FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2158335943> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2158335943 endingPage "913" @default.
• W2158335943 startingPage "913" @default.
• W2158335943 abstract "Cardiac imaging has advanced rapidly, providing clinicians with several choices for evaluating patients with suspected coronary artery disease, but few studies compare modalities directly.To review the contemporary literature and to compare the diagnostic performance of exercise echocardiography (ECHO) and exercise single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) imaging in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease.Studies published between January 1990 and October 1997 identified from MEDLINE search; bibliographies of reviews and original articles; and suggestions from experts in each area.Articles were included if they discussed exercise ECHO and/or exercise SPECT imaging with thallous chloride TI 201 (thallium) or technetium Tc 99m sestamibi for detection and/or evaluation of coronary artery disease, if data on coronary angiography were presented as the reference test, and if the absolute numbers of true-positive, false-negative, true-negative, and false-positive observations were available or derivable from the data presented. Studies performed exclusively in patients after myocardial infarction, after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty, after coronary artery bypass grafting, or with recent unstable coronary syndromes were excluded.Clinical variables, technical factors, and test performance were independently extracted by 2 reviewers on a standardized spreadsheet. Discrepancies were resolved by consensus.Forty-four articles met inclusion criteria. In pooled data weighted by the sample size of each study, exercise ECHO had a sensitivity of 85% (95% confidence interval [CI], 83%-87%) with a specificity of 77% (95% CI, 74%-80%). Exercise SPECT yielded a similar sensitivity of 87% (95% CI, 86%-88%) but a lower specificity of 64% (95% CI, 60%-68%). In a summary receiver operating characteristic model comparing exercise ECHO performance to exercise SPECT, exercise ECHO was associated with significantly better discriminatory power (parameter estimate, 1.18; 95% CI, 0.71-1.65), when adjusted for age, publication year, and a setting including known coronary artery disease for SPECT studies. In models comparing the discriminatory abilities of exercise ECHO and exercise SPECT vs exercise testing without imaging, both ECHO and SPECT performed significantly better than exercise testing. The incremental improvement in performance was greater for ECHO (3.43; 95% CI, 2.74-4.11) than for SPECT (1.49; 95% CI, 0.91-2.08).Exercise ECHO and exercise SPECT have similar sensitivities for the detection of coronary artery disease, but exercise ECHO has better specificity and, therefore, higher overall discriminatory capabilities as used in contemporary practice." @default.
• W2158335943 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2158335943 creator A5057932551 @default.
• W2158335943 creator A5061552996 @default.
• W2158335943 creator A5077292692 @default.
• W2158335943 creator A5079168094 @default.
• W2158335943 date "1998-09-09" @default.
• W2158335943 modified "2023-10-10" @default.
• W2158335943 title "Exercise Echocardiography or Exercise SPECT Imaging?" @default.
• W2158335943 cites W1772785070 @default.
• W2158335943 cites W1964948211 @default.
• W2158335943 cites W1967073664 @default.
• W2158335943 cites W1972050759 @default.
• W2158335943 cites W1973871097 @default.
• W2158335943 cites W1981760045 @default.
• W2158335943 cites W1982890131 @default.
• W2158335943 cites W1985212674 @default.
• W2158335943 cites W1985814494 @default.
• W2158335943 cites W1989437112 @default.
• W2158335943 cites W1991668508 @default.
• W2158335943 cites W1996168935 @default.
• W2158335943 cites W1998285493 @default.
• W2158335943 cites W2002072663 @default.
• W2158335943 cites W2010316718 @default.
• W2158335943 cites W2022772447 @default.
• W2158335943 cites W2025068971 @default.
• W2158335943 cites W2026409624 @default.
• W2158335943 cites W2028941615 @default.
• W2158335943 cites W2036908340 @default.
• W2158335943 cites W2037114224 @default.
• W2158335943 cites W2040963042 @default.
• W2158335943 cites W2042947293 @default.
• W2158335943 cites W2044487250 @default.
• W2158335943 cites W2049373023 @default.
• W2158335943 cites W2052465660 @default.
• W2158335943 cites W2052591934 @default.
• W2158335943 cites W2055495421 @default.
• W2158335943 cites W2056894549 @default.
• W2158335943 cites W2057163274 @default.
• W2158335943 cites W2057631921 @default.
• W2158335943 cites W2059146824 @default.
• W2158335943 cites W2062494452 @default.
• W2158335943 cites W2066748475 @default.
• W2158335943 cites W2070144971 @default.
• W2158335943 cites W2071552296 @default.
• W2158335943 cites W2074898664 @default.
• W2158335943 cites W2075615530 @default.
• W2158335943 cites W2082544267 @default.
• W2158335943 cites W2086974656 @default.
• W2158335943 cites W2088724740 @default.
• W2158335943 cites W2092724951 @default.
• W2158335943 cites W2092739738 @default.
• W2158335943 cites W2096466214 @default.
• W2158335943 cites W2097997050 @default.
• W2158335943 cites W2113009004 @default.
• W2158335943 cites W2113320661 @default.
• W2158335943 cites W2126570095 @default.
• W2158335943 cites W2143993137 @default.
• W2158335943 cites W2157825442 @default.
• W2158335943 cites W2186456632 @default.
• W2158335943 cites W2419493069 @default.
• W2158335943 cites W47963045 @default.
• W2158335943 cites W1962138425 @default.
• W2158335943 doi "https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.280.10.913" @default.
• W2158335943 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9739977" @default.
• W2158335943 hasPublicationYear "1998" @default.
• W2158335943 type Work @default.
• W2158335943 sameAs 2158335943 @default.
• W2158335943 citedByCount "450" @default.
• W2158335943 countsByYear W21583359432012 @default.
• W2158335943 countsByYear W21583359432013 @default.
• W2158335943 countsByYear W21583359432014 @default.
• W2158335943 countsByYear W21583359432015 @default.
• W2158335943 countsByYear W21583359432016 @default.
• W2158335943 countsByYear W21583359432017 @default.
• W2158335943 countsByYear W21583359432018 @default.
• W2158335943 countsByYear W21583359432019 @default.
• W2158335943 countsByYear W21583359432020 @default.
• W2158335943 countsByYear W21583359432021 @default.
• W2158335943 countsByYear W21583359432022 @default.
• W2158335943 countsByYear W21583359432023 @default.
• W2158335943 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2158335943 hasAuthorship W2158335943A5057932551 @default.
• W2158335943 hasAuthorship W2158335943A5061552996 @default.
• W2158335943 hasAuthorship W2158335943A5077292692 @default.
• W2158335943 hasAuthorship W2158335943A5079168094 @default.
• W2158335943 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2158335943 hasConcept C126838900 @default.
• W2158335943 hasConcept C164705383 @default.
• W2158335943 hasConcept C179104552 @default.
• W2158335943 hasConcept C185592680 @default.
• W2158335943 hasConcept C2778213512 @default.
• W2158335943 hasConcept C2989005 @default.
• W2158335943 hasConcept C44249647 @default.
• W2158335943 hasConcept C500558357 @default.
• W2158335943 hasConcept C559099789 @default.
• W2158335943 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2158335943 hasConceptScore W2158335943C126322002 @default.

• next