FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2156825773> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2156825773 endingPage "79" @default.
• W2156825773 startingPage "769" @default.
• W2156825773 abstract "To evaluate whether physicians' beliefs concerning episiotomy are related to their use of procedures and to differential outcomes in childbirth.Post-hoc cohort analysis of physicians and patients involved in a randomized controlled trial of episiotomy.Two tertiary care hospitals and one community hospital in Montreal.Of the 703 women at low risk of medical or obstetric problems enrolled in the trial we studied 447 women (226 primiparous and 221 multiparous) attended by 43 physicians. Subjects attended by residents or nurses were excluded.intact perineum v. perineal trauma, length of labour, procedures used (instrumental delivery, oxytocin augmentation of labour, cesarean section and episiotomy), position for birth, rate of and reasons for not assigning women to a study arm, postpartum perineal pain and satisfaction with the birth experience, physicians: beliefs concerning episiotomy.Women attended by physicians who viewed episiotomy very unfavorably were more likely than women attended by the other physicians to have an intact perineum (23% v. 11% to 13%, p < 0.05) and to experience less perineal trauma. The first stage of labour was 2.3 to 3.5 hours shorter for women attended by physicians who viewed episiotomy favourably than for women attended by physicians who viewed episiotomy very unfavorably (p < 0.05 to < 0.01), and the former physicians were more likely to use oxytocin augmentation of labour. Physicians who viewed episiotomy more favourably failed more often than those who viewed the procedure very unfavourably to assign patients to a study arm late in labour (odds ratio [OR] 1.88, p < 0.05), both overall and because they felt that fetal distress or cesarean section necessitated exclusion of the subject. They used the lithotomy position for birth more often (OR 3.94 to 4.55, p < 0.001), had difficulty limiting episiotomy in the restricted-use arm of the trial and diagnosed fetal distress and perineal inadequacy more often than the comparison groups. The patients of physicians who viewed episiotomy very favourably experienced more perineal pain (p < 0.01), and of those who viewed episiotomy favourably and very favourably experienced less satisfaction with the birth experience (p < 0.01) than the patients of physicians who viewed the procedure very unfavourably.Physicians with favourably views of episiotomy were more likely to use techniques to expedite labour, and their patients were more likely to have perineal trauma and to be less satisfied with the birth experience. This evidence that physician beliefs can influence patient outcomes has both clinical and research implications." @default.
• W2156825773 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2156825773 creator A5019669147 @default.
• W2156825773 creator A5043281686 @default.
• W2156825773 creator A5052254949 @default.
• W2156825773 creator A5063855071 @default.
• W2156825773 creator A5078818268 @default.
• W2156825773 creator A5085671800 @default.
• W2156825773 date "1995-09-15" @default.
• W2156825773 modified "2023-10-16" @default.
• W2156825773 title "Physicians' beliefs and behaviour during a randomized controlled trial of episiotomy: consequences for women in their care." @default.
• W2156825773 cites W1966940033 @default.
• W2156825773 cites W1978256067 @default.
• W2156825773 cites W1980592488 @default.
• W2156825773 cites W1980888267 @default.
• W2156825773 cites W1986231783 @default.
• W2156825773 cites W1998065604 @default.
• W2156825773 cites W2012448627 @default.
• W2156825773 cites W2013134294 @default.
• W2156825773 cites W2017216658 @default.
• W2156825773 cites W2018969273 @default.
• W2156825773 cites W2021815358 @default.
• W2156825773 cites W2042472315 @default.
• W2156825773 cites W2046525115 @default.
• W2156825773 cites W2049063853 @default.
• W2156825773 cites W2050559757 @default.
• W2156825773 cites W2073554632 @default.
• W2156825773 cites W2075376729 @default.
• W2156825773 cites W2076352231 @default.
• W2156825773 cites W2178074535 @default.
• W2156825773 cites W2312807852 @default.
• W2156825773 cites W2329632759 @default.
• W2156825773 cites W2394974971 @default.
• W2156825773 cites W2395786057 @default.
• W2156825773 cites W1996604851 @default.
• W2156825773 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/1487268" @default.
• W2156825773 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7664230" @default.
• W2156825773 hasPublicationYear "1995" @default.
• W2156825773 type Work @default.
• W2156825773 sameAs 2156825773 @default.
• W2156825773 citedByCount "37" @default.
• W2156825773 countsByYear W21568257732013 @default.
• W2156825773 countsByYear W21568257732015 @default.
• W2156825773 countsByYear W21568257732016 @default.
• W2156825773 countsByYear W21568257732017 @default.
• W2156825773 countsByYear W21568257732018 @default.
• W2156825773 countsByYear W21568257732019 @default.
• W2156825773 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2156825773 hasAuthorship W2156825773A5019669147 @default.
• W2156825773 hasAuthorship W2156825773A5043281686 @default.
• W2156825773 hasAuthorship W2156825773A5052254949 @default.
• W2156825773 hasAuthorship W2156825773A5063855071 @default.
• W2156825773 hasAuthorship W2156825773A5078818268 @default.
• W2156825773 hasAuthorship W2156825773A5085671800 @default.
• W2156825773 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2156825773 hasConcept C131872663 @default.
• W2156825773 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2156825773 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
• W2156825773 hasConcept C143095724 @default.
• W2156825773 hasConcept C151956035 @default.
• W2156825773 hasConcept C156957248 @default.
• W2156825773 hasConcept C168563851 @default.
• W2156825773 hasConcept C2777362633 @default.
• W2156825773 hasConcept C2779234561 @default.
• W2156825773 hasConcept C2779703513 @default.
• W2156825773 hasConcept C2781163205 @default.
• W2156825773 hasConcept C54355233 @default.
• W2156825773 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2156825773 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W2156825773 hasConceptScore W2156825773C126322002 @default.
• W2156825773 hasConceptScore W2156825773C131872663 @default.
• W2156825773 hasConceptScore W2156825773C141071460 @default.
• W2156825773 hasConceptScore W2156825773C142724271 @default.
• W2156825773 hasConceptScore W2156825773C143095724 @default.
• W2156825773 hasConceptScore W2156825773C151956035 @default.
• W2156825773 hasConceptScore W2156825773C156957248 @default.
• W2156825773 hasConceptScore W2156825773C168563851 @default.
• W2156825773 hasConceptScore W2156825773C2777362633 @default.
• W2156825773 hasConceptScore W2156825773C2779234561 @default.
• W2156825773 hasConceptScore W2156825773C2779703513 @default.
• W2156825773 hasConceptScore W2156825773C2781163205 @default.
• W2156825773 hasConceptScore W2156825773C54355233 @default.
• W2156825773 hasConceptScore W2156825773C71924100 @default.
• W2156825773 hasConceptScore W2156825773C86803240 @default.
• W2156825773 hasIssue "6" @default.
• W2156825773 hasLocation W21568257731 @default.
• W2156825773 hasOpenAccess W2156825773 @default.
• W2156825773 hasPrimaryLocation W21568257731 @default.
• W2156825773 hasRelatedWork W186189619 @default.
• W2156825773 hasRelatedWork W1964961361 @default.
• W2156825773 hasRelatedWork W2095195679 @default.
• W2156825773 hasRelatedWork W2104084766 @default.
• W2156825773 hasRelatedWork W2604613293 @default.
• W2156825773 hasRelatedWork W2670073026 @default.
• W2156825773 hasRelatedWork W2905758863 @default.
• W2156825773 hasRelatedWork W2949102045 @default.
• W2156825773 hasRelatedWork W2997973398 @default.
• W2156825773 hasRelatedWork W3172258182 @default.

• next