FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2155864215> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2155864215 endingPage "126" @default.
• W2155864215 startingPage "123" @default.
• W2155864215 abstract "Theeuwes (2010) summarizes an impressive number of studiesdemonstrating interference by irrelevant visual singletons in com-puter experiments with humans. In these studies, if participantssearch for a relevant singleton target, such as the single diamondamong circles (i.e., a shape singleton), an irrelevant singletondistractor, such as the single red circle among the green stimuli (i.e.,a color singleton), delays the correct response to the target (cf.Theeuwes, 1991, 1992). If this distractor – as was the case in therelevant experiments – does not predict the likely target position, it issaid tobeirrelevant.Theeuwes(2010)arguesthattheinterference bythe irrelevant distractor reflects stimulus-driven or exogenouscapture of attention by singletons or feature contrasts, which heassumes to occur early during the feed-forward phase of visualprocessing.According to this explanation, a stimulus initially capturesattention exogenously (i.e., in a stimulus-driven way) to its position,to the degree to which it is salient. Salience in turn is defined as thesummed local contrast in terms of color, luminance, and orientationdifference to the surrounding stimuli or the background (cf. Bergen J Itti & Koch, 2001). Theeuwes (2010) assumes that thissalience-driven capture of attention is fast and occurs within 150 mssince singleton onset, during the feed-forward phase of visualprocessing (cf. Lamme, 2003).In contrast to Theeuwes (2010), we think that top–downcontingent capture is the rule and explains initial and fast attentioncapture effects in the first feed-forward phase of visual processing.Duringa laterphaseand undersomeconditions exogenouscaptureofattention possibly follows. At the same time, we propose that theevidence presentedbyTheeuwesfails to supportexogenousorientingbecause it fails to exclude a top–down contingent capture explana-tion. We present our arguments in two sections. First, we review theevidence directly supporting ourclaim that saliencecapture is subjectto top–down control. From this evidence we derive the exogenous-capture criterion that must be met by experiments for demonstratingexogenousspatialattention,andshowthatthiscriterioninnotmetbythe studies reviewed by Theeuwes. Second, we review studiesshowing attentional capture by stimuli during the feed-forwardphase, and conclude that only top–down contingent capture but noexogenous-capture can be observed during the feed-forward phase ofvisual processing.1. The exogenous-capture criterionA number of visual search studies demonstrated that participantsexert top–down control over attentional capture (reviewed recentlyby Burnham, 2007). In the corresponding studies, the experimentersecures the participant's top–down control over attention bydeclaring a specific visual feature as defining the target, or at leastas being informative for finding the target. The amount of attentionalcapture can then be compared under two conditions: with stimulusfeatures (or feature contrasts) that match the search templates of theparticipants (i.e., their top–down control settings for attentionalcapture) and with stimulus features (or feature contrasts) that do notmatch the top–down control settings. In these studies, researchersinferred top–down control over attentional capture from stronger oreven exclusive attentional capture by stimuli with matching featuresor feature contrasts (cf. Bacon & Egeth, 1994; Folk, Remington, J Eimer & Kiss, 2008; Folk & Remington,1998).The finding that attentional capture depends on the matchbetween the attentional control settings and features of theattention-capturingstimulushasimplicationsfor proofsof exogenousattention, too. That is, from these studies follows that demonstratingexogenous or stimulus-driven attentional capture requires that norelevant task set to search for the attention-capturing feature orfeature contrast of a distractor stimulus exists (cf. Bacon & Egeth,1994; Folk et al., 1992). This is the exogenous-capture criterion.Importantly, the exogenous-capture criterion is not met by thestudies that have been reviewed by Theeuwes (2010).Thisisbecause all of Theeuwes' reviewed studies used singletons – astimulus which is salient on a particular dimension – as the relevant" @default.
• W2155864215 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2155864215 creator A5012133705 @default.
• W2155864215 creator A5016632844 @default.
• W2155864215 creator A5079421791 @default.
• W2155864215 date "2010-10-01" @default.
• W2155864215 modified "2023-10-18" @default.
• W2155864215 title "Top–down contingent attentional capture during feed-forward visual processing" @default.
• W2155864215 cites W1965466381 @default.
• W2155864215 cites W1975973734 @default.
• W2155864215 cites W1991630384 @default.
