Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2156103682> ?p ?o ?g. }
- W2156103682 endingPage "725" @default.
- W2156103682 startingPage "710" @default.
- W2156103682 abstract "Seismic vulnerability assessment of residential buildings in regions of high seismicity is an interdisciplinary problem requiring major inputs from fields of seismology and earthquake engineering. The basic two components of loss estimation methods are information on regional seismicity and building stock. This study presents a realistic loss estimation methodology where the first component, input ground motions, is obtained from regional ground-motion simulations using the stochastic finite-fault technique. The second component, building vulnerability information, on the other hand, is taken into account using fragility analyses. Introducing the ground-motion intensity parameters obtained from simulations to the fragility curves, we obtain seismic loss distribution in a region. In this study, we demonstrate the loss estimation methodology with an application to three northwestern cities in Turkey (Duzce, Bolu, and Kaynasli) that experienced two major earthquakes (![Graphic][1] and ![Graphic][2] ) in less than three months in 1999. We initially verify the methodology with comparisons of observed and estimated damage ratios for the 12 November 1999 (![Graphic][3] ) Duzce earthquake. Later, we present the estimated damage ratios under scenario earthquakes in the region for a magnitude range of ![Graphic][4] . ![Graphic][5] is predicted to be the threshold magnitude for the cities of Duzce and Kaynasli where more than 60% of the building stock experience moderate and heavy damage. Because Bolu is at a farther distance from the fault plane, less damage is estimated for ![Graphic][6] than those in the other centers. For ![Graphic][7] , all three cities are predicted to experience substantial rates of heavy damage and collapse. [1]: /embed/inline-graphic-1.gif [2]: /embed/inline-graphic-2.gif [3]: /embed/inline-graphic-3.gif [4]: /embed/inline-graphic-4.gif [5]: /embed/inline-graphic-5.gif [6]: /embed/inline-graphic-6.gif [7]: /embed/inline-graphic-7.gif" @default.
- W2156103682 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W2156103682 creator A5041174236 @default.
- W2156103682 creator A5070224209 @default.
- W2156103682 creator A5086048168 @default.
- W2156103682 date "2011-03-22" @default.
- W2156103682 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
- W2156103682 title "A Methodology for Seismic Loss Estimation in Urban Regions Based on Ground-Motion Simulations" @default.
- W2156103682 cites W1514703364 @default.
- W2156103682 cites W1960471763 @default.
- W2156103682 cites W1989262314 @default.
- W2156103682 cites W1995029445 @default.
- W2156103682 cites W2000035517 @default.
- W2156103682 cites W2004620726 @default.
- W2156103682 cites W2008934314 @default.
- W2156103682 cites W2030758474 @default.
- W2156103682 cites W2044473663 @default.
- W2156103682 cites W2047085482 @default.
- W2156103682 cites W2048968410 @default.
- W2156103682 cites W2075495200 @default.
- W2156103682 cites W2076908711 @default.
- W2156103682 cites W2080416317 @default.
- W2156103682 cites W2088175766 @default.
- W2156103682 cites W2095519592 @default.
- W2156103682 cites W2096294425 @default.
- W2156103682 cites W2096380511 @default.
- W2156103682 cites W2103817435 @default.
- W2156103682 cites W2106802957 @default.
- W2156103682 cites W2110114457 @default.
- W2156103682 cites W2111762688 @default.
- W2156103682 cites W2112727206 @default.
- W2156103682 cites W2117561728 @default.
- W2156103682 cites W2120381273 @default.
- W2156103682 cites W2127896615 @default.
- W2156103682 cites W2129133456 @default.
- W2156103682 cites W2133494665 @default.
- W2156103682 cites W2134026794 @default.
- W2156103682 cites W2135813695 @default.
- W2156103682 cites W2140957673 @default.
- W2156103682 cites W2157501616 @default.
- W2156103682 cites W2159613255 @default.
- W2156103682 cites W2159864677 @default.
- W2156103682 cites W2161623957 @default.
- W2156103682 cites W2163228006 @default.
- W2156103682 cites W2166483760 @default.
- W2156103682 cites W2169678989 @default.
