Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2156868802> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 91 of
91
with 100 items per page.
- W2156868802 endingPage "352.e2" @default.
- W2156868802 startingPage "347" @default.
- W2156868802 abstract "BackgroundSurgical approaches for forefoot osteomyelitis include amputation with immediate wound closure or resection followed by either staged re-resection and wound closure or local care of the open wound for secondary healing. This study evaluated the effectiveness of closed, staged, and open forefoot amputations in preventing major leg amputation and identified those variables that are associated with successful limb preservation.MethodsFrom July 2002 to June 2004, 208 patients with forefoot osteomyelitis or gangrene underwent minor amputation according to a standard treatment algorithm. Wounds with limited cellulitis underwent immediate wound closure (CLOSED), wounds with marginally viable soft tissue underwent open amputation followed by wound closure at 2 to 7 days (STAGED), and wounds with tenosynovitis or extensive necrosis underwent débridement with no attempt at wound closure (OPEN). Patient demographics, need for further operative interventions, time to complete healing, and progression to major amputation were recorded.ResultsWith four subjects lost to follow-up, 204 patients (98%) (94 CLOSED, 56 STAGED, and 54 OPEN) were monitored to complete healing, major amputation, or death. OPEN amputations had a significantly reduced initial healing rate (37%, P < .001) and a frequent need for repeat operative intervention (43%), although successful limb salvage was ultimately achieved in 70% of the cases. Initial healing in the CLOSED and STAGED amputation groups was similar (71% and 78%, respectively), leading to excellent early limb salvage (86% and 91%). The median time to healing for closed, staged, and open amputations was 1.2, 1.6, and 4.6 months, respectively (P < .001). Follow-up evaluation demonstrated the initial improvements in limb salvage with the CLOSED and STAGED groups were lost, resulting in similar amputation rates among the three groups of 30% to 35% over 36 months.ConclusionsAlthough open amputation of extensive forefoot infections frequently requires repeat operative interventions and a prolonged time to complete healing, this approach provides limb salvage rates approaching those observed for less invasive infections amenable to immediate closure. Staged closure offers an improved time to healing without negatively impacting the risk of major limb amputation. Independent of their initial operative approach, these patients frequently progress to early leg amputation. Surgical approaches for forefoot osteomyelitis include amputation with immediate wound closure or resection followed by either staged re-resection and wound closure or local care of the open wound for secondary healing. This study evaluated the effectiveness of closed, staged, and open forefoot amputations in preventing major leg amputation and identified those variables that are associated with successful limb preservation. From July 2002 to June 2004, 208 patients with forefoot osteomyelitis or gangrene underwent minor amputation according to a standard treatment algorithm. Wounds with limited cellulitis underwent immediate wound closure (CLOSED), wounds with marginally viable soft tissue underwent open amputation followed by wound closure at 2 to 7 days (STAGED), and wounds with tenosynovitis or extensive necrosis underwent débridement with no attempt at wound closure (OPEN). Patient demographics, need for further operative interventions, time to complete healing, and progression to major amputation were recorded. With four subjects lost to follow-up, 204 patients (98%) (94 CLOSED, 56 STAGED, and 54 OPEN) were monitored to complete healing, major amputation, or death. OPEN amputations had a significantly reduced initial healing rate (37%, P < .001) and a frequent need for repeat operative intervention (43%), although successful limb salvage was ultimately achieved in 70% of the cases. Initial healing in the CLOSED and STAGED amputation groups was similar (71% and 78%, respectively), leading to excellent early limb salvage (86% and 91%). The median time to healing for closed, staged, and open amputations was 1.2, 1.6, and 4.6 months, respectively (P < .001). Follow-up evaluation demonstrated the initial improvements in limb salvage with the CLOSED and STAGED groups were lost, resulting in similar amputation rates among the three groups of 30% to 35% over 36 months. Although open amputation of extensive forefoot infections frequently requires repeat operative interventions and a prolonged time to complete healing, this approach provides limb salvage rates approaching those observed for less invasive infections amenable to immediate closure. Staged closure offers an improved time to healing without negatively impacting the risk of major limb amputation. Independent of their initial operative approach, these patients frequently progress to early leg amputation." @default.
- W2156868802 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W2156868802 creator A5014730726 @default.
- W2156868802 creator A5016080958 @default.
- W2156868802 creator A5028140145 @default.
- W2156868802 creator A5058954583 @default.
- W2156868802 date "2006-08-01" @default.
- W2156868802 modified "2023-09-28" @default.