• W2155864215 cites W1995913285 @default.
• W2155864215 cites W2006063316 @default.
• W2155864215 cites W2010895162 @default.
• W2155864215 cites W2020570304 @default.
• W2155864215 cites W2022686269 @default.
• W2155864215 cites W2024892076 @default.
• W2155864215 cites W2025353453 @default.
• W2155864215 cites W2032995696 @default.
• W2155864215 cites W2035101688 @default.
• W2155864215 cites W2036958457 @default.
• W2155864215 cites W2053932441 @default.
• W2155864215 cites W2064633044 @default.
• W2155864215 cites W2082298490 @default.
• W2155864215 cites W2085179786 @default.
• W2155864215 cites W2090974309 @default.
• W2155864215 cites W2093353037 @default.
• W2155864215 cites W2106516151 @default.
• W2155864215 cites W2112113234 @default.
• W2155864215 cites W2120907531 @default.
• W2155864215 cites W2125646858 @default.
• W2155864215 cites W2130622773 @default.
• W2155864215 cites W2131605659 @default.
• W2155864215 cites W2137561905 @default.
• W2155864215 cites W2137608458 @default.
• W2155864215 cites W2139076245 @default.
• W2155864215 cites W2143659523 @default.
• W2155864215 cites W2144764737 @default.
• W2155864215 cites W2146810960 @default.
• W2155864215 cites W2149095485 @default.
• W2155864215 cites W2156281732 @default.
• W2155864215 cites W2170478537 @default.
• W2155864215 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.05.008" @default.
• W2155864215 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20883842" @default.
• W2155864215 hasPublicationYear "2010" @default.
• W2155864215 type Work @default.
• W2155864215 sameAs 2155864215 @default.
• W2155864215 citedByCount "21" @default.
• W2155864215 countsByYear W21558642152012 @default.
• W2155864215 countsByYear W21558642152013 @default.
• W2155864215 countsByYear W21558642152014 @default.
• W2155864215 countsByYear W21558642152015 @default.
• W2155864215 countsByYear W21558642152016 @default.
• W2155864215 countsByYear W21558642152018 @default.
• W2155864215 countsByYear W21558642152019 @default.
• W2155864215 countsByYear W21558642152020 @default.
• W2155864215 countsByYear W21558642152023 @default.
• W2155864215 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2155864215 hasAuthorship W2155864215A5012133705 @default.
• W2155864215 hasAuthorship W2155864215A5016632844 @default.
• W2155864215 hasAuthorship W2155864215A5079421791 @default.
• W2155864215 hasBestOaLocation W21558642151 @default.
• W2155864215 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2155864215 hasConcept C169760540 @default.
• W2155864215 hasConcept C180747234 @default.
• W2155864215 hasConcept C26760741 @default.
• W2155864215 hasConcept C2778251979 @default.
• W2155864215 hasConceptScore W2155864215C15744967 @default.
• W2155864215 hasConceptScore W2155864215C169760540 @default.
• W2155864215 hasConceptScore W2155864215C180747234 @default.
• W2155864215 hasConceptScore W2155864215C26760741 @default.
• W2155864215 hasConceptScore W2155864215C2778251979 @default.
• W2155864215 hasIssue "2" @default.
• W2155864215 hasLocation W21558642151 @default.
• W2155864215 hasLocation W21558642152 @default.
• W2155864215 hasOpenAccess W2155864215 @default.
• W2155864215 hasPrimaryLocation W21558642151 @default.
• W2155864215 hasRelatedWork W1972603698 @default.
• W2155864215 hasRelatedWork W1985950550 @default.
• W2155864215 hasRelatedWork W2042940951 @default.
• W2155864215 hasRelatedWork W2050944115 @default.
• W2155864215 hasRelatedWork W2065074698 @default.
• W2155864215 hasRelatedWork W2085642841 @default.
• W2155864215 hasRelatedWork W2093287941 @default.
• W2155864215 hasRelatedWork W2118417921 @default.
• W2155864215 hasRelatedWork W2128524530 @default.
• W2155864215 hasRelatedWork W2144689546 @default.
• W2155864215 hasVolume "135" @default.
• W2155864215 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2155864215 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2155864215 magId "2155864215" @default.
• W2155864215 workType "article" @default.