- W2156103682 cites W2185410891 @default.
- W2156103682 cites W2194202094 @default.
- W2156103682 cites W2312420296 @default.
- W2156103682 cites W2586161528 @default.
- W2156103682 cites W2606034161 @default.
- W2156103682 cites W3019852166 @default.
- W2156103682 cites W579372856 @default.
- W2156103682 cites W639295178 @default.
- W2156103682 cites W651478833 @default.
- W2156103682 doi "https://doi.org/10.1785/0120100159" @default.
- W2156103682 hasPublicationYear "2011" @default.
- W2156103682 type Work @default.
- W2156103682 sameAs 2156103682 @default.
- W2156103682 citedByCount "16" @default.
- W2156103682 countsByYear W21561036822015 @default.
- W2156103682 countsByYear W21561036822017 @default.
- W2156103682 countsByYear W21561036822018 @default.
- W2156103682 countsByYear W21561036822019 @default.
- W2156103682 countsByYear W21561036822020 @default.
- W2156103682 countsByYear W21561036822021 @default.
- W2156103682 countsByYear W21561036822022 @default.
- W2156103682 countsByYear W21561036822023 @default.
- W2156103682 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2156103682 hasAuthorship W2156103682A5041174236 @default.
- W2156103682 hasAuthorship W2156103682A5070224209 @default.
- W2156103682 hasAuthorship W2156103682A5086048168 @default.
- W2156103682 hasConcept C104114177 @default.
- W2156103682 hasConcept C127313418 @default.
- W2156103682 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
- W2156103682 hasConcept C13280743 @default.
- W2156103682 hasConcept C154945302 @default.
- W2156103682 hasConcept C165205528 @default.
- W2156103682 hasConcept C201995342 @default.
- W2156103682 hasConcept C2988284105 @default.
- W2156103682 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
- W2156103682 hasConcept C89929633 @default.
- W2156103682 hasConcept C96250715 @default.
- W2156103682 hasConceptScore W2156103682C104114177 @default.
- W2156103682 hasConceptScore W2156103682C127313418 @default.
- W2156103682 hasConceptScore W2156103682C127413603 @default.
- W2156103682 hasConceptScore W2156103682C13280743 @default.
- W2156103682 hasConceptScore W2156103682C154945302 @default.
- W2156103682 hasConceptScore W2156103682C165205528 @default.
- W2156103682 hasConceptScore W2156103682C201995342 @default.
- W2156103682 hasConceptScore W2156103682C2988284105 @default.
- W2156103682 hasConceptScore W2156103682C41008148 @default.
- W2156103682 hasConceptScore W2156103682C89929633 @default.
- W2156103682 hasConceptScore W2156103682C96250715 @default.
- W2156103682 hasIssue "2" @default.
- W2156103682 hasLocation W21561036821 @default.
- W2156103682 hasOpenAccess W2156103682 @default.
- W2156103682 hasPrimaryLocation W21561036821 @default.
