. Google Scholar Hilgers, F.J.M. & van As, C. J. (2005). Postlaryngectomy voice rehabilitation with the consistent use of indwelling voice prostheses.In P.C. Doyle & R.L. Keith (Eds.), Contemporary considerations in the treatment and rehabilitation of head and neck cancer (pp. 453–479). Austin, TX: PRO-ED. Google Scholar Hillman, R. E., Walsh, M. J., & Heaton, J. T. (2005). Laryngectomy speech rehabilitation: A review of outcomes.In P.C. Doyle & R.L. Keith (Eds.), Contemporary considerations in the treatment and rehabilitation of head and neck cancer (pp. 75–90). Austin, TX: PRO-ED. Google Scholar Hoops, H. R., & Guzek, T. J. (1974). The relationship of rate and phrasing to esophageal speech proficiency.Archives of Otolaryngology, 100, 190–193. Google Scholar Hoops, H. R., & Noll, J. D. (1969). Relationship of selected acoustic variables to judgment of esophageal speech.Journal of Communication Disorders, 2, 1–13. Google Scholar Hyman, M. (1994). The intermediate stage of teaching alaryngeal speech.In R.L. Keith & F.L. Darley (Eds.), Laryngectomee rehabilitation (3rd ed., pp. 309–321). Austin, TX: PRO-ED. Google Scholar King, P. S., Fowlks, E. W., & Pierson, G. A. (1968). Rehabilitation and adaptation of laryngectomy patients.American Journal of Physical Medicine, 47, 192–203. Google Scholar Leeper, H. A., Gratton, D. G., Lapointe, H. J., & Armstrong, J. E. A. (2005). Maxillofacial rehabilitation for oral cancer.In P.C. Doyle & R.L. Keith (Eds.), Contemporary considerations in the treatment and rehabilitation of head and neck cancer (pp. 261–313). Austin, TX: PRO-ED. Google Scholar Lerman, J. W. (1991). The artificial larynx.In S.J. Salmon & K.H. Mount (Eds.), Alaryngeal speech rehabilitation (pp. 27–45). Austin, TX: PRO-ED. Google Scholar Lerman, J. W. (1999). Group therapy for laryngectomees.In S.J. Salmon (Ed.), Alaryngeal speech rehabilitation: For clinicians by clinicians (2nd ed., 269–284). Austin, TX: PRO-ED. Google Scholar Lewin, J. S. (1999). Tracheoesophageal communication: Beyond traditional speech treatment.In S.J. Salmon (Ed.), Alaryngeal speech rehabilitation: For clinicians by clinicians (2nd ed., 151–163). Austin, TX: PRO-ED. Google Scholar Lewin, J. S. (2005). Problems associated with alaryngeal speech development.In P.C. Doyle & R.L. Keith (Eds.), Contemporary considerations in the treatment and rehabilitation of head and neck cancer (pp. 593–623). Austin, TX: PRO-ED. Google Scholar Martin, D. E. (1994). Evaluating esophageal speech development and proficiency.In R.L. Keith & F.L. Darley (Eds.), Laryngectomee rehabilitation (3rd ed., pp. 331–349). Austin, TX: PRO-ED. Google Scholar Minear, D., & Lucente, F. D. (1979). Current attitudes of laryngectomy patients.Laryngoscope, 89, 1061–1065. Google Scholar Myers, C. (2005). Group treatment models for head and neck cancer.In P.C. Doyle & R.L. Keith (Eds.), Contemporary considerations in the treatment and rehabilitation of head and neck cancer (pp. 639–663). Austin, TX: PRO-ED. Google Scholar O’Keefe, B. M. (1996). Communication disorders: Just minor inconveniences?.R. Renwick,I. Brown, & M. Nagler (Eds.), Quality of life in health promotion and rehabilitation: Conceptual approaches, issues and applications. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications. Google Scholar Palmer, A. D., & Graham, M. S. (2004). The relationship between communication and quality of life in alaryngeal speakers.Journal of Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology, 28, 3–24. Google Scholar Robbins, J. A., Christensen, J. C., & Kempster, G. (1986). Characteristics of speech production after tracheoesophageal puncture: Voice onset time and vowel duration.Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 29, 499–504. AbstractGoogle Scholar Robbins, J. A., Fisher, H. B., Blom, E. D., & Singer, M. L. (1984). A comparative acoustic study of normal, esophageal, and tracheoesophageal speech production.Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 49, 202–210. LinkGoogle Scholar Salmon, S. J. (1994a). Artificial larynxes: Teaching their use.In R.L. Keith & F.L. Darley (Eds.), Laryngectomee rehabilitation (3rd ed., pp. 179–189). Austin, TX: PRO-ED. Google Scholar Salmon, S. J. (1994b). Methods of air intake and associated problems.In R.L. Keith & F.L. Darley (Eds.), Laryngectomee rehabilitation (3rd ed., pp. 219–234). Austin, TX: PRO-ED. Google Scholar Salmon, S. J. (1999). Artificial larynx devices and their use.In S.J. Salmon (Ed.), Alaryngeal speech rehabilitation: For clinicians by clinicians (2nd ed., 79–104). Austin, TX: PRO-ED. Google Scholar Salmon, S. J. (2005). Commonalities among alaryngeal speech methods.In P.C. Doyle & R.L. Keith (Eds.), Contemporary considerations in the treatment and rehabilitation of head and neck cancer (pp. 59–74). Austin, TX: PRO-ED. Google Scholar Schmidt, R. A., & Bjork, R. A. (1992). New conceptualizations in practice: Common principles in three paradigms suggest new concepts for training.Psychology Science, 3, 207–217. Google Scholar Sedory, S. E., Hamlet, S. L., & O’Connor, N. P. (1989). Comparisons of perceptual and acoustic characteristics of tracheoesophageal and excellent esophageal speech.Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 54, 209–214. LinkGoogle Scholar Shanks, J. C. (1994). Developing esophageal communication.In R.L. Keith & F.L. Darley (Eds.), Laryngectomee rehabilitation (3rd ed., pp. 205–217). Austin, TX: PRO-ED. Google Scholar Snidecor, J. C. (1978a). The artificial larynx.In J.C. Snidecor (Ed.), Speech rehabilitation of the laryngectomized (2nd ed., pp. 199–208). Springfield, IL: Thomas. Google Scholar Snidecor, J. C. (1978b). Speech therapy for those with total laryngectomy.In J.C. Snidecor (Ed.), Speech rehabilitation of the laryngectomized (2nd ed., pp. 180–193). Springfield, IL: Thomas. Google Scholar Stalker, J. L., Hawk, A.M., & Smaldino, J.J. (1982). The intelligibility and acceptability of speech produced by five different electronic artificial larynx devices.Journal of Communication Disorders, 15, 299–307. Google Scholar Stone, R. E. & Hamilton, R. (1986). Laryngectomee rehabilitation in a group setting.Seminars in Speech and Language, 7, 53–65. CrossrefGoogle Scholar Weinberg, B. (1983). Voice and speech restoration following total laryngectomy.In W.H. Perkins (Ed.), Voice disorders (pp. 109–125). New York: Thieme-Stratton. Google Scholar Wienberg, B., Horii, Y., & Smith, B. E. (1980). Long time spectral and intensity characteristics of esophageal speech.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 67, 1781–1784. Google Scholar Wertz, R. T., LaPointe, L. L., & Rosenbek, J. C. (1984). Apraxia of speech in adults: The disorders and its management. New York: Grune and Stratton. Google Scholar Additional Resources FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 16Issue 2July 2006Pages: 25-32 Get Permissions Add to your Mendeley library History Published in issue: Jul 1, 2006 Metrics Downloaded 60 times Topicsasha-topicsasha-article-typesasha-sigsCopyright & Permissions© 2006 American Speech-Language-Hearing AssociationPDF DownloadLoading ..." @default.
• W2155476965 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2155476965 creator A5029705485 @default.
• W2155476965 date "2006-07-01" @default.
• W2155476965 modified "2023-10-17" @default.
• W2155476965 title "Strategies for Excelling With Alaryngeal Speech Methods" @default.
• W2155476965 cites W1981458889 @default.
• W2155476965 cites W1985200764 @default.
• W2155476965 cites W1991451249 @default.
• W2155476965 cites W2012527058 @default.
• W2155476965 cites W2014112953 @default.
• W2155476965 cites W2029806818 @default.
• W2155476965 cites W2039845493 @default.
• W2155476965 cites W2047707843 @default.
• W2155476965 cites W2061631583 @default.
• W2155476965 cites W2062923610 @default.
• W2155476965 cites W2070409125 @default.
• W2155476965 cites W2074572027 @default.
• W2155476965 cites W2085933330 @default.
• W2155476965 cites W2091648699 @default.
• W2155476965 cites W2094710079 @default.
• W2155476965 cites W2134907585 @default.
• W2155476965 cites W2154810846 @default.
• W2155476965 doi "https://doi.org/10.1044/vvd16.2.25" @default.
• W2155476965 hasPublicationYear "2006" @default.
• W2155476965 type Work @default.
• W2155476965 sameAs 2155476965 @default.
• W2155476965 citedByCount "2" @default.
• W2155476965 countsByYear W21554769652019 @default.
• W2155476965 countsByYear W21554769652023 @default.
• W2155476965 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2155476965 hasAuthorship W2155476965A5029705485 @default.
• W2155476965 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2155476965 hasConcept C46312422 @default.
• W2155476965 hasConcept C548259974 @default.
• W2155476965 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2155476965 hasConceptScore W2155476965C15744967 @default.
• W2155476965 hasConceptScore W2155476965C46312422 @default.
• W2155476965 hasConceptScore W2155476965C548259974 @default.
• W2155476965 hasConceptScore W2155476965C71924100 @default.
• W2155476965 hasIssue "2" @default.
• W2155476965 hasLocation W21554769651 @default.
• W2155476965 hasOpenAccess W2155476965 @default.
• W2155476965 hasPrimaryLocation W21554769651 @default.
• W2155476965 hasRelatedWork W1485446539 @default.
• W2155476965 hasRelatedWork W1719619818 @default.
• W2155476965 hasRelatedWork W1994638219 @default.
• W2155476965 hasRelatedWork W2007721624 @default.
• W2155476965 hasRelatedWork W2077865380 @default.
• W2155476965 hasRelatedWork W2127703805 @default.
• W2155476965 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.
• W2155476965 hasRelatedWork W2765975811 @default.
• W2155476965 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
• W2155476965 hasRelatedWork W2931662336 @default.
• W2155476965 hasVolume "16" @default.
• W2155476965 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2155476965 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2155476965 magId "2155476965" @default.
• W2155476965 workType "article" @default.