FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2158642775> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2158642775 endingPage "18" @default.
• W2158642775 startingPage "6" @default.
• W2158642775 abstract "Purpose The purpose of this paper is to look at some of the factors that influence the transfer of tacit knowledge between two product development partners. Design/methodology/approach Research involved the collection of both qualitative and quantitative data. The qualitative data was based on 13 interviews with various individuals, representing three companies, charged with integrating external technology. The quantitative portion of the data was collected through an online survey. The survey was executed by soliciting responses from managers of 39 discreet projects involving various types of external technology integration, representing five different companies. Findings The paper provides evidence that trust, early involvement, and due diligence influence the extent of meeting technology transfer expectations and tacit knowledge transfer expectations. It also finds that the subject of tacit knowledge transfer, content and process, is poorly understood. While managers and project leaders saw the value of tacit knowledge, there were different perceptions of the goals successful knowledge transfer and a lack of processes to manage its process. While project managers may feel that they have tacit knowledge transfer in hand, they have not managed to transfer the knowledge needed for long‐term product management. Research limitations/implications There are a number of limitations affecting the scope of these findings. For one, our survey respondents were all project or product managers. Future research should include a broader base of participants, both horizontally and vertically. Second, interviews and surveys were confined to a total of five US companies in three industries. Future research would benefit from a larger sample size, as well as greater sample diversity in terms of firm size, industry, and cultural context. Lastly, the measure of tacit knowledge transfer needs additional validation. Practical implications The paper offers several recommendations to help managers begin to think of tacit knowledge as an independent entity and manage it accordingly. Originality/value This paper offers empirical support for some of the factors that influence the extent of meeting technology and tacit knowledge transfer expectations. Moreover, it offers a unique model that highlights how different levels of an organizational hierarchy are governed by significantly different goals and expectations with regard to tacit knowledge transfer." @default.
• W2158642775 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2158642775 creator A5033476657 @default.
• W2158642775 creator A5047733206 @default.
• W2158642775 creator A5050230966 @default.
• W2158642775 date "2006-01-01" @default.
• W2158642775 modified "2023-10-02" @default.
• W2158642775 title "Tacit knowledge transfer and the knowledge disconnect" @default.
• W2158642775 cites W1969449589 @default.
• W2158642775 cites W1977344214 @default.
• W2158642775 cites W1986105606 @default.
• W2158642775 cites W1988727776 @default.
• W2158642775 cites W2008882796 @default.
• W2158642775 cites W2024624352 @default.
• W2158642775 cites W2072587244 @default.
• W2158642775 cites W2081880455 @default.
• W2158642775 cites W2096059703 @default.
• W2158642775 cites W2109469951 @default.
• W2158642775 cites W2136602380 @default.
• W2158642775 cites W2143160986 @default.
• W2158642775 cites W2179492332 @default.
• W2158642775 cites W2811172771 @default.
• W2158642775 cites W3123487730 @default.
• W2158642775 cites W4235722706 @default.
• W2158642775 cites W4244635346 @default.
• W2158642775 cites W4249149673 @default.
• W2158642775 cites W4253262538 @default.
• W2158642775 doi "https://doi.org/10.1108/13673270610650067" @default.
• W2158642775 hasPublicationYear "2006" @default.
• W2158642775 type Work @default.
• W2158642775 sameAs 2158642775 @default.
• W2158642775 citedByCount "163" @default.
• W2158642775 countsByYear W21586427752012 @default.
• W2158642775 countsByYear W21586427752013 @default.
• W2158642775 countsByYear W21586427752014 @default.
• W2158642775 countsByYear W21586427752015 @default.
• W2158642775 countsByYear W21586427752016 @default.
• W2158642775 countsByYear W21586427752017 @default.
• W2158642775 countsByYear W21586427752018 @default.
• W2158642775 countsByYear W21586427752019 @default.
• W2158642775 countsByYear W21586427752020 @default.
• W2158642775 countsByYear W21586427752021 @default.
• W2158642775 countsByYear W21586427752022 @default.
• W2158642775 countsByYear W21586427752023 @default.
• W2158642775 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2158642775 hasAuthorship W2158642775A5033476657 @default.
• W2158642775 hasAuthorship W2158642775A5047733206 @default.
• W2158642775 hasAuthorship W2158642775A5050230966 @default.
• W2158642775 hasConcept C111919701 @default.
• W2158642775 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
• W2158642775 hasConcept C162853370 @default.
• W2158642775 hasConcept C185592680 @default.
• W2158642775 hasConcept C19351080 @default.
• W2158642775 hasConcept C198531522 @default.
• W2158642775 hasConcept C199360897 @default.
• W2158642775 hasConcept C2524010 @default.
• W2158642775 hasConcept C2776960227 @default.
• W2158642775 hasConcept C2778012447 @default.
• W2158642775 hasConcept C2779561248 @default.
• W2158642775 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W2158642775 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2158642775 hasConcept C43617362 @default.
• W2158642775 hasConcept C56739046 @default.
• W2158642775 hasConcept C90673727 @default.
• W2158642775 hasConcept C98045186 @default.
• W2158642775 hasConceptScore W2158642775C111919701 @default.
• W2158642775 hasConceptScore W2158642775C144133560 @default.
• W2158642775 hasConceptScore W2158642775C162853370 @default.
• W2158642775 hasConceptScore W2158642775C185592680 @default.
• W2158642775 hasConceptScore W2158642775C19351080 @default.
• W2158642775 hasConceptScore W2158642775C198531522 @default.
• W2158642775 hasConceptScore W2158642775C199360897 @default.
• W2158642775 hasConceptScore W2158642775C2524010 @default.
• W2158642775 hasConceptScore W2158642775C2776960227 @default.
• W2158642775 hasConceptScore W2158642775C2778012447 @default.
• W2158642775 hasConceptScore W2158642775C2779561248 @default.
• W2158642775 hasConceptScore W2158642775C33923547 @default.
• W2158642775 hasConceptScore W2158642775C41008148 @default.
• W2158642775 hasConceptScore W2158642775C43617362 @default.
• W2158642775 hasConceptScore W2158642775C56739046 @default.
• W2158642775 hasConceptScore W2158642775C90673727 @default.
• W2158642775 hasConceptScore W2158642775C98045186 @default.
• W2158642775 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W2158642775 hasLocation W21586427751 @default.
• W2158642775 hasOpenAccess W2158642775 @default.
• W2158642775 hasPrimaryLocation W21586427751 @default.
• W2158642775 hasRelatedWork W1646044128 @default.
• W2158642775 hasRelatedWork W2030423481 @default.
• W2158642775 hasRelatedWork W2063807062 @default.
• W2158642775 hasRelatedWork W2158642775 @default.
• W2158642775 hasRelatedWork W2318589298 @default.
• W2158642775 hasRelatedWork W2356256218 @default.
• W2158642775 hasRelatedWork W2372283394 @default.
• W2158642775 hasRelatedWork W2510048666 @default.
• W2158642775 hasRelatedWork W2516157925 @default.
• W2158642775 hasRelatedWork W266358903 @default.
• W2158642775 hasVolume "10" @default.
• W2158642775 isParatext "false" @default.

• next