FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2155981081> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2155981081 abstract "Background Adhesive capsulitis (also termed frozen shoulder) is commonly treated by manual therapy and exercise, usually delivered together as components of a physical therapy intervention. This review is one of a series of reviews that form an update of the Cochrane review, 'Physiotherapy interventions for shoulder pain.' Objectives To synthesise available evidence regarding the benefits and harms of manual therapy and exercise, alone or in combination, for the treatment of patients with adhesive capsulitis. Search methods We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL Plus, ClinicalTrials.gov and the WHO ICTRP clinical trials registries up to May 2013, unrestricted by language, and reviewed the reference lists of review articles and retrieved trials, to identify potentially relevant trials. Selection criteria We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi‐randomised trials, including adults with adhesive capsulitis, and comparing any manual therapy or exercise intervention versus placebo, no intervention, a different type of manual therapy or exercise or any other intervention. Interventions included mobilisation, manipulation and supervised or home exercise, delivered alone or in combination. Trials investigating the primary or adjunct effect of a combination of manual therapy and exercise were the main comparisons of interest. Main outcomes of interest were participant‐reported pain relief of 30% or greater, overall pain (mean or mean change), function, global assessment of treatment success, active shoulder abduction, quality of life and the number of participants experiencing adverse events. Data collection and analysis Two review authors independently selected trials for inclusion, extracted the data, performed a risk of bias assessment and assessed the quality of the body of evidence for the main outcomes using the GRADE approach. Main results We included 32 trials (1836 participants). No trial compared a combination of manual therapy and exercise versus placebo or no intervention. Seven trials compared a combination of manual therapy and exercise versus other interventions but were clinically heterogeneous, so opportunities for meta‐analysis were limited. The overall impression gained from these trials is that the few outcome differences between interventions that were clinically important were detected only up to seven weeks. Evidence of moderate quality shows that a combination of manual therapy and exercise for six weeks probably results in less improvement at seven weeks but a similar number of adverse events compared with glucocorticoid injection. The mean change in pain with glucocorticoid injection was 58 points on a 100‐point scale, and 32 points with manual therapy and exercise (mean difference (MD) 26 points, 95% confidence interval (CI) 15 points to 37 points; one RCT, 107 participants), for an absolute difference of 26% (15% to 37%). Mean change in function with glucocorticoid injection was 39 points on a 100‐point scale, and 14 points with manual therapy and exercise (MD 25 points, 95% CI 35 points to 15 points; one RCT, 107 participants), for an absolute difference of 25% (15% to 35%). Forty‐six per cent (26/56) of participants reported treatment success with manual therapy and exercise compared with 77% (40/52) of participants receiving glucocorticoid injection (risk ratio (RR) 0.6, 95% CI 0.44 to 0.83; one RCT, 108 participants), with an absolute risk difference of 30% (13% to 48%). The number reporting adverse events did not differ between groups: 56% (32/57) reported events with manual therapy and exercise, and 53% (30/57) with glucocorticoid injection (RR 1.07, 95% CI 0.76 to 1.49; one RCT, 114 participants), with an absolute risk difference of 4% (‐15% to 22%). Group differences in improvement in overall pain and function at six months and 12 months were not clinically important. We are uncertain of the effect of other combinations of manual therapy and exercise, as most evidence is of low quality. Meta‐analysis of two trials (86 participants) suggested no clinically important differences between a combination of manual therapy, exercise, and electrotherapy for four weeks and placebo injection compared with glucocorticoid injection alone or placebo injection alone in terms of overall pain, function, active range of motion and quality of life at six weeks, six months and 12 months (though the 95% CI suggested function may be better with glucocorticoid injection at six weeks). The same two trials found that adding a combination of manual therapy, exercise and electrotherapy for four weeks to glucocorticoid injection did not confer clinically important benefits over glucocorticoid injection alone at each time point. Based on one high quality trial (148 participants), following arthrographic joint distension with glucocorticoid and saline, a combination of manual therapy and supervised exercise for six weeks conferred similar effects to those of sham ultrasound in terms of overall pain, function and quality of life at six weeks and at six months, but provided greater patient‐reported treatment success and active shoulder abduction at six weeks. One trial (119 participants) found that a combination of manual therapy, exercise, electrotherapy and oral non‐steroidal anti‐inflammatory drug (NSAID) for three weeks did not confer clinically important benefits over oral NSAID alone in terms of function and patient‐reported treatment success at three weeks. On the basis of 25 clinically heterogeneous trials, we are uncertain of the effect of manual therapy or exercise when not delivered together, or one type of manual therapy or exercise versus another, as most reported differences between groups were not clinically or statistically significant, and the evidence is mostly of low quality. Authors' conclusions The best available data show that a combination of manual therapy and exercise may not be as effective as glucocorticoid injection in the short‐term. It is unclear whether a combination of manual therapy, exercise and electrotherapy is an effective adjunct to glucocorticoid injection or oral NSAID. Following arthrographic joint distension with glucocorticoid and saline, manual therapy and exercise may confer effects similar to those of sham ultrasound in terms of overall pain, function and quality of life, but may provide greater patient‐reported treatment success and active range of motion. High‐quality RCTs are needed to establish the benefits and harms of manual therapy and exercise interventions that reflect actual practice, compared with placebo, no intervention and active interventions with evidence of benefit (e.g. glucocorticoid injection)." @default.
