Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2155508065> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 79 of
79
with 100 items per page.
- W2155508065 endingPage "201" @default.
- W2155508065 startingPage "193" @default.
- W2155508065 abstract "Abstract Background There is an increasing number of health-care systems using economic evaluations to inform decisions about the reimbursement of health technologies. There are usually two separate elements of this process: assembling relevant evidence and undertaking analyses (technology assessment), and decision-making. In most systems, technology assessment is undertaken by the manufacturer of the technology. In a few, assessment is used. Methods In the United Kingdom, the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence used a combination of third-party and manufacturer assessments between 1999 and 2005. After this point, a Single Technology Appraisal program (using manufacturer-based assessment) was instituted for some technologies. Here the role of third-party assessment is considered in this from of decision-making. The article reviews the requirements of economic evaluation to support decision-making, and considers the extent to which each type of assessment is likely to meet these requirements. It also attempts to address whether the two forms of assessment differ in their impact on decision-making using a comparison of the decisions made by National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) (under its multiple-technology appraisal system) and the Scottish Medicines Consortium (SMC), which relies on manufacturer assessment. Results The comparison is limited by the small number of technologies considered by both bodies. Nevertheless, it suggests that there are potentially important differences between the two bodies, with NICE generally placing more restrictions of the use of technologies. Conclusions The article concludes that there are potential advantages to third-party assessment, but its cost and timing may preclude its use for all new technologies. A hybrid arrangement is suggested where third-party assessment is used in particular circumstances." @default.
- W2155508065 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W2155508065 creator A5003412990 @default.
- W2155508065 creator A5060049178 @default.
- W2155508065 creator A5064378507 @default.
- W2155508065 date "2009-03-01" @default.
- W2155508065 modified "2023-10-18" @default.
- W2155508065 title "Who Does the Numbers? The Role of Third-Party Technology Assessment to Inform Health Systems' Decision-Making about the Funding of Health Technologies" @default.
- W2155508065 cites W1983744580 @default.
- W2155508065 cites W2024158966 @default.
- W2155508065 cites W2026500950 @default.
- W2155508065 cites W2087137161 @default.
- W2155508065 cites W2106952837 @default.
- W2155508065 cites W2113863882 @default.
- W2155508065 cites W2121271793 @default.
- W2155508065 cites W2134365707 @default.
- W2155508065 cites W2138110929 @default.
- W2155508065 cites W2159390189 @default.
- W2155508065 cites W2614452305 @default.
- W2155508065 doi "https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-4733.2008.00441.x" @default.
- W2155508065 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18700865" @default.
- W2155508065 hasPublicationYear "2009" @default.
- W2155508065 type Work @default.
- W2155508065 sameAs 2155508065 @default.
- W2155508065 citedByCount "30" @default.
- W2155508065 countsByYear W21555080652012 @default.
- W2155508065 countsByYear W21555080652013 @default.
- W2155508065 countsByYear W21555080652014 @default.
- W2155508065 countsByYear W21555080652015 @default.
- W2155508065 countsByYear W21555080652016 @default.
- W2155508065 countsByYear W21555080652017 @default.
- W2155508065 countsByYear W21555080652020 @default.
- W2155508065 countsByYear W21555080652022 @default.
- W2155508065 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2155508065 hasAuthorship W2155508065A5003412990 @default.
- W2155508065 hasAuthorship W2155508065A5060049178 @default.
- W2155508065 hasAuthorship W2155508065A5064378507 @default.
- W2155508065 hasBestOaLocation W21555080651 @default.
- W2155508065 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
- W2155508065 hasConcept C160735492 @default.
- W2155508065 hasConcept C162118730 @default.
- W2155508065 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
- W2155508065 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
- W2155508065 hasConcept C21333345 @default.
- W2155508065 hasConcept C39549134 @default.
- W2155508065 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
- W2155508065 hasConcept C50522688 @default.
- W2155508065 hasConcept C56739046 @default.
- W2155508065 hasConceptScore W2155508065C144133560 @default.
- W2155508065 hasConceptScore W2155508065C160735492 @default.
- W2155508065 hasConceptScore W2155508065C162118730 @default.
- W2155508065 hasConceptScore W2155508065C162324750 @default.
- W2155508065 hasConceptScore W2155508065C17744445 @default.
- W2155508065 hasConceptScore W2155508065C21333345 @default.
- W2155508065 hasConceptScore W2155508065C39549134 @default.
- W2155508065 hasConceptScore W2155508065C41008148 @default.
- W2155508065 hasConceptScore W2155508065C50522688 @default.
- W2155508065 hasConceptScore W2155508065C56739046 @default.
- W2155508065 hasIssue "2" @default.
- W2155508065 hasLocation W21555080651 @default.
- W2155508065 hasOpenAccess W2155508065 @default.
- W2155508065 hasPrimaryLocation W21555080651 @default.
- W2155508065 hasRelatedWork W2037209812 @default.
- W2155508065 hasRelatedWork W2042236949 @default.
- W2155508065 hasRelatedWork W2405441039 @default.
- W2155508065 hasRelatedWork W2518615930 @default.
- W2155508065 hasRelatedWork W2582704060 @default.
- W2155508065 hasRelatedWork W2884375869 @default.
- W2155508065 hasRelatedWork W2997480799 @default.
- W2155508065 hasRelatedWork W3021475143 @default.
- W2155508065 hasRelatedWork W3025742435 @default.
- W2155508065 hasRelatedWork W3122971585 @default.
- W2155508065 hasVolume "12" @default.
- W2155508065 isParatext "false" @default.
- W2155508065 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W2155508065 magId "2155508065" @default.
- W2155508065 workType "article" @default.