Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2157902911> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 99 of
99
with 100 items per page.
- W2157902911 endingPage "590.e1" @default.
- W2157902911 startingPage "583" @default.
- W2157902911 abstract "Background & AimsAlthough surgery is the standard technique for drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts, use of endoscopic methods is increasing. We performed a single-center, open-label, randomized trial to compare endoscopic and surgical cystogastrostomy for pancreatic pseudocyst drainage.MethodsPatients with pancreatic pseudocysts underwent endoscopic (n = 20) or surgical cystogastrostomy (n = 20). The primary end point was pseudocyst recurrence after a 24-month follow-up period. Secondary end points were treatment success or failure, complications, re-interventions, length of hospital stay, physical and mental health scores, and total costs.ResultsAt the end of the follow-up period, none of the patients who received endoscopic therapy had a pseudocyst recurrence, compared with 1 patient treated surgically. There were no differences in treatment successes, complications, or re-interventions between the groups. However, the length of hospital stay was shorter for patients who underwent endoscopic cystogastrostomy (median, 2 days, vs 6 days in the surgery group; P < .001). Although there were no differences in physical component scores and mental health component scores (MCS) between groups at baseline on the Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short-Form General Survey questionnaire, longitudinal analysis showed significantly better physical component scores (P = .019) and mental health component scores (P = .025) for the endoscopy treatment group. The total mean cost was lower for patients managed by endoscopy than surgery ($7011 vs $15,052; P = .003).ConclusionsIn a randomized trial comparing endoscopic and surgical cystogastrostomy for pancreatic pseudocyst drainage, none of the patients in the endoscopy group had pseudocyst recurrence during the follow-up period, therefore there is no evidence that surgical cystogastrostomy is superior. However, endoscopic treatment was associated with shorter hospital stays, better physical and mental health of patients, and lower cost. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00826501. Although surgery is the standard technique for drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts, use of endoscopic methods is increasing. We performed a single-center, open-label, randomized trial to compare endoscopic and surgical cystogastrostomy for pancreatic pseudocyst drainage. Patients with pancreatic pseudocysts underwent endoscopic (n = 20) or surgical cystogastrostomy (n = 20). The primary end point was pseudocyst recurrence after a 24-month follow-up period. Secondary end points were treatment success or failure, complications, re-interventions, length of hospital stay, physical and mental health scores, and total costs. At the end of the follow-up period, none of the patients who received endoscopic therapy had a pseudocyst recurrence, compared with 1 patient treated surgically. There were no differences in treatment successes, complications, or re-interventions between the groups. However, the length of hospital stay was shorter for patients who underwent endoscopic cystogastrostomy (median, 2 days, vs 6 days in the surgery group; P < .001). Although there were no differences in physical component scores and mental health component scores (MCS) between groups at baseline on the Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short-Form General Survey questionnaire, longitudinal analysis showed significantly better physical component scores (P = .019) and mental health component scores (P = .025) for the endoscopy treatment group. The total mean cost was lower for patients managed by endoscopy than surgery ($7011 vs $15,052; P = .003). In a randomized trial comparing endoscopic and surgical cystogastrostomy for pancreatic pseudocyst drainage, none of the patients in the endoscopy group had pseudocyst recurrence during the follow-up period, therefore there is no evidence that surgical cystogastrostomy is superior. However, endoscopic treatment was associated with shorter hospital stays, better physical and mental health of patients, and lower cost. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00826501." @default.
- W2157902911 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W2157902911 creator A5004945331 @default.
- W2157902911 creator A5017166637 @default.
- W2157902911 creator A5022886338 @default.
- W2157902911 creator A5043990962 @default.
- W2157902911 creator A5045645161 @default.
- W2157902911 creator A5073316920 @default.
- W2157902911 date "2013-09-01" @default.
- W2157902911 modified "2023-10-11" @default.
- W2157902911 title "Equal Efficacy of Endoscopic and Surgical Cystogastrostomy for Pancreatic Pseudocyst Drainage in a Randomized Trial" @default.
- W2157902911 cites W1968232838 @default.
- W2157902911 cites W1978004804 @default.
- W2157902911 cites W1982916649 @default.
- W2157902911 cites W1987551138 @default.
- W2157902911 cites W1991223887 @default.
- W2157902911 cites W2002683242 @default.
- W2157902911 cites W2014440969 @default.