• W2155981081 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2155981081 creator A5028188792 @default.
• W2155981081 creator A5036470851 @default.
• W2155981081 creator A5041905504 @default.
• W2155981081 creator A5053064833 @default.
• W2155981081 creator A5066434491 @default.
• W2155981081 creator A5089979303 @default.
• W2155981081 creator A5090548475 @default.
• W2155981081 date "2014-08-26" @default.
• W2155981081 modified "2023-10-14" @default.
• W2155981081 title "Manual therapy and exercise for adhesive capsulitis (frozen shoulder)" @default.
• W2155981081 cites W1813904347 @default.
• W2155981081 cites W1964502734 @default.
• W2155981081 cites W1966567647 @default.
• W2155981081 cites W1969502722 @default.
• W2155981081 cites W1977521225 @default.
• W2155981081 cites W1981726472 @default.
• W2155981081 cites W1981926633 @default.
• W2155981081 cites W1986965148 @default.
• W2155981081 cites W1988049925 @default.
• W2155981081 cites W1989844406 @default.
• W2155981081 cites W1990084533 @default.
• W2155981081 cites W1995557364 @default.
• W2155981081 cites W1997745808 @default.
• W2155981081 cites W2002010775 @default.
• W2155981081 cites W2002757376 @default.
• W2155981081 cites W2003168723 @default.
• W2155981081 cites W2008133889 @default.
• W2155981081 cites W2013828500 @default.
• W2155981081 cites W2018162612 @default.
• W2155981081 cites W2019161508 @default.
• W2155981081 cites W2023379364 @default.
• W2155981081 cites W2034456330 @default.
• W2155981081 cites W2038033196 @default.
• W2155981081 cites W2038836204 @default.
• W2155981081 cites W2045012562 @default.
• W2155981081 cites W2046391772 @default.
• W2155981081 cites W2050727545 @default.
• W2155981081 cites W2051333497 @default.
• W2155981081 cites W2052771935 @default.
• W2155981081 cites W2061532583 @default.
• W2155981081 cites W2062144833 @default.
• W2155981081 cites W2074215972 @default.
• W2155981081 cites W2097771266 @default.
• W2155981081 cites W2100551299 @default.
• W2155981081 cites W2102838534 @default.
• W2155981081 cites W2104154918 @default.
• W2155981081 cites W2104598126 @default.
• W2155981081 cites W2105596961 @default.
• W2155981081 cites W2105890595 @default.
• W2155981081 cites W2107740951 @default.
• W2155981081 cites W2120788970 @default.
• W2155981081 cites W2125680797 @default.
• W2155981081 cites W2126930838 @default.
• W2155981081 cites W2129819126 @default.
• W2155981081 cites W2129920090 @default.
• W2155981081 cites W2135919914 @default.
• W2155981081 cites W2139116587 @default.
• W2155981081 cites W2153246430 @default.
• W2155981081 cites W2156407343 @default.
• W2155981081 cites W2156804831 @default.
• W2155981081 cites W2161344815 @default.
• W2155981081 cites W2161575368 @default.
• W2155981081 cites W2163586958 @default.
• W2155981081 cites W2164529675 @default.
• W2155981081 cites W2170686370 @default.
• W2155981081 cites W4232349257 @default.
• W2155981081 cites W1973530718 @default.
• W2155981081 doi "https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.cd011275" @default.
• W2155981081 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25157702" @default.
• W2155981081 hasPublicationYear "2014" @default.
• W2155981081 type Work @default.
• W2155981081 sameAs 2155981081 @default.
• W2155981081 citedByCount "89" @default.
• W2155981081 countsByYear W21559810812014 @default.
• W2155981081 countsByYear W21559810812015 @default.
• W2155981081 countsByYear W21559810812016 @default.
• W2155981081 countsByYear W21559810812017 @default.
• W2155981081 countsByYear W21559810812018 @default.
• W2155981081 countsByYear W21559810812019 @default.
• W2155981081 countsByYear W21559810812020 @default.
• W2155981081 countsByYear W21559810812021 @default.
• W2155981081 countsByYear W21559810812022 @default.
• W2155981081 countsByYear W21559810812023 @default.
• W2155981081 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2155981081 hasAuthorship W2155981081A5028188792 @default.
• W2155981081 hasAuthorship W2155981081A5036470851 @default.
• W2155981081 hasAuthorship W2155981081A5041905504 @default.
• W2155981081 hasAuthorship W2155981081A5053064833 @default.
• W2155981081 hasAuthorship W2155981081A5066434491 @default.
• W2155981081 hasAuthorship W2155981081A5089979303 @default.
• W2155981081 hasAuthorship W2155981081A5090548475 @default.
• W2155981081 hasBestOaLocation W21559810811 @default.
• W2155981081 hasConcept C118552586 @default.
• W2155981081 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2155981081 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2155981081 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
• W2155981081 hasConcept C168563851 @default.
• W2155981081 hasConcept C17744445 @default.

• next