- W2156868802 title "Clinical outcomes after closed, staged, and open forefoot amputations" @default.
- W2156868802 cites W1972291981 @default.
- W2156868802 cites W1974910752 @default.
- W2156868802 cites W2037184208 @default.
- W2156868802 cites W2037316377 @default.
- W2156868802 cites W2046506159 @default.
- W2156868802 cites W2051827266 @default.
- W2156868802 cites W2054392002 @default.
- W2156868802 cites W2081341627 @default.
- W2156868802 cites W2084025044 @default.
- W2156868802 cites W2086857249 @default.
- W2156868802 cites W2096288788 @default.
- W2156868802 cites W2100415814 @default.
- W2156868802 cites W2112326179 @default.
- W2156868802 cites W2132770104 @default.
- W2156868802 cites W2140682284 @default.
- W2156868802 cites W2141600376 @default.
- W2156868802 cites W2165929153 @default.
- W2156868802 cites W2415425885 @default.
- W2156868802 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2006.04.043" @default.
- W2156868802 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16890866" @default.
- W2156868802 hasPublicationYear "2006" @default.
- W2156868802 type Work @default.
- W2156868802 sameAs 2156868802 @default.
- W2156868802 citedByCount "26" @default.
- W2156868802 countsByYear W21568688022012 @default.
- W2156868802 countsByYear W21568688022013 @default.
- W2156868802 countsByYear W21568688022014 @default.
- W2156868802 countsByYear W21568688022015 @default.
- W2156868802 countsByYear W21568688022016 @default.
- W2156868802 countsByYear W21568688022017 @default.
- W2156868802 countsByYear W21568688022018 @default.
- W2156868802 countsByYear W21568688022019 @default.
- W2156868802 countsByYear W21568688022020 @default.
- W2156868802 countsByYear W21568688022023 @default.
- W2156868802 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2156868802 hasAuthorship W2156868802A5014730726 @default.
- W2156868802 hasAuthorship W2156868802A5016080958 @default.
- W2156868802 hasAuthorship W2156868802A5028140145 @default.
- W2156868802 hasAuthorship W2156868802A5058954583 @default.
- W2156868802 hasBestOaLocation W21568688021 @default.
- W2156868802 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
- W2156868802 hasConcept C2776204877 @default.
- W2156868802 hasConcept C2776577363 @default.
- W2156868802 hasConcept C2776626339 @default.
- W2156868802 hasConcept C2777238321 @default.
- W2156868802 hasConcept C2780269544 @default.
- W2156868802 hasConcept C2780551157 @default.
- W2156868802 hasConcept C2993807428 @default.
- W2156868802 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W2156868802 hasConcept C81182388 @default.
- W2156868802 hasConceptScore W2156868802C141071460 @default.
- W2156868802 hasConceptScore W2156868802C2776204877 @default.
- W2156868802 hasConceptScore W2156868802C2776577363 @default.
- W2156868802 hasConceptScore W2156868802C2776626339 @default.
- W2156868802 hasConceptScore W2156868802C2777238321 @default.
- W2156868802 hasConceptScore W2156868802C2780269544 @default.
- W2156868802 hasConceptScore W2156868802C2780551157 @default.
- W2156868802 hasConceptScore W2156868802C2993807428 @default.
- W2156868802 hasConceptScore W2156868802C71924100 @default.
- W2156868802 hasConceptScore W2156868802C81182388 @default.
- W2156868802 hasIssue "2" @default.
- W2156868802 hasLocation W21568688021 @default.
- W2156868802 hasLocation W21568688022 @default.
- W2156868802 hasOpenAccess W2156868802 @default.
- W2156868802 hasPrimaryLocation W21568688021 @default.
- W2156868802 hasRelatedWork W2025851622 @default.
- W2156868802 hasRelatedWork W2031053840 @default.
- W2156868802 hasRelatedWork W2101959808 @default.
- W2156868802 hasRelatedWork W2156868802 @default.
- W2156868802 hasRelatedWork W2170237289 @default.
- W2156868802 hasRelatedWork W2418331222 @default.
- W2156868802 hasRelatedWork W2495815836 @default.
- W2156868802 hasRelatedWork W256085834 @default.
- W2156868802 hasRelatedWork W3193570560 @default.
- W2156868802 hasRelatedWork W4285096907 @default.
- W2156868802 hasVolume "44" @default.
- W2156868802 isParatext "false" @default.
- W2156868802 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W2156868802 magId "2156868802" @default.
- W2156868802 workType "article" @default.