FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2156811904> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2156811904 endingPage "1270" @default.
• W2156811904 startingPage "1263" @default.
• W2156811904 abstract "Cladistic and taxonomic treatments of the same plant group usually exhibit a mixture of congruences and incongruences. The question arises in the case of the incongruences as to which version is right and which is wrong. Many cladists believe that cladistics is a superior approach and gives the best results. There are several conceptual and methodological differences between cladistics and taxonomy that cause incongruence. One important conceptual difference is the use of different criteria for grouping: order of branching vs. similarity and difference (clades vs. taxa). Another is the policy regarding paraphyletic groups: to ban them in cladistics but ignore the ban in taxonomy. These two differences automatically lead to some incongruences. One approach is not right and the other wrong; each is operating by its own standards. However, when cladists apply the paraphyly rule to a taxonomic system and conclude that it needs revision to eliminate paraphyly, as cladists often do, they are judging the taxonomic system by a wrong standard. Several differences between the two schools in the use and handling of characters can also cause incongruence. First consider phenetic characters. Taxonomy uses a very wide range of these, whereas phenetic cladistics sets restrictions on the selection of characters, which deprive it of potentially useful evidence. Taxonomic systems generally rest on a broader empirical foundation than phenetic cladistic systems. Next, consider molecular cladistics, which is the leader in the use of DNA evidence. Two sources of incongruence between molecular cladistics and taxonomic systems can come into play here. First, the molecular evidence used in cladistics comes mainly from cytoplasmic organelles, whereas taxonomic systems are based on characters that are determined mainly by the chromosomal genome. More generally, the database in a molecular cladogram is, in itself, too narrow to serve as a foundation for an organismic classification. In cases of incongruence, the molecular evidence can be a reliable indicator of taxonomic relationships sometimes, misleading other times, and may afford no clear basis for a systematic decision. In this situation, it is helpful, indeed necessary, to integrate the molecular evidence with the phenetic evidence and bring more characters to bear on the question." @default.
• W2156811904 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2156811904 creator A5033788247 @default.
• W2156811904 date "2003-09-01" @default.
• W2156811904 modified "2023-09-30" @default.
• W2156811904 title "Incongruence between cladistic and taxonomic systems" @default.
• W2156811904 cites W143810700 @default.
• W2156811904 cites W1967149203 @default.
• W2156811904 cites W1997822439 @default.
• W2156811904 cites W2011054556 @default.
• W2156811904 cites W2019663823 @default.
• W2156811904 cites W2025448463 @default.
• W2156811904 cites W2029037970 @default.
• W2156811904 cites W2042124425 @default.
• W2156811904 cites W2073618128 @default.
• W2156811904 cites W2079511939 @default.
• W2156811904 cites W2082677347 @default.
• W2156811904 cites W2095782662 @default.
• W2156811904 cites W2096275035 @default.
• W2156811904 cites W2101851879 @default.
• W2156811904 cites W2118049579 @default.
• W2156811904 cites W2132264441 @default.
• W2156811904 cites W2138129584 @default.
• W2156811904 cites W2150039144 @default.
• W2156811904 cites W2150931281 @default.
• W2156811904 cites W2170537778 @default.
• W2156811904 cites W2312586925 @default.
• W2156811904 cites W2321999674 @default.
• W2156811904 cites W2326123017 @default.
• W2156811904 cites W2334717273 @default.
• W2156811904 cites W2339039675 @default.
• W2156811904 cites W2472794204 @default.
• W2156811904 cites W2485343961 @default.
• W2156811904 cites W2498672684 @default.
• W2156811904 cites W2584580173 @default.
• W2156811904 cites W2586164484 @default.
• W2156811904 cites W2889761479 @default.
• W2156811904 cites W66022270 @default.
• W2156811904 doi "https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.90.9.1263" @default.
• W2156811904 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21659226" @default.
• W2156811904 hasPublicationYear "2003" @default.
• W2156811904 type Work @default.
• W2156811904 sameAs 2156811904 @default.
• W2156811904 citedByCount "36" @default.
• W2156811904 countsByYear W21568119042012 @default.
• W2156811904 countsByYear W21568119042013 @default.
• W2156811904 countsByYear W21568119042014 @default.
• W2156811904 countsByYear W21568119042015 @default.
• W2156811904 countsByYear W21568119042016 @default.
• W2156811904 countsByYear W21568119042018 @default.
• W2156811904 countsByYear W21568119042020 @default.
• W2156811904 countsByYear W21568119042023 @default.
• W2156811904 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2156811904 hasAuthorship W2156811904A5033788247 @default.
• W2156811904 hasConcept C104317684 @default.
• W2156811904 hasConcept C160525816 @default.
• W2156811904 hasConcept C18903297 @default.
• W2156811904 hasConcept C189592816 @default.
• W2156811904 hasConcept C20822588 @default.
• W2156811904 hasConcept C44465124 @default.
• W2156811904 hasConcept C55493867 @default.
• W2156811904 hasConcept C58642233 @default.
• W2156811904 hasConcept C71640776 @default.
• W2156811904 hasConcept C78458016 @default.
• W2156811904 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W2156811904 hasConcept C90132467 @default.
• W2156811904 hasConcept C90856448 @default.
• W2156811904 hasConceptScore W2156811904C104317684 @default.
• W2156811904 hasConceptScore W2156811904C160525816 @default.
• W2156811904 hasConceptScore W2156811904C18903297 @default.
• W2156811904 hasConceptScore W2156811904C189592816 @default.
• W2156811904 hasConceptScore W2156811904C20822588 @default.
• W2156811904 hasConceptScore W2156811904C44465124 @default.
• W2156811904 hasConceptScore W2156811904C55493867 @default.
• W2156811904 hasConceptScore W2156811904C58642233 @default.
• W2156811904 hasConceptScore W2156811904C71640776 @default.
• W2156811904 hasConceptScore W2156811904C78458016 @default.
• W2156811904 hasConceptScore W2156811904C86803240 @default.
• W2156811904 hasConceptScore W2156811904C90132467 @default.
• W2156811904 hasConceptScore W2156811904C90856448 @default.
• W2156811904 hasIssue "9" @default.
• W2156811904 hasLocation W21568119041 @default.
• W2156811904 hasLocation W21568119042 @default.
• W2156811904 hasOpenAccess W2156811904 @default.
• W2156811904 hasPrimaryLocation W21568119041 @default.
• W2156811904 hasRelatedWork W12688802 @default.
• W2156811904 hasRelatedWork W2019733687 @default.
• W2156811904 hasRelatedWork W2131102331 @default.
• W2156811904 hasRelatedWork W2138572064 @default.
• W2156811904 hasRelatedWork W2156811904 @default.
• W2156811904 hasRelatedWork W2161435444 @default.
• W2156811904 hasRelatedWork W2208454085 @default.
• W2156811904 hasRelatedWork W2318729186 @default.
• W2156811904 hasRelatedWork W4230186018 @default.
• W2156811904 hasRelatedWork W4242402111 @default.
• W2156811904 hasVolume "90" @default.
• W2156811904 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2156811904 isRetracted "false" @default.

• next