FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2157029647> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2157029647 endingPage "1288" @default.
• W2157029647 startingPage "1280" @default.
• W2157029647 abstract "Background: A variety of measures have been developed to calculate refill adherence from administrative data such as pharmacy claims databases. These measures have focused on improving the accuracy of adherence measures or clarifying the evaluation time frame. As a result, there are many measures used to assess adherence that may or may not be comparable or accurate. Objective: To compare available refill adherence measures. Methods: A systematic literature review was conducted to identify current or recently used measures of calculating adherence from administrative data. A MEDLINE search (January 1990–March 2006) was undertaken using the search terms adherence or compliance in the title combined with administrative, pharmacy, or records in any field, including subheadings medical, nursing, and hospital records. Non-English articles were excluded. Seven hundred fifteen articles were available for review. Review articles and letters were excluded from measure selection, but were included in the search terms and used to identify additional research articles. Adherence measures were excluded if they were incompletely described, produced non-numeric values, or were duplicates. Eleven refill adherence measures were identified and compared using data from the LOSE Weight (Long-term Outcomes of Sibutramine Effectiveness on Weight) study. Measures compared include Continuous Measure of Medication Acquisition (CMA); Continuous Multiple Interval Measure of Oversupply (CMOS); Medication Possession Ratio (MPR); Medication Refill Adherence (MRA); Continuous Measure of Medication Gaps (CMG); Continuous, Single Interval Measure of Medication Aquisition (CSA); Proportion of Days Covered (PDC); Refill Compliance Rate (RCR); Medication Possession Ratio, modified (MPRm); Dates Between Fills Adherence Rate (DBR); and Compliance Rate (CR). Results: The results suggest that the CMA, CMOS, MPR, and MRA are identical in terms of measuring adherence to prescription refills throughout the study period, each with a value of 63.5%; CMG and PDC are slightly lower (63.0%) and are equivalent to MRA when oversupply is truncated. CR, MPRm, RCR, and CSA result in higher adherence values of 84.4%, 86.6%, 104.8%, and 109.7%, respectively. Conclusions: Five measures produce equivalent results for measuring prescription refill adherence over the evaluation period. Of these, MRA has the fewest calculations, is easily truncated if one desires to exclude surplus medication issues, and requires the least amount of data. MRA is therefore recommended as the preferred measure of adherence using administrative data." @default.
• W2157029647 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2157029647 creator A5018460766 @default.
• W2157029647 creator A5050834677 @default.
• W2157029647 creator A5067710734 @default.
• W2157029647 creator A5086515905 @default.
• W2157029647 date "2006-07-01" @default.
• W2157029647 modified "2023-10-11" @default.
• W2157029647 title "Measurement of Adherence in Pharmacy Administrative Databases: A Proposal for Standard Definitions and Preferred Measures" @default.
• W2157029647 cites W1972110417 @default.
• W2157029647 cites W1982767335 @default.
• W2157029647 cites W1992534062 @default.
• W2157029647 cites W1998985591 @default.
• W2157029647 cites W2004396406 @default.
• W2157029647 cites W2013450580 @default.
• W2157029647 cites W2016820871 @default.
• W2157029647 cites W2021245875 @default.
• W2157029647 cites W2037561002 @default.
• W2157029647 cites W2056950322 @default.
• W2157029647 cites W2057112394 @default.
• W2157029647 cites W2058622522 @default.
• W2157029647 cites W2058647728 @default.
• W2157029647 cites W2060344068 @default.
• W2157029647 cites W2062299562 @default.
• W2157029647 cites W2063611994 @default.
• W2157029647 cites W2063780338 @default.
• W2157029647 cites W2068733872 @default.
• W2157029647 cites W2113708423 @default.
• W2157029647 cites W2137665561 @default.
• W2157029647 cites W2138418531 @default.
• W2157029647 cites W2156867561 @default.
• W2157029647 cites W2166754635 @default.
• W2157029647 cites W2170543905 @default.
• W2157029647 cites W2318545861 @default.
• W2157029647 doi "https://doi.org/10.1345/aph.1h018" @default.
• W2157029647 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16868217" @default.
• W2157029647 hasPublicationYear "2006" @default.
• W2157029647 type Work @default.
• W2157029647 sameAs 2157029647 @default.
• W2157029647 citedByCount "648" @default.
• W2157029647 countsByYear W21570296472012 @default.
• W2157029647 countsByYear W21570296472013 @default.
• W2157029647 countsByYear W21570296472014 @default.
• W2157029647 countsByYear W21570296472015 @default.
• W2157029647 countsByYear W21570296472016 @default.
• W2157029647 countsByYear W21570296472017 @default.
• W2157029647 countsByYear W21570296472018 @default.
• W2157029647 countsByYear W21570296472019 @default.
• W2157029647 countsByYear W21570296472020 @default.
• W2157029647 countsByYear W21570296472021 @default.
• W2157029647 countsByYear W21570296472022 @default.
• W2157029647 countsByYear W21570296472023 @default.
• W2157029647 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2157029647 hasAuthorship W2157029647A5018460766 @default.
• W2157029647 hasAuthorship W2157029647A5050834677 @default.
• W2157029647 hasAuthorship W2157029647A5067710734 @default.
• W2157029647 hasAuthorship W2157029647A5086515905 @default.
• W2157029647 hasConcept C104863432 @default.
• W2157029647 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2157029647 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2157029647 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2157029647 hasConcept C195910791 @default.
• W2157029647 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2157029647 hasConcept C2779473830 @default.
• W2157029647 hasConcept C44249647 @default.
• W2157029647 hasConcept C512399662 @default.
• W2157029647 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2157029647 hasConceptScore W2157029647C104863432 @default.
• W2157029647 hasConceptScore W2157029647C126322002 @default.
• W2157029647 hasConceptScore W2157029647C141071460 @default.
• W2157029647 hasConceptScore W2157029647C17744445 @default.
• W2157029647 hasConceptScore W2157029647C195910791 @default.
• W2157029647 hasConceptScore W2157029647C199539241 @default.
• W2157029647 hasConceptScore W2157029647C2779473830 @default.
• W2157029647 hasConceptScore W2157029647C44249647 @default.
• W2157029647 hasConceptScore W2157029647C512399662 @default.
• W2157029647 hasConceptScore W2157029647C71924100 @default.
• W2157029647 hasIssue "7-8" @default.
• W2157029647 hasLocation W21570296471 @default.
• W2157029647 hasOpenAccess W2157029647 @default.
• W2157029647 hasPrimaryLocation W21570296471 @default.
• W2157029647 hasRelatedWork W135528526 @default.
• W2157029647 hasRelatedWork W150703042 @default.
• W2157029647 hasRelatedWork W1990819102 @default.
• W2157029647 hasRelatedWork W2006809269 @default.
• W2157029647 hasRelatedWork W2059320089 @default.
• W2157029647 hasRelatedWork W2281112539 @default.
• W2157029647 hasRelatedWork W2410837653 @default.
• W2157029647 hasRelatedWork W4249139583 @default.
• W2157029647 hasRelatedWork W4307034070 @default.
• W2157029647 hasRelatedWork W1909278487 @default.
• W2157029647 hasVolume "40" @default.
• W2157029647 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2157029647 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2157029647 magId "2157029647" @default.
• W2157029647 workType "article" @default.