- W2157902911 cites W2015920630 @default.
- W2157902911 cites W2023854752 @default.
- W2157902911 cites W2028615590 @default.
- W2157902911 cites W2034500494 @default.
- W2157902911 cites W2036650088 @default.
- W2157902911 cites W2045291273 @default.
- W2157902911 cites W2059658791 @default.
- W2157902911 cites W2074509767 @default.
- W2157902911 cites W2083410949 @default.
- W2157902911 cites W2086282192 @default.
- W2157902911 cites W2086306963 @default.
- W2157902911 cites W2088698189 @default.
- W2157902911 cites W2098260480 @default.
- W2157902911 cites W2145634361 @default.
- W2157902911 cites W2145758369 @default.
- W2157902911 cites W2151365580 @default.
- W2157902911 cites W2159823771 @default.
- W2157902911 cites W2169588513 @default.
- W2157902911 cites W2784659661 @default.
- W2157902911 cites W4292806894 @default.
- W2157902911 doi "https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2013.05.046" @default.
- W2157902911 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23732774" @default.
- W2157902911 hasPublicationYear "2013" @default.
- W2157902911 type Work @default.
- W2157902911 sameAs 2157902911 @default.
- W2157902911 citedByCount "392" @default.
- W2157902911 countsByYear W21579029112013 @default.
- W2157902911 countsByYear W21579029112014 @default.
- W2157902911 countsByYear W21579029112015 @default.
- W2157902911 countsByYear W21579029112016 @default.
- W2157902911 countsByYear W21579029112017 @default.
- W2157902911 countsByYear W21579029112018 @default.
- W2157902911 countsByYear W21579029112019 @default.
- W2157902911 countsByYear W21579029112020 @default.
- W2157902911 countsByYear W21579029112021 @default.
- W2157902911 countsByYear W21579029112022 @default.
- W2157902911 countsByYear W21579029112023 @default.
- W2157902911 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2157902911 hasAuthorship W2157902911A5004945331 @default.
- W2157902911 hasAuthorship W2157902911A5017166637 @default.
- W2157902911 hasAuthorship W2157902911A5022886338 @default.
- W2157902911 hasAuthorship W2157902911A5043990962 @default.
- W2157902911 hasAuthorship W2157902911A5045645161 @default.
- W2157902911 hasAuthorship W2157902911A5073316920 @default.
- W2157902911 hasBestOaLocation W21579029111 @default.
- W2157902911 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
- W2157902911 hasConcept C168563851 @default.
- W2157902911 hasConcept C203092338 @default.
- W2157902911 hasConcept C2775967933 @default.
- W2157902911 hasConcept C2778451229 @default.
- W2157902911 hasConcept C2779763456 @default.
- W2157902911 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W2157902911 hasConceptScore W2157902911C141071460 @default.
- W2157902911 hasConceptScore W2157902911C168563851 @default.
- W2157902911 hasConceptScore W2157902911C203092338 @default.
- W2157902911 hasConceptScore W2157902911C2775967933 @default.
- W2157902911 hasConceptScore W2157902911C2778451229 @default.
- W2157902911 hasConceptScore W2157902911C2779763456 @default.
- W2157902911 hasConceptScore W2157902911C71924100 @default.
- W2157902911 hasIssue "3" @default.
- W2157902911 hasLocation W21579029111 @default.
- W2157902911 hasLocation W21579029112 @default.
- W2157902911 hasOpenAccess W2157902911 @default.
- W2157902911 hasPrimaryLocation W21579029111 @default.
- W2157902911 hasRelatedWork W1516075881 @default.
- W2157902911 hasRelatedWork W2002120878 @default.
- W2157902911 hasRelatedWork W2003938723 @default.
- W2157902911 hasRelatedWork W2047967234 @default.
- W2157902911 hasRelatedWork W2118496982 @default.
- W2157902911 hasRelatedWork W2406432356 @default.
- W2157902911 hasRelatedWork W2439875401 @default.
- W2157902911 hasRelatedWork W4238867864 @default.
- W2157902911 hasRelatedWork W2519357708 @default.
- W2157902911 hasRelatedWork W2525756941 @default.
- W2157902911 hasVolume "145" @default.
- W2157902911 isParatext "false" @default.
- W2157902911 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W2157902911 magId "2157902911" @default.
- W2157902911 workType "article" @default.