FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W215764929> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W215764929 startingPage "85" @default.
• W215764929 abstract "Increasingly, institutions of higher education are responding concerns about elementary and secondary teacher preparation programs. Roth (1992) summarizes the main criticisms aimed at teacher education programs: ill conceived and poorly taught education courses, the worst students, the least amount of funding, highly theoretical lectures from faculty in university ivory towers, and not enough time in schools gain practical experience. The reform attempts have faulted as well. Sarason (Sarason, Davidson & Blatt, 1986) claims that many recommendations for addressing these concerns have been offered countless times in the past without discernible effect. His overriding concern has the unaddressed need to better prepare teachers for the realities of the classroom, the school, and the school system. What has encouraging in recent years is the growing perception that collaborations between public schools and universities offer a powerful, more creative means for effecting change. This paper reports conflicts and lessons learned from one such collaborative effort. In School-University Partnerships, Lieberman discusses the arrival of school-university coalitions as serendipitous because these partnerships come at a time when research universities are being called task for having grown distant from the real problems that schools are facing while school people are being criticized for having so immersed in their daily problems that they have spent little time or energy reflecting on how schools could be improved (Sirotnik & Goodlad, 1988, p. 69). Collaborations have taken many forms. Based on the notion that individual programs need be analyzed, shaped, and developed around the beliefs and experiences of local participants (Sikula, 1990, p. 80), public school teachers and administrators are being asked participate in a variety of university program improvement efforts. In our project, five school and four university members worked redesign the structure and curriculum of an elementary teacher preparation program in a research university. We believe there is much be learned from the experience: about what happened, why we think it happened, and what things we would have done differently had we wiser in understanding the nature of collaboration and the culture of the university. Case Study Overview The revision effort began when an assistant professor was hired replace a retiring professor in elementary education. Other new appointments were slated replace some of the limited term instructors who had served the program for several years. The plan was use this opportunity re-evaluate the elementary program that had not changed in over twenty years. The new professor was given the task of organizing and chairing a committee revise the elementary teacher education program. Having trained in organizational development and collaborative change, she immediately moved form a committee represented equally by respected school and university members. Her tenets of planning were help promote what you help create and the process, which refers the necessity of keeping the faith through the sometimes difficult moments in consensus decision making. The planning model, based on the work of Russell Ackoff (1974), involved envisioning the ideal which was, in this case, the ideal elementary teacher be graduated from this university, and developing a structure and curriculum realize the emerging vision. Essential the change process were ongoing team and consensus building develop trust among the committee members who had not previously worked together. A study phase included a review of the literature and visits exemplary programs. Next came the development of a philosophy statement and the generation of a knowledge base be possessed by the ideal teacher. Existing courses were then dissected and modified, and new courses designed. …" @default.
• W215764929 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W215764929 creator A5017041449 @default.
• W215764929 creator A5046718992 @default.
• W215764929 date "1993-09-22" @default.
• W215764929 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
• W215764929 title "Redesigning Teacher Education: Lessons from a School-University Collaboration" @default.
• W215764929 hasPublicationYear "1993" @default.
• W215764929 type Work @default.
• W215764929 sameAs 215764929 @default.
• W215764929 citedByCount "1" @default.
• W215764929 countsByYear W2157649292014 @default.
• W215764929 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W215764929 hasAuthorship W215764929A5017041449 @default.
• W215764929 hasAuthorship W215764929A5046718992 @default.
• W215764929 hasConcept C120912362 @default.
• W215764929 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W215764929 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W215764929 hasConcept C145420912 @default.
• W215764929 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W215764929 hasConcept C169760540 @default.
• W215764929 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W215764929 hasConcept C19417346 @default.
• W215764929 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W215764929 hasConcept C201995342 @default.
• W215764929 hasConcept C26760741 @default.
• W215764929 hasConcept C2780451532 @default.
• W215764929 hasConcept C39549134 @default.
• W215764929 hasConceptScore W215764929C120912362 @default.
• W215764929 hasConceptScore W215764929C127413603 @default.
• W215764929 hasConceptScore W215764929C144024400 @default.
• W215764929 hasConceptScore W215764929C145420912 @default.
• W215764929 hasConceptScore W215764929C15744967 @default.
• W215764929 hasConceptScore W215764929C169760540 @default.
• W215764929 hasConceptScore W215764929C17744445 @default.
• W215764929 hasConceptScore W215764929C19417346 @default.
• W215764929 hasConceptScore W215764929C199539241 @default.
• W215764929 hasConceptScore W215764929C201995342 @default.
• W215764929 hasConceptScore W215764929C26760741 @default.
• W215764929 hasConceptScore W215764929C2780451532 @default.
• W215764929 hasConceptScore W215764929C39549134 @default.
• W215764929 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W215764929 hasLocation W2157649291 @default.
• W215764929 hasOpenAccess W215764929 @default.
• W215764929 hasPrimaryLocation W2157649291 @default.
• W215764929 hasRelatedWork W111161630 @default.
• W215764929 hasRelatedWork W1492703472 @default.
• W215764929 hasRelatedWork W1585214255 @default.
• W215764929 hasRelatedWork W1974059333 @default.
• W215764929 hasRelatedWork W1998849979 @default.
• W215764929 hasRelatedWork W2028669467 @default.
• W215764929 hasRelatedWork W2052857862 @default.
• W215764929 hasRelatedWork W2057647253 @default.
• W215764929 hasRelatedWork W208265480 @default.
• W215764929 hasRelatedWork W2088577579 @default.
• W215764929 hasRelatedWork W2093671731 @default.
• W215764929 hasRelatedWork W2183758288 @default.
• W215764929 hasRelatedWork W258248866 @default.
• W215764929 hasRelatedWork W266296615 @default.
• W215764929 hasRelatedWork W27004752 @default.
• W215764929 hasRelatedWork W336678718 @default.
• W215764929 hasRelatedWork W51438756 @default.
• W215764929 hasRelatedWork W758208029 @default.
• W215764929 hasRelatedWork W2144904906 @default.
• W215764929 hasRelatedWork W43240856 @default.
• W215764929 hasVolume "114" @default.
• W215764929 isParatext "false" @default.
• W215764929 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W215764929 magId "215764929" @default.
• W215764929 workType "article" @default.