!["Seismic vulnerability assessment of residential buildings in regions of high seismicity is an interdisciplinary problem requiring major inputs from fields of seismology and earthquake engineering. The basic two components of loss estimation methods are information on regional seismicity and building stock. This study presents a realistic loss estimation methodology where the first component, input ground motions, is obtained from regional ground-motion simulations using the stochastic finite-fault technique. The second component, building vulnerability information, on the other hand, is taken into account using fragility analyses. Introducing the ground-motion intensity parameters obtained from simulations to the fragility curves, we obtain seismic loss distribution in a region. In this study, we demonstrate the loss estimation methodology with an application to three northwestern cities in Turkey (Duzce, Bolu, and Kaynasli) that experienced two major earthquakes (![Graphic][1] and ![Graphic][2] ) in less than three months in 1999. We initially verify the methodology with comparisons of observed and estimated damage ratios for the 12 November 1999 (![Graphic][3] ) Duzce earthquake. Later, we present the estimated damage ratios under scenario earthquakes in the region for a magnitude range of ![Graphic][4] . ![Graphic][5] is predicted to be the threshold magnitude for the cities of Duzce and Kaynasli where more than 60% of the building stock experience moderate and heavy damage. Because Bolu is at a farther distance from the fault plane, less damage is estimated for ![Graphic][6] than those in the other centers. For ![Graphic][7] , all three cities are predicted to experience substantial rates of heavy damage and collapse. [1]: /embed/inline-graphic-1.gif [2]: /embed/inline-graphic-2.gif [3]: /embed/inline-graphic-3.gif [4]: /embed/inline-graphic-4.gif [5]: /embed/inline-graphic-5.gif [6]: /embed/inline-graphic-6.gif [7]: /embed/inline-graphic-7.gif"](?object=%22Seismic%20vulnerability%20assessment%20of%20residential%20buildings%20in%20regions%20of%20high%20seismicity%20is%20an%20interdisciplinary%20problem%20requiring%20major%20inputs%20from%20fields%20of%20seismology%20and%20earthquake%20engineering.%20The%20basic%20two%20components%20of%20loss%20estimation%20methods%20are%20information%20on%20regional%20seismicity%20and%20building%20stock.%20This%20study%20presents%20a%20realistic%20loss%20estimation%20methodology%20where%20the%20first%20component%2C%20input%20ground%20motions%2C%20is%20obtained%20from%20regional%20ground-motion%20simulations%20using%20the%20stochastic%20finite-fault%20technique.%20The%20second%20component%2C%20building%20vulnerability%20information%2C%20on%20the%20other%20hand%2C%20is%20taken%20into%20account%20using%20fragility%20analyses.%20Introducing%20the%20ground-motion%20intensity%20parameters%20obtained%20from%20simulations%20to%20the%20fragility%20curves%2C%20we%20obtain%20seismic%20loss%20distribution%20in%20a%20region.%20In%20this%20study%2C%20we%20demonstrate%20the%20loss%20estimation%20methodology%20with%20an%20application%20to%20three%20northwestern%20cities%20in%20Turkey%20(Duzce%2C%20Bolu%2C%20and%20Kaynasli)%20that%20experienced%20two%20major%20earthquakes%20(!%5BGraphic%5D%5B1%5D%20and%20!%5BGraphic%5D%5B2%5D%20)%20in%20less%20than%20three%20months%20in%201999.%20We%20initially%20verify%20the%20methodology%20with%20comparisons%20of%20observed%20and%20estimated%20damage%20ratios%20for%20the%2012%20November%201999%20(!%5BGraphic%5D%5B3%5D%20)%20Duzce%20earthquake.%20Later%2C%20we%20present%20the%20estimated%20damage%20ratios%20under%20scenario%20earthquakes%20in%20the%20region%20for%20a%20magnitude%20range%20of%20!%5BGraphic%5D%5B4%5D%20.%20!%5BGraphic%5D%5B5%5D%20is%20predicted%20to%20be%20the%20threshold%20magnitude%20for%20the%20cities%20of%20Duzce%20and%20Kaynasli%20where%20more%20than%2060%25%20of%20the%20building%20stock%20experience%20moderate%20and%20heavy%20damage.%20Because%20Bolu%20is%20at%20a%20farther%20distance%20from%20the%20fault%20plane%2C%20less%20damage%20is%20estimated%20for%20!%5BGraphic%5D%5B6%5D%20than%20those%20in%20the%20other%20centers.%20For%20!%5BGraphic%5D%5B7%5D%20%2C%20all%20three%20cities%20are%20predicted%20to%20experience%20substantial%20rates%20of%20heavy%20damage%20and%20collapse.%20%5B1%5D%3A%20%2Fembed%2Finline-graphic-1.gif%20%5B2%5D%3A%20%2Fembed%2Finline-graphic-2.gif%20%5B3%5D%3A%20%2Fembed%2Finline-graphic-3.gif%20%5B4%5D%3A%20%2Fembed%2Finline-graphic-4.gif%20%5B5%5D%3A%20%2Fembed%2Finline-graphic-5.gif%20%5B6%5D%3A%20%2Fembed%2Finline-graphic-6.gif%20%5B7%5D%3A%20%2Fembed%2Finline-graphic-7.gif%22){kind=link}